1.2 Understanding the Group’s organization
The Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne are owned by 9.8 million cooperative shareholders. This highly stable shareholding structure is imbued with a strong cooperative spirit.
The 14 Banques Populaires and the 15 Caisses d’Epargne hold an equal 100% stake in BPCE, which is responsible for defining the Group’s policy and strategic orientations, and coordinating the commercial policies of each network.
The Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne are banks in their own right. They collect deposits and savings, distribute loans and define their priorities locally.
The Fédération Nationale des Banques Populaires (FNBP) and the Fédération Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne (FNCE), the bodies that provide deliberation, communication and representation for the two networks and their cooperative shareholders, play an essential role in defining, coordinating and promoting the banks’ cooperative spirit and social responsibility initiatives, in accordance with Groupe BPCE’s commercial and financial objectives. Persons representative of their regional economies sit on the Board of Directors of the Banques Populaires and on the Steering and Supervisory Board of the Caisses d’Epargne. Their resources are first and foremost allocated to meet the needs of local areas and regional customers.
Under the cooperative banking model, the cooperative shareholders are the focal point of the Group’s governance.
The Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne are credit institutions wholly-owned by their cooperative shareholders (via LSCs – Local Savings Companies – for the Caisses d’Epargne).
Cooperative shareholding customers – both individuals and legal entities – play an active part in the life, ambitions and development of their bank.
Being a cooperative shareholder means owning a cooperative share (a percentage of the share capital not quoted on the stock exchange), representing a portion of the share capital in a Banque Populaire or an LSC for a Caisse d’Epargne, and playing a role in the bank’s operation by taking part in General Meetings and voting to approve the financial statements and resolutions, validating management decisions and electing directors.
Each institution is governed by a Board of Directors and a Chief Executive Officer for the Banques Populaires, or a Steering and Supervisory Board (COS) and a Management Board for the Caisses d’Epargne.
BPCE brings together the central institution of Groupe BPCE, the retail and global business lines, as well as the resource pools. To support the Group’s performance, development and strategic ambitions, BPCE ensures the coordination, consistency and synergies between its various brands and companies.
– The central institution, BPCE SA, is responsible for defining the policy and strategic orientations of the Group and each of the two networks.
- coordinate trade policies;
- represent the Group and its networks, and negotiate national/international agreements on their behalf;
- represent the Group and its networks as an employer;
- take all necessary measures to ensure the Group’s liquidity and solvency, risk management and internal control.
All banks affiliated with the central institution are covered by a guarantee and solidarity mechanism.
– Beyond the central institution, BPCE brings together the following business lines, to serve the Group’s development:
- Insurance
- Digital & Payments
- Financial Solutions & Expertise
- BPCE Technologies & Opérations
- Corporate & Investment Banking
- Asset & Wealth Management
1.3 Highlights
In partnership with the European Investment Bank, Banque Populaire offers a budget of €150 million to facilitate the installation of health professionals and thus strengthen access to patient care.
BPCE Lease and the European Investment Bank sign a €300 million financial partnership dedicated to the environmental transition of SMEs and mid-sized companies in France and Europe.
Caisse d’Epargne creates an offering for micro-entrepreneurs enabling them to open their professional account online in a few minutes, access dedicated services and benefit from the expertise of an advisor.
Groupe BPCE becomes the first banking group in France to offer “Tap to Pay”, a new generation payment solution for the two main operating systems on the market.
BPCE Assurances announces a new initiative to facilitate access to insurance for customers of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks who have overcome breast cancer.
Caisse d’Epargne launches a private debt fund of €535 million to finance the development of French mid-sized companies in the regions. This fund is managed by the private debt platform of AEW, the real estate asset management company of Natixis Investment Managers.
Groupe BPCE announces the signature of a memorandum of understanding with Société Générale with a view to acquiring the activities of Société Générale Equipment Finance (SGEF). The transaction is expected to be completed for first-quarter 2025.
Natixis CIB announces the extension of Natixis Partners’ minority participation in Clipperton, a boutique specializing in mergers & acquisitions advisory services in the tech sector.
Banque Populaire mobilizes to promote access to healthcare in all regions and offers the Zero Medical Desert Loan to its new professional healthcare customers.
Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne announce the launch of a new exclusive remote monitoring offer with Verisure, French leader in remote monitoring.
With the planned acquisition of HSBC Epargne Entreprise, Natixis Interépargne strengthens its leadership in the employee savings and retirement market in France.
Groupe BPCE opens a new chapter in its history with the launch of its VISION 2030 strategic project.
Banque Populaire, Caisse d’Epargne and Oney forge a partnership with Leroy Merlin to offer their customers a turnkey experience with a comprehensive, integrated solution.
Natixis CIB announces the strategic investments of Natixis Partners in two M&A boutiques: Tandem Capital Advisors (Belgium) and Emendo Capital (the Netherlands).
BNP Paribas and BPCE forge a strategic partnership to create the No. 1 payment processor in France, in the top 3 in Europe.
The Standard & Poor’s agency improves Groupe BPCE’s long-term rating, which now stands at A+ with a stable outlook. This rating places the Group at the best European standard.
Caisse d’Epargne Hauts de France announces the signing of a memorandum of understanding with Dajia Insurance Group to acquire 100% of the share capital of Bank Nagelmackers, the oldest bank in Belgium.
Groupe BPCE publishes its new decarbonization commitments for five industrial sectors (aluminum, aviation, commercial real estate, residential real estate, and agriculture) and announces an extension of the scope of its objectives in three sectors already covered (automotive, steel, and cement).
Groupe BPCE is the first Premium Partner of the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games. This partnership was signed in 2019.
With the launch of the CATVair and CATVert term accounts, the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne offer their customers the opportunity to become players in the energy transition in their regions through their savings.
BPCE acquires iPaidThat in order to have an all-in-one digital financial management solution for the professional and VSE-SME customers of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne.
Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne innovate to facilitate home ownership for individual first-time buyers under the age of 36, by allowing them to borrow more to purchase their main residence and to defer the capital repayment over time up to a limit of 10% to 20% of the total amount financed.
To deal with the cybersecurity challenges faced by their customers in terms of protecting their data and their activities, the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne offer a comprehensive, customized system to support their professional and corporate customers.
The European Investment Bank, the European Investment Fund and Groupe BPCE strengthen their partnership to support the financing of innovation and the energy transition of SMEs and mid-sized companies in France, with a total budget of more than €1 billion.
BPCE launches its first “Social Bond” with share coupon with the assistance of Natixis CIB. This social bond, issued for the benefit of the Institut Robert-Debré du Cerveau de l’Enfant supported by the Fondation de l’Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, was placed entirely with leading French institutional investors.
Banque Populaire reaffirms its commitment to innovative companies through three key initiatives: the signature of a partnership with the Start Industrie association, an organization representing French industrial start-ups and scale-ups, and two new financing agreements with the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund.
1.4 The Group’s business lines
1.4.1 Retail Banking and Insurance
The 14 Banques Populaires are shareholders in BPCE on an equal footing with the Caisses d’Epargne, and are fully-fledged banks owned by their cooperative shareholders. They form a first-rate banking network made up of 12 regional Banques Populaires and two national affinity banks: CASDEN Banque Populaire, the benchmark bank for the French public sector, and Crédit Coopératif, the bank for the social and solidarity economy.
The Banques Populaires are actively involved in local communities and remain true to their entrepreneurial roots, providing their individual, professional, association, corporate and institutional customers with a full range of financing, savings, insurance, payment and specialized financial services (such as private management, leasing, factoring and social engineering).
The Banques Populaires are wholly-owned by their cooperative shareholders. The strength and durability of their cooperative model is based on balanced governance. Members are cooperative shareholders, co-owners of their bank’s capital, through the purchase of shares. They elect the directors, who are committed local personalities, at the General Meeting, reinforcing the local character of Banque Populaire institutions.
Each year, the Banques Populaires measure the cooperative and responsible actions they carry out in their regions, mainly in three areas: local proximity, entrepreneurial culture, and cooperative and sustainable commitment. These actions are listed in the cooperative and societal footprint, a tool based on ISO 26000 (the international standard for CSR) which references all the voluntary, non-regulatory and non-commercial actions carried out by the 14 Banques Populaires. As an indication, in 2023, more than 6,400 actions were carried out for an amount of nearly €200 million.
IN 2024
- The Banques Populaires innovated by launching the first packaged responsible incentive contract for their corporate customers.
- The Banques Populaires reaffirmed their role as key partners of farmers, in particular by implementing support measures to help them overcome their cash flow difficulties.
- The Banques Populaires strengthened their positioning with healthcare professionals, notably with the launch of several dedicated solutions.
- The Banques Populaires rolled out their new strategy for young people around three initiatives: the launch of the young entrepreneurs package, the introduction of free international operations, and the launch of the Nathan tutoring offer for the children of their customers.
- Premium Partners of Paris 2024 and Official Sponsors of the Relais de la Flamme (Torch Relay) of Paris 2024, the Banques Populaires were strongly committed to the success of the Games (Refer to section 1.3 Highlights / Groupe BPCE contributes to the success of Paris 2024).
In terms of activity, the year 2024 was marked by a slowdown in the real estate market which had an impact on the momentum of winning new customers: the Banques Populaires recorded a 10.3% decrease in the number of new customers in the retail market.
In Consumer Loans, the pace of development remained brisk, with growth of 1% in production, in line with previous years.
The number of principal active banking customers continues to grow, with stock growth of 1.5%, to 4.65 million principal active banking customers.
In non-life insurance (IARD) and personal protection insurance, the Banques Populaires recorded a decrease of 4% in total gross sales, with a stable sales volume on motor vehicles and a decrease of 4% on the sales of multi-risk home insurance policies, in line with the reduction in the home loan activity. Regarding personal protection, overall sales were stable with significant contrasts in performance between the various solutions: MAV (multi-risk personal accidents) recorded an increase of +15% in the gross sales volume; on the other hand, performance was down on family insurance (-3%) and precautionary insurance (-12%). The range was enhanced with a remote monitoring solution, in partnership with Verisure.
The new youth strategy was rolled out around three initiatives: the launch of the young entrepreneurs package, combining the opening of a personal bank account and a professional account at a competitive price, a dedicated advisor, and extra-banking services including a training platform specific to entrepreneurship, developed in partnership with the Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM); the introduction of free international transactions (concerning international withdrawals and payments by card, with no ceiling limit, for all their customers aged 18 to 28 with a banking package); lastly, the launch of the Nathan tutoring offer for the children of Banque Populaire customers (with free access to the myMaxicours tutoring platform throughout the school year).
The digital bank savings pathways were strengthened with the selfcare deployment of several products (Livret de Développement Durable (LDD) passbook savings accounts, home purchase savings schemes and Livret Jeunes youth passbook savings accounts, Livret dépôt solidaire deposit passbook savings accounts and CASDEN Banque Populaire passbook accounts). This change meets a real expectation, as illustrated by the number of Livret A passbook savings accounts opened in selfcare in 2024 (34,000).
Lastly, Banque Populaire innovated in the field of payment wallet solutions with the launch of solutions in partnership with SwatchPay!, Garmin Pay and Google pay.
- €15.3bn in new loans, -15.9%
- €152.3bn in loan outstandings, -1.7%
- €201.7bn in savings deposits, +3.0%
- 309,091 new non-life insurance policies (IARD)
PRIVATE MANAGEMENT
In 2024, the Banques Populaires’ activity was sustained in private banking, with an increase in total customer outstandings of +3.2%.
The percentage of on-balance sheet savings increased by 177 points over a rolling 12-month period, thanks to the strategy of supporting non-equipped customers and the conduct of digital marketing actions. At the same time, the Banques Populaires strengthened their green offering with the launch of the CAT VAIR, which meets the needs of their customers looking for responsible, sustainable and environmental investments. Business was also buoyant in life insurance thanks, in particular, to loan issues and protected structured fund solutions; gross inflows from life insurance amounted to €4.03 billion. In individual retirement savings (PERI), a solution favored by French people, the Banques Populaires recorded 35,000 new contracts, an increase of +40% in the number of contracts.
Lastly, concerning financial savings, 2024 was marked by the launch of funds dedicated to sport (€153 million were invested) and solutions to address transition issues (€221 million were invested in Article 9 funds across all individuals and legal entities markets).
Overall, customer satisfaction increased with an NPS of +38. The quality of all these solutions was recognized at the 39th edition of the “Corbeilles” of the monthly Mieux Vivre votre Argent magazine: Banque Populaire was awarded 3rd place in the long-term five year “Corbeille” category.
- 579,145 customers, +2.7%
- €113bn under management, +3.70%
In an uncertain economic environment, the Banques Populaires reaffirmed their commitment to their customers, craftspeople, retailers, self-employed professionals and farmers, at each stage of their projects: creation/installation, development, disposal/ transmission. This commitment was reflected in the good resilience in the acquisition of new customers, albeit with a contraction of -4.9%.
In the emblematic franchise market, Banque Populaire remains the leader in the franchisor segment (with 60% of the Banques Populaires customer franchise networks) and in the franchise segment (with 25% penetration rate).
Despite a difficult economic situation in certain sectors of activity (construction/masonry, agriculture, clothing, etc.), credit flows held up well, at €162.8 billion, a very slight decrease of -0.2% on the previous year. The intensity of the relationship with professional customers also increased, with an increase in the number of active equipped customers of +2.7% year-on-year and an increase in the number of customers with dual active relationships by +3.7 %.
In terms of financing, equipment loans to professionals recorded a further decline but which was less significant than in 2023. This decrease is the result of a slowdown in demand for financing, in a context of economic and political uncertainty. Conversely, the number of equipment leasing financings increased by +2.1%, confirming the Banques Populaires’ commitment to support professionals in their development projects.
In insurance, the number of contracts sold rose by +7%, a trend driven by professional motor insurance (+10%) and personal protection (+6%).
In employee savings, a +30% increase in outstandings was recorded, reflecting customers’ growing need to prepare for retirement.
Lastly, the number of premium cards rose by +2.1%, boosted by the partnership with Visa in connection with the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
This dynamic activity was accompanied by a historically high level of customer satisfaction, with an NPS of +23.
In the context of the crisis in the agricultural sector, it reaffirmed its role as a key partner of farmers, by implementing support measures to deal with the cash flow difficulties encountered by the profession.
- The NEXT SANTE affinity platform, which offers advice and practical information to all healthcare professionals, regardless of their specialty, and gives access to a dedicated Banque Populaire expert;
- Financing of €150 million, in partnership with the European Investment Bank, to facilitate the installation of new practitioners, in particular in high-tension areas in order to offer better access to local care in the regions;
- Finally, the “Zero Medical Desert Loan”, a 0% financing up to €20,000, to encourage doctors to set up in medical deserts.
The year was also marked by the strengthening of the Banques Populaires’ positioning as preferred partners of accountants thanks to the launch of new dedicated offers, such as the electronic invoicing offer of the subsidiary iPaidThat, acquired by Groupe BPCE in 2024.
- 1.2 million professional customers
- 558,632 tradesmen
- 185,517 liberal professionals
- 76,319 farmers
- €74.7bn in loan outstandings, -1.0%
CORPORATE CUSTOMERS
In 2024, Banque Populaire continued its drive to win over corporate customers (more than 9,500 new customers), with a particularly marked increase in the mid-sized companies segment (almost +10%), in line with its strategic mid-sized companies program. This momentum can also be seen in the intensity of relationships with positive growth in active and active equipped customers, and a customer stock that recorded growth of more than 3.5%. This change is reflected in a significant increase in credit flows entrusted by corporate customers and the symbolic crossing of the €500 billion mark over a rolling year. On the credit side, investment loans are up by 2% in 2024 and short-term loans are holding up positively. In line with the Climate priority of Groupe BPCE’s VISION 2030 strategic project, the Banques Populaires continued to support the ESG transition of their customers in 2024. Following the deployment of the “BP impact” loan throughout the country in 2023, subscriptions accelerated with a 3.5-fold increase in the number of contracts and a +46% increase in production by amount. Same focus on green financing with an increase in production of +2%. A collaboration with the Impact France movement was also launched to promote the impact score among business leaders. To meet companies’ transition challenges, the Banques Populaires offered tools to support the digital transition, in particular for new payment methods and digital monitoring, thanks to the full digital management of international transactions, transfers with GPI Tracker, or their trade activities with Trade Tracker. Protection against cyber risks is not neglected around three lines of security: anti-fraudulent email software and training for employees, in partnership with Mailinblack; cyber security insurance offers; and tools against banking fraud with SuiteEntreprise.com. Lastly, Banque Populaire broke new ground by launching the first packaged responsible incentive contract. It makes it possible to involve all employees in the company’s results and to increase the incentive bonus thanks to the achievement of CSR criteria. In addition, in 2024, the number of customers supported by employee savings plans was up by +32%.
- 164,259 corporate customers, +3.7%
- 268,691 non-profits and institutions, +2.0%
- No. 1 bank for corporates, 44% are customers
- €44.0bn of medium- and long-term loan outstandings
One year after its launch, Banque Populaire’s communication territory continued to focus on a buoyant discourse on successes. Thank to a constant presence via radio, Internet, social networks, billboards ..., the brand gained ground in terms of spontaneous notoriety, particularly with its historical targets: professionals (+4 points) and companies (+5 points). The year will, of course, remain marked by the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games, for which Groupe BPCE was the first Premium Partner. The global success of the event reflected on Banque Populaire, which was the Official Sponsor of the Relais de la Flamme (Torch Relay). The brand generated 1,000 medoa mentions and 259 million contacts through the media. It also reached 8.5 million spectators along the roadsides and at celebration sites.
CASDEN BANQUE POPULAIRE
CASDEN Banque Populaire, a cooperative bank serving specifically members of the French civil service, continued its development. In 2024, it won over 79,798 new cooperative shareholders, of which 66% came from the civil service excluding National Education. Among these new CASDEN cooperative shareholders, 52,380 are also Banque Populaire customers. Today, it brings together nearly 2,359,980 Cooperative shareholders. In 2024, CASDEN maintained its level of new home loans, in a tense market with the distribution of nearly 12,000 home loans. In order to facilitate the first-time home ownership of young civil servants, the Starden Immobilier loan, previously reserved for cooperative shareholders under the age of 30, is now available up to the age of 35, in order to finance a principal residence at a fixed rate. The Real Estate Starden Loan is cumulative with the PTZ (interest-free loan) and the “PTZ + X” (additional loan to the PTZ, granted up to €25,000, up to double the limit of the PTZ). As part of its premium partnership with the 2024 Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games, CASDEN launched the CASDEN Sport loan to encourage its members to take part in sports by enabling them to finance their sports equipment. CASDEN Banque Populaire is committed to supporting its Cooperative shareholders in terms of the ecological transition. With the Cozynergy offer, CASDEN offers them a turnkey service to carry out their energy renovation work. It was the leading Banque Populaire bank on leads for the Cozynergy offer in 2024. And, out of more than 1,500 cooperative shareholders who have completed their projects, 85% are satisfied with its support and 90% believe that the solutions proposed have enabled them to better control the cost of their work. Parnasse Garanties, a surety insurance subsidiary held by CASDEN Banque Populaire at 80% and by MGEN at 20%, now insures the new guarantees of the MGEN mutualists and the entire portfolio of MGEN stock has been transferred to it. More than 57,000 guarantees were taken over by Parnasse Garanties, representing more than €2 billion. The diffusion of the “History, sport and citizenship” exhibition, created with the ACHAC research group continued in schools and public sector establishments. Placed under the high patronage of Emmanuel Macron, this educational program on the history of the Olympic and Paralympic Games is part of the Heritage of Paris 2024 component. Nearly 9,000 events were organized around the exhibition, already having attracted 8.5 million visitors. Finally, the third edition of the Défi des Pas, a sporting and solidarity-based challenge organized by CASDEN and Banque Populaire, raised €30,000 for the Fondation des Hôpitaux.
- More than 2.3 million cooperative shareholders.
- More than 10,000 activists: 248 CASDEN delegates and 10,080 correspondents
As a reference bank for the social and solidarity economy, real economy companies and committed individual customers, Crédit Coopératif is committed alongside its customer-cooperative shareholders to build a fairer, more inclusive, more local economy that is respectful of the environment.
In 2024, Crédit Coopératif recorded an increase in its customers, particularly individual customers (+4.2%). This momentum is reflected in a significant increase in the number of cooperative shareholders, both legal entities (+4.9%) and individual customers (+11.6%).
In the retail market, the launch of the Family plan was one of the highlights of the year. This traced bank account includes an Agir solidarity bank card and the possibility for each family member to personalize their commitment and choose the association they wish to support via a micro-donation system. This solution offers a single and advantageous monthly contribution for the entire family, while preserving everyone’s financial autonomy.
Other solutions have been launched, such as the Millevie retirement savings plan, which provides additional income for retirement while opting for savings with a positive social and environmental impact.
In line with the challenge of offering the same service face-to-face or remotely, online banking continued to expand its services with the online subscription of non-life insurance policies (IARD) and the PER (retirement savings plan), and online payments without providing a bank card number.
At the same time, after Toulouse and Lyon, a third branch dedicated to Individual customers was created in Grenoble. Lastly, customer satisfaction is up sharply with an NPS of 35.
In the legal entity market, two offers were launched in collaboration with recognized partners: Iremia santé (a specialist in the management of third-party payment and administrative conduct of healthcare professionals, which supports customers in managing third-party payments (tiers payant) and reducing payment terms), as well as Mailinblack (cybersecurity experts who offer solutions to combat IT attacks) for the security and peace of mind of its customers on a daily basis.
The “Tap to Pay” solution was also offered to customers with a compatible Android smartphone or tablet. Thus, Crédit Coopératif offers a payment solution adapted to all types of customers, from one-off needs to expert solutions.
Lastly, Crédit Coopératif supported its legal entity customers in their ecological transition by deploying strategic ESG interviews on a massive scale.
- 138,516 cooperative shareholders
- 423,048 customers
- Over €7.1 million in donations, raised from solidarity-based products, distributed to 59 associations
- €2.7bn in new amortizable loans paid (+47%)
The 15 Caisses d’Epargne are equal shareholders of BPCE with the Banques Populaires, and are fully-fledged regional cooperative banks. Committed to local community life, they offer their individual, professional, association, corporate, institutional and local authority customers a comprehensive range of financing, savings, private management, insurance, payment and specialized financial services (such as leasing and factoring). They make decisions and act locally, in a short circuit, and reinvest their customers’ savings where they live to finance useful projects close to home (schools, hospitals, associations, etc.).
As cooperative banks, the Caisse d’Epargne belong solely to their 4.4 million cooperative shareholders, who participate in the decisions of their bank, voting on resolutions at the General Meeting and electing their representatives, the 2,500 Directors, from among their peers. Cooperative shareholders and directors are brought together in the local savings companies (LSC), which hold part of the capital of a Caisse d’Epargne and constitute a local tier, reinforcing the regional anchoring, proximity and expression of the cooperative shareholders.
The Caisses d’Epargne are the only banks to provide long-term support to all players in a given region: individual customers, businesses, professionals, social housing and social and solidarity economy players, institutions, local authorities and associations. As such, they have the capacity to create the synergies required for local development.
In 2023, the 15 Caisses d’Epargne launched their Utility Contract to strengthen their commitment to the regions, for the benefit of those who live there.
- 100% useful to economic development: as banks serving all their customers and their territory, but also as local businesses and major employers in the region;
- 100% useful to the environmental transition: by building solutions to enable everyone to become a player in this transition, and by financing projects that will help accelerate it in local areas;
- 100% useful to social progress: as cooperative banks, having always been committed to the principles of solidarity and the fight against exclusion.
IN 2024
- The Caisses d’Epargne strengthened their customers’ insurance equipment thanks to the development of a global strategy on protection, property insurance, personal risk insurance and remote monitoring.
- The Caisses d’Epargne have launched many innovative payment solutions in partnership with Garmin Pay, SwatchPay and Google Pay, as well as the peer-to-peer solution, WERO.
- The Caisses d’Epargne were one of the lead arrangers of the first French gigafactory project, “Verkor”, established in Dunkerque.
- The Caisses d’Epargne confirmed their commitment to the sports sector through the distribution of the EIB budget for the renovation of sports facilities and participation in the “swimming pool plan”.
- The Caisses d’Epargne, Premium partners of Paris 2024 and Official Sponsors of the Relais de la Flamme (Torch Relay) of Paris 2024, were strongly committed to the success of the Games (Refer to section 1.3 Highlights / Groupe BPCE contributes to the success of Paris 2024).
Supporting young people and families has been a common thread in the strategy of the Individual customers market, with a strong challenge to win new customers and provide access to banking services.
The household mortgage market share was 14.02%, up +19 basis points year-on-year. The Caisses d’Epargne have rolled out several innovative solutions to support their first-time home buyer customers, particularly young people under the age of 35.
Supporting households in the energy renovation of their homes remained a priority in 2024 with the launch of an impact real estate loan offer and a large-scale Renov’ énergie campaign on the financing of works.
In terms of inflows, activity was particularly dynamic in life insurance with gross inflows of €13.7 billion, generating an overall surplus of €4.3 billion. This activity was boosted by the marketing of three Natixis CIB loans and the deployment of a support approach for customers to prepare for their retirement.
The Caisses d’Epargne have also strengthened their customers’ insurance equipment thanks to the development of a global strategy for protection, property insurance, personal risk insurance and remote monitoring - thanks to a partnership with VERISURE.
In the field of payments, the Caisses d’Epargne have launched numerous innovative solutions in partnership with Garmin Pay, SwatchPay and Google Pay, not to mention the peer-to-peer payment solution, WERO. In the end, the Caisses d’Epargne maintained their strong growth in customer satisfaction in the retail market with an NPS of 23, i.e. +7 points compared to 2023. The favorable trend in satisfaction also concerns young customers, with a 4-point increase in NPS over 18-24 year olds.
- €207.7bn in loan outstandings, +0.8%
- €408.1bn in savings deposits, +3.4%
- €13.7bn collected in life insurance, +1.1%
- 6.5 million non-life insurance contracts marketed, +2.1%
PRIVATE MANAGEMENT
The Caisses d’Epargne continued their acquisition momentum with 160,000 new Premium customers and growth of €6 billion in outstandings. In total, 3.4 million customers entrust the Caisses d’Epargne with a total amount of €312 billion in savings. The momentum around life insurance and Individual Retirement Savings Plans was particularly noteworthy, with an inflow of €10.5 billion and surpluses exceeding €3 billion. At the same time, banking services increased, with 70% of principal banked customers, as well as equipment in loans, insurance and protection. The satisfaction of high net-worth customers is constantly increasing, with a net promoter score (NPS) of +29.
- 3.4 million Premium customers
- €312bn in assets under management, +3.31%
The Caisses d’Epargne remain the leading bank for protected persons, persons under guardianship, trusteeship and dependent adults living at home in France. Across France, 200 specialized advisors are on-hand to assist family representatives and legal guardians.
The year was marked by the generalization of the new version of Webprotexion, an online banking service for family or professional representatives of people under legal protection.
PROFESSIONAL CUSTOMERS
Despite a tense economic context, more than 44,000 new Professional customers were gained, representing growth in the customer base of 2.1% year-on-year. Thanks to numerous actions implemented in synergy with the Premium market, the stock of customers with dual Premium relationships increased by 6.4% to reach more than 87,000 customers. In 2024, the Caisses d’Epargne strengthened their positioning as privileged partners of healthcare system players, including healthcare professionals, through several actions:
- The launch of the “EIB Health Pros Budget” subsidized-rate financing offer made available by the European Investment Bank and dedicated to business creation or recovery projects;
- The provision of SantExpert, an online space dedicated to healthcare professionals;
- The development of key partnerships with renewed support for the ISNI (InterSyndicale Nationale des Internes) for the second year running in order to provide long-term support to medical interns and future healthcare professionals. Two new partnerships were forged: one with CERP Rhin Rhône Méditerranée (merged with CERP Rouen in July 2024) to support the installation of young community pharmacists and the other with Médecins Solidaires, to support the development of the association that fights against medical deserts in rural areas.
Among the other highlights of the year, the Caisses d’Epargne launched new non-banking offers: remote monitoring with Verisure and meal and gift vouchers with Swile.
Lastly, the digitalization of customer journeys continued with the development of two new self-care subscription pathways on the Retirement Savings Plan and Tap to Pay offers.
- 447,241 customers, +2.2%
- €4.3bn in loan outstandings
- 8,560 employee savings contracts signed
- 16,716 Pro non-life insurance policies (IARD) taken out
- 34,522,109 personal protection insurance contracts subscribed
With more than 38,800 customers (VSEs, SMEs and mid-sized companies), the Caisses d’Epargne continued their commitment to business development in 2024. As a reference partner for the regions, they have fully played their role with all economic players to promote their growth and that of the regions, not only by meeting their financial needs but also by supporting them in their transition challenges.
The Caisses d’Epargne confirmed the acceleration of their support for the decarbonization of the economy through the deployment of a strategic ESG dialog with business leaders, the increase in their production of green financing and the increase in power of the marketing of Impact Loans dedicated to SMEs and mid-sized companies. In concrete terms, they encourage companies to integrate more non-financial criteria into their activities. This system has been audited by Moody’s ESG Solutions, one of the world leaders in ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) analyses.
This year, the Caisses d’Epargne anticipated significant regulatory and societal changes to provide their corporate customers with genuine support.
The law on value sharing requires companies with 11 to 49 employees to set up a legal value-sharing scheme, as of January 1, 2025.
E-invoicing becomes mandatory for all companies subject to VAT in France, between July 1, 2024 and January 1, 2026, requiring the choice of a platform for the exchange of invoices.
Finally, cybersecurity has become a priority because it is no longer a question of knowing “if” a company is at risk of malicious cyber acts, but “when” it will occur.
In response to all these challenges, Caisse d’Epargne has structured its offers and strengthened its awareness-raising process around these crucial themes.
In the agricultural sector, the member cooperatives of the UFG (Union Finances Grains) were supported by the implementation of the NeuCP (Negotiable European Commercial Paper) program. This issue of short-term negotiable securities represented a credit line of around €132 million for the Caisse d’Epargne network.
The Caisses d’Epargne also confirmed their position as Industry bankers. Their average penetration rate is 20%, including industries both inside and outside of energy.
Through its Néo Business program, the Caisses d’Epargne continued to support the development of innovative companies throughout France and in all business sectors. They now support 2,000 start-ups/scale-ups in their growth with dedicated solutions.
- 38,807 customers (+3.4%)
- 3,352 new relationships (-8.6%)
- €34.1bn in MLT loan outstandings (+1.7%)
- €3.3bn in MLT commitments (excluding CBM & CBI)
- €19.4bn in term deposit outstandings (+12.9%)
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING
The Caisses d’Epargne’s financial engineering activity is growing. It reached €128 million in net fees and commissions generated in 2024, up 25% year-on-year. Over the duration of the 2020-2024 strategic plan, the amount of net fees and commissions generated was multiplied by four. This level of performance validates our choice of organization of the activity around financial engineering teams located locally, as close as possible to the operations and regions, supported where necessary by the action of Groupe BPCE’s subsidiaries and specialized structures.
In terms of private equity activities, the activity of the Regional Investment Companies combined with the support of national vehicles generated a capital gain of approximately €20 million.
In addition, in 2024, a new debt fund, backed by a syndication desk, was launched. Fully subscribed by the Caisses d’Epargne for an amount of €535 million, it meets the financing needs of mid-sized companies. By creating this original system, the Caisses d’Epargne are opening up a new asset class to institutional investors, those of regional mid-sized companies, and enabling these mid-sized companies to diversify their sources of financing at the best price while benefiting from the support of their long-term operations.
Lastly, the Caisses d’Epargne supported emblematic projects in 2024. Drawing on the resources and expertise of the renewable energy and energy transition debt fund launched in 2022, they were among the lead arrangers of the Dieppe le Tréport and Yeu Noirmoutier offshore wind farms, as well as the first French gigafactory project, “Verkor”, located in Dunkerque.
The Institutional market is facing many transitions that require very heavy investments. As such, I4CE (the French Institute of the Economy for the Climate) calculates the additional need for energy, transport and decarbonization for local authorities at €11 billion per year. As for social housing, 1.2 million housing units must undergo an energy-efficient renovation before the end of 2025.
In this context, the Caisses d’Epargne confirmed their presence with their customers to serve the regions. They remain the leading private banks for local authorities, with €26 billion in outstandings and almost €2.7 billion in new financing loans. They are also the leading private bankers for social housing, with Habitat en Région, and for the semi-public sector, with over €2.1 billion in new MLT loans and €11.2 billion in MLT loan outstandings. At the end of December 2024, inflows totaled €9.4 billion (including demand deposit accounts).
In the Professional Real Estate market, the decline in new construction activity continued. Short-term financing for real estate professionals, developers and property dealers was down -10.5%. Long-term financing remained stable at +3.4%.
In 2024, the Caisses d’Epargne confirmed their commitment to the sports sector through the distribution of the EIB budget for the renovation of sports facilities and participation in the “swimming pool plan” alongside Union Sport et Cycle.
In addition to the ESG questionnaires and the distribution of green or impact loans, the Caisses d’Epargne’s commitment to the ecological transition was further strengthened through their participation in the Métamorph-OSE program. This Groupe BPCE program operationally implements Groupe BPCE’s Impact strategy on BtoB customers. It is based on a new commercial approach, tools and specific training. It mobilizes elected officials, companies, associations and citizens to accelerate the process of solidarity and ecological transition in the regions.
Lastly, 2024 was marked by the equity merger with Finances & Territoires, a consulting firm specializing in public financing. This decision will enable the Caisses d’Epargne to establish a long-term approach to bank financing and maximum mobilization of support mechanisms for Institutional investors.
SOCIAL ECONOMY
Caisses d’Epargne is a leading financier of the SSE sector, with loan outstandings of €6.5 billion in 2024, and supports more than 20,600 customers, including associations and other SSE companies. In the field, 130 account managers, dedicated to this not for profit clientele, master all the legal, tax and governance specifics and business models unique to these associations, foundations and impact companies. Over 1,000 new relationships were entered into in 2024. This development is based on a long-standing partnership with the entire SSE ecosystem and social innovation support networks (ESS France, France Active, Impact France movement, La Ruche, etc.), as well as main industry federations (Nexem, FEHAP, FNOGEC, etc.). In 2024, a new national partnership was signed with Le Kiif, an alliance of ten incubators, located in nine French regions, which support the spin-off or development of socially innovative projects in rural areas
- 23.2% credit market share (source: Apri)
- €696m in new medium- and long-term loans
Official sponsor of the Olympic Torch Relay and Premium partner of Paris 2024, Caisse d’Epargne deployed an ambitious communication system for the benefit of the brand’s reputation and image: 4,500 press coverage mentions (TV, PQN, PQR), 8.5 million people present on the Relay route, the first advertising announcer of an opening ceremony followed by 24.4 million French viewers, more than 600 TV trailers broadcast during the Games. Caisse d’Epargne also launched several communication campaigns on essential topics for its customers, in particular, the energy transition (with a new TV film) and savings. At the same time, the brand strengthened its digital presence and launched a TikTok account for young people (5.5 million videos viewed).
In 2024, Caisse d’Epargne received 12 professional awards recognizing the performance of its communication systems (Grands Prix Stratégie, Top Com, Grands Prix du Sport Business, etc.).
Banque Palatine, a 100% subsidiary of Groupe BPCE, is mainly dedicated to mid-sized companies, executives and private banking. For more than 240 years, Banque Palatine has been working alongside entrepreneurs on both a professional and personal level. It provides them with a range of banking products (current accounts, real estate and personal loans, financial investments, financing solutions to meet environmental challenges) and insurance products. Its network consists of 36 offices in France.
Banque Palatine offers value-added expertise dedicated to supporting its customers’ growth and performance: wealth, legal and tax engineering, investment advice, global approach to managers’ assets, corporate finance, specialized approach to real estate, trade finance, customer desk, etc.
In the regulated real estate market, where the Bank is the market leader, and in the audiovisual market, where it is a key player, it deploys a dedicated national organization.
Its signature “The art of being a banker” illustrates Banque Palatine’s determination to develop a model of close relationships based on excellent support for its 13,500 corporate and 46,000 private customers.
Banque Palatine is notably a patron of the French Sports Foundation. Through this sponsorship, Banque Palatine finances the training, socio-professional integration and retraining of four top athletes.
In 2024, the drive to win over companies with revenues exceeding €15 million continued, with 248 new customers active in this segment. Banque Palatine recorded strong momentum in attracting private customers, executives and senior executives with 1,056 new relationships. Inflows in financial savings, equipment of customers with savings products, and the performance of wealth audits also showed a very good trend. On the other hand, the distribution of home loans is behind schedule by 25%.
Structured financing transactions recorded a sustained performance, generating income from fees and commissions of €12.9 million. At the same time, new corporate loans reached €2.2 billion, of which €0.6 billion in structured financing.
In terms of payments, Banque Palatine now offers transfer initiation, which allows companies and property managers to offer a new simple and secure means of payment for their collections and simplify their bank reconciliations.
In terms of innovation, Banque Palatine, with Groupe BPCE, conducted two pilots on generative AI technologies: one on reading and extracting the minutes of General Meetings in real estate, the other on the preparation of interviews between advisors and prospects or customers.
In 2024, Banque Palatine unveiled its purpose, the foundation of its new strategic plan “PALATINE 2030”, focused on three pillars: customers, risks and people and obtained the CSR Committed label from AFNOR.
BPCE Assurances is Groupe BPCE’s Insurance division. A fully-fledged insurer, it designs, distributes and manages a comprehensive range of personal and non-life insurance products for customers of Groupe BPCE’s banking networks:
- personal insurance: life insurance, retirement savings, borrower insurance and individual and professional personal protection insurance;
- non-life insurance: motor insurance, multi-risk home insurance, supplementary health insurance, personal accident insurance (GAV), multimedia equipment insurance, legal protection, parabanking insurance, professional car and multi-risk insurance, etc.
BPCE Assurances’ insurance subsidiaries (BPCE Assurances IARD, BPCE IARD, BPCE Vie, BPCE Life) do not distribute their products. The Group’s banking networks distribute their insurance(1) products.
Personal insurance business was dynamic during 2024, with gross inflows reaching €15.1 billion in savings, marking an increase of 17% compared to the previous year.
The year was marked by the launch, within the Crédit Coopératif network, of the Millevie retirement savings plan, which makes it possible to build up additional income for retirement while opting for savings with a positive social and environmental impact.
In borrower insurance (ADE), the number of termination requests by borrowers stabilized after the entry into force of the Lemoine law. In addition, in a context of stagnation in new home loans, the production of borrower insurance contracts remained limited in the first half of the year before rising again in the second half, at the same time as the fall in interest rates. In 2024, the ADE offer has evolved twice. First of all, the addition of a new “Family assistance” cover makes it possible, when an insured family is faced with the illness, disability or serious accident of one of their children, to alleviate the household’s economic situation by taking on part of the loan repayments. Then, people who have overcome breast cancer and are in the remission phase can now take out a borrower insurance policy for a real estate or professional project, without additional premiums and exclusion, even partial, and without waiting for the legal period of five years set by the law.
Non-life insurance (IARD) business recorded a good level of customer growth, both in the individual customers (+2%) and professional customers (+6%) markets. More specifically, with regard to the Caisses d’Epargne network, 35% of customers are now equipped with non-life insurance (IARD)/personal protection solutions, six months ahead of the target set in the BPCE 2024 strategic plan.
- Firstly, the deployment of non-life insurance (IARD) products in the networks of Société de Banque et d’Expansion (a joint subsidiary of BRED Banque Populaire and Banque Populaire Val de France), Crédit Coopératif and BRED Banque Populaire, including in French overseas territories.
- Then, the launch of a pilot to test a new distribution model for the health product in six customer relationship centers.
- Lastly, the launch of the Sightcall video assistance solution, rolled out in the MRH and AUTO scope, which enables managers to assist their policyholders during the reporting and management of a claim. The policyholder can show the damage in real time and be guided remotely, thus simplifying the interactions and the identification of the claim. This solution enabled BPCE Assurances IARD to win the Argus d’Or 2024 claims management award.
Finally, it should be noted that the exceptional rainfall, which affected many regions of France, strongly impacted the activity of BPCE Assurances’ centers of expertise.
- With the exception of BPCE Life, a subsidiary of BPCE Assurances, which deals directly with certain customers outside the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks.
The Digital & Payments division brings together all of Groupe BPCE’s business lines and expertise in the fields of innovation, digital, data and artificial intelligence, payments, and trade finance with Oney.
Oney, a subsidiary of Groupe BPCE (50.1%) and ELO (formerly Auchan Holding) (49.9%), is a French bank with a European dimension, specializing in payments, consumer financing, insurance and the fight against fraud. Founded in 1983 and a player in new modes of consumption, it supports the daily lives of more than 7 million customers and the development of more than 37,000 merchants and e-merchants by designing solutions for payments, financing, insurance and the fight against fraud. The mobilization of the expertise of its 1,900 employees worldwide allows Oney to offer seamless and secure in-store and online shopping experiences. Oney is currently the leader in payment in three or four installments by bank card in France and, via its subsidiary Oneytrust, in fraud detection and digital identification. Oney is present in 10 countries in Europe.
BPCE Payment Services, with its recognized expertise in the field of electronic payment processing and payment flows, supports Groupe BPCE’s banks and subsidiaries as well as external customers consisting of financial institutions and payment service providers. The subsidiary now manages more than 33 million payment cards, 11 billion transactions per year, and more than 500,000 merchant contracts for their needs in payment terminals and associated services. Its pioneering culture in terms of innovation has enabled the Group’s institutions to position themselves as pioneers in a number of payment market standards, such as Apple Pay, instant transfers and more recently, Tap to Pay.
Payplug, an omnichannel payment solution, specializing in credit card payments and payment acceptance and acquisition offers, this fintech from the BPCE Digital & Payments division is aimed at retailers and e-retailers of all sizes for which the European market and its various local payment methods is a priority issue.
Xpollens, a Groupe BPCE Banking as a Service Platform, enables companies to offer payment services with accounts and cards, as well as the automation of payment flows in the business line interfaces of companies.
- The Digital customer department, composed of digital experts who design remote banking for the Group’s institutions, and ensure its continuous improvement by developing the best applications thanks to AI and Data.
- The AI & Data department designs and deploys services and tools that exploit the potential of data, for the benefit of the competitiveness of each of the Group’s business lines. By placing artificial intelligence at the service of performance and simplicity, they enrich the customer experience, optimize processes for advisors, and facilitate the daily lives of all Group employees.
- The Innovation department whose mission is to build new sources of revenue, incubate internal and external strategic projects and participate in the capital of technology companies. Its work focuses on open finance, blockchain, new payment methods and the energy transition.
IN 2024
2024 was marked by several structuring transactions.
BPCE and BNP Paribas announced their project to create a European player in payment processing, to equip themselves with the best technology in terms of payment processing for cardholders and merchants. This processor aims to handle all card payments in Europe from BNP Paribas and Groupe BPCE, accounting for 17 billion transactions, and could also be opened to other banks. It would thus be the No. 1 processor in France, and both Groups share the ambition to make it one of the Top 3 processors in Europe.
In 2024, the European Payments Initiative (EPI) announced the launch of Wero, the European instant account-to-account payment solution. With Wero, Groupe BPCE now offers all Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne customers a new instant account-to-account payment solution that meets new expectations. As a pioneer in this area, Groupe BPCE successfully completed the first cross-border instant payment transactions in December 2023.
Groupe BPCE and Oney have partnered with Leroy Merlin to support the customers of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne in their energy renovation projects, from financing to completion of the works. Customers benefit from a turnkey program, with a global and integrated solution, and a complete range of financial solutions including the Eco-Loan at Zero Interest Rate.
The Group’s Digital Banking system has increased the number of new functionalities offered to customers of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks, with the top 10 current customer transactions already available in self-care. And also through a winning mobile strategy that has led to a significant increase in active mobile customers. The applications show a growing use by individual customers, professionals and companies and they retain very high scores (4.7/5 on the App Store, for example).
Lastly, in July 2024, Groupe BPCE acquired iPaidThat, a specialist and leading player in invoicing and business activity management. The integration of iPaidThat into the Digital & Payments division accelerates the development of these solutions and significantly enriches the digital experience offered to the Group’s professional and corporate customers.
On the innovation front, the Digital & Payments division confirmed its dynamism through several initiatives:
- First, the launch of the “Tap to Pay” offer for customers of the Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne equipped with Android smartphones. This service, which allows users to accept contactless payments via their smartphone or tablet, can be used on the main payment schemes. Groupe BPCE thus became the first banking group in France to offer this new generation payment solution on the two main operating systems on the market.
- Then, access to the SwatchPAY! Contactless payment solution. Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne customers were the first in France to be able to make their purchases safely with a simple movement of the wrist, thanks to their watch equipped with contactless payment technology.
- Groupe BPCE has become a partner of Garmin, the world’s leading supplier of navigation products and one of the first manufacturers of sports connected watches to integrate contactless payment.
- Lastly, in accordance with the “VISION 2030” strategic plan, the “AI for all” program was rolled out with the launch of the generative AI tool MAiA which, at the end of December 2024, had 26,000 user employees in the Group and which aims for a target of 50% of employees adopters by 2026.
In collaboration with COJOP and Visa, BPCE’s Digital & Payments division, with its fintech Payplug, handled the processing of all 3 million transactions (from more than 170 countries), with a quality of service that can be summed up in one figure: the acceptance rate reached 98%, well above the standard of 92% in France. At the same time, Visa (the official supplier of the International Olympic Committee) entrusted BPCE’s Digital & Payments division with the management of payments within the Paris 2024 forums during the 29 days of competition.
The Financial Solutions & Expertise (FSE) division brings together BPCE’s expertise in financing, insurance, custodial and advisory services for the Group’s corporate customers.
BPCE Financement develops offers and complete solutions for the management of revolving loans and personal loans for Groupe BPCE’s networks.
BPCE Lease offers a complete range of rental solutions: equipment and real estate leasing, trust, long-term vehicle leasing, leasing with purchase option, boating or automotive leasing, IT operational leasing, and renewable energy financing.
BPCE Factor develops factoring solutions for companies of all sizes, at any stage of their growth process (creation, development, external growth, international development, etc.)
SOCFIM is a leading player in the real estate financing market, covering the whole of France and all asset classes: new and existing housing, managed housing (students and seniors), offices, retail and logistics warehouses.
Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions (CEGC) offers a wide range of financial guarantees in all of the Group’s markets: individuals, professionals and companies, real estate, social economy and social housing.
It should be noted that CEGC joined the Insurance division as of January 1, 2025. This new organization is part of our strategic project VISION 2030, one of the objectives of which is to become the fourth largest insurer in France.
BPCE Solutions immobilières is a major player in real estate consulting in France. It comprises three business line divisions: Expertise & Consulting, Residential, Investment & Rental.
EuroTitres develops a comprehensive range of services for the custody of securities accounts and the management of transactions carried out by individual customers: stock market, mutual funds, securities transactions, portfolio statements, tax forms, etc.
Pramex International specializes in advising French start-ups, SMEs and mid-sized companies on international expansion, either through internal growth (creating and overseeing foreign subsidiaries) or external growth (international acquisitions).
IN 2024
BPCE Financement With total outstandings of €37.1 billion in 2024, BPCE Financement strengthened its position as the leading player in consumer loans in France with a market share of 18.07% in the third quarter of 2024, excluding LOA (lease with purchase option), down -5.1% (source: ASF at the end of November 2024). The year was marked by the overhaul of the revolving credit underwriting process across all institutions, with high levels of satisfaction from advisors. Significant investments in Artificial Intelligence were made, particularly in the orchestration of customer contacts, enabling a significant increase in the contribution of digital marketing to total financing. In addition, an allocated credit chain has been developed for the financing of energy renovation through an initial partnership with Cozynergy.
BPCE Lease After record production in 2023, BPCE Lease again recorded a significant increase in production of +5%. Several areas even outperformed, such as equipment leasing (+10%), renewable energy financing (+17%) and long-term leasing (+22%). Several highlights marked the year:
- The takeover of the new production of Banque Populaire Rives de Paris under a commissioning scheme.
- Acquisition of a majority stake in SIMPEL, a specialist in the management of rental flows and B2B and B2C subscriptions.
- The launch of the Société Générale Equipment Finance (SGEF) portfolio and booking takeover project.
Lastly, a few large-scale projects were financed in 2024, such as the Hilton hotel in Sevilla, the logistics warehouse in Moussy-le-Neuf (Seine et Marne), 34 electrical equipment for Spanish airports, or the electrolyzer gigafactory in Belfort (Territoire de Belfort).
BPCE Factor In 2024, BPCE Factor handled 11 million invoices, supporting the changing working capital requirements of companies, both in their day-to-day business and as they grow. With a 25% market share in France, BPCE Factor is the leader in the factoring market in terms of number of contracts. Its factoring revenues amounted to €61 billion. The year was marked by the continuation of a major program to develop the customer experience, initiated in 2023: creation of an onboarding unit for new customers, deployment of a modernized telephone system, expanded contact hours and enhanced customer relationship intensity through new contact channels. These items resulted in a two-point increase in customer NPS over one year. Finally, for the ninth consecutive year, Bureau Veritas Certification confirmed BPCE Factor’s service certification and label, recognizing the high level of quality perceived by customers, with 92% overall satisfaction.
SOCFIM In a real estate market severely affected by the inflationary context of high interest rates and, more generally, administrative constraints, SOCFIM maintained a satisfactory level of activity with more than €3 billion in new loans to real estate professionals. It thus retained its position as the main financier of property developers and increased its penetration of the long-term investor segment. The structural and financial difficulties encountered by real estate professionals, the wait-and-see attitude of the markets and the general decline in values had an impact on the increase in the portfolio’s risks, partially offset by a reinforcement of dedicated teams, the quality of the customer base and close monitoring. The year was marked by the ramp-up of urban regeneration real estate projects, which now represent more than a quarter of new projects, and of course the timely delivery of the Athletes’ Village, which welcomed participants to the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games before starting the Heritage phase of the project.
Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions (CEGC) guaranteed 146,502 real estate loans for individual customers produced by Groupe BPCE networks, for a total of €20.8 billion, down 34% on 2023, in line with market trends(1).In the construction sectors, CEGC covered the delivery “at the agreed price and deadline” of 7,629 single-family houses and issued financial guarantees for the completion of 599 real estate development projects. Lastly, in the building, construction, business and industry sectors, 115,763 market guarantees were issued, mainly via the www.cautiondemarche.com solution which posted a net promoter score of +53(2). CEGC benefits from the trust of its reinsurers, which renewed 100% of their reinsurance contracts in 2024. With nearly €2.5 billion, CEGC is one of the world’s leading buyers of home loan reinsurance for individual customers. The quality of CEGC’s credit rating was confirmed by the rating agencies Moody’s and DBRS, which renewed their good assessment levels with respective ratings of A1 and A High. Finally, CEGC carried out its first EcoVadis assessment in 2024 and obtained the bronze medal with a score of 64/100. A score that reflects the quality of its policies and actions in the four areas assessed: environment, social and human rights, ethics and responsible purchasing.
BPCE Solutions immobilières continued its sustained activity with the Group’s companies in 2024, mainly in the residential sector. However, the crisis in the real estate market penalized a more marked development. Nearly 850 units were sold to individual customers (600 in 2023), and SCPI inflows totaled €48 million. The Expertise division recorded revenues of €12.8 million in 2024, and continued its development with large institutional investors.
EuroTitres is one of the leaders in the outsourcing of retail custody of financial instruments in France. Retail activity on the stock market and UCIs remained resilient overall in 2024 with 1,890,000 stock market orders processed compared to 2,009,000 last year. The Internet and mobile transactional site was the main channel used by customers, with a constantly improving NPS and a good level of positioning in the benchmark of online stock market sites carried out periodically by the firm Ailancy. In 2024, on collective investments, volumes decreased by 4% with 2,635,000 subscriptions/redemptions. As last year, the stock of ordinary securities accounts and PEA held as well as the number of value lines in the portfolio were stable. The year was marked by two major events:
- firstly, the contribution to the successful placement of BPCE/Natixis loans on the one hand and of structured products on the other;
- then EuroTitres new commercial and technical initiatives for the networks, in support of the relaunch of Securities Financial Savings.
Pramex International In a still uncertain economic and geopolitical context, the number of contract signatures saw slower growth. The year was marked by the launch of Pramex International’s strategic plan focused on two main areas: quality at all levels and the France firm with the aim of expanding the clientele target by welcoming foreign companies wishing to set up in France. In addition, the deployment of the Senta management interface was finalized. This tool will make it possible to manage the production and delivery of services more efficiently and securely. Finally, very attentive to the quality of its service, Pramex conducted a new satisfaction survey on all its subsidiaries. The rate of 88% reflects the high level of overall satisfaction of its customers.
2 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The scope of consolidation of both groups, organized around the central institution, is presented in the diagram below.
In addition to BPCE, Groupe BPCE includes the Banques Populaires, the Caisses d’Epargne and their respective subsidiaries.
2.1 Groupe BPCE sustainability report
PART 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 Basis for preparation
Groupe BPCE has prepared its sustainability report in accordance with European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). These standards provide a comprehensive framework for the disclosure of non-financial information on environmental, social and governance issues.
The Group’s sustainability report is based on a double materiality assessment, which takes into account both the impact of Groupe BPCE on the environment and society, and the influence of changes in the environment and society on the company’s performance. This approach takes into account the expectations of stakeholders, in particular employees, investors, customers, cooperative shareholders and the communities in which the Group operates. It results in a list of impacts caused by Groupe BPCE’s activity, and of risks and opportunities (IRO) related to environmental and societal changes.
To prepare this report, Groupe BPCE has collected data on a consolidated basis and across its value chain. This sustainability report is audited as required by the regulations with a limited level of assurance.
The scope of consolidation used for this sustainability report is identical to that of Groupe BPCE’s consolidated financial statements. All entities included in the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) consolidation scope of Groupe BPCE are also included in this sustainability report.
The institutions included in Groupe BPCE’s consolidation, permanently affiliated with BPCE in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (CRR) and exempted from the individual and consolidated disclosure obligation in terms of sustainability are the following:
Banques Populaires | Caisses d’Epargne |
Banque Populaire Alsace Lorraine Champagne | Caisse d’Epargne Aquitaine Poitou-Charentes |
Banque Populaire Aquitaine Centre Atlantique | Caisse d’Epargne d’Auvergne et du Limousin |
Banque Populaire Auvergne Rhône Alpes | Caisse d’Epargne de Bourgogne Franche-Comté |
Banque Populaire Bourgogne Franche-Comté | Caisse d’Epargne Bretagne Pays de Loire |
Banque Populaire Grand Ouest | Caisse d’Epargne Côte d’Azur |
Banque Populaire Méditerranée | Caisse d’Epargne Grand Est Europe |
Banque Populaire du Nord | Caisse d’Epargne Hauts de France |
Banque Populaire Occitane | Caisse d’Epargne Ile-de-France |
Banque Populaire Rives de Paris | Caisse d’Epargne Languedoc-Roussillon |
Banque Populaire du Sud | Caisse d’Epargne Loire-Centre |
Banque Populaire Val de France | Caisse d’Epargne Loire Drôme Ardèche |
CASDEN Banque Populaire | Caisse d’Epargne de Midi-Pyrénées |
Crédit Coopératif | Caisse d’Epargne Normandie |
Caisse d’Epargne Provence Alpes Corse | |
Caisse d’Epargne Rhône Alpes |
Exclusions from the reporting scope by family of indicators are indicated in the description of each indicator.
Groupe BPCE has not made use of the option that allows it to omit certain disclosures relating to intellectual property, know-how or the results of innovations. This option is provided for in Section 7.7 of ESRS 1: Classified and sensitive information, and information on intellectual property, know-how or results of innovation.
In most cases, the material impacts, risks and opportunities have been assessed in the short, medium and long term. To obtain forward-looking information on Groupe BPCE’s material impacts, risks and opportunities in its sustainability reports, the Group has adopted the general principles as defined in Section 6.4 of the ESRS 1 section, namely:
- 1 year as short term (annual financial statement presentation period);
- between 1 year and 5 years as medium term;
- more than 5 years as long term.
When the time horizons deviate from these general guidelines, this information is communicated at the same time as the relevant information concerning the specific material subject. During the preparation of this sustainability report, forward-looking estimates and assumptions were made. The results observed may differ from these estimates and assumptions.
The indicators must cover the entire consolidated scope. However, for the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions under ESRS E1-6 (greenhouse gas emissions), the indicator is calculated over an extended scope. Scope 3, category 15 emissions relate to the value chain, in particular financed emissions.
For the calculation of Scope 3 category 15 emissions on the banking book, greenhouse gas data come from several sources:
- data collected from the Group’s customers (DPE); and
- public databases (Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment).
When data is not available, the Group uses sectoral intensity estimates: either through extrapolation or using a proxy defined through PCAF.
This report, known as the Groupe BPCE sustainability report, was prepared in accordance with the legal and regulatory requirements resulting from the transposition of the European Directive on the disclosure of information on companies’ sustainability (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive or “CSRD Directive”). This first year of application is characterized by uncertainties about the interpretation of the texts, which are generalist and cover all sectors of activity but do not specify a specific framework for banking and financial business models. There is also the absence of established practices or comparative information and certain data, in particular within the “value chain”.
In this context, Groupe BPCE has endeavored to apply the normative requirements set by the ESRS, as applicable at the date of the sustainability statement, based on the information available within the timeframe for its preparation, by doing its best to reflect its role as a universal bank-insurer, as well as its various business models.
For the double materiality analysis and, in particular, that relating to its value chain, Groupe BPCE encountered limitations relating to the maturity of its valuation methodologies and the availability of data. As presented in Section 1.5.1.1 on the Environment (E), we considered that only the issue of mitigation and adaptation related to climate change is material within the meaning of the standard. The limitations relating to the market information and methodologies available at this stage did not make it possible to characterize the Nature ESRS’s materiality within the standard’s meaning, which led the Group to assess these environmental issues as non-material. This assessment was carried out based on the definitions of the standard, and the methodologies available to assess and carry out the rating exercises. This assessment can be explained, in particular, by the absence of a consensus on robust methodologies developed on the topics in question and of relevant and appropriate data which would make it possible to establish a link between the impact or risks for Groupe BPCE regarding these topics through its value chain. In view of Groupe BPCE’s continuous improvement approach to these environmental issues, the work and ongoing changes in international methodologies, the standards that are being put in place, the best market practices that are emerging and information and data from its customers, which should gradually become available, this double materiality analysis may change in the coming years. The dual materiality analysis, the results of which are presented in this report, aims to qualify the impacts, risks and opportunities as described in the CSRD standard: this analysis only meets the needs of sustainability reporting and not the analysis of factors risks presented in the chapter on risk management.
For the data points presented in this report, the BPCE Group used methodological options that it deemed relevant and made estimates for many data points, particularly concerning the various activities of its value chain. The data, analysis, and studies carried out do not guarantee that expectations and targets will be achieved: they are based on objectives, commitments, estimates, assumptions, standards, and methodologies under development and currently available data, which continue to evolve and develop. Some of the information contained in this document has been obtained from public sources or from sources that appear to be reliable or from market references: the BPCE Group has not independently verified them. In addition, Groupe BPCE notes that the information expected in terms of sustainability is based on so-called “agnostic” European standards (ESRS), which are generalist and do not reflect the specificities of the financial sector. As a result, certain data items deemed irrelevant or not applicable, given Groupe BPCE’s business models and value chain, have not been produced. The same applies to certain data points relating to the Taxonomy Regulation.
Regarding the climate change mitigation and adaptation transition plan, in its transition plan, Groupe BPCE distinguishes between actions relating to its own operations and the targets and actions that it has set itself in order to contribute to the decarbonization of the economy by supporting its customers. The actions described present, in particular, the achievements and roadmap for the actions that seem to impact the downstream value chain. The Group’s transition plan describes past, current and future efforts to align its financing, investment and insurance portfolios with scientifically established trajectories aimed at achieving global carbon neutrality by supporting its customers with their environmental transition. This report does not quantify the effects of decarbonization levers or future estimates of total financed emissions. Indeed, the actions undertaken by the Group cannot replace those of individual customers, companies or States that it supports with the transition, and the transition of the economy to a low-carbon economy depends on many parameters external to Groupe BPCE.
As regards the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, as a service company, the Group emits a limited level of CO2e in terms of its own operations, including by integrating the upstream value chain (purchases, including those related to IT and technological investments, mobility including business trips, etc.) and the travel of its customers to its branches or business centers. Most of Groupe BPCE’s GHG emissions come from financed emissions and are subject to a normative calculation for category 15 of the emissions of the downstream “investment” value chain, otherwise known as “financed emissions”, aimed at attributing to the financial institution a portion of the CO2 emissions of its financed customers or securities in which it invests. This calculation takes into account the scopes 1-2-3 of customers, which therefore also include the emissions of their value chain, and leads to a maximum calculation. It is estimated that the financed emissions can be, on average, three times the same greenhouse gas emissions for portfolios of exposure to companies in the same value chain. For this sustainability statement, the Group considered the mandatory categories of financial assets provided for in the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) protocol for calculating financed emissions. The scopes, methodologies used and the main assumptions and data sources are detailed in the paragraph relating to (E1-6) “Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions”.
With regard to Taxonomy, the assumptions used and limitations are detailed in Chapter 2.1 Indicators of the European taxonomy on sustainable activities.
Groupe BPCE believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, they are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, are difficult to predict, generally outside of the control of Groupe BPCE, sometimes unknown, and may lead to results or cause events to unfold significantly differently from those expressed, implied, or anticipated by the aforementioned information and forward-looking statements.
As for all French companies, the sustainability report for the 2024 fiscal year is the first such report produced by the Group. Consequently, no change in the definition or calculation of metrics, including those used to set targets and monitor progress towards their achievement, is to be reported.
As indicated above, since this exercice is the first, comparative data with previous periods are not presented. The reporting of errors in previous periods does not extend to the reference periods preceding this first year of application of the sustainability standards by the company. Furthermore, no significant error related to the previous Green Asset Ratio (GAR) period was identified.
1.1.2.6 DISCLOSURES STEMMING FROM OTHER LEGISLATION OR GENERALLY ACCEPTED SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
With regard to risk management, Groupe BPCE has defined sustainability risk as a risk factor. The chapter on environmental, social and governance risks under Pillar III ESG describes how the Group defines and manages these risks. This chapter also contains an overview of the impact of climate and environmental risks on other types of risks. Further details on the methodologies and management used for traditional types of risks, such as credit risk, market risk, operational risk and liquidity risk, are provided in Chapter 7 - Risk factors and management.
In addition, the elements relating to the eligibility and alignment of the Group’s portfolio as defined in Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and supplemented by Delegated Regulations (EU) 2021/2178, 2021/ 2139 and 2023/2486 are included in Section 2.1. Indicators of the European Taxonomy on sustainable activities.
In order to avoid duplication, ESRS 1 allows the incorporation of parts prepared in other documents, such as the management report or the Universal Registration Document, by means of a simple mention, provided that this information has equivalent characteristics, particularly in terms of reliability. This generally concerns the parts relating to the description of the company’s activities and strategy, its governance, remuneration policies, risk factors and the Duty of Care. The ESRS believe that it is imperative to ensure and explain the consistency between the sustainability report and the financial statements, by paying particular attention to significant amounts, assumptions and projections. The amounts considered as material from the financial statements must be accompanied by a reference, although the presentation of a reconciliation in the form of a comparative table between the amounts of the sustainability report and those of the financial statements remains optional.
Name of the disclosure requirement | Data point | Registration document | Section of the Registration Document | |||
Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies | ESRS GOV-2, Para. 26 (a) & (b) | Universal Registration Document | Chapter 4 - Report on corporate governance - 4.3 Composition of the management and supervisory bodies and 4.4 Role and operating rules of governing bodies | |||
Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | ESRS BP-2 Para. 15 | Universal Registration Document | Chapter 7 - Factors and risk management - 7.16. Environmental, social and governance risks | |||
The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | ESRS 2 GOV-1 Para. 19 & 21 | Universal Registration Document | Chapter 4 - Report on corporate governance - 4.3 Composition of the management and supervisory bodies | |||
Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting | ESRS 2 GOV-5 Para. 36 (a) | Universal Registration Document | Chapter 7 - Factors and risk management - 7.16. Environmental, social and governance risks |
1.2 Cooperative dimension
Groupe BPCE is a cooperative full-service bank and insurance Group serving its customers, cooperative shareholders, territories and the economy. Its cooperative model is inseparable from the history of its two historical networks, Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne. These roots, which forge its identity, also condition its performance, both financial and non-financial.
Since its origin, Groupe BPCE has been rooted in a humanist aspiration: making people a core priority, giving everyone the means to save money and finance their projects, and playing a pioneering role in regional development. This DNA, supported by century-old brands, has been embodied at every stage of its history:
- 1818: creation of the first Caisse d’Epargne et de Prévoyance to promote, collect, and manage the general public’s savings;
- 1878: creation of the first Banque Populaire, founded by and for entrepreneurs to help finance their projects;
- 1919: creation of Crédit National, from which Natixis originated, to finance the reconstruction of the French economy;
- 2009: creation of Groupe BPCE through the combination of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne groups, sharing common values of solidarity and proximity.
Thanks to its unlisted cooperative nature, which enables it to invest to meet the challenges of tomorrow, the Group’s action is part of the long term and provides local and concrete responses to the transformations of the economy and society. Its sustainable model is based on a positive financial trajectory and economic footprint contributing to both an environmental and societal impact. After fifteen years of transformation and simplification, Groupe BPCE is today a unique and solid group, 100% cooperative and bringing together 9.8 million cooperative shareholders.
By holding the company’s capital through cooperative shares, customers become cooperative shareholders and actively participate in the life, ambitions and sustainable development of their bank, with the aim of implementing a fairer and more inclusive company that is more democratic and guided by the public interest.
- The 9.8 million cooperative shareholders of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks hold 100% of the capital of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne (through the intermediary of the local savings companies [LSC] for the Caisses d’Epargne). Their representatives sit on the Boards of Directors of the Banques Populaires and on the Steering and Supervisory Boards of the Caisses d’Epargne.
- The 14 Banques Populaires and the 15 Caisses d’Epargne, all with firm roots in their regions, hold 100% of the capital of BPCE, the Group’s central institution.
A fundamental characteristic of its identity, the local presence of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne enables the Group to be attentive to everyone and understand the expectations of society. The Group transforms this proximity into a capacity for innovation to serve regional growth. By acting alongside local players (local authorities, associations, business networks, educational and university communities, etc.), Groupe BPCE brings this proximity to life:
- by making use of a short circuit of money. Local savings and results finance projects on this same scale, purchases are mainly made from local suppliers, and the Group creates jobs as close as possible to the regions;
- by promoting local ecosystems and dialog with its stakeholders such as chambers of commerce and industry, professional associations, social and solidarity-based economy players, NGOs and associations. Aware that solutions to social and environmental challenges require acting together, it stands alongside those who come together to take action.
Strong and proud of its many faces, Groupe BPCE has built itself around solid and complementary brands: Banque Populaire, Caisse d’Epargne, Natixis CIB, Natixis IM, Oney, Banque Palatine, with full-service regional institutions with differentiating expertise. The societal project that guides their activities defines the way in which the Group conducts its business. Coupled with its regional cooperative model, these brands contribute to the Group’s strengths, resources and stability.
With its VISION 2030 strategic project, the Group reaffirms the societal ambition of its activities by placing the cooperative dimension at the heart of its growth. It is now managed on the basis of a “cooperative performance”; both financial and non-financial, with an environmental and societal impact, and is part of a long-term perspective reconciling robustness, subsidiarity and impact.
By being unlisted the Group is protected from any speculation, reserves are indivisible and the value created is distributed fairly among stakeholders. A portion of the surpluses is reinvested in the future of the Group’s companies to develop them and pass them on to future generations, and a portion is paid to the cooperative shareholders as well as used for the local development of the regions.
This model results in regular and low-volatility profitability, a moderate risk appetite and high solvency. The Group thus distinguished itself in Europe, where it maintained some of the highest solvency requirements.
Groupe BPCE’s decentralization and regional presence are real assets for supporting transitions and lasting transformation of society; they are the guarantors of rapid decision-making, as close as possible to the regions.
With its VISION 2030 strategic project, the Group aims to “make impact accessible to all”: this is the meaning of ‘impact for all.’ Its generalization is based on three main principles:
- the impact for all clients: individual clients for their energy renovation projects, corporate clients for their transition plans, local authorities in support of their policies;
- impact for all territories and the society: by enabling local players to join forces, with the help of the Group’s cooperative shareholders and developing regional initiatives;
- impact for all employees and boards of directors: by deploying an Impact Inside operation and by mobilizing 100% of Groupe BPCE’s employees, companies and governing bodies around ESG issues.
Groupe BPCE is convinced that it is a model in line with society’s expectations, whose changes it has always supported.
The philanthropic engagement and solidarity and sponsorship actions of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne
Since 1992, the Fondation Nationale Banque Populaire, an instrument of sponsorship for the 14 Banques Populaires and their cooperative shareholders, has promoted individual initiative and supported, over the life of their projects, talented, creative people with an entrepreneurial spirit and a taste for innovation in three areas: classical music, disability and arts and crafts.
In 2024, the Fédération nationale des Banques Populaires endowment fund continued its support for ADIE, a national and regional association that finances and supports micro-entrepreneurs. Supplemented by the action of each of the Banques Populaires in the regions, Banque Populaire (excluding CASDEN) is once again in 2023 the first financial partner of ADIE with €47.7 million, which financed 10,000 microloans and contributed to the creation or maintenance of 12,200 self-employed and salaried jobs, in addition to skills sponsorship, honor loans, and other training support or Créadie Awards.
In addition to sponsorship, they are involved in actions in favor of civil society. They are highly involved in supporting business creation, integration (through microloans in particular) and solidarity, and actively support education and research. In addition, Crédit Coopératif and its foundation are mainly focused on supporting and promoting the social and solidarity-based economy. CASDEN Banque Populaire naturally favors education and research.
The impact of the sponsorship of the 14 Banques Populaires is one of the components measured each year via the Banque Populaire Cooperative and Societal Footprint (ECS). Based on ISO 26000 (the leading international standard for CSR), this footprint identifies and values in euros the CSR and cooperative actions implemented within each bank for the benefit of society, employees and customers, cooperative shareholders and suppliers. These actions go beyond regulations, excluding commercial, and traditional banking activity. In 2023, the cooperative and societal footprint (ECS) shows that the Banques Populaires network - composed of 12 regional Banques Populaires, CASDEN Banque Populaire and Crédit Coopératif -carried out 6,434 actions for the benefit of society and the regions, for a total amount of €194.6 million. There has been a sharp increase in the number and amount of ECS actions supported.
Created by philanthropists, the Caisses d’Epargne have been working to promote social cohesion and the fight against exclusion since their inception. They are among the leading corporate sponsors in France.
The Fédération nationale des Caisses d’Epargne has adopted CSR and Cooperative Guidelines that provide a shared framework for the actions of the Caisses d’Epargne around four ambitions: be a key player in the transformation of the regions and the local economy (local footprint), pursue the continuous improvement of ESG policies and their integration into all business lines for more impact (overall performance), encourage employees and cooperative shareholders to become cooper’actors (active cooperation) and anticipate societal needs to build solutions that contribute to progress (societal innovation).
The purpose of the endowment fund of the Caisse d’Epargne network constituted by the FNCE, is to encourage and support actions of general interest aimed at combating exclusion and poverty, particularly in banking and financial situations, and to support solidarity actions and assistance programs. It also supports the Finances et Pédagogie association, which deploys educational programs on money issues throughout the country. It also supports other large structures such as the Fondation Belem, which is recognized as a public utility, whose purpose is to promote France’s maritime past and to preserve France’s last large ship of the 19th century, which has been classified as a historic monument since 1984. Lastly, it has a €200,000 fund that responds quickly to natural disasters.
The 15 Caisses d’Epargne have their own sponsorship strategy in their regions. In 2024, sponsorship represented a total of €20.8 million and 1,290 local projects were supported, mainly in the field of youth, solidarity and sport.
Groupe BPCE, a Premium Partner of the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games, is building a social and environmental legacy that makes sport accessible to all
Groupe BPCE, with all its companies - Banque Populaire, Caisse d’Epargne, Natixis, CASDEN, Crédit Coopératif, ONEY and Banque Palatine - was the leading Premium Partner of the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games. In addition to sharing the values of one of the biggest sporting events in the world, it was an opportunity for the Group to continue to respond in a tangible way to the current challenges of society and to participate in building a social and environmental legacy which makes sport accessible to all:
- making sport a tool for regional planning;
- supporting the local economic fabric and employment;
- taking action to promote the inclusion of people with disabilities.
1.3 Strategy
In 2024, Groupe BPCE rolled out its strategic project VISION 2030, a growth project at the service of its customers and their support in the face of the challenges of the environmental, demographic, technological and geopolitical changes.
The priority given to climate in its latest strategic project has been renewed and integrated into the Impact strategy, with an extra-financial trajectory that includes fifteen key impact indicators. This prioritizes the expansion of impact solutions to all clients of the group, accelerating across all ESG dimensions
VISION 2030, Groupe BPCE’s new strategic project outlines the major priorities it has set for itself in order to build a growth project to serve its customers, in a society marked by four major transitions: environmental, demographic, technological and geopolitical.
Faced with this situation, Groupe BPCE is mobilizing its local and regional presence, its business lines and expertise, to enable its customers, cooperative shareholders and employees to assert their power to act and to trust in the future.
The cooperative nature of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne, combined with the banks’ strong local presence, have made Groupe BPCE a financial player which has notably committed to the decarbonization of the economy in recent years. Groupe BPCE’s global business lines - Natixis Corporate & Investment Banking (Natixis CIB) and Natixis Investment Managers (Natixis IM) - are positioned as key global players in transitions.
Faced with the climate emergency, Groupe BPCE’s approach sets out to ensure the rapid implementation and rollout of measures designed to mitigate and adapt to the already tangible environmental and socio-economic impacts. Making “the impact accessible to all”(2) means raising awareness and providing support to all its clients in the environmental transition by providing them with expertise, advisory services, and comprehensive solutions.
Building on the scenarios defined by science, the BPCE Group and its businesses position themselves as facilitators of transition efforts, with a clear and ambitious goal: to finance a carbon-neutral economy by 2050 by taking action today.
The Group’s approach is based on its cooperative business model: a presence in local communities and a commitment to society geared to financing the economy.
For individual clients: providing support for energy renovations and home adaptations addressing aging and reduced autonomy by offering financing solutions and by mobilizing Groupe BPCE’s role as a housing operator, trusted third party along with its network of partnerships:
- by offering an “Advice and Sustainable Solutions” tool in partnership with ADEME, making it easy for clients to calculate their carbon footprint but also to benefit from advice and assistance for energy renovation work, for decarbonized mobility or green investments;
- by providing support at every stage of energy renovation projects for individual homes and condominiums: energy assessment, search for grants, guarantee of successful completion of work, with financing pathways tailored to each situation;
- by increasing the volume of financing for the energy renovation of buildings.
- Terminology for the strategic project VISION 2030: https://www.groupebpce.com/en/the-group/strategic-plan/
- VISION 2030 strategic project terminology: https://www.groupebpce.com/le-groupe/plan-strategique/
For BtoB customers: supporting the transition of the business models of its clients, from SMEs to the largest international companies. The Group engages with its clients through dedicated dialogue and sector-specific expertise to integrate ESG issues according to the size of the companies and their economic sectors, particularly in energy infrastructure, transportation, waste management and treatment, etc. Sustainable solutions also exist for investor clients with a range of responsible investments and placements: sustainable development passbook accounts, funds with a sustainable investment target, theme-labeled funds, etc..
-
Support for the evolution of the energy mix: faced with the climate emergency, the priority is to accelerate the advent of a sustainable energy system:
- by positioning itself among the world leaders in debt project financing in the renewable energy sector;
- by increasing its financing dedicated to the production and storage of green electricity;
- by providing advice about capital raising processes to its clients commanding leading positions in the infrastructure and equipment sector related to energy transition as well as innovative and high-growth companies in the same sector;
- by advising its customers on energy transformation projects in their financing or capital raising processes;
- by supporting the reindustrialization of regions and energy sovereignty;
- by setting up teams of experts dedicated to low-carbon energies (solar, wind, electrolysis, etc.) and critical metals.
-
Alignment of its financing and insurance portfolios with trajectories compatible with the objectives of the Paris Agreement:
- by developing carbon emission measurement systems;
- by developing its system for identifying and managing physical and transitional climate risks affecting both its clients and its own activities, on the basis of a continuous improvement approach;
- by gradually withdrawing from the most-carbon emitting activities, in particular through adapted ESG policies.
In this context, the Group has joined the Net Zero Banking Alliance initiative of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP FI), and has a decarbonization ambition for the most carbon-emitting sectors.
- Active and innovative issuer in sustainable finance: in its VISION 2030 strategic project the Group has set itself the target of issuing more than five green, social or health funding instruments per year, using all the debt instruments at its disposal.
The Group is a leading financier in the Social and Solidarity Economy sector, local authorities and a major player in social housing, social entrepreneurship and microcredit.
-
A player in the territories and regions of the world where it operates: Groupe BPCE plays a major role in local ecosystems promoting territorial cohesion, supporting numerous initiatives in favor of social inclusion and the reduction of inequalities:
- the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne are key players in the dynamic development of our territories, notably by financing the construction or renovation of infrastructure and facilities necessary for education, health, and mobility. They are the leading providers of private funding for local authorities and the hospital sector;
- on a global scale, Natixis Investment Managers and Natixis Corporate & Investment Banking are developing their Asset & Wealth Management and Corporate & Investment banking business lines in over 40 countries, in line with international commitments in terms of investment and financing activities.
-
Committed to supporting local and national initiatives:
- the impact of the sponsorship activities of the 14 Banques Populaires is measured annually through their Cooperative & Societal Footprint metric. This footprint identifies and values in euros the CSR and cooperative actions implemented within each bank;
- the 15 Caisses d’Epargne have rolled out their Utility Contract in all regions of France: 100% cooperative, 100% regional and 100% useful for the economic, social and environmental development of the territories.
In order to support the transitions of its clients in accordance with the best available standards, Groupe BPCE has launched an internal transformation plan entitled ‘Impact Inside’. In order to expand its impact solutions to its clients and speed up its progress in all the different aspects of ESG, Groupe BPCE has undertaken a transformation of all its companies at every level. It mobilizes its governance and employees, which it trains in ESG issues, and also acts on its own activities by reducing its carbon footprint.
Among the strategic priorities of VISION 2030, Groupe BPCE is renewing its commitment to supporting environmental and societal transitions. It is committed to making “impact accessible to all”(1) and to reinforcing its “global positive based on the strength of local solutions accessible to all.”(2).
The Group’s strategy is accompanied by quantified objectives to implement and steer the Group’s concrete actions by 2026. All of these objectives (depending on the major service groups, customer categories, geographic areas and relations with interested parties) are set out in the table below.
- Terminology for the strategic project VISION 2030 - Environmental impact, Groupe BPCE: https://www.groupebpce.com/en/csr/actor-in-the-environmental-transition/.
- Terminology for the strategic project VISION 2030 - A Group with positive impact, Groupe BPCE: https://www.groupebpce.com/en/csr/our-csr-approach/.
Topics | Metrics | Business lines | Clients |
Geographic areas |
Completed in 2024 |
2026 target | ||||||
Energy renovation with solutions designed to preserve the value of households’ real estate assets | Amount of energy renovation financing for individuals |
Retail Banking |
Individual customers |
France |
€698m(1) |
> €1bn |
||||||
Number of unique visits to the Sustainable Advisory and Solutions digital module | Retail Banking | Individual customers | France | 5.2 million(2) | 6 million | |||||||
Local advisory for the transition of our corporate customers’ business models via dialog devoted to this subject and by providing expertise to incorporate ESG issues according to their size and business sector | Amount of transition and decarbonization financing |
Retail Banking |
Corporate customers |
France |
€1.1bn(3) |
€5bn |
||||||
Percentage of active corporate clients having participated in an ESG dialog | Retail Banking | Corporate customers | France | 55%(4) | 100% active corporate customers | |||||||
Action plans and/or decarbonization trajectories for the highest carbon-emitting sectors | Number of sectors | Group | N/A | World | 11 sectors | 11 sectors | ||||||
Investment offering geared to sustainable instruments, in sync with planetary limits and societal issues, thereby reducing the carbon impact of € and unit-linked portfolios | Reducing the carbon intensity of portfolios | Insurance | All clients | France | 34.3% | 40% reduction to reach 50 tCO2eq/€m | ||||||
Supporting our clients in their allocations on sustainable investment solutions | Growth in AuM (Assets Under Management) in transitions | Asset & Wealth Management | All clients | World | +11.7% | CAGR +5% | ||||||
Positioning of Corporate & Investment Banking at the heart of transitions | Green revenues | Corporate & Investment Banking | All clients | World | x2.1 | 1.5x the rate of CIB growth | ||||||
A GROUP WITH POSITIVE SOCIETAL IMPACT | ||||||||||||
Topics | Metrics | Business lines | Clients |
Geographic areas |
Completed in 2024 |
2026 target | ||||||
A key player in territories | Financing for the social and solidarity economy, social housing and public actors |
Retail Banking |
SSE, social housing, public sector players |
France |
+3.7%(5) |
+8% |
||||||
Social entrepreneurship: number of local projects supported / year | Retail Banking | Professionals | France | 10,589(6) | 11,000 per year | |||||||
A pioneering and ambitious approach in sustainable finance | Number of Green, Social, Healthcare bond issuances per year | Group | N/A | World | 5 | 5 per year |
- The scope for reporting this indicator is made up of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks. This indicator sums the financing of energy renovation work for individual customers (natural persons). The calculation base for this indicator is made up of production data relating to energy renovation, ECO PTZ MPR and ECO PTZ.
- The scope for reporting this indicator is made up of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks. This indicator is the cumulative number of unique visitors who have consulted the “Sustainable Advisory and Solutions” section of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks mobile app since 2023. The basis for calculating this indicator is made up of the almost real-time reporting of digital navigation data traced by the tool Adobe Analytics.
- This indicator calculates, for Groupe BPCE, the percentage of corporate outstandings covered by an ESG dialog. The basis for calculating this indicator is made up of outstandings at risk covered by an ESG dialog for third-party corporate assets in the commercial sense.
- This indicator sums the financing of the public sector, social housing and the social and solidarity economy. It is established for the Caisses d’Epargne on the basis of the Panorama BDR CE + HeR for social housing financing. Source FSE for the Banques Populaires.
- It is established for the Caisses d’Epargne on the basis of the Panorama BDR CE + HeR for social housing financing. Source FSE for the Banques Populaires.
- The scope for reporting this indicator is made up of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks. This indicator lists the annual number of professional projects financed by microloans. The calculation basis for this indicator is made up of the number of pro take-off loans carried out in the Caisses and the amount of microloans made by the CE and BPs sent by external organizations (France Active, CREA-SOL and ADIE).
- New system currently being rolled out.
- 15% reduction achieved over the 2019-2024 period.
- 21.4% market share in outstanding loans, all non-financial sector customers (Banque de France Q3 2024).
- Market share: 21.9% in household deposits/savings and 26.3% in home loans (Banque de France Q3 2024).
- 2023 Kantar SME SMI survey.
- Observatoire de la dette Finance Active des Collectivités Locales (published in 2024).
- Insurance Argus 2023.
- Cerulli Quantitative Update: Global Markets 2023 ranked Natixis Investment Managers the seventeenth largest asset management company in the world, based on the assets under management at December 31, 2022.
- Population of adults under professional mandate estimated at more than 810,000 (source: Ministry of Justice) – Caisse d’Epargne network: nearly 350,000 protected customers, including over 325,000 adults at September 30, 2024.
As a universal, cooperative and regional bank, Groupe BPCE is a major player in Retail Banking and Insurance in France, in specialized businesses lines in Europe, and in Corporate & Investment Banking and Asset Management internationally.
Groupe BPCE’s business models and business lines are structured around two divisions: Retail Banking and the related business lines, mainly in France, and the global business lines of Groupe BPCE:
-
Retail Banking: Groupe BPCE is present in the Retail Banking field in France via its two cooperative networks, Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne, along with Banque Palatine:
- the Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne provide their customers with a complete range of solutions in terms of account access, financing, savings, private management, insurance, payment and specialized financial services (such as leasing or factoring);
- Banque Palatine provides its customers with a range of banking products (current accounts, real estate and personal loans, financial investments, financing solutions to meet environmental challenges).
-
Insurance: BPCE Assurances is Groupe BPCE’s Insurance division. A fully-fledged insurer, it designs, distributes and manages a comprehensive range of personal and non-life insurance products for customers of Groupe BPCE’s banking networks:
- personal insurance: life insurance, retirement savings, creditor insurance and individual and professional personal protection insurance;
- non-life insurance: motor insurance, multi-risk home insurance, supplementary health insurance, personal accident insurance (GAV), multimedia equipment insurance, legal protection, parabanking insurance, professional car and multi-risk insurance, etc.
- Digital & Payments: the Digital & Payments division brings together all of Groupe BPCE’s business lines and expertise in the fields of innovation, digital, data and artificial intelligence, payments, and trade finance with Oney.
- Financial Solutions & Expertise: the Financial Solutions & Expertise division brings together the expertise in the financing business lines - these develop revolving credit and personal loan offers for the Group’s banks, offer a complete range of rental solutions (in particular equipment and real estate leasing, long-term leasing, and leasing with option to buy) and develop factoring solutions - as well as in the business lines of insurance, custodial and advisory services.
The Financial Solutions & Expertise business line represents 5% of the Group’s NBI, i.e. €1.3 billion.
- Corporate & Investment Banking: Natixis Corporate & Investment Banking (CIB) provides advice and designs solutions for its corporate customers, financial institutions, institutional investors, financial sponsors and public sector entities, drawing on all of its expertise in advisory, investment and financing, commercial banking and capital markets. It is organized around five main business lines: Global Markets, Investment Banking, Real Assets, Global Trade, M&A.
The Corporate & Investment Banking business line represents 19% of the Group’s NBI, i.e. €4.4 billion.
-
Asset & Wealth Management: Asset & Wealth Management develops solutions to meet the deposits and savings, investment, risk management and advisory needs of the various private banking and institutional customers of Groupe BPCE:
- Asset Management: Natixis Investment Managers (Natixis IM) supports investors on all continents in building their portfolios by offering them a wide range of diversified and responsible solutions. Natixis IM offers a range of more than 200 strategies to enable its investor customers to achieve their investment objectives, and develops its offer around four key areas of expertise: fundamental active management, liability-driven management, real assets, and quantitative management;
- Wealth Management: Natixis Wealth Management designs tailor-made wealth management and financial solutions to structure and manage the assets of business leaders, senior executives, large private investors and holders of family capital. Natixis Wealth Management supports its clients in their initiatives to undertake, invest and transmit by mobilizing a wide range of expertise: corporate advisory, origination, vanilla and complex financing, investment, wealth engineering, asset management and diversification solutions, in particular private equity;
- Employee and retirement savings: Natixis Interépargne supports companies of all sizes in setting up and managing their employee savings and retirement savings (PEE, PERCO, Collective PER, Mandatory PER) as well as employee shareholding.
Groupe BPCE, a universal banking group, serves 35 million customers worldwide. The offers are aimed at a wide range of customers, including the main target customer groups:
- individual customers: Groupe BPCE is the second-largest bank for individuals(1) in France;
- professional customers: Groupe BPCE is the second-largest bank for professional customer and self-employed customers(2). The professional market includes craftspeople, small retailers and liberal professions
- corporate customers: the Group supports companies of all sizes - SMEs, SMIs, medium-sized companies and large companies. Groupe BPCE, thanks in particular to its Banque Populaire network, is the No. 1 bank for SMEs(3);
- local authorities: Groupe BPCE, in particular through the Caisse d’Epargne network, is the main private financier of local authorities(4), the hospital sector(5), and more generally the French public sector;
- social housing operators: Groupe BPCE is a long-standing partner and leading private banker in social housing(6);
- Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE): Groupe BPCE, thanks to the action of its Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks, is a major player in the private financing of the Social and Solidarity Economy. They support the various SSE structures, regardless of their size and status: cooperatives, mutuals, associations and foundations, employer structures in the historical sectors of SSE activity.
In addition, as part of its VISION 2030 strategic project, the Group is defining a new growth model to develop simultaneously in three major geographical circles France, Europe and the world. This ambition concerns:
- in France: insurance and individual customers, professional customers and corporate customers;
- in Europe: financial services;
- in the world: the Group’s global business lines, Corporate & Investment Banking and Asset Management.
ESG sector policies govern Groupe BPCE’s activities in sectors deemed sensitive from an environmental, social and governance (ESG) point of view.
- Thermal coal: in October 2015, Natixis Corporate & Investment Banking (CIB) committed to no longer finance coal-fired power plants and thermal coal mines worldwide. This policy has gradually been strengthened. In 2021, Groupe BPCE extended its policy to all of its banking activities and committed to a strategy aimed at gradually reducing its banking activities’ exposure to thermal coal to zero by 2030 (for European Union and OECD countries) and 2040 (for the rest of the world).
- Oil and gas industry: published for the first time in 2017, this ESG policy, initially applicable to Natixis CIB’s activities, was extended in 2023 to all of Groupe BPCE’s banking activities and was strengthened with new criteria.
- Defense industry: Natixis CIB excludes the financing, investment and provision of services to companies involved in the production, storage and trade of anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions.
- Tobacco industry: Natixis CIB has undertaken to cease all dedicated financing related to tobacco activities, as well as all non-dedicated financing in favor of a company whose business is 25% or more tobacco-based.
The European asset management companies affiliated with Natixis Investment Managers also apply sector and/or exclusion policies:
European asset management companies have developed responsible investment policies that explain their overall ESG approach, provide detailed guidance on the integration of environmental factors, and explain their sectoral and/or exclusion policies. All European asset management companies ban controversial weapons from their investments, and have exclusion policies in the coal, non-conventional oil and gas, and tobacco sectors. Some affiliated asset management companies have developed more restrictive exclusion policies, based on recognized frameworks for fossil fuels. The majority of asset management companies offering investment products in non-listed assets completely exclude fossil fuels in favor of transition and renewable energies.
- Market share: 21.9% in household deposits/savings and 26.3% in home loans (Banque de France Q3 2024).
- 37% (rank 2) penetration rate among professional customers and self-employed customers (Pépites CSA 2023-2024 survey).
- 2023 Kantar SME SMI survey.
- Observatoire de la dette Finance Active des Collectivités Locales (published in 2024).
- Observatoire Finance Active Établissements de Santé (published in 2024).
- Repères 136 USH of August 2024 (Les HLM en chiffres).
- Tobacco sector: total exclusion of producers and exclusion of distributors whose tobacco-related turnover exceeds 5% of their total business.
- Controversial weapons: total exclusion.
- Thermal coal: for new investments, exclusion of producers whose turnover from thermal coal is higher than 10%, the annual coal production exceeds 10 million metric tons, or the electricity capacity generated from coal is greater than 5 GW. Distributors developing new thermal coal generation capacities of more than 300 MW are also excluded. For existing investments, divestment planned for 2030 at the latest for companies in OECD countries and for 2040 for companies in non-OECD countries.
- Oil & Gas: for new investments, companies developing new upstream fossil fuel (conventional or non-conventional) exploration or production projects, as well as those whose production of unconventional hydrocarbons or those with a high environmental impact exceeds 10% of their total activity are excluded. For existing investments, divestment no later than 2030 for companies that do not meet these criteria.
- International guidelines: for new investments, companies that violate the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) and the OECD guidelines are excluded. For existing investments, priority divestment of companies that violate international principles.
- Pesticides: companies whose turnover from the production or marketing of pesticides exceeds 5% and which do not have a biodiversity strategy whose targets are aligned with target 7 of the Kunming-Montreal agreements for new investments are excluded. For existing investments, divestment set no later than 2030 for companies that do not meet the defined criteria.
Groupe BPCE has made several long-standing commitments to scale up its actions and accelerate the positive transformations to which it is contributing.
Since 2003, the Group has been a participating member of the Global Compact (United Nations Global Compact), which defines ten principles relating to respect for human rights, labor standards, environmental protection and the fight against corruption.
Since 2008, through Natixis, the Group has adhered to the PRI, which supports institutional investors in incorporating environmental, social and corporate governance considerations into the investment decision-making process.
Since 2010, through Natixis, the Group has been a signatory of the Equator Principles. They aim to take into account social and environmental risks in the context of project financing.
Groupe BPCE and Natixis have signed the Principles for Responsible Banking and are committed to strategically aligning their activities with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Climate Agreement.
In July 2021, Groupe BPCE joined the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), a financial initiative of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP FI) covering more than 40% of the assets financed by banks worldwide. This alliance between banking institutions is a decisive step in the mobilization of the financial sector.
In accordance with its commitment to align the trajectory of its portfolios with the objective of carbon neutrality by 2050, Groupe BPCE has published its ambitions for the eleven sectors with the highest carbon emissions (power generation, oil and gas, automotive, steel, cement, aluminum, aviation, commercial real estate, residential real estate and agriculture).
Since 2022, BPCE Assurances has been a member of the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance (NZAOA), an international group of investors committed to transitioning their investment portfolios with the aim of contributing to carbon neutrality by 2050.
By joining act4nature international in 2024, Groupe BPCE is strengthening its commitment to the environment by renewing the partnership supported by Natixis since 2018.
By joining act4nature international, a coalition that mobilizes companies, public authorities, scientists and environmental associations in favor of the protection, enhancement and restoration of biodiversity, the Group has set itself 24 proactive objectives as part of its banking, insurance and investing activities.
- Certain affiliates of Natixis Investment Managers (Natixis IM) scope, BPCE Assurances joining the PRI in 2016.
- Commitment made by Natixis in 2018, extended to include Groupe BPCE in 2024.
Actions carried out by Groupe BPCE are often assessed by public and private bodies who provide certificates that guarantee compliance with a particular standard or label.
Banque Populaire | Caisse d’Epargne | ||
CSR strategy | |||
Global CSR approach (ISO 26000) | |||
Lucie label | 3 | ||
CSR Committed Label (AFNOR) | 3 | CSR Committed Label (AFNOR) | 2 |
Responsible brand | 1 | ||
CSR Label | 2 | ||
B-Corp | 2 | ||
Consumer relations | |||
Customer service quality: ISO 9001 and Pepp’s | 2 | ||
Sustainable and solidarity-based products: Finansol | 1 | ||
Environment | |||
Guaranteed 100% renewable electricity | 5 | ||
ISO 50001 certification (energy management system) | 1 | Environmental certifications | 6 |
Green buildings: HQE certification | 8 | Real estate: HPE label and BBC label | 5 |
Green buildings: Effinergie label | 4 | ||
Green buildings: other labels | 45 | ||
Responsible purchasing | |||
Supplier Relations and Responsible Purchasing label | Supplier Relations and Responsible Purchasing label | 7 | |
Diversity, equal opportunities, discrimination | |||
Professional equality | 10 | Professional equality | 5 |
Cancer@Work | 7 | Cancer@Work | 3 |
Diversity label / AFNOR diversity - inclusion | 1 | Diversity label / AFNOR diversity - inclusion | 4 |
Cap Handeo | 1 | Cap Handeo | 3 |
Partner employer label for firefighters | 9 | ||
Responsible digital | 1 |
As a financial institution, Groupe BPCE receives funds in the form of customer deposits or purchases of financial instruments by investors and grants loans to its customers (banking transformation function).
The downstream value chain includes customers who benefit from Groupe BPCE’s products or services, particularly loans.
Taking into account stakeholder expectations is an essential exercise to better identify and assess the Group’s sustainability impacts. Groupe BPCE’s stakeholder consultation process is based on a large number of systems that aims to involve its stakeholders in its process of identifying and assessing impacts, risks and opportunities, as well as levers for improving both environmental and societal topics. These systems are detailed in the table below.
The Group’s cooperative model places dialog with stakeholders at the heart of its actions. The local presence of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne enables the Group to be attentive to everyone and understand society’s expectations, by promoting local ecosystems and dialog with its stakeholders such as chambers of commerce, professional associations, players in the social and solidarity economy (SSE), entrepreneurial ecosystems, educational structures, associations, foundations, mutuals that the Group has historically supported, given its role as a major financier of the social and solidarity economy.
By holding the company’s capital through cooperative shares, customers become cooperative shareholders and actively participate in the life, strategic and sustainable development of their bank. The members of the Board represent the cooperative shareholders, the regions and civil society within the governance of their bank.
Everywhere in the territories in France and in the regions of the world where the Group operates, stakeholder expectations are identified and taken into account through regular relations with the executives of the Group’s companies, the Fédération Nationale des Banques Populaires, the Fédération Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne, the employee representative bodies, investors roadshows, meetings with rating agencies and NGOs (non-governmental organizations). Lastly, discussions with regulators, and image or forward-looking surveys are all sources of identification of changes in stakeholder expectations.
Stakeholders | Dialog methods | Purpose | ||
Cooperative shareholders (Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne) |
• Participation in General Meetings • Election of representatives • Dedicated meetings and newsletters • Cooperative shareholders club • Coordination by the Fédération Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne and the Fédération Nationale des Banques Populaires |
• Promotion of the cooperative model • Participation in the life of the bank • Access to inside information on the bank’s life and its impact on the region • Measurement of satisfaction |
||
Board members (Banques Populaires a |
• Participation in the Boards of Directors (Banques Populaires) or Steering and Supervisory Boards (Caisses d’Epargne) • Participation in specialized committees • Focus groups • Training programs and seminars • Dedicated directors website |
• Representation of the cooperative shareholders’ interests in governance • Participation in the definition of strategic orientations • Monitoring function, in particular risk management and reliability of internal control |
||
Employees |
• Social survey (internal survey measuring the social climate in the Group’s companies) and business line satisfaction survey • Annual interviews • Training • Internal communication • Non-profit networks (women, intergenerational, LGBT+) • Employee whistleblowing rights • Consultation of employee representatives and representative trade unions |
• Improving quality of life at work, health and safety at work • Employee loyalty and commitment (career and talent management, skills and expertise development) • Participation of employee representatives in major strategic and transformation issues and negotiation of agreements |
||
Clients |
• Interviews • Strategic dialog to integrate ESG issues • Customer events • NPS satisfaction surveys(1) • Institutional and commercial partnerships • Voting policies (available on the websites of the asset management subsidiaries) |
• Definition of offers and customer support • ESG dialog: customer acculturation on ESG issues, support for transformation initiatives, risk assessment for better prevention and management by the customer and for incorporation of ESG criteria in the granting of loans • Improving customer satisfaction • Development of a committed shareholder base to encourage companies to transform their strategy and reduce their ESG risks • Monitoring of the respect for compliance and ethics rules in commercial policies, procedures and sales • Complaint management • Mediation |
||
Suppliers and sub-contractors |
• Responsible purchasing policy • Commitment to government initiatives (e.g. “I choose French Tech”) • Regular meetings with strategic suppliers • “Supplier voices” survey • Preparation of certifications • Listening system and satisfaction surveys • Supplier whistleblowing rights and establishment of an independent mediator • Audit |
• Responsible Supplier Relations Charter, involving suppliers in the implementation of Duty of Care measures • Compliance with ESG clauses included in contracts • Identification of progress plans to better understand supplier expectations • Improve the level of satisfaction and the relationship • Consultations and calls for tenders • Measurement of satisfaction |
||
Institutions, federations, regulators |
• Regular meetings (public authorities, regulators, chambers of commerce and industry, etc.) • Contribution to marketplace work (in particular within the FBF - Fédération Bancaire Française), participation in sectoral working groups • Responses to public consultations • Transmission of information and documents • Board seats (EPL, LS, ESS, etc.) |
• Constructively contributing to public debate and participating in collective, fair and informed decision-making • Taking into account sector specificities • Regulatory compliance |
||
Rating agencies, investors and independent third parties |
• Regular dialog, participation in meetings (technical meetings, roadshows, conferences, etc.) • Transfer of information and documents for ratings/audits • Publication of official documents: Universal Registration Document, quarterly earnings, press releases, investor website |
• Improving transparency • Diversification of the Group’s refinancing, in particular by promoting the issuance of Green / social / sustainable bonds • Improving financial and non-financial ratings • Meeting the expectations and questions of investors and rating agencies • Reports publication (CDP, act4nature international, PRB, etc.) |
||
NGOs and non-profits |
• Calls for projects • Sponsorship • Employee volunteering, skills sponsorship • Regular dialog • Contributions to market questionnaires • Seats on the boards of foundations or associations |
• Positive impacts through numerous cultural and solidarity initiatives in various fields: business creation, integration, solidarity, young people, sport, environmental protection, etc. • Improving transparency • Contribution of cross-expertise: banking / financial and better understanding of local players |
||
Academic and research sector |
• Relations and partnerships with business schools and universities • Partnership with research chairs • Participation in forums and events • Discussions and consultations with scientific experts |
• Welcome and recruitment of work-study students and interns • Improving the employer brand • Contribution to the Group’s research, working groups and strategies |
Certain stakeholders were consulted as part of the double materiality assessment (see 1.5.1.1 IRO-1).
1.4 Governance
The Supervisory Board of Groupe BPCE has 19 members(1): 7 representatives of the Banques Populaires, 7 representatives of the Caisses d’Epargne, 3 independent members(2) and 2 employee representatives. The Supervisory Board includes 6 non-voting directors acting in an advisory capacity.
As of 31st December 2024, with eight women on its Supervisory Board out of a total of seventeen members, Groupe BPCE had a proportion of women of:
- 47.05%(3) (in accordance with Article L. 225-79 of the French Commercial Code, members representing employees are not taken into account in this calculation);
- 42.11%, in accordance with ESRS 2 (European Sustainability Reporting Standards 2) of the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive).
The Management Board of Groupe BPCE is composed of four members(4), including a Chairman. The diversity rate is 50%(5).
The modalities and details of the composition of the Supervisory Board and Management Board (as well as the Executive Management Committee) are provided in Chapter 4.
Thus, the members of the Supervisory Board and the Management Board are appointed in accordance with the appointment and succession policy (adopted by the Supervisory Board at its meeting of February 7, 2024), which specifies the diversity policy applicable to them.
The Appointments Committee - responsible for formulating proposals concerning the choice of Board members, non-voting directors and external independent members (in compliance with legal and statutory rules and in accordance with the Supervisory Board’s internal rules) - thus verifies the suitability of candidates to join the Board in view of their good repute, skills and independence while pursuing an objective of diversity within the Board, i.e. a situation where the characteristics of the members of the Board differ to a degree ensuring a variety of views within the Board. The Group’s cooperative nature contributes to this diversity.
When assessing a candidate for the Supervisory Board, the Appointments Committee strives to maintain or achieve a balance and have a skill set appropriate for the Group’s activities and strategic project, as well as the technical responsibilities assigned to the various Supervisory Board committees.
The Supervisory Board is mainly composed of representatives from the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne, and in particular of the directors and Chairmen of the Boards from both networks. The board chairmen are first and foremost cooperative shareholders of their bank and have in-depth knowledge of the cooperative model, the region and regional specificities.
The skills of the members are reported in the collective skills matrix of the Supervisory Board in Chapter 4(6). This matrix notably mentions all the regulatory skills expected by the supervisor (including banking skills such as: banking and financial markets, accounting and auditing, interpretation of a credit institution’s financial information, risk management, etc.). In addition, these elements are supplemented by the information appearing in the terms of office sheet of each member(7), which describes his or her experience in detail.
In view of the Supervisory Board’s collective skills matrix, the Supervisory Board’s average skill level, particularly with regard to ESG skills, is as follows:
This expertise covers the understanding of climate and environmental risk and its challenges for a banking group, the general regulatory context as regards the environment, the specific expectations on the banking sector, and the measurement of this risk and its main indicators. It also covers knowledge of the action plans implemented by the Group.
- The Supervisory Board of BPCE exercises permanent control over the management carried out by the Management Board and must include, according to the Group’s articles of association, between 10 and 19 members (non-executive company directors) as well as 6 non-voting directors chosen in accordance with the procedures provided for in the diversity policy adopted on February 7, 2024.
- i.e. a proportion of 15.79% of independent members on BPCE’s Supervisory Board. The proportion of independent members on the board committees is specified in Chapter 4.
- The Supervisory Board aims for a minimum of 40% representation of the under-represented gender, a ratio calculated by the ratio of the number of women members of the Supervisory Board to the total number of Supervisory Board members, it being specified that the members representing the employees are not included in the calculation.
- The Management Board has the broadest powers and must include between two and five members according to Groupe BPCE’s articles of association (executive company directors).
- The Management Board of BPCE, which is not subject to any regulatory or statutory obligations, calculates this ratio by dividing the number of women members of the Management Board with the total number of members of the Management Board.
- The matrix presents the average of the collective skills of all of the members. It is based on skill levels (between 1 and 5) as declared by the members. During the assessments, the Appointments Committee checks the consistency of the declared skill levels with the CVs and training completed.
- See 4.3.5 “Directorships and offices held by corporate officers”.
This expertise covers the understanding of the various areas of intervention of the social and solidarity economy (fair trade, responsible consumption, short supply chains, solidarity-based finance, integration through economic activity, confiscation of criminal assets for the use of social utility, social currencies and non-monetary exchange systems, etc.) and its specific challenges, knowledge of social innovations, the role of the various players, and interactions with public authorities.
This expertise covers the specificities of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks, banks and cooperative companies, which are owned by their cooperative shareholders. As cooperative banking institutions, the operations and missions of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne are governed by law (as is BPCE as the central institution of these institutions): participatory governance, regional proximity, legal duties to implement the principles of solidarity and fight against exclusion, promotion and collection of savings, development of provident insurance, contribution to the protection of popular savings, financing of social housing, improvement of local and regional economic development, and fight against banking and financial exclusion of all players in economic, social and environmental life. Knowledge of these specificities, the very essence of the Group’s model, is the basis of this “cooperative banking experience”.
This competence involves understanding and taking into account the economic and social strengths and weaknesses of the territories.
This expertise covers knowledge of the strategies for the development, revitalization and optimization of a region as well as understanding of the role of the various players and partners and the legal and financial constraints.
In order to strengthen the skills available to the Supervisory Board, training provided by internal and/or external providers is offered to Board members, particularly on sustainability issues. The training program takes into account the diversity of experiences and the needs of the Board members, as well as the proposals made as part of the Board’s annual assessment.
The training offered in 2024 in terms of sustainability, both as part of the regulatory initial training and continuing training, were as follows:
- climate and environmental risks: training delivered by internal and external providers with the aim of understanding climate risk, the general regulatory context regarding the environment, and the specific expectations on the banking sector;
- the challenges of the energy transition and the management of climate and environmental risks: internal training with the aims of improving knowledge about the integration of ESG criteria in risk monitoring, presenting the main regulatory requirements related to climate and environmental risks, and describing the action plans implemented by the Group to respond to them;
- CSRD and transition plan: training delivered by internal and external providers, with the aim of ensuring a good understanding of the CSRD regulatory requirements and the challenges related to this new regulation for Groupe BPCE;
- the climate solutions fresco: external training with the aim of achieving good understanding of the impacts and challenges related to climate risks on the various sectors of the economy;
- Retail Banking operating model: internal training aimed at seeing how the Group is accelerating its transformation of the support functions and how future technologies can trigger new dynamics in Retail Banking operating models;
- governance of cooperative ‘banks’, overview of the governance and organization of cooperative banks in France and Europe: training delivered by internal and external providers with the aim of presenting an overview of the governance and organization of cooperative banks in France and Europe.
1.4.2 GOV-2- Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies
The Supervisory Board supervises and puts the Group’s ESG strategy into perspective. The Executive Management Committee of Groupe BPCE validates the ESG strategy, ensures its implementation and oversees the Group’s risk management (the composition and diversity of the management and supervisory bodies, the roles and responsibilities of the bodies are detailed in Chapter 4 of the Universal Registration Document - Report on corporate governance).
Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne place ESG at the heart of their business model, and ESG issues have historically been an integral part of the governance of each institution.
The Supervisory Board meets as often as the company’s interests and legal and regulatory provisions require. The frequency is at least once per quarter. Several specialized committees have been set up by the Supervisory Board and carry out their activities under its responsibility. Their duties are defined in the Supervisory Board’s internal rules. The Chairman of each of these committees reports on the committee’s work to the Supervisory Board.
In addition to the subjects regularly addressed during Board meetings, such as the quarterly reports of the Management Board, related-party agreements, executive approvals, current events and other matters for information, sustainability subjects are also examined mainly in the context of committee minutes.
Board | Chairman |
Frequency in 2024 |
Duties | Main ESG topics addressed in 2024 | ||||
Audit and Investment Committee | Kadidja Sinz - Independent member of the Supervisory Board | 9 sessions per year |
The Audit and Investment Committee: Monitors the process of preparing the sustainability information and the process implemented to determine the information to be published in accordance with the sustainability reporting standards. Monitors the effectiveness of the internal control and risk management systems, and where applicable the internal audit, regarding the procedures relating to the preparation and processing of accounting and financial information used for sustainability reporting. Monitors the performance of the statutory audit by the Statutory Auditors and certification of sustainability information and ensures compliance with the independence conditions required of the parties involved in the audit and certification of sustainability information. Reports regularly to the collegiate body in charge of administration or to the supervisory body on the performance of its duties. It also reports on the results of the certification of the financial statements and the sustainability information, as well as on the way in which these missions have contributed to the integrity of the financial and sustainability information. It reports on the role it has played in this process. |
Monitoring of the construction and progress of the CSRD sustainability report: • result of the sustainability auditor’s call for tenders; • methods for implementing the CSRD regulation (structuring and construction of the project). Presentation of CSRD issues for Groupe BPCE (joint meeting with the Risk Committee). Presentation of the double materiality assessment approach followed, results of the exercise and guidelines adopted by Groupe BPCE for the rating, overall view of the Group’s materiality positions. Presentation by the sustainability auditor of his strategy and approach to verification of the sustainability report. |
||||
Cooperative and CSR Committee | The Chairmen of Fédération Nationale des Banques Populaires and Fédération Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne alternately | 4 sessions per year |
The Cooperative and CSR Committee: Develops proposals and recommendations aimed at promoting and translating the cooperative and social values of long-term engagement, as well as professional and interpersonal ethics, within the activities of the Group and networks, thereby strengthening the cooperative and CSR dimension of the Group and each of the networks. Develops proposals on strategy and institutional communication related to ESG issues. Reviews the sustainability report, as well as any other document or report relating to current or future legal obligations (taxonomy, etc.). Monitors the communication plan and the indicators used to measure the actions of the Group’s strategic plan around the actions falling within the scope of the Cooperative and CSR Committee. More generally, makes any proposal it deems useful regarding CSR actions that could be carried out. |
VISION 2030 strategic project: positions on Impact, monitoring of the ESG program, in particular assessment of the 2021-2024 ESG program, preparation and implementation of the 2024-2026 Impact program, Net Zero trajectories, biodiversity approach. News and key indicators of Groupe BPCE’s Impact Program, monitoring of indicators. Management of Net Zero trajectories (NZBA). Sustainability reports: 2023 NFPS with focus on the carbon audit, new CSRD regulations. CSRD: double materiality assessment (approach followed, results of the exercise and guidelines adopted by Groupe BPCE for the rating, global view of the Group’s materiality positions). Presentation by the sustainability auditor of his strategy and approach to verification of the sustainability report. Conduct and Ethics Reporting. News from the national federations of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne. “Protection of the local natural assets” initiative. |
||||
Risk Committee | Independent member of the Supervisory Board of BPCE | 10 sessions per year |
The Risk Committee: Assesses the effectiveness of the internal control and risk management systems. Supports risk management. Assesses and reviews the implementation of the operational strategy for managing BPCE’s and the Group’s climate and environmental risks and issues proposals, opinions or recommendations in this area to the Supervisory Board. Examines the overall exposure of the Group’s activities to current and future climate and environmental risks (based on the work of the ESG Risk Committee) |
Climate risks: presentation of the annual work program and monitoring. ESG risks: regulatory news, presentation of the action plan and monitoring. Validation and monitoring of the implementation of the ESG risk action plan. Business Environment Scan and assessment of the materiality of the risks. Climate risk appetite management. Monitoring of regulatory news and interactions with supervisors. Cybersecurity. Half-yearly reports of the compliance functions. Annual report on the combat against money laundering and financing of terrorism. |
Board | Chairman | Frequency | Duties | Main ESG topics addressed in 2024 | ||||
ESG Risk Committee | Chief Risk Officer | 6 sessions per year |
The ESG risk committee notably: Performs the consolidated monitoring of the ESG risks to which Groupe BPCE is exposed and ensures the implementation of the organization and operational strategy in terms of ESG risk management. Validates the main methodological choices and scenarios used within the Group in the context of ESG risk management. Reviews and validates the assessment of the materiality of ESG risks and expresses its opinion on the Group’s ESG risk appetite. |
ESG risk management system. Materiality assessment of climate and environmental risks for Groupe BPCE. Climate scenarios and stress test approach. ESG risk dashboard. Monitoring of regulatory news and interactions with supervisors. Climate and environmental risk materiality identification and assessment. Review and monitoring of the ESG risk action plan. Organizational ESG risk charter. Monitoring of work to strengthen the system: geo-sectoral assessments of physical and transition risks, modeling of physical risks on residential real estate, climate scenarios and stress test system, implementation and monitoring of work to integrate ESG issues in the analysis of customer business models (including the credit process). Climate risk appetite management. |
||||
Executive Management Committee | Chairman of the Management Board | Weekly |
The Executive Management Committee: Validates strategic priorities in terms of social and environmental responsibility. Supervises their implementation. |
Progress of the 2021-2024 ESG Program. Impact strategy in VISION 2030. ESG operating model. 2023 NFPS and TCFD publications. Update on the work on the 2023 Duty of Care plan. “Protection of the local natural assets” initiative. Business Environment Scan and assessment of the materiality of the risks. Action plan to strengthen the ESG risk system. Monitoring of regulatory news and interactions with supervisors. Net Zero trajectories of the most emitting sectors. Impact 2024-2026 program. |
||||
Environmental Transition Strategy Committee | Chairman of the Management Board | 4 sessions per year |
The Strategic Environmental Transition Committee: Defines the Group’s Impact strategy in terms of environmental transition and manages its implementation: action plans, indicators by business line, measurement of the Group’s ambitions. Defines the Group’s positions in terms of environmental transition. Manages the Group’s non-financial communication plan on ESG issues and monitors its impact (non-financial ratings, etc.). |
Net Zero trajectories of the most emitting sectors. ESG policies in sensitive sectors. CSRD project. Transition plan. Biodiversity approach. |
||||
Data & Technologies ESG Committee |
Chief Technology & Operations Officer Chief Digital & Payments Officer |
2 sessions per year |
The ESG Data & Technologies Committee: Ensures the implementation of the system for distributing the ESG data required for the various uses in all of the Group’s information systems. |
ESG data as part of VISION 2030. Data governance. |
||||
Group Regulatory Committee | General Secretary | 4 sessions per year |
The Group’s Regulatory Monitoring Committee: Monitors regulatory changes, from the genesis of texts to their daily implementation. Carries out a regulatory watch, with a cross-functional and global vision of current/recent regulatory changes. Decides and monitors the implementation. |
CSRD. Pillar III ESG, Green Asset Ratio Article 28 of the Energy and Climate act. ECB guide to climate and environmental risks. Guidance on the granting and monitoring of loans. Duty of Care. |
The double materiality assessment was presented to the Cooperative and CSR Committee in November 2024 and to the Audit and Investment Committee in December 2024. These two committees communicated their report at the Supervisory Board meeting held in December 2024.
The material impacts, risks and opportunities focus on climate change, value chain workers, affected communities, consumers and end-users and business conduct. The skills of the members of the management and supervisory bodies in connection with these IROs are available in Chapter 4(1).
These diverse topics are the responsibility of various specialized committees and the material matters are dealt with within the ordinary framework of the existing bodies. For example, the material matters related to the climate are dealt with by the Environmental Transition Strategy Committee (CTSE), which is notably tasked with defining the Group’s Impact strategy as regards the environmental transition and overseeing its implementation, through action plans, business line indicators and measurement of ambitions. It is in this body that the decarbonization action plans and/or trajectories of the eleven highest-emitting sectors published by Groupe BPCE were validated, before being presented to the Executive Management Committee (CDG).
The Sustainability Office which reports directly to the Chairman of the Management Board, proposes, validates and implements the Group’s ESG strategy. It plays a cross-functional role within the Group, carrying out the following key missions:
- co-construct the VISION 2030 of the Group’s Impact on the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) dimensions;
- develop and deploy ESG expertise and ensure the Group’s representation and communication;
- conduct and interpret scientific and competitive monitoring and support regulatory monitoring, to ensure continuous improvement;
- manage the Impact 2026 program and carry out structuring projects within its scope in accordance with Group standards and regulatory expectations;
- ensure overall coordination and support each sector’s “Impact Inside” operations while implementing the necessary synergies.
- with the Executive Management Committee, which oversees projects related to the implementation of the Impact VISION 2030 for the Group, with a regular review of the portfolio of structuring projects;
- with the Strategic Environmental Transition Committee, which validates the main operational guidelines and monitors the deployment of environmental projects;
- via the institutions, with an Impact Committee, composed of CEOs of Banques Populaires and Chairmen of Caisses d’Epargne, which guides the Impact program and monitors the progress of projects, with the various functions of the divisions notably with the Impact/CSR function to ensure a global vision of the program, a co-construction dynamic and its implementation in the institution;
- with the Group’s business lines through specific systems adapted to each business line (the global business lines of Groupe BPCE, Insurance, FSE and D&P), based on existing committees, notably including work between business line departments and a dedicated coordination to co-construct and implement the Group Impact program with the ESG managers.
With the exception of the Chairman, who receives a fixed annual fee, the members of the Supervisory Board receive remuneration on the basis of their activities. The Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Supervisory Board do not receive any additional remuneration for their participation in committees.
Each remuneration payment relates to the corporate officer’s attendance at Board Meetings and is calculated according to the total compensation package set by by each company’s General Meeting.
For the 2024 fiscal year, CSR and employee cooperative shareholding within BPCE are one of the five qualitative criteria influencing the variable pay of Management Board members. The variable portion of pay relating to the five qualitative criteria represents 40% of the total variable pay, with no specific weighting for each of the individual criteria. The achievement rate was assessed overall by taking into account the attention paid to the five criteria, taken as a whole, including CSR topics and employee cooperative shareholding within BPCE.
On February 6, 2025, on the proposal of the Remuneration Committee, BPCE’s Supervisory Board decided to set the Management Board’s variable pay targets for the 2025 fiscal year by incorporating a specific criterion related to the environment, climate and decarbonization trajectories with a weighting of 5%.
MAIN FEATURES OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM LINKED TO THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCEDURE
Within the Group, the preparation and processing of sustainability information is mainly the responsibility of the Group Finance division which mobilizes its Architecture & Reporting (A&R) and Financial and Non-Financial Communication teams and the Sustainability Office.
Reporting to the Finance division, the Architecture and Reporting (A&R) department is responsible for securing the key Information Systems Finance & Risks applications, ensuring the reliability of complex production processes (data transformed with the preparation of regulatory and management reports) and ensuring that these processes comply with BCBS 239 principles(1).
In 2024, the department created a unit dedicated to managing non-financial issues closely related to the management of the financial statements. The Responsible Finance Management (RFM) structure is in line with the new “Impact Inside” model.
The new RFM department played a key role in coordinating the work to draw up Groupe BPCE’s sustainability report:
- coordination of project committee and governance internally, including interaction with other Group entities that prepare their own sustainability report;
- strengthened coordination of the data strategy and the processes for producing the regulatory indicators required by the ESRS, including the conduct of a test system involving all production entities;
- active monitoring of best practices in force in the market (methodologies for producing indicators, transition plan);
- acculturation of the Finance function of the Group’s companies on the new CSRD challenges, in particular via the existing National Finance Committee (NFC) bodies;
- interaction with the College of Auditors.
Teams are involved in the CSRD set-up and responsible for the production of the Universal Registration Document. They drive the narrative production process. The drafting of the narratives is entrusted to the production business lines, who are experts in the themes. The project teams perform the following functions:
- identify, integrate and raise awareness among the ESRS-themed narrative writers of the new CSRD challenges as well as the editorial requirements required by the standard;
- provide tools to the production business lines such as an editorial guide, methods for monitoring production and completeness, and instructions for proofreading and validation with the managers of the contributing divisions;
- manage the narrative collection process with the Sustainability Office and data collection in collaboration with the Architecture & Reporting department;
- ensure the production of the sustainability report within the milestones of the URD production schedule;
- organize the mechanisms necessary to collect investors’ expectations.
This approach aims to ensure a good understanding of the spirit of the EFRAG standard and guide(2). The drafting work is carried out according to a schedule and in the collaborative tool used to draft the URD.
The Sustainability Office, which reports directly to the Chairman of the Management Board, proposes, validates and implements the Group’s ESG strategy. It plays a cross-functional role within the Group and, as part of the CSRD project and is more specifically involved in the following projects:
- CSRD acculturation: the Sustainability Office has designed and runs acculturation sessions for employees, various business lines (Purchasing, Governance, Compliance, etc.) and the Group’s management bodies, subsidiaries and institutions. The educational objective of these sessions is to put into perspective the challenges of the CSRD and the sustainability report, explain the regulatory requirements and new structuring concepts, present the organization of the project at Group level and the expected contributions;
-
double materiality assessment: this analysis was carried out in two stages (for a detailed description, see ESRS 2 IRO-1):
- the identification of impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO) relevant to Groupe BPCE’s activity was coordinated by the Finance division (A&R) and the Sustainability Office, with the operational support of the Retail Banking & Insurance business lines, the global business lines of Groupe BPCE, as well as the ESG Risk, Operational Risk, Achats & Services, Human Resources, Compliance, Technology and Operations, and Public Affairs departments at group level. The double materiality assessment was carried out in two phases, A and B, by the Finance department and the Sustainability Office respectively. Phase A lead to identify the topics and subtopics of the ESRS relevant to Groupe BPCE, through workshops with internal business line experts, and then to carry out an initial identification of the IROs. Phase B lead to draw up the final list of relevant IROs for Groupe BPCE, as well as to rate them,
- assessment of the materiality of the IROs: the Sustainability Office is responsible for establishing, on behalf of the Group, the IRO rating methodology and it coordinates and supervises the rating of IROs, in conjunction with the internal stakeholders mentioned above; the business lines and functional departments are responsible for rating the IROs falling within their scope;
- communication strategy and editorial content: the Sustainability Office ensures that the editorial content of the sustainability report is relevant and consistent with the Group’s strategy on sustainability issues, for which it is responsible;
- transition plan: the Sustainability Office is responsible for drafting the transition plan;
- coordination of the Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne: the Sustainability Office supports the institutions and defines a framework, guidelines and certain content for the preparation of their Impact reports (non-regulatory report produced by certain institutions).
In accordance with the requirements defined by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the central institution prepares the sustainability report.
It also ensures the proper application by the entities subject to this requirement of the rules defined by the Group and verifies compliance with these requirements. Within the Group, the entities subject to the requirement to publish a sustainability report are Natixis, BPCE Assurances, BRED Banque Populaire and Banque Palatine.
- a project structure dedicated to the publication of sustainability reports and distributed to all Group entities;
- a process for consolidating all the information to be published in the sustainability report, including controls to ensure the consistency of the information published and the analyses;
- a complete body of documentation;
- a harmonized permanent control system, the organization of which is described in the following Section (GOV-5 1.4.4.2).
The internal control system defined by the Group contributes to the control of risks of all kinds and is governed by an umbrella charter – the Group Internal Control Charter – which stipulates that this system is designed, in particular, to ensure “[…] the reliability of financial and non-financial information reported both inside and outside the Group.”
The Group has defined and implemented a permanent control system to ensure the quality of this information, in accordance with the requirements defined by the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014 on internal control, or any other regulatory obligations relating to the quality of reports, and in particular for the publication of information on sustainability.
For the sustainability report, the internal control system must ensure compliance with the requirements defined by:
- the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD);
- the Group, in the framework for the preparation and publication of reports and management indicators, which aims to harmonize the reporting practices within the Group.
To ensure strict independence in the implementation of controls, the permanent control system is based annually on two levels of controls with:
- a first level exercised by all those involved in the production and reporting process. The following functions produced the information used for the sustainability report: Finance, Risk, Human Resources, Impact/CSR, Purchasing, Corporate Secretary’s Office and Governance;
- a second level is handled by independent units within the Risk, Compliance or Permanent Control functions. For the CSRD reporting, this work is coordinated by the Group Financial Control (Group Corporate Secretary’s Office) in conjunction with the other level two control players (risk).
The level one controls consist of self-checking and control procedures implemented by each unit or entity responsible for producing sustainability information.
They aim in particular to ensure compliance with the rules defined by the CSRD and by the Group in the framework for the preparation and publication of reports and management indicators.
The level one controls are carried out throughout the report production process. The definition and implementation of these controls is the responsibility of each function or entity in charge of production, throughout the chain of contributors to the CSRD sustainability report. The production processes have been documented internally.
The results of the controls are formalized by the units or entities responsible for producing the information relating to sustainability and they specify, where applicable, any anomalies identified and their remediation plans to resolve them over the long term.
- reconciliation with the financial statements, if applicable;
- analysis of changes;
- the quality of the data collected from external suppliers, where applicable;
- drafting of a documentary corpus describing the planned production process and first-level controls.
The level one controls are carried out either in the technical production chains or by the business lines, with particular attention paid to processes involving office automation and manual interventions.
In addition, and in accordance with the requirements of the CSRD regulations (MDR-M(1)), the methods and main assumptions underlying the indicators, as well as the associated limitations, have been documented internally and reproduced in the CSRD report to provide the reader with all the background information necessary to understand the published indicators. As this is the first year of application of the system related to the assessment of double materiality, the internal control process is under construction and will be strengthened in the coming years.
To ensure that the main reports published within the Group comply with all the requirements defined by the Group or by regulations, the Group has defined a method for assessing reports called the independent review of reports based on the implementation of strict criteria and carried out by independent functions.
This review, organized to ensure that the regulatory requirements are met, mainly aims to obtain an opinion or reasonable assurance that the reports are produced and published in a satisfactory internal control environment and that they include reliable and clear data that is useful and auditable.
Coordinated by the Group’s Corporate Secretary’s Office (Group Financial Control), this system is mainly carried out in four major phases:
- a risk assessment phase aiming to identify the indicators to be checked, to plan the controls and to include the system in an annual control plan N+1 (under PRISCOP(2)) validated by the Internal Control Coordination Committee. The risk assessment is carried out on all the indicators provided for in the publication of the sustainability report, based on the double materiality assessment, to identify gross risks, and on the internal procedures to assess the risk management system related to these indicators. The results of the assessment are based on three levels of risk (low, moderate and high) in order to select those that require a targeted review;
- an implementation phase of the level two controls carried out, according to the scoring method, via a grid of rated controls, in accordance with the rules set out in the permanent control framework document on a scale ranging from 1 (requirement not met) to 4 (requirement fully met):
- the quality of the documentation;
- the robustness of the organization relating to the production and publication of the report;
- the quality of the audit trail of the data and/or indicators included in the reporting;
- the effectiveness of the system of level one controls;
- the accuracy of the data and/or indicators published and their consistency with the information provided in other publications;
- the clarity of the information.
- a control review phase: the results of the controls are formalized and presented in a summary note, which presents the work carried out and the conclusions, specifying in particular the anomalies identified and, where applicable, the recommendations made (or action plans or corrective measures). The results are included, by criterion, in the Group’s permanent control tool (PRISCOP) and the conclusions are shared with the audited units, the external auditors (Statutory Auditors in particular) and with the supervisory body or its specialized bodies (the Audit and Investment Committee on the one hand, and the Cooperative and CSR Committee on the other hand);
- a phase of monitoring corrective actions (recommendations issued) and/or areas for improvement identified: this monitoring is carried out in conjunction with the business lines and after the publication of the Group’s sustainability report in order to strengthen the system for subsequent publications. Their implementation will also be monitored for the actions reported under PRISCOP by the Group entities subject to the publication of this report.
The environmental, social and governance risk management system is described in detail in Chapter 7, section 16 of the Universal Registration Document.
- physical risks arising from the impacts of extreme or chronic climate or environmental events (biodiversity, pollution, water, natural resources) related to the activities of Groupe BPCE or its counterparties;
- transition risks, arising from the impacts of the transition to a low-carbon economy, or to one with a lower environmental impact, regarding Groupe BPCE or its counterparties, including regulatory changes, technological developments, and the behavior of stakeholders (including consumers).
Social risks arise from the impacts of social factors on Groupe BPCE’s counterparties, including issues related to the rights, well-being and interests of individuals and stakeholders (the company’s workforce, workers in the value chain, communities concerned, consumers and end-users).
Governance risks arise from the impacts of governance factors on Groupe BPCE’s counterparties, including in particular issues related to ethics and corporate culture (governance structure, business integrity and transparency, etc.), supplier relationship management, influence activities and business practices.
The ESG Risk department coordinates the implementation of the ESG risk management system at Groupe BPCE level through a dedicated program. This program, initiated in 2021, was reviewed and strengthened during 2024 in line with Groupe BPCE’s climate and environmental commitments within the framework of the VISION 2030 strategic project and the regulatory requirements. It defines a multi-year action plan aligned with the action plan that implements the 2024-2026 strategic project. It is directly linked to the strategy and actions implemented by the Impact program. This program is monitored quarterly by the ESG Risk Committee, Groupe BPCE’s Supervisory Board and the European supervisor.
- ESG risk governance: committee procedures, roles and responsibilities, remuneration;
- strengthening risk knowledge: monitoring systems, sector analyses and assessments, risk reference framework, risk analysis methodologies and processes, data;
- operational integration of work: in coordination with the other functions of the Risk division, consideration of ESG risk factors in their respective management systems and decision-making processes;
- consolidated risk management mechanisms: dashboards, contributions to RAF / ICAAP / ILAAP, training and acculturation plan for directors, managers and employees, contribution to non-financial communication.
The execution of this program mobilizes the main internal stakeholders in terms of ESG risks, in particular the Sustainability Office, the teams and functions of the other departments of the Risk division, the Finance division and the Compliance department, as well as Groupe BPCE business lines, in particular the departments in charge of developing sustainable finance activities.
Based on specific ESG risk assessment methodologies, Groupe BPCE is gradually integrating ESG risk factors into its operational decisions through the existing systems in the bank’s main risk functions.
The process of identifying and assessing climate risks and the associated action plans are described in Chapter E1 - Climate change (in Sections 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.3.4 respectively).
Reputational and/or litigation and liability risks have been identified as material in the chapters Climate change, Workers in the value chain, Affected communities and Consumers and end-users, and are covered by the following sections:
The growing awareness and sensitivity of citizens and economic players to environmental, social and governance issues is leading to increased exposure to reputational risks related to these topics.
Faced with these risks, Groupe BPCE relies on a reputational risk management system overseen by Groupe BPCE Risk division and structured around the Group Reputation Risk Committee, which is tasked with reviewing the most sensitive issues at Groupe BPCE level.
This system is based on the measures implemented in the decision-making processes in order to assess reputational risks and implement mitigation measures if necessary. This concerns in particular:
- the responsible purchasing policy, which requires knowledge and assessment of suppliers’ ESG risks, and the implementation of a carbon clause in supplier contracts since 2024;
- the new products/new activities (NPNA) system concerning the characteristics and communication related to Groupe BPCE’s products and activities, which includes a systematic opinion from the ESG Risk department and the Impact department;
- the application of sector CSR policies as part of the new relationship, credit and investment processes.
Given the particular sensitivity of its activities to reputational risks, a dedicated system is deployed by Natixis. This system is based in particular on an assessment of the reputational risk arising from Natixis CIB’s customers, from inception and throughout the business relationship, including the management of controversies. It is carried out in the normal course of business and, to the extent possible, using the various existing governance mechanisms and committees. A reporting process also makes it possible to report all the files likely to generate a significant risk of damage to the reputation of Natixis and/or Groupe BPCE, composed of members of the entity’s Executive Management.
In addition, a system for monitoring the Group’s ESG reputation has been set up, conducting monthly monitoring of the main controversies related to ESG issues that have involved Groupe BPCE and their impact on its overall reputation score. This monitoring is presented quarterly to the ESG Risk Committee.
Groupe BPCE plans to continue to enhance these systems in the course of 2025, in particular by defining a framework for monitoring voluntary commitments and strengthening its reputational risk management system.
The environmental, social and governance issues are likely to lead to litigation risks for Groupe BPCE. These can be based on legal foundations specific to the ESG issues (Duty of Care, international treaties or European legislation on the climate and the environment), on broader principles applied in this context (competition law, consumer law, criminal law), or unilateral commitments made by Groupe BPCE.
Groupe BPCE has identified and integrated into its operational risk mapping three main litigation and liability risk situations specifically related to ESG issues:
- communication using the ecological/sustainable argument in a misleading manner (greenwashing);
- non-compliance with the voluntary commitments made by Groupe BPCE or voluntary commitments deemed insufficient;
- controversial activities of Groupe BPCE or its entities, customers and/or suppliers.
As for the reputational risks, the risk management relating to these three situations is based on a set of measures integrated into the Group’s main decision-making processes.
In addition, Groupe BPCE’s Legal department also defines and disseminates best practices in terms of communication on climate and environmental issues and supports Groupe BPCE’s business lines and functions in their implementation regarding internal and external communication.
The table below maps the information concerning the due diligence procedure included in Groupe BPCE’s sustainability report.
Core elements of due diligence | Sections in the statement relating to sustainability | ||
a) | Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model. | 1.3.1.1 / 1.3.1.2 / 1.4.2 | |
b) | Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the reasonable due diligence. | 1.3.2 | |
c) | Identifying and assessing adverse impacts. | 1.5.1 / 2.2.2.1 | |
d) | Taking actions to address those adverse impacts. | 2.2.3.1 / 2.2.3.4 / 3.2.3.3 / 3.2.3.4 / 3.4.3.3 / 3.4.3.4 | |
e) | Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating. | 2.2.3.10 / 2.2.4.1 / 3.2.4.1 / 3.4.4.1 |
1.5 Impacts, risks and opportunities management
1.5.1.1 IRO-1 - DESCRIPTION OF THE IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES PROCESS
The double materiality exercise is the starting point for the preparation of the sustainability report.
Double materiality has two dimensions: i) materiality from an impact point of view and ii) materiality from a financial point of view.
The impacts, risks and opportunities which are identified as material represent the material matters on which the content of the sustainability report is based.
- identification of impacts, risks and opportunities relevant to Groupe BPCE’s business and its entire value chain;
- assessment of the materiality of these impacts, risks and opportunities.
The IRO identification was carried out by topic and sub-topic according to the ESRS 1 requirements (AR 16):
- topics and sub-topics: the topics and sub-topics identification was carried out by mobilizing internal sources, such as the ESG matters identified in Groupe BPCE’s 2022 and 2023 NFPS reports, the reasonable due diligence process put in place by the Group as part of the Duty of Care plan and the existing risks mapping, supplemented by external sources, such as the analysis of a business sectors benchmark, with a focus on the most relevant matters for banking players. Following this identification of an initial list of topics and sub-topics, additional work was carried out to align with CSRD requirements. This alignment was carried out in two stages through workshops involving in-house business experts to (i) validate the list of topics and sub-topics according to these experts, and (ii) reconcile ESG issues with ESRS themes for the E, S and G components (AR 16 of ESRS 1). This work was carried out with the business lines in charge of the ESRS topics and sub-topics, drawing on the expertise of the employees of these teams;
- Impacts, Risks and Opportunities (IRO): work to identify the IRO within each theme was carried out in order to cover both impact materiality and financial materiality. Several internal and external sources were used to identify IROs;
- the relevance of each IRO was verified with the business lines concerned to ensure that the listed IRO effectively reflected a Risk, Opportunity or Impact for Groupe BPCE, to qualify the Impacts as positive or negative for the same sub-topic and to avoid duplication between similar IRO.
- a. positioning each IRO in Groupe BPCE’s value chain, i.e. upstream of its own activities, or downstream;
- b. defining the potential or actual nature of the negative and positive impacts.
Process for identifying and assessing impacts, risks and opportunities related to E2-Pollution, E3-Water and marine resources, E4-Biodiversity, E5-Resource use and circular economy.
The process of identifying the impacts of environmental matters, excluding climate change, at Groupe BPCE level was carried out across the entire value chain. Impacts have been identified on own operations as well as financing and asset management operations.
The rating of these impacts was conducted according to experts. As far as financing and asset management activities are concerned, the rating was carried out by experts based in particular on a business sectors analysis of Groupe BPCE’s exposures by the Group ESG Risk division as part of the scale assessment. This rating was strengthened by the mobilization of the Group’s stakeholders’ views.
The process of identifying and assessing environmental risks, excluding climate, is part of the same system as assessing the materiality of climate and environmental risks set up by Groupe BPCE.
With regard to opportunities, the identification and assessment process was carried out by experts taking into account economic changes related to environmental issues, excluding climate change, and Groupe BPCE’s outlook to adapt its banking, insurer and investor business models.
The activities of Groupe BPCE and its entire upstream and downstream value chain were taken into account in the double materiality assessment. In light of Groupe BPCE’s business sector specific nature, the following guidelines have been adopted:
- a. map its activities and the stakeholders in the value chain to identify which stakeholders are in risky areas;
- b. carry out an analysis by major stakeholders families: customers, suppliers, subcontractors, etc...;
- c. enlarge this analysis beyond first-level and direct business relationships: the business lines took into consideration, in addition to the major families of direct stakeholders in the value chain, the entire environment surrounding them, in particular through sectors analysis.
The identification of IROs was coordinated by and under the joint responsibility of Groupe BPCE’s Finance department, Financial Communication department and Impact department. The Retail Banking, Insurance, Architecture and Reporting, Risks, Purchasing, and Human Resources teams helped formalize and assess these IROs.
Following this first stage, among all the IROs identified as relevant, the impacts, risks and opportunities rating led to designate those that are material from an impact point of view or from a financial point of view, which are presented in this sustainability report.
The ESRS impose criteria for assessing the materiality of IROs. These criteria may be different depending on whether one is related to an impact (negative or positive), a risk or an opportunity.
-
The negative impacts are rated according to two dimensions:
- i. likelihood this involves assessing the probability that Groupe BPCE will have a negative impact on the subject identified;
-
ii. severity composed of:
- Scale: the severity of the negative impact on people or the environment,
- Scope: the scope of the negative impacts. In the case of an environmental impact, the extent may refer to the extent of the damage caused to the environment or a geographic area. In the case of impacts on the population, the extent may refer to the number of people affected by the impact,
- Irremediable character: assessing whether, and to what extent, the negative impacts can be remediated.
Note : In the event of a potential negative impact on human rights, the severity of the impact takes precedence over its likelihood.
-
The positive impacts are rated according to three dimensions:
- i. likelihood: this involves assessing the probability that Groupe BPCE will have a positive impact on the subject identified;
- ii. scale: the beneficial effect of the impact on people or the environment;
- iii. scope: the extent of the impact (e.g. geographical or demographic).
-
The risks and opportunities are rated according to two dimensions:
- i. likelihood of occurrence: probability of the risk or opportunity occurring;
- ii. scale of the financial impact: measurement of the potential financial effects.
All IROs have been rated in gross terms, meaning without taking into account the action plans implemented by the group to prevent, mitigate, or remedy them.
Rating scales are not prescribed by the ESRS. They have been defined by and for Groupe BPCE. Each rating criterion was assessed on a scale from 1 to 4.
Materiality threshold refers to the score or rating based on which impacts, risks and opportunities are material.
As part of the harmonization of the rating scales defined for the criteria, a rating scale has also been defined for the rating level of impacts, risks and opportunities.
An impact, risk or opportunity is material when the rating level is greater than or equal to 3, corresponding to a high or very high level.
The Sustainability Office established the methodology for rating impacts, risks and opportunities on behalf of the Group. It also coordinated and supervised the IRO rating work on behalf of the Group.
Groupe BPCE’s Sustainability Office proposed the methodological approach for rating IROs as part of the CSRD Project.
Workshops were held with the institutions (Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne) as well as with the global business lines and BPCE Assurances to discuss structuring options for the rating of IROs and to co-construct a common approach.
A Group operating procedure was prepared and shared with the representatives of the institutions (Banques Populaires, Caisses d’Epargne, BPCE) as well as with the subsidiaries.
Several functional departments were called upon as part of the rating of the IROs. These notably include:
- the Purchasing department;
- the Compliance department;
- the Sustainability Office ;
- the Human Resources department;
- the ESG Risk department;
- the Operational Risk department;
- the Technology and Operations department.
The rating of the environmental impacts in connection with financing and investments was carried out, according to experts, by the Sustainability Office, Retail Banking, BPCE Assurances and Natixis based on a business sectors analysis of Groupe BPCE’s exposures carried out by the Group Risk department as part of the assessment of the scale. This analysis focuses on the impact of 26 business sectors on various environmental matters (mitigation and adaptation to climate change, pollution, biodiversity, water and marine resources and the circular economy). A three-level scale is applied to each business sector depending on the criticality of its impact on each environmental matter:
This information is used to score the “Scale” criterion of the negative impacts identified by Groupe BPCE:
- No or very little impact when exposure to “strong impact” sectors is between 0% and 15%;
- Significant: when exposure to “strong impact” sectors is between 15% and 50%;
- High: when exposure to “strong impact” sectors is between 50% and 75%;
- Very high: when the exposure to “strong impact” sectors exceeds 75%.
This rating was subject to additional reviews by experts in order to streamline the quantitative analysis and to cover all of the Group’s exposures, taking into account:
- the scope of the environmental impacts of other sectors beyond the 26 business sectors analyzed by the ESG Risk department;
- additional exposures to those obtained by the ESG Risk Department (exposures to individual retail, the public sector and exposures to financial institutions).
The other criteria, scope, irremediable character and likelihood were assessed on an expert basis taking into account the rating scales defined for all impacts.
The rating of environmental risks was carried out by the ESG Risk department on the basis of the materiality assessment of climate and environmental risks conducted annually by Groupe BPCE since 2021. The latter aims to qualify the materiality of climate and environmental, physical or transition, short-, medium- and long-term risks in relation to the “traditional” risks to which Groupe BPCE is exposed (according to the risk taxonomy defined within Groupe BPCE’s Risk Appetite Framework, e.g. credit risk, market risk, operational risk, etc.). This rating of environmental risks was based on an analysis of the impact of 26 business sectors regarding various environmental matters (mitigation and adaptation to climate change, pollution, biodiversity, water and marine resources and the circular economy).
This annual process is based on scientific knowledge (scenarios, assessment tools) and knowledge bases (e.g. Business Environment Scan), internal measures and indicators available at the date of completion of the exercise, as well as the expertise of all internal parties involved in the risk management system (LOD1 or LOD2). The assessments are carried out on the gross risk. This annual review is part of the continuous improvement of the underlying processes and methods.
As part of the assessment of the financial materiality of the CSRD risks, the assessment of the materiality of climate and environmental risks was cross-referenced with the materiality assessment of each of the “traditional” risks. This assessment is carried out annually as part of the work on the Risk Appetite Framework in order to obtain an assessment of the intrinsic materiality for each IRO on the same criteria as the other IROs (likelihood of occurrence / scale of impact), to ensure consistency between the different exercises. An expert’s overall consistency check was carried out to validate the materiality levels obtained.
To date, Groupe BPCE’s rating of environmental risks (biodiversity, water, pollution and circular economy) has been applied uniformly to all these environmental topics. The work undertaken by Groupe BPCE to strengthen the climate and environmental risk management system will gradually refine this analysis.
- representatives of the business lines concerned by each topic, subtopic and each Purchasing, Human Resources, Operational Risks IRO, etc.;
- sponsors of the institutions (4 Banques Populaires, 4 Caisses d’Epargne);
- the ESG Risk department;
- the CSR representatives of the global business lines, BPCE Assurances, Banque Palatine, BRED Banque Populaire, Crédit Coopératif, FSE and Digital & Payments;
- the Group Sustainability Office.
Although the consultation of stakeholders is not mandatory as part of the double materiality exercise, Groupe BPCE has deemed it important to specifically consult some of its stakeholders within the limits of this first exercise in addition to the existing permanent listening systems (see 1.3.2 - SBM-2). The ad hoc systems deployed concern customers, suppliers and cooperative shareholders and more than 300 members of the Group’s company boards.
In accordance with the CSRD transposed into French law, the sustainability report is prepared annually. As a result, and as specified by EFRAG in its guidance on double materiality, Groupe BPCE must determine the list of material IROs every year. If Groupe BPCE concludes, on the basis of audit evidence, that the results of the double materiality exercise for the previous year are still relevant at the reporting date, it may use the conclusions obtained previously for the preparation of the sustainability report.
Each year, Groupe BPCE will verify the elements that may trigger a revision of the list of material IRO, for example, a major merger and acquisition transaction leading to a new activity, an entry into a new sector or a significant change in operations, a global event (pandemic, natural disaster, etc.), a change in scientific evidence that could affect the severity criteria.
Environment CLIMATE CHANGE (ESRS E1)
|
Social OWN WORKFORCE (ESRS S1)
|
WORKERS IN THE VALUE CHAIN (ESRS S2)
|
AFFECTED COMMUNITIES (ESRS S3)
|
CONSUMERS AND END-USERS (ESRS S4)
|
Governance BUSINESS CONDUCT (ESRS G1)
|
1.5.2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
The material impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO) resulting from the double materiality assessment are listed in Section 1.5.1.1 (IRO-1). This description makes it possible to identify where in its business model, its own activities or its value chain these material IRO are concentrated.
The business model, value chain and integration of sustainability matters into Groupe BPCE’s strategy are detailed in Section 1.3.1.2 (SBM-1).
The interactions between these material impacts, risks and opportunities, the Group’s business model and its strategy embodied by the VISION 2030 strategic project, as well as the way in which positive or negative material impacts affect the company (customers, regional players or employees) or the environment are presented within each topical ESRS.
In the absence of established practices for financial institutions, are not published in respect of the 2024 fiscal year the financial effects relating to:
- material risks and opportunities of the company on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows;
- material risks and opportunities for which there is a risk of a significant adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities included in the financial statements during the next annual period.
With respect to climate risks, Groupe BPCE analyzes the resilience of its business model across its three activities (financing, insurance, asset management) through climate stress tests as part of the self-assessment process of its capital (ICAAP) and liquidity (ILAAP) adequacy with regard to the risks it may face. This analysis is presented in Chapter E1 - Climate change (Section 2.2.3.2.1).
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Board’s gender diversity, Section 21, point (d) | Indicator No. 13, Table 1, Annex I | Annex II of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816(5) | 1.4.1.1 | ||
Percentage of board members who are independent, Section 21, point (e) | Annex II of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | 1.4.1.1 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Statement on due diligence, Section 30 | Indicator No. 10, Table 3, Annex I | 1.4.5 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities, Section 40, point (d) (i) | Indicator No. 4, Table 1, Annex I | Article 449 bis of Regulation (EU) 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453(6), Table 1: Qualitative information on environmental risk and Table 2: Qualitative information on social risk | Annex II of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | Not applicable | |
Involvement in activities related to chemical production, Section 40, point (d) (ii) | Indicator No. 9, Table 2, Annex I | Annex II of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | Not applicable | ||
Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons, Section 40 (d) (iii) | Indicator No. 14, Table 1, Annex I | Article 12 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (7), Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | Not applicable | ||
Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco, Section 40, point (d) (iv) |
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II. |
Not applicable |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050, Section 14 | Article 2 (1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 | 2.2.3.1 | |||
Undertakings excluded from Paris Agreement-aligned Benchmarks, Section 16, point (g) |
Article 449 bis Regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 1: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, issues and residual maturity |
Article 12 (1) (d) to (g) and Article 12 (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 | Not applicable |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
GHG emission reduction targets, Section 34 | Indicator No. 4, Table 2, Annex I |
Article 449 bis Regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 3: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: alignment indicators |
Article 6 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 | 2.2.4.1 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors), Section 38 | Indicator No. 5, Table 1, and Indicator No. 5, Table 2, Annex I | Not relevant | |||
Energy consumption and mix, Section 37 | Indicator No. 5, Table 1, Annex I | Not relevant | |||
Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors, Sections 40 to 43 | Indicator No. 6, Table 1, Annex I | Not relevant |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions, Section 44 | Indicators No. 1 and No. 2, Table 1, Annex I |
Article 449 bis of Regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 1: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, issues and residual maturity |
Article 5 (1), Article 6 and Article 8 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 | 2.2.4.2 | |
Gross GHG emissions intensity, Sections 53 to 55 | Indicator No. 3, Table 1, Annex I |
Article 449 bis of Regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 3: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: alignment indicators |
Article 8 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 | Not relevant |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
GHG removals and carbon credits, Section 56 | Article 2 (1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 | Not relevant |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks, Section 66 |
Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 |
Phase-in | |||
Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk, Section 66, point (a) Location of significant assets at material physical risk, Section 66, point (c) |
Article 449 bis of Regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, paragraphs 46 and 47, Template 5: Banking book - Climate-related physical risks: exposures subject to a physical risk |
Phase-in | |||
Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy-efficiency classes, Section 67, point (c) |
Article 449 bis of Regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, paragraph 34, Template 2: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Loans secured by real estate assets - Energy efficiency of collateral |
Phase-in | |||
Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities, Section 69 | Annex II of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 | Phase-in |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the E-PRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) emitted to air, water and soil, Section 28 |
Indicator No. 8, Table 1, Annex I; Indicator No. 2, Table 2, Annex I; Indicator No. 1, Table 2, Annex I; Indicator No. 3, Table 2, Annex I |
Not material |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Water and marine resources, Section 9 | Indicator No. 7, Table 2, Annex I | Not material | |||
ESRS E3-1 Dedicated policy Section 13 |
Indicator No. 8, Table 2, Annex I | ||||
ESRS E3-1 Sustainable oceans and seas, Section 14 |
Indicator No. 12, Table 2, Annex I | Not material |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Total water recycled and reused, Section 28, point (c) | Indicator No. 6.2, Table 2, Annex I | Not material | |||
Total water consumption in m3 per net revenue on own operations, Section 29 | Indicator No. 6.1, Table 2, Annex I | Not material |
Disclosure requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Section 16, point (a) i | Indicator No. 7, Table 1, Annex I | Not material | |||
Section 16, point (b) | Indicator No. 10, Table 2, Annex I | Not material | |||
Section 16, point (c) | Indicator No. 14, Table 2, Annex I | Not material |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies, Section 24, point (b) | Indicator No. 11, Table 2, Annex I | Not material | |||
Sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies, Section 24, point (c) | Indicator No. 12, Table 2, Annex I | Not material | |||
Policies to address deforestation, Section 24, point (d) | Indicator No. 15, Table 2, Annex I | Not material |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Non-recycled waste, Section 37, point (d) | Indicator No. 13, Table 2, Annex I | Not material | |||
Hazardous waste and radioactive waste, Section 39 | Indicator No. 9, Table 1, Annex I | Not material |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Risk of incidents of forced labor, Section 14, point (f) | Indicator No. 13, Table 3, Annex I | 3.1.3.4.1 | |||
Risk of incidents of child labor, Section 14, point (g) | Indicator No. 12, Table 3, Annex I | 3.1.3.4.1 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Human rights policy commitments, Section 20 | Indicator No. 9, Table 3, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I | 3.1.3.1.1 | |||
Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organization Conventions 1 to 8, Section 21 | Annex II of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 |
3.1.3.1.1 3.1.3.1.2 3.1.3.4.1 |
|||
Processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings, Section 22 | Indicator No. 11, Table 3, Annex I |
3.1.3.1.1 3.1.3.4.1 |
|||
Workplace accident prevention policy or management system, Section 23 | Indicator No. 1, Table 3, Annex I | 3.1.3.1.2 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Grievance/complaints handling mechanisms, Section 32, point (c) | Indicator No. 5, Table 3, Annex I | 3.1.3.3.1 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents, Section 88, points (b) and (c) | Indicator No. 2, Table 3, Annex I | Annex II of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | 3.1.5.10 | ||
Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness, Section 88, point (e) | Indicator No. 3, Table 3, Annex I | 3.1.5.10 |
Disclosure Requirement and related
data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Unadjusted gender pay gap, Section 97, point (a) | Indicator No. 12, Table 1, Annex I | Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | 3.1.5.12 | ||
Excessive CEO pay ratio, Section 97, point (b) | Indicator No. 8, Table 3, Annex I | 3.1.5.12 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Incidents of discrimination, Section 103, point (a) | Indicator No. 7, Table 3, Annex I | Not relevant | |||
Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines, Section 104, point (a) | Indicator No. 10, Table 1, and Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I | Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Article 12 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 | Not relevant |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Significant risk of child labor or forced labor in the value chain, Section 11, point (b) |
Indicators No. 12 and No. 13, Table 3, Annex I |
3.2.2 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Human rights policy commitments, Section 17 | Indicator No. 9, Table 3, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I | 3.2.3.1 | |||
Policies related to value chain workers, Section 18 | Indicators No. 11 and No. 4, Table 3, Annex I | 3.2.3.1 | |||
Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines, Section 19 | Indicator No. 10, Table 1, Annex I | Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Article 12 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 | Not relevant | ||
Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organization Conventions 1 to 8, Section 19 | Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | 3.2.3.4 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Human rights issues and incidents* connected to its upstream and downstream value chain, Section 36 | Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I | Not relevant |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Human rights policy commitments, Section 16 |
Indicator No. 9, Table 3, Annex I, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I |
3.3.2 | |||
Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles or OECD guidelines, Section 17 | Indicator No. 10, Table 1, Annex I | Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Article 12 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/ 1818 | Not relevant |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Human rights issues and incidents, Section 36 | Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I | 3.3.3.1.3 |
Disclosure Requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Policies related to consumers and end-users, Section 16 | Indicator No. 9, Table 3, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I | 3.4.3.1 | |||
Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines, Section 17 | Indicator No. 10, Table 1, Annex I | Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Article 12 (1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/ 1818 | Not relevant |
Disclosure requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Human rights issues and incidents, Section 35 | Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I | 3.4.3.3 |
Disclosure requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
United Nations Convention against Corruption, Section 10, point (b) | Indicator No. 15, Table 3, Annex I | 4.1.1.5.1 | |||
Protection of whistle-blowers, Section 10, point (d) | Indicator No. 6, Table 3, Annex I | 4.1.1.3.3 |
Disclosure requirement and related data point |
SFDR reference(1) | Pillar III reference(2) |
Benchmark indices regulation reference(3) |
EU European law on climate(4) |
Report section |
Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, Section 24, point (a) | Indicator No. 17, Table 3, Annex I | Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 | 4.1.2.1 | ||
Standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery, Section 24, point (b) | Indicator No. 16, Table 3, Annex I | 4.1.2.1 |
- Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 27, 2019 on sustainability reporting in the financial services sector (OJ L 317, December 9, 2019, p. 1).
- Regulation (EU) 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 26, 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) 648/2012 (Capital Requirements Regulation - CRR) (OJ L 176, June 27, 2013, p. 1).
- Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 8, 2016 on the indices used as benchmarks for financial instruments and contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2014/17/EU and Regulation (EU) 596/2014 (OJ L 171, June 29, 2016, p. 1).
ESRS | Disclosure Requirement | References in the sustainability statement | Page |
ESRS 2 | BP-1 — General basis for the preparation of sustainability statements | 1.1.1 BP 1 - General basis for the preparation of sustainability statements | 50 |
BP 2 — Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | 1.1.2 BP 2 - Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | 51 | |
GOV-1 — The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | 1.4.1 GOV-1 - The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | 67 | |
GOV 2 — Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies | 1.4.2 GOV 2 - Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies | 69 | |
GOV-3 — Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | 1.4.3 GOV-3 - Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | 73 | |
GOV 4 — Statement on due diligence | 1.4.5 GOV 4 - Statement on due diligence | 77 | |
GOV 5 — Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting | 1.4.4 GOV 5 - Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting | 73 | |
SBM-1 — Strategy, business model and value chain | 1.3.1 SBM 1 - Strategy, business model and value chain | 55 | |
SBM 2 — Interests and views of stakeholders | 1.3.2 SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders | 65 | |
SBM 3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | 1.5.2 SBM 3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | 87 | |
IRO-1 — Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | 1.5.1 IRO-1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | 78 | |
IRO-2 — Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statements | 1.5.3 IRO-2 - Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statements | 87 | |
ESRS E1 | ESRS 2 GOV-3 — Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | 1.4.3 GOV-3 - Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | 73 |
E1-1 — Transition plan for climate change mitigation | 2.2.3.1 (E1-1) Transition plan for climate change mitigation | 111 | |
ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | 2.2.3.2 (ESRS 2 SBM-3) Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | 125 | |
ESRS 2 IRO-1 — Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities | 2.2.2.1 (ESRS 2 - IRO-1) Description of processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities | 106 | |
E1-2 — Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | 2.2.3.3 (E1-2) Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | 126 | |
E1-3 — Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies | 2.2.3.4 (E1-3) Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies | 127 | |
E1-4 — Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | 2.2.4.1 (E1-4) Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | 134 | |
E1-6 — Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions | 2.2.4.2 (E1-6) Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions | 140 | |
ESRS S1 | ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders | 3.1.1 SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders | 144 |
ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | 3.1.2 Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | 144 | |
S1-1 — Policies related to own workforce | 3.1.3.1 (S1-1) Policies related to own workforce | 145 | |
S1-2 — Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers’ representatives about impacts | 3.1.3.2 (S1-2) Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers’ representatives about impacts | 153 | |
S1-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns | 3.1.3.3 (S1-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns | 156 | |
S1-4 — Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and the effectiveness of those actions | 3.1.3.4 (S1-4) Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and the effectiveness of those actions | 158 | |
S1-5 — Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | 3.1.4.1 (S1- 5) Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | 163 | |
S1-6 — Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees | 3.1.5.2 (S1-6) Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees | 167 | |
S1-7 — Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce | 3.1.5.3 (S1-7) Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce | 170 | |
S1-8 — Collective bargaining coverage and social dialog | 3.1.5.4 (S1-8) Collective bargaining coverage and social dialog | 170 | |
S1-9 — Diversity metrics | 3.1.5.5 (S1-9) Diversity metrics | 171 | |
S1-10 — Adequate wages | 3.1.5.6 (S1-10) Adequate wages | 172 | |
S1-11 — Social protection | 3.1.5.7 (S1-11) Social protection | 172 | |
S1-12 — Persons with disabilities | 3.1.5.8 (S1-12) Persons with disabilities | 173 | |
S1-13 — Training and skills development metrics | 3.1.5.9 (S1-13) Training and skills development metrics | 173 | |
S1-14 — Health and safety metrics | 3.1.5.10 (S1-14) Health and safety metrics | 174 | |
S1-15 — Work-life balance metrics | 3.1.5.11 (S1-15) Work-life balance metrics | 176 | |
S1-16 — Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration) | 3.1.5.12 (S1-16) Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration) | 177 | |
S1-17 — Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts | 3.1.5.13 (S1-17) Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts | 178 | |
ESRS S2 | ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders | 1.3.2 SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders | 181 |
ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | 3.2.1.2 (ESRS 2 SBM-3) Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | 181 | |
S2-1 — Policies related to value chain workers | 3.2.3.1 (S2-1) Policies related to value chain workers | 182 | |
S2-2 — Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts | 3.2.3.2 (S2-2) Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts | 184 | |
S2-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns | 3.2.3.3 (S2-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns | 185 | |
S2-4 — Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions | 3.2.3.4 (S2-4) Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions | 187 | |
S2-5 — Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | 3.2.4.1 (S2-5) Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | 189 | |
ESRS S3 | ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders | ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders | 191 |
ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | 191 | |
S3-1 — Policies related to affected communities | 3.3.3.1.1/ 3.3.3.2.1 (S3-1) Policies related to affected communities | 192/196 | |
S3-2 — Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts | 3.3.3.1.2/ 3.3.3.2.2 (S3-2) Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts | 192/197 | |
S3-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns | 3.3.3.1.3/ 3.3.3.2.3 (S3-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns | 192/197 | |
S3-4 — Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions | 3.3.3.1.4/ 3.3.3.2.4 (S3-4) Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions | 193/198 | |
S3-5 — Targets related to the management of material negative impacts, the development of positive impacts, and the management of material risks and opportunities | 3.3.4.1/ 3.3.4.2 (S3-5) Targets related to the management of material negative impacts, the development of positive impacts, and the management of material risks and opportunities | 200 | |
ESRS S4 | ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders | 3.4.1 SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders | 201 |
ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | 3.4.2 (ESRS 2 SBM-3) Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model | 201 | |
S4-1 —Policies related to consumers and end-users | 3.4.3.1 (S4-1) Policies related to consumers and end-users | 203 | |
S4-2 — Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts | 3.4.3.2 (S4-2) Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts | 208 | |
S4-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns | 3.4.3.3 (S4-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns | 210 | |
S4-4 — Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions | 3.4.3.4 (S4-4) Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions | 212 | |
S4-5 — Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | 3.4.4.1 (S4-5) Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | 216 | |
ESRS G1 | ESRS 2 GOV-1 — The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | 4.1.1.1 (ESRS 2 - GOV-1) The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | 218 |
ESRS 2 IRO-1 — Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | 4.1.1.2 (IRO-1) Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | 218 | |
G1-1 — Corporate culture and business conduct policies | 4.1.1.3 (G1-1)Corporate culture and business conduct policies | 218 | |
G1-2 — Management of relationships with suppliers | 4.1.1.4 (G1-2) Management of relationships with suppliers | 221 | |
G1-3 — Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery | 4.1.1.5 (G1-3) Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery | 223 | |
G1-4 — Incidents of corruption or bribery | 4.1.2.1 (G1-4) Incidents of corruption or bribery | 226 |
2.2 Statutory Auditors’ report on the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report
Report on the certification of sustainability information and verification of the disclosure requirements under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of Groupe BPCE
This is a translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the certification of sustainability information and verification of the disclosure requirements under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the Company issued in French and it is provided solely for the convenience of English speaking users.
This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and the H2A guidelines on “Limited assurance engagement - Certification of sustainability reporting and verification of disclosure requirements set out in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852”.
This report is issued in our capacity as statutory auditor of Groupe BPCE. It covers the sustainability information and the information required by Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, relating to the year ended December 31, 2024 and included in the group management report and disclosed in section 2.1 “Groupe BPCE Sustainability report” in the chapter 2 of the universal registration document (below the “Groupe BPCE Sustainability report”).
Pursuant to Article L. 233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, Groupe BPCE is required to include the above mentioned information in a separate section of the group management report. This information has been prepared in the context of the first time application of the aforementioned articles, a context characterized by uncertainties regarding the interpretation of the laws and regulations, the use of significant estimates, the absence of established practices and frameworks in particular for the double-materiality assessment, and an evolving internal control system. It enables an understanding of the impact of the activity of the group on sustainability matters, as well as the way in which these matters influence the development of the business of the group, its performance and position. Sustainability matters include environmental, social and corporate governance matters.
Pursuant to Article L.821-54 paragraph II of the aforementioned Code our responsibility is to carry out the procedures necessary to issue a conclusion, expressing limited assurance, on:
- compliance with the sustainability reporting standards adopted pursuant to Article 29 b of Directive (EU) 2013/34 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 (hereinafter ESRS for European Sustainability Reporting Standards) of the process implemented by Groupe BPCE to determine the information reported, and compliance with the requirement to consult the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the French Labour Code;
- compliance of the sustainability information included in the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report with the requirements of Article L. 233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, including ESRS; and
- compliance with the reporting requirements set out in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
This engagement is carried out in compliance with the ethical rules, including independence, and quality control rules prescribed by the French Commercial Code.
It is also governed by the H2A guidelines on “Limited assurance engagement - Certification of sustainability reporting and verification of disclosure requirements set out in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852”.
In the three separate sections of the report that follow, we present, for each of the sections of our engagement, the nature of the procedures that we carried out, the conclusions that we drew from these procedures and, in support of these conclusions, the elements to which we paid particular attention and the procedures that we carried out with regard to these elements. We draw your attention to the fact that we do not express a conclusion on any of these elements taken individually and that the procedures described should be considered in the overall context of the formation of the conclusions issued in respect of each of the three sections of our engagement.
Finally, where deemed necessary to draw your attention to one or more disclosures of sustainability information provided by Groupe BPCE in the group management report, we have included an emphasis of matter paragraph hereafter.
As the purpose of our engagement is to express limited assurance, the nature (choice of techniques), extent (scope) and timing of the procedures are less than those required to obtain reasonable assurance.
Furthermore, this engagement does not provide guarantee regarding the viability or the quality of the management of Groupe BPCE, in particular it does not provide an assessment, of the relevance of the choices made by Groupe BPCE in terms of action plans, targets, policies, scenario analyses and transition plans, which would go beyond compliance with the ESRS reporting requirements.
It does, however, allow us to express conclusions regarding the entity’s process for determining the sustainability information to be reported, the sustainability information itself, and the information reported pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, as to the absence of identification or, on the contrary, the identification of errors, omissions or inconsistencies of such importance that they would be likely to influence the decisions that readers of the information subject to this engagement might make.
Any comparative information that would be included in the group management report are not covered by our engagement.
Compliance with the ESRS of the process implemented by Groupe BPCE to determine the information reported, and compliance with the requirement to consult the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the French Labour Code
- the process defined and implemented by Groupe BPCE has enabled it, in accordance with the ESRS, to identify and assess its impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters, and to identify the material impacts, risks and opportunities, that lead to the publication of information disclosed in the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report, and
- the information provided on this process also complies with the ESRS.
On the basis of the procedures we have carried out, we have not identified any material errors, omissions or inconsistencies regarding the compliance of the process implemented by Groupe BPCE with the ESRS.
Concerning the consultation of the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the French Labour Code we inform you that as of the date of this report, this consultation has not yet been held.
Without qualifying the conclusion expressed above, we draw your attention to the information provided in the note 1.1.2.3 “Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty” which underlines the uncertainty and limitations related to the methodologies used to perform the double materiality analysis regarding the thematic standards E2, E3, E4 and E5 (pollution, water and marine resources, biodiversity and ecosystems, and resource use and circular economy) for the year 2024.
We set out below the elements that have been the subject of particular attention in relation to our assessment of compliance with the ESRS of the process implemented by Groupe BPCE to determine the information reported.
Information on the identification of stakeholders is set out in the note 1.3.2 “SBM2 – Interests and views of stakeholders” of the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report.
We interviewed management and others within the entity as appropriate and inspected available documentation.
We also assessed the consistency of the primary stakeholders identified by Groupe BPCE in view of the nature of its activities and its geographical location, taking into account its business relationships, its cooperative dimension and value chain.
Information on the identification of impacts, risks and opportunities is provided in the note 1.5.1.1 “IRO-1 – Description of the identification and assessment of material impacts” of the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report.
- We obtained an understanding of the process implemented by the entity to identify actual or potential impacts – both negative and positive – risks and opportunities (IROs), in relation to the sustainability matters mentioned in paragraph AR 16 of ESRS 1, “Application requirements”, and where applicable, those specific to Groupe BPCE, as presented in the above cited note.
In particular, we assessed the approach taken by the entity to determine its impacts and dependencies, which may be a source of risks or opportunities, including the dialogue undertaken, where appropriate, with stakeholders.
We obtained an understanding of the group’s mapping of identified IROs, including a description of their distribution within the group’s own operations and its value chain, as well as their time horizon (short, medium or long term), and assessed the consistency of this mapping with our knowledge of Groupe BPCE and, where applicable, with the risk analyses conducted by Groupe BPCE.
Information on the assessment of impact materiality and financial materiality is provided in the note 1.5.1.1 “IRO-1 – Description of the identification and assessment of material impacts” the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report.
Through interviews with management and inspection of available documentation, we obtained an understanding of the process implemented by the entity to assess impact materiality and financial materiality, and assessed its compliance with the criteria defined in ESRS 1.
In particular, we assessed the way in which the entity established and applied the materiality criteria defined in ESRS 1, including those relating to the setting of thresholds, in order to determine the following material information reported:
- metrics relating to material IROs identified in accordance with the relevant ESRS standards;
- entity-specific disclosures.
Compliance of the sustainability information included in the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report with the requirements of Article L.233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, including the ESRS
Our procedures consisted in verifying that, in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the ESRS:
- the disclosures provided enable an understanding of the general basis for the preparation and governance of the sustainability information included in the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report, including the basis for determining the information relating to the value chain and the exemptions from disclosures used;
- the presentation of this information ensures its readability and understandability;
- the scope chosen by Groupe BPCE for providing this information is appropriate; and
- on the basis of a selection, based on our analysis of the risks of non-compliance of the information provided and the expectations of users, that this information does not contain any material errors, omissions or inconsistencies, i.e. that are likely to influence the judgement or decisions of users of this information.
Based on the procedures we have carried out, we have not identified material errors, omissions or inconsistencies regarding the compliance of the sustainability information included in the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report, with the requirements of Article L.233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, including the ESRS.
Without qualifying the conclusion expressed above, we draw your attention to the information provided in the notes 1.1.2.3 “Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty”, 2.2.3.1 “(E1-1) Transition plan for climate change mitigation” and 2.2.4.2 “(E1-6) Gross scopes 1,2, 3 and total GHG emissions”, which disclose the scope selected for the transition plan and for the calculation of financed emissions related to the value chain (category 15 of scope 3 according to the GHG Protocol) , as well as the limitations related to data availability, the assumptions used, and the methodologies applied to determine the estimates related to decarbonization targets and the greenhouse gas emissions balance.
- Information provided in application of the standards relating to general requirements and general disclosure (ESRS 1 – Climate change)
We set out below the elements that have been the subject of particular attention in relation to our assessment of compliance with the ESRS of the following information disclosed in the notes 2.2.3.1 “Transition plan for climate change mitigation” and 2.2.4 “Metrics and targets”.
With regard to the information published on the greenhouse gas emissions (ESRS E1-6), as mentioned in the note 2.2.4.2 “(E1-6) Gross scopes 1,2,3 and total GHG emissions” of the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report, our work consisted primarily of:
- obtaining an understanding of the process, methods, frames, data and estimates used by Groupe BPCE to prepare the information (including procedures and internal control);
- with regard to Scope 3 emissions (categories 1, 2 and 6) regarding Groupe BPCE own operations:
- assessing the appropriateness of the emission factors used and the calculation of the related conversions, taking into account the uncertainty inherent in the state of scientific or economic knowledge and the quality of the external data;
- reconciling physical data, on a sample basis, to the underlying data used to draw up the greenhouse gas emissions assessment and tracing to supporting documents
- with regard to financed emissions (scope 3, category 15 of GHG Protocol) :
- Understanding the scope of covered assets as described and assess its justification in regard of the applicable framework;
- Verifying that the base used for computing financed emissions corresponds to the scope of covered assets as described in the note 2.2.4.2 and reconciling it with the consolidated general balance
- assessing the appropriateness of the method for determining estimates, including the sectoral proxies chosen;
- verifying the accuracy of the calculations used to prepare this information on a sample basis.
With regard to the information published on the Transition plan for climate change mitigation and adaptation (ESRS E1-1), as defined in the note 2.2.3.1 “(E1-1) Transition plan for climate change mitigation” of the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report, our work consisted primarily of:
- assessing the information related to the scope chosen for the Transition Plan (transition plan for own activities and sector-specific transition plans covering the value chain), as well as the processes, methodologies, frameworks, data, and estimates adopted by the Group to prepare the published information;
- assessing the description of the structural assumptions and reference climate scenarios underlying this plan, it being understood that we are not required to express a conclusion on the appropriateness or the level of ambition of the transition plan’s objectives ;
- assessing whether the transition plan reflects the commitments made by Groupe BPCE as stated in the minutes of its governance bodies’ meetings and other group communications;;
- assessing whether the transition plan is in line with the strategic plan as approved by the governing bodies and the financial planning of Groupe BPCE;
- assessing the information related to the scope chosen for the analysis of transition risks (physical and transition risks), as well as the methodologies, scenarios, and assumptions adopted by the group, and their integration into risk mapping of the Group.
Our procedures consisted in verifying the process implemented by Groupe BPCE to determine the eligible and aligned nature of the activities of the entities included in the consolidation.
They also involved verifying the information reported pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, which involves checking:
- the compliance with the rules applicable to the presentation of this information to ensure that it is readable and understandable;
- on the basis of a selection, the absence of material errors, omissions or inconsistencies in the information provided, i.e. information likely to influence the judgement or decisions of users of this information.
Based on the procedures we have carried out, we have not identified any material errors, omissions or inconsistencies relating to compliance with the requirements of Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
- The information in the paragraph “Methodology used” in the note 2.1 “Indicators of the European taxonomy on sustainable activities” which discloses the main methodological assumptions used to assess the alignment of loans granted to individuals
- The information in the paragraph “Assumptions used and existing limitations in the preparation and collection of information” in the note 2.1 “Indicators of the European taxonomy on sustainable activities” which discloses the main existing limitations in the presentation of information, including those concerning the presentation of cash flow information regarding the KPI on off-balance-sheet exposures.
2.3 BPCE Sustainability report
The following sustainability report is the result of a regulatory obligation imposing a publication on a scope covering only BPCE, which is made up of the central institution of Groupe BPCE, the business lines serving the activities of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks, Natixis SA, as well as resource pools.
The analysis of the double materiality for the two scopes is identical. The criteria for identifying impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO) and assessing their materiality are the same. The same applies to the definition of policies and action plans.
This is why this report makes references to Groupe BPCE’s sustainability report for elements of strategy and editorial content.
This report presents certain quantitative metrics required by the standard, when they are applicable to the BPCE scope.
Where applicable, the reported quantitative metrics are calculated for the BPCE scope. This concerns a majority of the indicators required by the ESRS.
- greenhouse gas emission reduction targets: these are calculated solely for Groupe BPCE scope, as an integral part of the transition strategy covering the entire Group scope;
- indicators relating to the G1-3 and G1-4 topics, which are calculated for the scope of Groupe BPCE only.
PART 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 Reporting basis
1.1.2.6 DISCLOSURES STEMMING FROM OTHER LEGISLATION OR GENERALLY ACCEPTED SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
1.2 Strategy
1.3 Governance
1.3.2 GOV-2-Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies
1.4 Impact, risk and opportunity management
1.4.1 IRO-1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
1.4.2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
2.4 Statutory Auditors’ report on the BPCE sustainability report
Report on the certification of sustainability information and verification of the disclosure requirements under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852
This is a translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the certification of sustainability information and verification of the disclosure requirements under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the Company issued in French and it is provided solely for the convenience of English speaking users.
This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and the H2A guidelines on “Limited assurance engagement - Certification of sustainability reporting and verification of disclosure requirements set out in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852”.
This report is issued in our capacity as statutory auditors of BPCE group. It covers the sustainability information and the information required by Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, relating to the year ended December 31, 2024 and included in section 2.3 “BPCE Sustainability report” in the chapter 2 of the universal registration document (below “BPCE Sustainability report”).
Pursuant to Article L. 233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, BPCE is required to include the above mentioned information in a separate section of the group management report. This information has been prepared in the context of the first time application of the aforementioned articles, a context characterized by uncertainties regarding the interpretation of the laws and regulations, the use of significant estimates, the absence of established practices and frameworks in particular for the double-materiality assessment, and an evolving internal control system. It enables an understanding of the impact of the activity of the group on sustainability matters, as well as the way in which these matters influence the development of the business of the group, its performance and position. Sustainability matters include environmental, social and corporate governance matters.
Pursuant to Article L.821-54 paragraph II of the aforementioned Code our responsibility is to carry out the procedures necessary to issue a conclusion, expressing limited assurance, on:
- compliance with the sustainability reporting standards adopted pursuant to Article 29 b of Directive (EU) 2013/34 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 (hereinafter ESRS for European Sustainability Reporting Standards) of the process implemented by BPCE to determine the information reported, and compliance with the requirement to consult the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the French Labour Code;
- compliance of the sustainability information included in BPCE Sustainability report included the group management report with the requirements of Article L. 233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, including ESRS; and
- compliance with the reporting requirements set out in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
This engagement is carried out in compliance with the ethical rules, including independence, and quality control rules prescribed by the French Commercial Code.
It is also governed by the H2A guidelines on “Limited assurance engagement - Certification of sustainability reporting and verification of disclosure requirements set out in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852”.
In the three separate sections of the report that follow, we present, for each of the sections of our engagement, the nature of the procedures that we carried out, the conclusions that we drew from these procedures and, in support of these conclusions, the elements to which we paid particular attention and the procedures that we carried out with regard to these elements. We draw your attention to the fact that we do not express a conclusion on any of these elements taken individually and that the procedures described should be considered in the overall context of the formation of the conclusions issued in respect of each of the three sections of our engagement.
Finally, where deemed necessary to draw your attention to one or more disclosures of sustainability information provided by BPCE in the BPCE Sustainability report, we have included an emphasis of matter paragraph hereafter.
As the purpose of our engagement is to express limited assurance, the nature (choice of techniques), extent (scope) and timing of the procedures are less than those required to obtain reasonable assurance.
Furthermore, this engagement does not provide guarantee regarding the viability or the quality of the management of BPCE, in particular it does not provide an assessment, of the relevance of the choices made by BPCE in terms of action plans, targets, policies, scenario analyses and transition plans, which would go beyond compliance with the ESRS reporting requirements.
It does, however, allow us to express conclusions regarding the entity’s process for determining the sustainability information to be reported, the sustainability information itself, and the information reported pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, as to the absence of identification or, on the contrary, the identification of errors, omissions or inconsistencies of such importance that they would be likely to influence the decisions that readers of the information subject to this engagement might make.
Any comparative information that would be included in the group management report are not covered by our engagement.
Compliance with the ESRS of the process implemented by BPCE to determine the information reported, and compliance with the requirement to consult the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the French Labour Code
- the process defined and implemented by BPCE has enabled it, in accordance with the ESRS, to identify and assess its impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters, and to identify the material impacts, risks and opportunities, that lead to the publication of information disclosed in the BPCE Sustainability report, and
- the information provided on this process also complies with the ESRS.
On the basis of the procedures we have carried out, we have not identified any material errors, omissions or inconsistencies regarding the compliance of the process implemented by BPCE with the ESRS.
Concerning the consultation of the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the French Labour Code we inform you that as of the date of this report, this consultation has not yet been held.
Without qualifying the conclusion expressed above, we draw your attention to the information provided in:
- the paragraph “Introductory remarks” of the BPCE Sustainability report, which recalls the existence of two scopes for publishing sustainability information (BPCE and Groupe BPCE) and the reasons why the sustainability report for the BPCE scope refers to the sustainability report of the Groupe BPCE scope, as well as the modalities of these references, and specifies that the double materiality analysis for these two scopes is identical.
- paragraph 1.1.2.3 “Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty” which refers to the corresponding section in the Groupe BPCE Sustainability report, for which we make the same observation as for the Groupe BPCE scope, concerning the uncertainty and limitations related to the methodologies used to perform the double materiality analysis regarding the thematic standards E2, E3, E4, and E5 (pollution, aquatic and marine resources, biodiversity and ecosystems, and resource use and circular economy) for the year 2024
We set out below the elements that have been the subject of particular attention in relation to our assessment of compliance with the ESRS of the process implemented by BPCE to determine the information reported.
Information on the identification of stakeholders is set out in section 1.2.2 SBM-2 - Interests and views of stakeholders of the BPCE Sustainability report.
We interviewed management and others within the entity as appropriate and inspected available documentation.
We also assessed the consistency of the primary stakeholders identified by BPCE in view of the nature of its activities and its geographical location, taking into account its business relationships, its cooperative dimension and value chain
Information on the identification of impacts, risks and opportunities is provided in section 1.4.1 “IRO-1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities” of the BPCE Sustainability report.
We obtained an understanding of the process implemented by BPCE to identify actual or potential impacts – both negative and positive –risks and opportunities (IROs), in relation to the sustainability matters mentioned in paragraph AR 16 of ESRS 1, “Application requirements”, and where applicable, those specific to BPCE, as presented in the above cited note.
In particular, we assessed the approach taken by BPCE to determine its impacts and dependencies, which may be a source of risks or opportunities, including the dialogue undertaken, where appropriate, with stakeholders.
We obtained an understanding of the group’s mapping of identified IROs, including a description of their distribution within the group’s own operations and its value chain, as well as their time horizon (short, medium or long term), and assessed the consistency of this mapping with our knowledge of BPCE group and, where applicable, with the risk analyses conducted by BPCE.
Information on the assessment of impact materiality and financial materiality is provided in section 1.4.1 “IRO-1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities” of the BPCE Sustainability report.
Through interviews with management and inspection of available documentation, we obtained an understanding of the process implemented by the entity to assess impact materiality and financial materiality, and assessed its compliance with the criteria defined in ESRS 1.
In particular, we assessed the way in which BPCE established and applied the materiality criteria defined in ESRS 1, including those relating to the setting of thresholds, in order to determine the following material information reported:
- metrics relating to material IROs identified in accordance with the relevant ESRS standards;
- entity-specific disclosures.
Compliance of the sustainability information included in BPCE Sustainability report with the requirements of Article L.233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, including the ESRS
Our procedures consisted in verifying that, in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the ESRS:
- the disclosures provided enable an understanding of the general basis for the preparation and governance of the sustainability information included in BPCE Sustainability report, including the basis for determining the information relating to the value chain and the exemptions from disclosures used
- the presentation of this information ensures its readability and understandability;
- the scope chosen by BPCE for providing this information is appropriate; and
- on the basis of a selection, based on our analysis of the risks of non-compliance of the information provided and the expectations of users, that this information does not contain any material errors, omissions or inconsistencies, i.e. that are likely to influence the judgement or decisions of users of this information
Based on the procedures we have carried out, we have not identified material errors, omissions or inconsistencies regarding the compliance of the sustainability information included in BPCE Sustainability report, with the requirements of Article L.233-28-4 of the French Commercial Code, including the ESRS.
Without qualifying the conclusion expressed above, and in connection with the statement made above regarding the paragraph “Introductory remarks” concerning the scope of publication of sustainability information for BPCE and Groupe BPCE, we draw your attention to:
- the paragraph “Introductory remarks”, which specifies that the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets are calculated only for the Groupe BPCE scope, as an integral part of the transition strategy covering the entire group scope;paragraph 2.2.4.2 “(E1-6) gross scopes 1, 2, 3 and total ghg emissions” which outlines the calculation of financed emissions related to the value chain (category 15 of scope 3 according to the GHG protocol) as well as the limitations related to data availability, assumptions used, and methodologies applied to determine estimates related to decarbonization targets and the greenhouse gas emissions balance.
- Information provided in application of the standards relating to general requirements and general disclosure (ESRS 1 – Climate change))
We set out below the elements that have been the subject of particular attention in relation to our assessment of compliance with the ESRS of the following information disclosed in the paragraphs 2.2.3.1 “(E1-1) Transition plan for climate change mitigation” and 2.2.4 “Metrics and targets”.
With regard to the information published on the greenhouse gas emissions (ESRS E1-6), as mentioned in the paragraph 2.2.4.2 “(E1-6) Gross scopes 1, 2, 3 and total ghg emissions”, our work consisted primarily of:
- obtaining an understanding of the process, methods, frames, data and estimates used by BPCE to prepare the information (including procedures and internal control);
-
with regard to Scope 3 emissions (categories 1, 2 and 6) regarding BPCE own operations:
- assessing the appropriateness of the emission factors used and the calculation of the related conversions, taking into account the uncertainty inherent in the state of scientific or economic knowledge and the quality of the external data;
- reconciling physical data, on a sample basis, to the underlying data used to draw up the greenhouse gas emissions assessment and tracing to supporting documents
-
with regard to financed emissions(scope 3, category 15 of GHG Protocol) :
- Understanding the scope of covered assets as described and assess its justification in regard of the applicable framework
- Verifying that the base used for computing financed emissions corresponds to the scope of covered assets as described in note 2.2.4.2 and reconciling it with the consolidated general balance
- assessing the appropriateness of the method for determining estimates, including the sectoral proxies chosen;
- verifying the accuracy of the calculations used to prepare this information on a sample basis.
Our procedures consisted in verifying the process implemented by BPCE to determine the eligible and aligned nature of the activities of the entities included in the consolidation.
They also involved verifying the information reported pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, which involves checking:
- the compliance with the rules applicable to the presentation of this information to ensure that it is readable and understandable;
- on the basis of a selection, the absence of material errors, omissions or inconsistencies in the information provided, i.e. information likely to influence the judgement or decisions of users of this information.>
Based on the procedures we have carried out, we have not identified any material errors, omissions or inconsistencies relating to compliance with the requirements of Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
Without qualifying the conclusion expressed above, and in connection with the statement made above regarding the paragraph “Introductory remarks” concerning the scope of publication of sustainability information for BPCE and Groupe BPCE, we draw your attention to the information in paragraph 2.1 “Indicators of the European taxonomy on sustainable activities” of the BPCE Sustainability report, which refers to sections 2.1 and 5 “Indicators of the European taxonomy on sustainable activities” of the Groupe BPCE Sustainability Report, for which we make the same statements as for the Groupe BPCE scope, regarding:
3.1 Duty of Care plan
3.1.1 Purpose of the Duty of Care
French Act No. 2017-399 of March 27, 2017 on the Duty of Care of parent companies and ordering companies requires the establishment and effective implementation of a Duty of Care plan. The plan includes reasonable vigilance measures to identify risks and prevent serious violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, health and safety of people and the environment, resulting from the company’s activities and those of the companies it controls, as specified below, as well as the activities of suppliers or subcontractors with which there is an established commercial relationship, when these activities are related to this relationship.
This plan must include risk mapping, measures to assess and mitigate the risks of serious harm, monitoring their implementation and an whistlebowing mechanism.
3.2 Report on the effective implementation of the vigilance plan
Since the entry into force of the act on the Duty of Care of parent companies and ordering companies, BPCE has improved its system aimed at preventing risks of harm to the environment, human rights and fundamental freedoms, the health and safety of people.
In the 2024 fiscal year, this approach was strengthened with the launch of the VISION 2030 strategic project, reaffirming Groupe BPCE’s desire to support environmental and societal transitions.
Groupe BPCE’s commitment to respecting and promoting human rights was also reaffirmed by the publication of the Group’s human rights charter, validated by the Executive Management Committee in September 2024.
Through this charter, Groupe BPCE recognizes the principles and international standards that aim to guarantee minimum standards in terms of human rights and strives to ensure that all of its stakeholders comply with them.
These commitments are broken down into principles of action with regard to employees, suppliers, customers and society.
In 2024, specific actions were also rolled out for each of the three pillars that structure the vigilance approach.
3.2.1 Employees
- several of the Group’s companies invested in obtaining the Professional Equality label;
- BPCE’s Executive Management Committee signed the “Autre Cercle” charter, encouraging companies to promote and respect LGBT+ diversity in their workforce;
- Groupe BPCE has signed the Landoy charter, to promote the employment of people over the age of 50;
- several actions aimed at raising awareness of visible and non-visible disabilities and improving the inclusion of employees with disabilities were carried out by BPCE’s Human Resources departments;
- the partnership with Paris 2024 was an opportunity to reinforce the Group’s efforts and commitments in the fight against sedentary lifestyles, and to contribute to the well-being of its employees.
4.1 Introduction
In addition to the management report and in accordance with Article L. 225-68 of the French Commercial Code, this report by the Supervisory Board contains information on:
- the composition of the Supervisory Board and implementation of the principle of balanced representation of women and men;
- the conditions governing the preparation and organization of the Supervisory Board’s work during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024;
- the principles and rules governing the determination of all types of remuneration and benefits granted to corporate officers.
4.2 Corporate Governance Code
In preparing this report, BPCE referred to the Corporate Governance Code for listed companies published in December 2008 and revised in December 2022 by the French Association of Private Enterprises (Association française des entreprises privées – AFEP) and the Movement of French Enterprises (Mouvement des entreprises de France – MEDEF), hereinafter referred to as the Afep-Medef Code, and including the recommendations of October 2008 on executive compensation, as set out in Article L. 225-68 of the French Commercial Code.
Only certain provisions were not followed, insofar as they are not deemed to apply to BPCE’s operating procedures as the central institution of a cooperative group and its equal ownership by the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks, which is reflected in the composition of its Board. These provisions were as follows: terms of office, the proportion of independent directors on the Supervisory Board and its committees, Board member ownership of a material number of shares and the publication of the CEO pay ratio.
Regarding terms of office, unlike the maximum four-year term recommended in the Afep-Medef Code, the statutory term of office of the members of the Supervisory Board of BPCE is six years, i.e. the maximum permitted by law. The benefit of a four-year term, as presented by the Afep-Medef Code, is that it gives shareholders sufficiently frequent opportunity to provide an opinion on Board Member performance. However, this is unnecessary for BPCE, as its shareholders are limited to Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne, which are already amply represented on the Supervisory Board, via the Chairmen of the Boards, the Chairmen of the Management Board and the Chief Executive Officers of these institutions, as members or non-voting directors. Indeed, 20 members or non-voting directors of the Supervisory Board come from the 29 Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne shareholders of BPCE. Accordingly, a shorter term of office would not substantially change the composition of the Supervisory Board. In addition, BPCE staggers reappointments, renewing the terms of office of half of the members of the Supervisory Board every three years, in order to avoid mass reappointments and promote a smooth Board member reappointment process. This gives shareholders sufficiently frequent opportunity, every three years, to provide an opinion on the members of the Supervisory Board, as recommended in the Afep-Medef Code.
Regarding Supervisory Board member ownership of a material number of shares, BPCE’s articles of association take into account the fact that, in accordance with act No. 2008-776 of August 4, 2008, members of the Supervisory Board are no longer required to own shares in the company. As a result, members of the Supervisory Board of BPCE do not own a material number of shares and are not shareholders in a personal capacity, but the two categories of shareholders are represented through their appointment, which ensures that the company’s interests are respected.
Concerning the proportion of independent directors on the Board and its committees, BPCE does not follow the recommendation of the Afep-Medef Code, under which independent directors must represent half of the members of the Boards of companies that are not under control, as defined by Article L. 233-3 of the French Commercial Code. In fact, this recommendation is not compatible with Article L. 512-106 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, which stipulates that the representatives of cooperative shareholders proposed by the Chairmen of the Steering and Supervisory Boards of the Caisses d’Epargne and the Chairmen of the Boards of Directors of the Banques Populaires account for a majority of the Supervisory Board of BPCE. In addition to this legal rule, good governance rules result from Groupe BPCE’s unique structure: a balance of power must be maintained, as well as balanced representation of the Banque Populaire and Caisses d’Epargne networks. However, this organizational structure does not compromise the quality of the work and discussions of the Board, an objective of the Afep-Medef Code recommendation.
However, BPCE wishes to demonstrate the independence of the members of its Supervisory Board representing the cooperative shareholders proposed by the Chairmen of the Steering and Supervisory Boards of the Caisses d’Epargne and the Chairmen of the Boards of Directors of the Banques Populaires. The report “Coopératives et mutuelles: un gouvernement d’entreprise original” [Cooperatives and mutual insurance companies: original corporate governance], drafted within the framework of the French Institute of Directors in January 2006, explains why the elected directors of the cooperative companies that are the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne fully meet the definition of “independent director”. Thus, "the question of “independent directors” concerns a specific type of company, which is the listed company. (…) In cooperative companies, the governance logic is radically different. (…) The legitimacy and control of a mutualist executive, and therefore their independence, depends on the mandate they exercise through their election. Removing a director from the electoral process would dissociate him from the interests of the organization and its cooperative shareholders. From another perspective, it is a fact that the directors of cooperatives and mutual societies commit themselves out of conviction and not out of financial interest. They devote a significant portion of their time and energy to their responsibilities as directors. They are wide open to the local, non-profit and/or political world. These are all characteristics that make them truly independent directors, an independence that is beyond doubt, but is continually reinforced by an authentic democratic process.”
With regard to Supervisory Board meetings, BPCE has not formalized, in its institutional agenda, the organization of an annual meeting without the presence of the executive company directors. In addition, it is specified that no internal text of BPCE provides for the mandatory presence of executive corporate officers who attend Supervisory Board meetings only at the invitation of its Chairman. Sometimes, part of the Supervisory Board meetings take place without the presence of the executive company directors, in particular when decisions of the Supervisory Board or the opinions of the Board committees concerning the executive company directors are discussed.
In addition, the Fédération Nationale des Banques Populaires and the Fédération Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne, bodies that organize discussions, hear ideas and provide representation, each hold annual meetings bringing together all the Chairmen of the Boards of Directors and the Chief Executive Officers of the Banques Populaires and all the Chairmen of the Steering and Supervisory Boards and Management Board of Caisses d’Epargne without the presence of Statutory Auditors and the company directors of BPCE. These meetings, which guarantee the free expression of all participants, who represent BPCE’s shareholders, promote strategic discussions and, accordingly, protect the interests of the institutions they represent.
Regarding information on company director pay, BPCE does not apply the recommendation that stipulates that information on pay ratios should be published, thereby enabling comparison of company director pay and employee pay. BPCE considers that the main objective pursued by the legislator when drafting this legal provision, which is now included in this recommendation, is to enable shareholders or investors in public companies to assess the remuneration of executives in relation to the company’s performance and the average remuneration of the company’s employees, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph b of 1 of Article 9b of directive 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of May 17, 2017 (known as the SRD 2 directive). In this respect, BPCE, whose shares are not listed, considers that the publication of all information relating to the variable pay of executives and the performance of BPCE and the Group is sufficient to enable shareholders and potential investors to assess whether the remuneration rewards long-term performance and to measure the evolution of the performance and remuneration of executives in the medium and long term.
Finally, with the exception of the CEO pay ratio, BPCE formally adheres to and implements the Afep-Medef Code recommendations on executive pay.
Independent directors | Recommendations partly implemented (not followed regarding proportion of independent directors on the Board) |
Board meetings and committee meetings | Recommendations partly implemented (not followed regarding the organization of an annual meeting without the presence of executive company directors) |
Directors’ terms of office | Recommendations partly implemented (not followed regarding the six-year term) |
Audit Committee | Recommendations partly implemented (not followed regarding the proportion of independent directors on the committee) |
Committee responsible for appointments | Recommendations partly implemented (not followed regarding the proportion of independent directors on the committee) |
Committee responsible for pay | Recommendations partly implemented (not followed regarding the proportion of independent directors on the committee) |
Shareholding obligation of company directors | Recommendations not implemented |
Information on pay awarded to company directors | Recommendations partially implemented (not followed with regard to the publication of the equity ratio) |
4.3 Composition of the management and supervisory bodies
4.3.1 Groupe BPCE’s governance organization chart
- exercises all banking, financial, administrative, and technical powers ;
- involves the Group’s internal solidarity mechanisms ;
- performs duties as the company’s central institution as specified by law and, where applicable, after receiving prior authorization from the Supervisory Board, as specified by the articles of association.
- approves the policy and strategic guidelines of the Group and each of the networks ;
- verifies and audits the parent company and consolidated financial statements.
- is tasked with preparing financial information, the statutory audit of the annual and consolidated financial statements by the Statutory Auditors and the independence of the Statutory Auditors ;
- reviews the transactions as defined in BPCE’s articles of association and is responsible for monitoring investments in accordance with the procedures described in section 4.4.2.
- assists the Supervisory Board with regard to BPCE’s overall strategy and risk appetite, both current and future, and when it monitors the implementation of this strategy ;
- is responsible for assessing the effectiveness of the internal control and risk management systems and, more generally, performs the missions described in 4.4.2.
- makes proposals to the Supervisory Board regarding the choices of Supervisory Board members, non-voting directors and experts from outside the Group, as well as the appointment of the Chairman of the Management Board;
- is also responsible for the ongoing assessment of the individual and collective qualities of the members of the Management Board and the members of the Supervisory Board.
- makes proposals to the Board regarding the levels and conditions of pay granted to the members of the Management Board and the Chairman of the Board, and the distribution of attendance fees payable to the Board members.
- is in charge of making proposals and recommendations aimed at promoting the cooperative and social values of long-term engagement as well as professional and interpersonal ethics. It also ensures that Group and network activities represent these values, thereby strengthening the cooperative banking model of the Group and each of the networks.
4.4 Role and operating rules of governing bodies
4.4.1 Supervisory Board
The Supervisory Board performs the duties attributed to it by law. At any time, throughout the year, it carries out all checks and controls it deems appropriate and may request any documents it regards as expedient in fulfilling its mission.
- receives a report from the Management Board on the company’s business activities once every quarter;
- examines and checks the parent company and consolidated financial statements prepared and presented by the Management Board within three months of the end of the fiscal year, along with a written report on the position and activities of the company and its subsidiaries during the past year;
- presents to the Ordinary shareholders’ Meeting a report on corporate governance that states the makeup of the managerial and supervisory bodies, the role and operation of the governing bodies, the diversity policy applied to members of the Supervisory Board, the principles and rules for determining remuneration and benefits of any kind given to corporate officers, and including its observations on the management report prepared by the Management Board and the financial statements for the previous fiscal year.
- appoint the Chairman of the Management Board;
- appoint the other members of the Management Board, based on motions by the Chairman of the Management Board;
- set the method and amount of pay received by each member of the Management Board;
- grant the status of Chief Executive Officer to one or more members of the Management Board, based on a motion by the Chairman of the Management Board, and withdraw said status as applicable;
- propose the appointment of the Statutory Auditors at the General Shareholders’ Meeting, after they are recommended by the Audit Committee;
- decide to move the registered office to another location within the same department or to an adjacent department, subject to ratification of the decision by the next Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting.
The following operations proposed by the Management Board must receive prior authorization from the Supervisory Board, acting by simple majority of its present or represented members:
- approval of the policy and strategic guidelines of Groupe BPCE and each of the networks;
-
authorize:
- any proposed Transaction (as defined in BPCE’s articles of association(1) under “Definitions”) for an amount exceeding €100 million,
- any proposed Transaction (as defined in BPCE’s articles of association(1) under “Definitions”) carried out by BPCE and not in line with BPCE’s strategic plan, regardless of the amount;
- approval of the company’s annual budget and definition of the rules for calculating contributions due from affiliated institutions;
- authorization of related-party agreements pursuant to the French Commercial Code;
- approval of the Group’s internal solidarity mechanisms;
- approval of the national and international agreements involving each of the networks and the Group as a whole;
-
approval of the general criteria that must be met by the directors of Groupe BPCE’s affiliated institutions, including age limits, which may not exceed:
- 65 for Chief Executive Officers or members of the Management Board, or
- 70 for Chairmen of Boards of Directors and Steering and Supervisory Boards, it being stipulated that no individuals may be appointed Chairman of a Board of Directors or a Steering and Supervisory Board if they cannot, on the date of first appointment, complete at least half the term as Chairman before reaching this age limit; however, the age limit remains set at 68 for offices currently held on the date of the Supervisory Board Meeting that approved the age limit set in this section;
- authorization of the directors of affiliated institutions as well as the withdrawal of such authorization and all other dismissals as set out in Article L. 512-108 of the French Monetary and Financial Code;
- approval of the creation or elimination of a Banque Populaire or Caisse d’Epargne, including through the merger of two or more Banques Populaires or two or more Caisses d’Epargne;
- examination and approval of the main risk limits applicable to the Group and each network, as defined by the Management Board; regular examinations and checks on the Group’s risks, any changes therein and the systems and procedures used to control them; examination of Internal Control audits and finding, and the main conclusions of audits performed by the Group Internal Audit;
- appointment of BPCE’s representatives to the Natixis Board of Directors. Representatives from the Caisses d’Epargne and from the Banques Populaires will be of identical number and will together hold, at a minimum, the majority of seats on the Board;
- upon recommendation from the Appointments Committee, examination and assessment of the integrity and skills of candidates for the Supervisory Board and the non-voting directors, Chairman, and other members of the Management Board;
- adoption of the Board’s internal rules.
The following operations proposed by the Management Board are subject to the prior authorization of the Supervisory Board and a favorable vote from at least 13 of its 19 present or represented members:
- any decision to subscribe for or acquire (or any agreement binding the company therein), by any means (including by transfer of assets to the company), securities or rights of any kind whatsoever, be they issued by a company or any other entity and directly or indirectly representing an investment or contribution of more than one (1) billion euros;
- any decision to transfer (or any agreement binding the company therein), by any means, securities or rights of any kind whatsoever held by the company and representing a divestment of more than one (1) billion euros for the company;
- any decision by the company to issue equity securities or shares giving immediate or eventual access to the company’s capital, without pre-emptive rights;
- any decision to submit to the General Shareholders’ Meeting any changes to the articles of association with regard to the company that amend the terms of governance;
- any merger, demerger, spin-off, or related decision involving the company;
- any decision to appoint the Chairman or remove the Chairman of the company’s Management Board from office;
- any decision relating to the admission of company shares or shares in any of its main direct or indirect subsidiaries to trading on a regulated market;
- any decision to approve the disposal of securities.
The internal rules of the Supervisory Board(1), adopted at the Board Meeting of July 31, 2009 and amended at the Board meeting of February 7, 2024, form the Supervisory Board’s Governance Charter, which sets out its internal operating procedures, notably for the purpose of ensuring that governing bodies interact efficiently and operate smoothly.
The internal rules enhance the quality of the work done by members of the Supervisory Board by promoting the application of corporate governance principles and best practices in the interest of ethics and efficiency.
- specifying the procedures for convening Supervisory Board and Supervisory Board Committee meetings, as well as the rules under which they are to deliberate;
- specifying the general and specific powers of the Board under the law, as set out in Articles 27.1 and 27.2 of the company’s articles of association;
- note that the decisions requiring the prior approval of the Board for transactions (as defined by the articles of association under “Definitions”) are set out in Articles 27.3 and 27.4 of the company’s articles of association(1);
- specifying the rules governing the information of the Board;
- specifying the duties of the various committees, for which they serve as the internal rules;
- specifying the professional secrecy and confidentiality obligations binding the members of the Supervisory Board and its committees;
- defining the penalties that apply in the event members of the Supervisory Board or of a committee fail to comply with any of their obligations.
The Supervisory Board’s rules of procedure are available on the BPCE website: https://groupebpce.com/en/investors/regulated-information/other-information
The Supervisory Board of BPCE adopted an Ethics and Compliance Charter for its members at its meeting of June 22, 2016 and amended at its meeting of February 7, 2024. The Ethics and Compliance Charter is divided into four main chapters that set out good governance principles, in addition to reiterating several laws and regulations.
- the total number of offices held by members of the Supervisory Board and their availability (time spent preparing for meetings and reviewing issues);
- expertise, i.e. consolidation of knowledge and understanding of information that may be used in performing their duties;
- diligence and effectiveness (active participation);
- duty to intervene and raise the alarm, i.e. expressing viewpoints and participating in discussions;
- risk culture, i.e. the standards, attitudes, and behaviors of Board members in relation to risk awareness, risk-taking and risk management;
- respect for corporate responsibility and good faith.
- respect for the law and the company’s articles of association;
- integrity (lack of a criminal record, incompatibility with certain duties);
- good credit history, which is checked by the Risk division of the institution or network in which the member also holds office, under the authority of the BPCE Risk division (except for independent members, whose credit history is checked using any rating either internal or external to the company in which they play a primary role);
- gifts or benefits (soliciting or accepting direct or indirect benefits is prohibited).
- banking secrecy and the duty of discretion;
- management of inside information (with the understanding that all members are on the list of permanent insiders);
- reporting of transactions on financial instruments issued by BPCE and Groupe BPCE companies;
- compliance with blackout periods on financial instruments issued by Groupe BPCE companies.
- independence of judgment;
- incompatibility with the duties performed on their own behalf in other investment banks or investment companies outside Groupe BPCE (unless explicitly approved by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board and the Chairman of the Management Board of BPCE);
- due diligence in business relationships.
In accordance with Article 25.1 of the articles of association, the Supervisory Board meets as often as the company’s interests, laws and regulations require, and at least once every quarter in order to examine the Management Board’s quarterly report. Board meetings may be convened by its Chairman, its Vice-Chairman or by one half of its members and take place at the registered office or any other location stated in the notice of meeting.
In accordance with Article L. 823-17 of the French Commercial Code, the Statutory Auditors are invited to Board meetings examining full-year and half-year financial statements.
The Supervisory Board of BPCE met eleven times between January 1 and December 31, 2024. In 2024, the average attendance rate for members of the Supervisory Board was 97.46%.In addition to the topics regularly discussed – quarterly reports of the Management Board, related-party agreements, approvals of executives, current events, and other matters for information – the main topics discussed during the Board meetings were as follows:
- determination of the remuneration of the members of the Management Board for the 2023 fiscal year (payment of deferred portions due in 2024 and variable portion for 2023), setting of the determination criteria (performance criteria, triggering criteria, quantitative and qualitative criteria) for the variable pay of the members of the Management Board in respect of the 2024 fiscal year;
- approval of the 2024 remuneration policy for corporate officers;
- setting a minimum capital threshold for Groupe BPCE for the allocation of variable portions of Groupe BPCE risk takers for the 2024 fiscal year;
- adoption of the revised Group standard on risk-takers;
- taking note of the report provided for in Article 266 of the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014 on internal control concerning the policy and practices for the remuneration of risk takers;
- review of the terms and conditions for the remuneration of non-executive directors and non-voting directors;
- presentation of the Supervisory Board’s corporate governance report;
- opinion of the Social and Economic Committee on BPCE’s economic and financial position in 2023;
- preparation of the Annual General Meeting, deed of the payment of a dividend with the option of payment in cash or securities;
- proposal to the Annual General Meeting to appoint the Statutory Auditors in charge of the sustainability report;
- proposal to the Annual General Meeting to renew the term of office of an independent member of the Supervisory Board;
- monitoring of the regulatory radar set up in order to present to the Supervisory Board the regulatory changes in progress;
- taking note of the end of terms of office of members and the resignation of a non-voting director of the Supervisory Board;
- approval of the appointment by the General Meeting of members and of a non-voting director of the Supervisory Board;
- appointment of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Supervisory Board and review of remuneration terms;
- review of the composition of the Supervisory Board bureau;
- review of the composition of the Supervisory Board Committees;
- taking note of the start of duties by a non-voting director as of right and appointment of the Chairman of the Cooperative and CSR Committee;
- approval of the appointment of Natixis directors;
- review of the policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest for executive management and members of the Supervisory Board;
- review of the policy for the appointment and succession of executive management and members of the Supervisory Board;
- review and update of the policy for assessing the suitability of executive management and members of the Supervisory Board;
- monitoring of the company’s policy on professional and pay equality;
- annual review of the progress of HR work and review of the HR policy in terms of executive management and development of potential executives;
- monitoring of the Supervisory Board’s annual assessment process and review of the assessment report;
- monitoring of the individual assessment of the suitability of the members of the Supervisory Board and the Management Board;
- annual review of independent member status on the Supervisory Board;
- review of the dashboard of persons comprising the “regulated population”;
- definition of mandatory training;
- implementation of the 2025 training program for members of the Supervisory Board.
- approval of the proposed acquisition by BPCE of Société Générale Equipment Finance (SGEF);
- approval of the strategic partnership project between BPCE and BNP Paribas;
- approval of the “VISION 2030” strategic project and the growth objectives resulting from the 2026 financial trajectory;
- approval in principle of the proposed acquisition by Caisse d’Epargne Hauts-de-France of Bank Nagelmackers;
- approval in principle of the proposed acquisition by BRED Banque Populaire of the stake of Société Générale’s subsidiary in Madagascar, Société Générale Madagasikara;
- authorization of the proposed sale by Natixis Investment Managers of all the share capital of the asset management company MV Credit Limited;
- monitoring of the implementation of the strategic operations authorized by the Supervisory Board since the end of 2023;
- review of the proposed merger of the asset management business lines of Natixis Investment Managers and Generali Investments Holding;
- presentation of an update on the analysis of the competition with a benchmark of the strategic movements of French banks in 2024.
- presentation of the annual financial statements, as of December 31, 2023, of Groupe BPCE, BPCE and BPCE SA;
- presentation of the 2024 quarterly and first-half financial statements of Groupe BPCE, BPCE and BPCE SA;
- taking note of the bottom line for 2024 and the 2025 budget of Groupe BPCE, approval of the 2025 budget of BPCE SA;
- acknowledgment of the 2025/2027 dividend payment policy;
- monitoring of the report on the assignments and services provided by the Statutory Auditors within Groupe BPCE;
- presentation of an update on the analysis of the competition with benchmark of Groupe BPCE’s results compared to French peers.
- follow-up on the reports and investigations of the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR), the French prudential supervisory authority for the banking and insurance sector, and the European Central Bank (ECB);
- risk monitoring: monitoring of consolidated risks, forward-looking risk management approach, monitoring of the Group’s internal ceilings and limits, monitoring of risk governance and annual review and reconsideration of Groupe BPCE’s risk appetite, modification of operational limits;
- taking note of the main changes in the system for monitoring compliance with prudential requirements;
- annual review of the system for reporting significant incidents and assessment of the 2023 reports;
- review of the Group’s annual report on the operation of internal control (RACI) and risk measurement and monitoring;
- annual assessment by the Supervisory Board of the Group’s Internal Control functions;
- examination of the annual reports on the organization of internal control systems for the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing and the freezing of assets, on a parent-company and consolidated basis, for the 2023 fiscal year;
- monitoring of the recommendations of the Group Internal Audit and of the supervisor;
- quarterly monitoring of the program to strengthen BPCE’s roles and responsibilities as a central institution (Riqueti program);
- acknowledgment of the measures taken in 2023 to ensure the control of essential outsourced services, including the monitoring of critical or important services and review of the 2024 outsourcing policy;
- monitoring and annual review of Groupe BPCE’s recovery plan as well as in the USA;
- follow-up on the ICAAP (Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process) for 2024, the methods used within this framework and the results of internal stress tests used to determine figures for 2024;
- follow-up to the 2024 ILAAP (Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process) report;
- review of the summary of BCBS 239 self-assessments by type of risk and current action plans;
- acknowledgment of the limitations under BCBS 239;
- update of the solidarity mechanism;
- acknowledgment of the definition of the role and responsibilities of the central institution, the content of the Riqueti 2024/2025 roadmap and the resulting initiatives;
- climate and environmental risks: acknowledgment of the action plan and quarterly monitoring from 09/30/2024;
- acknowledgment of the follow-up letters from the ECB and the work in progress to respond to them;
- acknowledgment of the work carried out as part of the 2023 Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP).
- CSR actions and cooperative guidelines of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne;
-
monitoring of environmental issues:
- assessment of the 2021-2024 ESG program,
- monitoring of the preparation of the VISION 2030 program: positioning, key indicators, priority deliverables, program for 2024-2026,
- Net Zero trajectory,
- the Group’s biodiversity approach;
- review of the Group conduct and ethics reporting;
- review of sustainability reports: work on the production of the 2023 non-financial performance statement and monitoring of the new CSRD regulation (scope, acculturation, work, double materiality analysis).
4.5 Rules and principles governing the determination of remuneration and benefits
4.5.1 Remuneration policy, pay components, benefits in kind, loans, guarantees and remuneration received by members of the Supervisory Board of BPCE(1)
At the meeting on May 19, 2017, the Supervisory Board set the pay for the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Supervisory Board as well as the terms for distributing pay for attendance at meetings among the members of the Supervisory Board. These terms and conditions were reviewed by the Supervisory Board at its meetings of March 26, 2020, June 16, 2022, March 23, 2023 and June 25, 2024.
The remuneration package for the members of the Supervisory Board of BPCE was set at €1,600,000 for the 2023 fiscal year and subsequent years by the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of May 25, 2023. This pay is detailed in the statement regarding pay collected by the non-executive corporate officers of BPCE.
With the exception of the Chairman, who receives a fixed annual fee, the members of the Supervisory Board receive remuneration on the basis of their activities.
The Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Supervisory Board do not receive any additional remuneration for their participation in committees.
- annual fixed pay: €130,000;
- variable remuneration paid for each meeting attended: €3,000. Other members of the Supervisory Board:
- variable remuneration paid for each meeting attended: €3,000.
As a reminder, the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Supervisory Board do not receive any pay for participating in the Cooperative and CSR Committee.
Pursuant to Article 28.3 of the articles of association(1), the Supervisory Board has resolved to compensate non-voting directors by making a deduction from the pay for attendance at meetings allocated to members of the Supervisory Board at the General Shareholders’ Meeting.
- €3,000 paid in respect of each meeting of the Supervisory Board that they attended;
- €1,500 paid in respect of each committee meeting that they attended.
Attendance fees were eliminated by Article 185 of the PACTE act (act no. 2019-486 of May 22, 2019), which replaced them with “pay” that may be paid to directors and members of the Supervisory Board of a French limited liability company (société anonyme).
The change in legal terminology has no impact on the tax or social security charges applicable to the sums paid to directors and members of the Supervisory Board.
As such, any references to “attendance fees” below should be construed from a legal point of view as “pay.”
Attendance fees are subject to single mandatory withholding tax at the global rate of 30%, consisting of a non-discharging flat 12.80% of the income tax plus social security contributions at the global rate of 17.20%.
Taxpayers may, if they so choose, opt for the progressive income tax scale instead of the flat 12.80% when filing their tax return. This option can be used for the full amount, provided that it applies to all income and gains that fall within the scope of the single flat-rate withholding tax, which are collected or earned during a single year by all members of the tax household.
-
withholdings:
- a non-exempting flat-rate withholding tax, serving as income tax, at a rate of 12.80%. This tax entitles taxpayers to a tax credit that can be applied to the tax calculated for the year in which the attendance fees are collected at either the flat rate or using the progressive scale, as per their choice. Taxpayers may ask to be exempted from this withholding if they provide the attendance fee distributing company with a sworn statement that the baseline tax income thresholds set out by law have been met, no later than November 30 of the year preceding the year in which the attendance fees are paid,
- social security charges at rates applicable on the date of the levy (17.20% since January 1, 2018, including a CSG [contribution sociale généralisée – general social security tax] of 6.8 points deductible from taxable income for the year of the payment, if the taxpayer has opted for the progressive scale),
- declaration of attendance fees on the 2042 income tax return and taxation at the flat rate of 12.80% or, optionally, using the progressive income tax scale. The tax credit attributed for the non-exempting flat withholding tax is determined in this way.
This pay is understood to be the total amount of remuneration received by each corporate officer in respect of their offices held on the Boards of the subsidiaries of BPCE as well as FNCE and FNBP during the fiscal year concerned.
Each payment relates to the corporate officer’s presence at Board meetings and is calculated on the basis of the total budget for attendance at meetings set by each company’s General Meeting.
Table of remuneration received by BPCE’s non-executive corporate officers from January 1 to December 31, 2024 (AMF Table No. 3)
2023 fiscal year | 2024 fiscal year | |||
Amounts due(1) | Amounts paid(2) | Amounts due(3) | Amounts paid(4) | |
Éric Fougère | ||||
Vice-Chairman until May 23, 2024 and Chairman of the Supervisory Board since May 23, 2024 | ||||
BPCE pay | €160,000.00 | €160,000.00 | €334,478.50 | €334,478.50 |
Other pay | €4,000.00 | €4,000.00 | €3,400.00 | €3,400.00 |
Marie Pic-Pâris Allavena | ||||
Member and, since May 23, 2024, Vice-Chairwoman of the Supervisory Board | ||||
BPCE pay | €55,000.00 | €55,000.00 | €122,303.76 | €122,303.76 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
CAISSE D’EPARGNE REPRESENTATIVES | ||||
Catherine Amin-Garde (until May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | €43,500.00 | €43,500.00 | €18,000.00 | €18,000.00 |
Other pay | €9,000.00 | €9,000.00 | €20,434.00 | €9,000.00 |
Christine Fabresse | ||||
BPCE pay | €31,500.00 | €31,500.00 | €46,500.00 | €46,500.00 |
Other pay | €4,000.00 | €4,000.00 | €2,800.00 | €2,800.00 |
Françoise Lemalle | ||||
BPCE pay | €31,500.00 | €31,500.00 | €45,000.00 | €45,000.00 |
Other pay | €15,497.24 | €15,497.24 | €23,000.00 | €23,000.00 |
Didier Patault | ||||
BPCE pay | €60,000.00 | €60,000.00 | €66,000.00 | €66,000.00 |
Other pay | €9,000.00 | €9,000.00 | €9,000.00 | €9,000.00 |
Benoît Pellerin | ||||
BPCE pay | €40,500.00 | €40,500.00 | €43,500.00 | €43,500.00 |
Other pay | €3,400.00 | €3,400.00 | €3,400.00 | €3,400.00 |
Philippe Rougeot | ||||
BPCE pay | €28,500.00 | €28,500.00 | €42,000.00 | €42,000.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €3,400.00 | €3,400.00 |
Valérie Savani (since May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | NA | NA | €37,500.00 | €37,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €30,861.00 | €43,000.00 |
BANQUE POPULAIRE REPRESENTATIVES | ||||
Gérard Bellemon (until May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | €43,500.00 | €43,500.00 | €18,000.00 | €18,000.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €1,500.00 | NA |
François Brun (since May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | NA | NA | €25,500.00 | €25,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Thierry Cahn | ||||
Chairman of the Supervisory Board and member (until May 23, 2024) | ||||
Annual fixed pay | €450,000.00 | €450,000.00 | €177,217.74 | €177,217.74 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Benoît Catel | ||||
BPCE pay | €28,500.00 | €28,500.00 | €51,000.00 | €51,000.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Bernard Dupouy (until May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | €45,000.00 | €45,000.00 | €16,500.00 | €16,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Philippe Henri (since May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | NA | NA | €37,500.00 | €37,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €1,500.00 | €750.00 |
Daniel Karyotis | ||||
BPCE pay | €60,000.00 | €60,000.00 | €63,000.00 | €63,000.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Catherine Mallet | ||||
BPCE pay | €30,000.00 | €30,000.00 | €33,000.00 | €33,000.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Jérôme Saddier (since May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | NA | NA | €37,500.00 | €37,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €2,700.00 | €2,700.00 |
INDEPENDENT MEMBERS | ||||
Valérie Pancrazi | ||||
BPCE pay | €73,500.00 | €73,500.00 | €76,500.00 | €76,500.00 |
Other pay | €43,500.00 | €44,500.00 | €46,500.00 | €46,500.00 |
Anne-Claude Pont | ||||
BPCE pay | €97,000.00 | €97,000.00 | €101,500.00 | €101,500.00 |
Other pay | €1,800.00 | €3,000.00 | €2,400.00 | €1,800.00 |
Kadidja Sinz | ||||
BPCE pay | €97,000.00 | €97,000.00 | €101,500.00 | €101,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVES | ||||
Nicolas Getti(5) | ||||
BPCE pay | €36,000.00 | €36,000.00 | €39,000.00 | €39,000.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Bertrand Guyard(5) | ||||
BPCE pay | €34,500.00 | €34,500.00 | €34,500.00 | €34,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
NON-VOTING DIRECTORS | ||||
Sabine Calba (until May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | €27,000.00 | €27,000.00 | €9,000.00 | €9,000.00 |
Other pay | €8,500.00 | €10,750.00 | €21,689.00 | €21,689.00 |
Bruno Deletré | ||||
BPCE pay | €30,000.00 | €30,000.00 | €46,500.00 | €46,500.00 |
Other pay | €2,800.00 | €2,800.00 | €2,200.00 | €2,200.00 |
Frédérique Destailleur | ||||
BPCE pay | €6,000.00 | €6,000.00 | €42,000.00 | €42,000.00 |
Other pay | €27,497.24 | €27,497.24 | €25,151.00 | €25,151.00 |
Alain Di Crescenzo | ||||
BPCE pay | €52,500.00 | €52,500.00 | €51,000.00 | €51,000.00 |
Other pay | €41,836.96 | €41,836.96 | €66,784.65 | €66,784.65 |
Philippe Hourdain (since June 25, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | NA | NA | €31,500.00 | €31,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €70,509.01 | €81,000.01 |
André Joffre (until June 7, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | €36,000.00 | €36,000.00 | €13,500.00 | €13,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €25,000.00 | €25,000.00 |
Jean-Paul Julia | ||||
BPCE pay | €18,000.00 | €18,000.00 | €37,500.00 | €37,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Mathieu Réquillart (since May 23, 2024) | ||||
BPCE pay | NA | NA | €34,500.00 | €34,500.00 |
Other pay | NA | NA | €3,000.00 | €4,500.00 |
TOTAL PAY | €1,852,607.98 | €1,857,057.98 | €2,178,719.66 | €2,208,074.66 |
- Amounts due in respect of 2023: all amounts owed in respect of the 2023 fiscal year, regardless of the date of payment.
- Amounts paid in 2023: all amounts paid and received in 2023 (due in 2022 and paid in 2023 and due in 2023 and paid in 2023) excluding withholding taxes (amounts actually received by members include withholding taxes).
- Amounts due in respect of 2024: all amounts owed in respect of the 2024 fiscal year, regardless of the date of payment.
- Amounts paid in 2024: all amounts paid and received in 2024 (due in 2023 and paid in 2024 and due in 2024 and paid in 2024) excluding withholding taxes (amounts actually received by members include withholding taxes).
- The two members of the Supervisory Board representing the employees have waived their BPCE pay in favor of their unions.
4.6 Potential conflicts of interest
4.6.1 Members of the Supervisory Board
Pursuant to Article L. 511-98 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, the integrity and expertise of all newly appointed members are subject to review by the Appointments Committee.
In accordance with the internal rules of the Supervisory Board of BPCE, members of the Supervisory Board must perform their duties with loyalty and professionalism.
They must not take any initiatives intended to harm the company’s interests and they must act in good faith in all circumstances.
In addition, the members of the Supervisory Board and its committees, as well as any person called to attend their meetings, are bound by professional secrecy under the conditions provided for by Article L. 511-33 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and to an obligation of discretion regarding their deliberations, as well as any information of a confidential nature or presented as such by the Chairman of the meeting, under the conditions provided for by Article L. 225-92 of the French Commercial Code.
The Chairman of the Board stresses that the proceedings of a meeting are confidential whenever regulations or the interests of the company or the Group may require it. The Chairman of each Board Committee does the same.
The Chairman of the Board or one of its committees takes the measures necessary to ensure the confidentiality of discussions. This may require all persons taking part in a meeting to sign a confidentiality agreement.
If a member of the Board or one of its committees fails to comply with an obligation, in particular the obligation of confidentiality, the Chairman of the Supervisory Board refers the matter to the Board in order to issue a warning to said member, independently of any measures taken under the applicable legal, regulatory or statutory provisions. Said member is given advance notice of the penalties being considered and will be able to present observations to the Supervisory Board.
- undertake to devote the necessary time and attention to their duties;
- attend all meetings of the Supervisory Board and the committees of which they are members, unless this is impossible;
- stay informed about the company’s business lines, activities, issues, and values;
- endeavor to maintain the level of knowledge they need to fulfill their duties;
- request and make every effort to obtain, in a timely manner, the information deemed necessary to be able to hold informed discussions at Supervisory Board Meetings.
In accordance with the EBA and ESMA guidelines, the Supervisory Board adopted, at its meeting of February 7, 2024, a policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest of executive management and of the members and non-voting directors of the Supervisory Board.
The purpose of this policy is to enhance the Group’s conflict of interest management system by formalizing the detection, management and prevention of potential and/or proven conflicts of interest of members of the Management Board and Board members and non-voting directors as well as their related parties.
The Policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest formalizes what is already practiced by BPCE, in accordance with legal and regulatory texts and specifically, stipulates that:
- a precise definition of conflicts of interest, i.e. any situation in which the independent, fair, impartial, and objective performance of a person’s functions is likely to be influenced by another public or private interest distinct from the interest he or she must defend in his or her functions;
- a precise definition of related parties and the obligation to declare them;
- sources of conflicts of interest and ways to identify, prevent and manage them;
- the controls carried out by the operational departments and, in particular, controls of loans and other transactions, of declared mandates, of “good credit history” for the members of the Supervisory Board, and of negative media coverage.
At its meeting of December 12, 2024, the Supervisory Board reviewed the policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest and decided to maintain its initial wording.
- there are no potential conflicts of interest between the duties of the members of the Supervisory Board with regard to the issuer and other private duties or interests. If required, the Supervisory Board’s internal rules and the Ethics and Compliance Charter, along with the conflict of interest prevention and management policy, govern the conflicts of interest of any member of the Supervisory Board;
- there is no arrangement or agreement with an individual shareholder, customer, supplier, or other, under which any of the Supervisory Board’s members has been selected;
- there are no family ties between the members of the Supervisory Board;
- no restriction, other than legal, is accepted by any of the members of the Supervisory Board regarding the disposal of their equity interest in the company.
In addition, specific conflicts of interest may arise from financial ties that may exist between the Group in which an external independent member holds executive office and BPCE.
In application of the Afep-Medef Code and the EBA guidelines, financial ties are only an obstacle to the qualification of independence if they are significant.
The balanced and immaterial nature of the business relationship is assessed according to cumulative criteria relating to:
- the weight of the debts and receivables of the Group in which the independent member exercises his main activity vis-à-vis Groupe BPCE, in relation to its liabilities or its revenue;
- the dependence of the company in which the independent member exercises executive functions on a Groupe BPCE entity with regard to its financing.
The Appointments Committee reviews business relationships on an annual basis. In 2024, it did not identify any significant business relationships during the fiscal year.
To the company’s knowledge, to date, no member of the Supervisory Board of BPCE has been convicted of fraud in the last five years. To the company’s knowledge, to date, no member of the Supervisory Board of BPCE has been declared bankrupt or in liquidation, or had assets placed in receivership, in the last five years.
5.1 Foreword
The financial data for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and the comparative data for 2023 were prepared by applying the accounting policies under IFRS as adopted by the European Union and applicable at that date, excluding some provisions of IAS 39 on hedge accounting. This management report discusses the results of Groupe BPCE and BPCE (formerly BPCE SA group), built around the central institution, BPCE, which was established on July 31, 2009 following the merger of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne groups.
5.2 Economic and financial environment
2024: Reduction in inflation without a recession and political uncertainty in France
The global economy was resilient in 2024, as in 2023, even returning to 3.2% growth in activity for the year, despite the contraction of international trade in relation to GDP and the emergence of major new uncertainties. In particular, two events marked the year: the surprise dissolution of the French National Assembly and the election of Donald Trump as president in the United States. The profound divergence in growth trajectories between the major economic zones, which was already observed until 2023, was reinforced with a striking contrast: the European continent continued to fall behind in the strategic race to industrial leadership implemented by China and the United States. Overall, the global economy benefited mainly from the decline in inflation and the exceptional dynamism of private demand in the United States. Inflation on both sides of the Atlantic has been defeated, without a recession being mechanically triggered by the aggressive tightening of key rates by the Fed and the ECB since March and July 2022 respectively. The easing of fiscal policies, particularly in the United States, which offset the monetary brake, boosted activity. In addition, disinflation has once again boosted the purchasing power of private agents on both sides of the Atlantic.
In 2024, China confirmed a process of structural slowdown, while the US economy exceeded the forecast of a simple soft landing, thanks to the still insolent dynamism of its private demand. Conversely, the Eurozone took refuge in an outlook of persistently sluggish growth, despite signs of improvement in the first half of the year, as the energy crisis eased. In the United States, as in China, the momentum came from abyssal public deficits. In addition to a now less expansionary fiscal policy and the negative effects of the previous monetary tightening, Europe suffered from a violent lag in its production prices relative to the United States and especially compared to China, due to the repercussions of the energy crisis of 2022. The economic recovery in the Eurozone was therefore quite modest in 2024, reaching 0.8%, compared to 0.5% in 2023. The support came mainly from foreign trade, as the contribution of domestic demand remained insufficient, despite disinflation, with household savings rates well above their historical average in the four main countries.
France entered an unknown situation of very marked economic and political uncertainty after the dissolution of the National Assembly on June 9. Its fiscal credibility, already tarnished by an unanticipated public deficit of 5.5% of GDP in 2023 and by the downgrade of its sovereign rating by Standard & Poor’s, the most powerful American agency, followed by Moody’s, became the main victim of ambitious election campaign promises, with no real basis in terms of financing. With the censorship of the government of Prime Minister Michel Barnier on December 4, political uncertainty took over from inflationary fears, despite the appointment of François Bayrou. The public deficit has also slipped again, reaching 6.1% of GDP in 2024. The sovereign spread with Germany reached nearly 80 basis points (bps) after the dissolution of the National Assembly, compared to only 50 bps previously.
French GDP grew by 1.1%, as in 2023. It benefited from the strong expansion of public spending and a record contribution from foreign trade, the latter mainly due to the decline in imports. It was artificially boosted by the impact of the Olympic and Paralympic Games in Paris in the third quarter. Conversely, with a wait-and-see policy giving way to mistrust, business investment fell, due to the tightening of financing conditions and increased reluctance on the part of private players. Consumption increased almost as much as in 2023, even though households experienced clear gains in purchasing power (+2.1% after +0.9%), boosted by the decline in prices. Given the general increase in uncertainty and probably the future risk of a tax increase in the face of the drift in public finances, the household savings rate increased to 17.9%, i.e. a level 4 points higher than before the health crisis. Real estate investment by households remained in sharp contraction.
Inflation declined markedly, due to the year-on-year slowdown in the prices of food, manufactured products, energy and services, notably in telecommunications: 2.0% per year on average, compared to 4.9% in 2023 and 5.2% in 2022. The unemployment rate stabilized at around 7.4%, compared to 7.3% in 2023, reflecting an increase in employment close to that of the active population: 214,000 net jobs were created over the year, for 256,000 additional assets, according to INSEE.
Regarding monetary policy, the resilience of domestic demand and inflation in services in the United States led the Fed to postpone the start of the key rate cuts previously planned for 2024 until September. The Fed made three successive reductions, one of 50 bps in September, which is rather unusual in magnitude, then two of 25 bps in November and December, i.e. a total of 100 bps, bringing key rates at the end of December within the range of 4.25%-4.5%, compared to 5.25%-5.5% previously. The ECB began its monetary easing process on June 6, before the Fed and for the first time in its history, even if it meant causing a temporary rise in the dollar-euro exchange rate. This decision was motivated by a structural European deficit in productivity gains, the weakness of domestic demand and the more significant decline in inflation than on the other side of the Atlantic. Next, three additional cuts of 25 bps were made in September, October and December, i.e. a total decrease of 100 bps over the year, with the deposit facility rate, the refinancing rate and the marginal lending rate being reduced respectively to 3%, 3.15% and 3.4% on December 12. The 125 bps spread in favor of US key rates, the exceptional economic dynamism of the United States and the anticipation of more favorable growth with the election of Donald Trump have therefore fueled the weakness of the euro against the dollar, with the latter standing at $1.04 on December 30, 2024, compared to approximately $1.11 at the end of 2023 (12/27). As of the second half of the year, the ECB also began to exit from the PEPP asset acquisition program launched during the pandemic, at a cautious disengagement rate of €7.5 billion per month.
Despite the net decline in inflation, 10-year rates on both sides of the Atlantic rebounded, after their sharp easing at the end of 2023, due to the postponement of the monetary easing process, which was finally less intensive than initially expected, until the second half of the year. The 10-year OAT was an annual average of 3%, as in 2023. However, it reached 3.29% on June 28 and ended at 3.19% on December 31, due to a risk premium increased by nearly 83 bps with Germany, despite the 100 bps decline in the ECB deposit facility rate. Lastly, the CAC 40 suffered significantly from the dissolution of the National Assembly and both political and budgetary uncertainty. It fell by 2.2% in 2024 (compared to an increase of 16.5% in 2023), reaching 7,380.74 on December 31, compared to 7,543.18 points at the end of 2023.
5.4 Groupe BPCE financial data
5.4.1 Groupe BPCE results
Groupe BPCE reported revenue of €23.3 billion, up +5.0% compared to 2023 and net income of €3.5 billion up +25.5% compared to 2023.
Groupe BPCE | ||||||||
Chg. 2024/2023 | ||||||||
in millions of euros | 2024 | 2023 pf | €m | % | ||||
Net banking income | 23,317 | 22,198 | 1,119 | 5.0% | ||||
Operating expense | (16,384) | (16,328) | (56) | 0.3% | ||||
Gross operating income | 6,933 | 5,870 | 1,063 | 18.1% | ||||
Cost/income ratio | 70.3% | 73.6% | - | -3.3 pts | ||||
Cost of risk | (2,061) | (1,731) | (330) | 19.1% | ||||
Share in net income of equity-accounted associates | 57 | 35 | 22 | 62.0% | ||||
Gains or losses on other assets | 28 | 8 | 20 | ns | ||||
Income before tax | 4,956 | 4,182 | 775 | 18.5% | ||||
Income tax | (1,357) | (1,340) | (17) | 1.3% | ||||
Non-controlling interests (minority interests) | (79) | (38) | (42) | ns | ||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE PARENT | 3,520 | 2,804 | 716 | 25.5% |
Groupe BPCE’s net banking income (NBI) reached €23.3 billion in 2024, an increase of +5.0% compared to 2023. This recovery was accompanied by significant momentum throughout the year compared to 2023: a slight decrease of -1.1% in the first quarter, followed by an increase of +2.9% in the second quarter, then +8.0% in the third quarter, and +10.7% in the fourth quarter.
Retail Banking and Insurance revenues increased by +3.8% compared to 2023, with solid performances in the Banque Populaire and Caisses d’Epargne networks, where net banking income grew by +3.7%. This performance was driven by the +5.0% growth in fees and commissions. The net interest margin (NIM) increased by +3.0%, equivalent to €172 million, despite a -9.3% decrease in new loans in a deteriorated real estate market. This recovery is partly due to a decrease in the cost of resources, as well as a significant increase in the credit production rate of +46 basis points over the year. Within BPA, the other divisions continued their development: Financial Solutions & Expertise (+2.2%), Insurance (+9.5%), the Digital and Payments division (+7.0%), while Banque Palatine’s revenues were down slightly (-2.3%).
Loan outstandings grew by +1% year-on-year, reaching €724 billion at the end of December 2024, stable for home loans at €400 billion, a +3% increase in equipment loans to €199 billion, and a +4% increase in consumer loans to €41 billion.
At the end of December 2024, savings deposits on the balance sheet stood at €681 billion, an increase of +€5 billion year-on-year.
The dynamic activity in FSE businesses with the retail networks continued, notably driven by Leasing (+8% year-on-year) and Consumer loans (+7% year-on-year) business lines.
In life insurance, outstandings exceeded the €100 billion threshold for the first time, at €103 billion at the end of December 2024, up +12% since the beginning of the year thanks to significant positive net inflows in unit-linked products and euro funds. The non-life insurance of customers of the Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne networks continued to grow, by nearly 34% in 2024.
The activity for the Digital & Payments division saw the increase in the number of card transactions of +5% year-on-year with +54% year-on-year for mobile payments. Oney’s revenues were up by +8% in 2024 year-on-year, reflecting the subsidiary’s recovery.
The net banking income of the Global Financial Services division increased by +8.0% at current exchange rates and by +8.1% at constant exchange rates compared to 2023 and amounted to €7,947 million. The Asset & Wealth Management and Corporate & Investment Banking divisions saw sustained positive changes: in Wealth & Asset Management, revenues increased by +9.9% at current exchange rates and by +9.9% at constant exchange rates, while revenues from Corporate & Investment Banking were up by +6.6% at current exchange rates and +6.8% at constant exchange rates. The change in the Asset & Wealth Management division’s net banking income is the result of several factors: strong growth in fees and commissions on outstandings and financial products with cash income benefiting from the rise in interest rates and the increase in the valuation of the Seed money portfolio. The net banking income of Corporate & Investment Banking was driven by all of its business lines in 2024, with revenue from capital markets increasing by +7.2% at constant exchange rates compared to 2023, financing by +12%, and Investment Banking including M&A activities by +17%.
Groupe BPCE’s operating expenses amounted to -€16.4 billion, stable (+0.3%) compared to 2023. Taking into account the impact of the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), which amounted to -€457 million in 2023, expenses continued to increase at +3.2% compared to 2023. This increase in expenses, close to the level of inflation (around +2% in France and +3% in the United States) reflects the support for the activity of the business lines and their development projects.
Groupe BPCE’s transformation costs, related to synergy-creating transactions such as mergers of institutions and migrations of IT platforms for digital transformation, are included in operating expenses. Restated for these items, operating expenses are slightly up by +0.4% compared to 2023, i.e. +3.3% excluding the contribution to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF).
Retail Banking and Insurance operating expenses, including transformation costs, were up moderately by +0.9%.
In the Global Financial Services division, operating expenses were -€5,651 million, up +7.2% at current exchange rates. They increased both in the Asset & Wealth Management division (+6.1%) driven by variable payroll (in line with performance) and fixed payroll (due to headcount growth) expenses and on Corporate & Investment Banking (+8.4%) to support business growth.
Groupe BPCE’s headcount increased by +0.7% in relation to end 2023, to 101,234 employees on December 31, 2024.
The cost/income ratio stood at 70.3% in 2024, an improvement of -3.3 points compared to 2023, and -1.4 points after restatement of non-recurring items and the SRF contribution.
Groupe BPCE’s cost of risk amounted to -€2.1 billion, up +19% compared to 2023, mainly in the Stage 3 segment, in particular due to certain specific cases and a deterioration in the economic environment.
As a percentage of customer loan outstandings, Groupe BPCE’s average annual cost of risk was 24 basis points in 2024 vs. 20 points in 2023.
The rate of non-performing loans to gross outstandings was 2.5% on December 31, 2024, a very slight increase in relation to 2023 (2.4%). The coverage rate for non-performing loans, including collateral on impaired loan outstandings, came to 68.1% on December 31, 2024 versus 68.2% on December 31, 2023.
In retail banking, the cost of risk relative to the outstandings of the Banque Populaire and Caisses d’Epargne networks was up compared to 2023 (at 24 basis points compared to 21 basis points). The risk ratio was up for Corporate & Investment Banking: 40 basis points in 2024 compared to 24 basis points in 2023, mainly impacted by individual provisions for non-performing loans and compared to a low level in 2023.
Net income (expense) from other assets amounted to €28 million in 2024 compared to €8 million in 2023.
Groupe BPCE’s pre-tax income was €5.0 billion in 2024, up +18.5% compared to 2023, driven by both Retail Banking and Insurance (+8%), and by the Global Financial Services division (+4.4%).
Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for Groupe BPCE amounted to €3,520 million in 2024, up by +25.5% compared to 2023.
- the growth in Common Equity Tier-1, driven in particular by retained earnings (+60 basis points) and to a lesser extent to the collection of cooperative shares (+6 basis points), but mitigated by the increase in the deduction for insufficient provisioning of non-performing loans (-3 basis points) and prudent assessment (-3 basis points);
- the control of risk-weighted assets (-3 basis points), favored by the change in the weighting of local authorities to 0% and the transition to Corporate IRBA for the high-end segment of the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne.
At December 31, 2024, the Tier-1 ratio stood at 16.2% and the total capital ratio at 18.8% compared to 15.6% and 18.2%, respectively, at December 31, 2023. These ratio levels remain well above the regulatory requirements defined by the European Central Bank (ECB) during the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) in 2025.
Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) amounted to €122.1 billion at end-December 2024. The TLAC ratio was 26.7% on December 31, 2024 versus 25.4% on December 31, 2023 for a target of 25.5% as defined in the new “VISION 2030” strategic plan.
The leverage ratio increased over the year (+10 basis points) and stood at 5.1% at December 31, 2024, the change in equity being offset by the increase in balance sheet and off-balance sheet exposures. This ratio is well above the regulatory threshold of 3.5%.
Groupe BPCE’s total liquidity reserves amounted to €302 billion on December 31, 2024, including €127 billion in available assets eligible for central bank funding, €67 billion in LCR-eligible assets, and €109 billion in liquid assets placed with central banks.
Short-term funding was €138 billion on December 31, 2024 compared to €146 billion on December 31, 2023.
5.5 BPCE (formerly BPCE SA group) financial data
5.5.1 BPCE results
In 2024, the transition from Groupe BPCE’s net income attributable to equity holders of the parent to BPCE can be broken down as follows:
Retail Banking and |
Global Financial |
Corporate center | BPCE | |||||||||||||
in millions of euros | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
Net banking income | 3,245 | 3,108 | 7,946 | 7,357 | 531 | 544 | 11,722 | 11,009 | ||||||||
Operating expense | (1,639) | (1,664) | (5,650) | (5,268) | (1,357) | (1,582) | (8,646) | (8,514) | ||||||||
Gross operating income | 1,606 | 1,444 | 2,295 | 2,089 | (825) | (1,038) | 3,076 | 2,495 | ||||||||
Cost/income ratio | 50.5% | 53.5% | 71.1% | 71.6% | ns | ns | 73.8% | 77.3% | ||||||||
Cost of risk | (297) | (302) | (268) | (154) | (43) | (71) | (607) | (527) | ||||||||
Share in net income of equity-accounted associates | 15 | (11) | 23 | 14 | 10 | (6) | 48 | (3) | ||||||||
Gains or losses on other assets | (3) | (39) | 0 | 18 | (11) | 0 | (14) | (21) | ||||||||
Value adjustments on goodwill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Income before tax | 1,321 | 1,093 | 2,051 | 1,967 | (869) | (1,114) | 2,503 | 1,945 | ||||||||
Income tax | (320) | (298) | (533) | (507) | 129 | 97 | (724) | (709) | ||||||||
Non-controlling interests (minority interests) | (0) | 49 | (66) | (56) | (1) | (0) | (67) | (7) | ||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE PARENT | 1,001 | 844 | 1,452 | 1,403 | (741) | (1,018) | 1,712 | 1,229 |
5.7 Post-balance sheet events
Announcement of a project to merge Groupe BPCE’s Asset Management activities with those of GENERALI
Assicurazioni Generali SpA (“Generali”) and BPCE signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on January 21, 2025 aimed at bringing together, in a joint venture, the asset management activities of Generali Investments Holding (“GIH”) and Natixis Investment Managers (NIM). BPCE (via Natixis IM) and GIH would each hold 50% of the combined activities with balanced governance and control. In the future, the interest held in the joint venture would be accounted for using the equity method, due to joint control. The activities that would be contributed by NIM are now included in the “Asset Management/ AWM” business segment presented in note 12.1. With €1,900 billion in assets under management (as of September 30, 2024), the proposed merger would create a global asset management platform with leading positions and critical size in both Europe and North America. The combined entity would be ranked first by revenues and second by assets under management in Europe; 9th by assets under management and 1st in insurance management worldwide.
The new joint venture would offer a full range of solutions in both traditional and alternative asset classes, which would meet the increasingly sophisticated needs of clients. The combined platform would also be uniquely positioned to continue to develop its activities on behalf of third parties in Europe, North America and regions with high growth potential in Asia, leveraging a global distribution network integrating an efficient centralized distribution platform as well as local multi-channel partnerships. The employee representative bodies of the various parties concerned will be consulted before the final agreements relating to the transaction are signed. The effective completion of the transaction will depend on obtaining the usual regulatory authorizations, with a completion date expected in early 2026.
5.8 2025 economic outlook
2025 forecasts: a European and French uncoupling?
The year 2025 has once again begun with a period of very marked geopolitical, political and economic uncertainty, particularly in France, where the political and budgetary situation remains very uncertain. Internationally, the impact of the election of the new US President remains a source of unknowns, particularly regarding the rapid implementation of customs measures liable to slow down global trade. Added to this is the reaction of monetary policy to the potential resurgence of the seeds of inflation. We could also see a deepening of the economic slowdown in Europe, in particular in Germany and France, due to a loss of competitiveness and attractiveness of the Eurozone, in the race to industrial leadership between the two main competitors, China and the United States. In addition, other perennial sources of instability, such as the war in Ukraine, the situation in the Middle East or the Red Sea, could cause tensions on oil and gas prices and shipping costs, resulting in upwards risk on inflation and downwards risk on activity. In France, in addition to a significant risk of an additional increase in the interest rate risk premium compared to Germany, an additional wait-and-see policy may emerge, due to unintended budgetary consequences. Any forecast thus runs the major risk of being caught off guard by unexpected political developments.
In 2025, in the absence of a specific shock, global growth should increase by +3.3% according to the OECD, slightly more than in 2024, mainly driven by emerging countries, due to the decline in inflation on a global scale, monetary easing on both sides of the Atlantic, the American economic dynamism and a certain rebalancing between internal and external demand in China. In the absence of a recovery in energy prices, faster-than-expected disinflation would gradually strengthen the economy, further favoring the purchasing power of private agents in advanced countries. This would make it possible, in an induced manner, to continue the process of easing monetary conditions, more in the Eurozone than in the United States, due to the a priori inflationary consequences of the Trump program.
The convergence of economic situations should continue, with China (GDP at 4.5% in 2025, after 5% in 2024) and the United States (respectively more than 2.5%, after 2.8%) seeing a slowdown in activity, while benefiting from significant support, thanks to a higher growth potential and a much more favorable budgetary stimulus. In particular, across the Atlantic, the Trump program, which is based on four main areas, namely deregulation, protectionism, reduction in taxation and public spending and finally the control of migration flows, would be moderately inflationary in the short term but favorable to growth, while widening public and trade deficits. As for the Eurozone, it should regain a slightly less sluggish momentum (respectively 1%, after 0.8%), while continuing to lag behind the other two major economies.
In 2025, French GDP should grow by only +0.8%, compared to +1.1% in 2024. Inflation is expected to reach an annual average of less than 1.4%, compared to 2% in 2024. In particular, disinflation should benefit from a specific decline in gas prices of -15% on February 1 and a decline in prices of food, energy and manufactured goods, while inflation in services should decline more slowly. Activity would probably be driven by the economic momentum still provided by disinflation, the fall in energy costs and the slightly more favorable trend in interest rates, or even by the expected mitigation of the desire to save, in a slightly more buoyant European economic context, although being hampered by Germany. However, this lower cyclical performance, compared to that of 2024, could be explained by the negative impact of the prolonged political uncertainty, despite the favorable effect of a lower reduction in budget expenditure than initially anticipated. The absence of a voted budget and a clear strategy to reduce the drift in public spending would fuel the wait-and-see attitude, followed by the mistrust of private agents. This would lead them to adopt much more cautious spending behaviors. The rather modest improvement in household spending, the main driver of activity, would then be insufficient to counteract the increased prudence of companies in terms of employment, management of inventories and investment, due to the environment of still high interest rates, the deterioration of the cash position of VSEs/SMEs and the rise in defaults.
Savings incentives should remain strong, slowing the expected decrease in the household savings rate, in particular through the formation of precautionary savings. The rise of specific concerns such as fears of losing your job, the effects of the political uncertainty arising from the dissolution of the National Assembly or the concern for budgetary imbalances, has partly replaced the feeling of deterioration in purchasing power and the effect of real cash holdings (the traditional increase in savings during periods of inflation to compensate for the loss of purchasing power of financial assets). In addition, employment is expected to decline, as the partial and gradual recovery of previous losses in productivity and lower activity in the merchant sectors should push the unemployment rate towards an annual average of 7.8%. The savings rate would therefore tend to decline moderately to around 17.6%, after 17.9% in 2024, not returning to the average levels before Covid (14.6% in 2019). Lastly, French growth is likely to remain structurally hampered by the need to better control the drift in public accounts, which are increasingly constrained by the increase in the debt expense and by the implementation of a European excessive deficit procedure. The public deficit would still be very high in 2025: around 5.4% of GDP, compared to 6.1% in 2024.
The FED would only reduce its main key rate by -50 bps by June, or even only -25 bps. If the previously anticipated -75 bps decline were to be true, due to the sharper decline in labor market tensions and the decline in inflation to below 2.5%, the key rate range could then be reach 3.25%-3.5% by the end of 2025. As for the ECB, it would gradually reduce the deposit rate by -100 bps, perhaps by the summer of 2025, given the sluggishness and fragility of the economic cycle, not to mention the sharp easing of the inflation, although this remains heterogeneous across European countries. It should take it from 3% at the end of 2024 to 2% at the end of 2025, in steps of -25 bps, with this cautious pace taking into account the difficulty of settling wages, which is a real cause for concern, as it fuels inflation in services.
In addition, the trend for central bank balance sheets to deflate, the very high and widespread level of public and private debt and the scale of the issues required between 2024 and 2027 to renew debt stocks would prevent long-term yields from falling, despite the easing of key rates and the decline in inflation expectations. Moreover, the risk premiums on the sustainability of public debts in the United States and certain European countries, such as Italy and now France, are likely to increase. In the absence of a lasting and profound questioning of a credible fiscal consolidation path, the 10-year OAT, whose current level reflects more a normalization of the interest rate regime than a rebound in economic activity, would be around an annual average of 3.1% in 2025 after 3.0% in 2024 and 2023, leading to a new steepening of the interest rate curve.
5.9 Alternative performance indicators Article 223-1 of the AMF General Regulation
Notes on methodology
Alternative Performance Indicators | Definition | Rationale for use |
Underlying net banking income |
Net banking income restated for exceptional items. Details of exceptional items are provided in the table below. |
Measurement of Groupe BPCE’s net banking income excluding items that do not reflect operating performance or significant non-recurring items. |
Underlying operating expenses |
Operating expenses restated for exceptional items. Details of exceptional items are provided in the table below. |
Measurement of the level of operating expenses. |
Underlying cost/income ratio | Ratio calculated based on net banking income and operating expenses excluding exceptional items | Measurement of the Group’s operating efficiency |
Underlying cost/income excluding SRF ratio | Ratio calculated based on net banking income and operating expenses excluding exceptional items and restated for the contribution to the SRF (Single Resolution Fund) | Measurement of the Group’s operating efficiency. |
Cost of risk | “Cost of credit risk” item in the reportable consolidated income statement | Measurement of the level of risk. |
Exceptional items |
Non-recurring items of a significant amount or items that do not reflect operating performance, in particular transformation and restructuring costs. Details of exceptional items are provided in the table below. |
|
Underlying net income attributable to equity holders of the parent | Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent restated for exceptional items. | Measurement of Groupe BPCE’s income excluding non-recurring items of a significant amount or items that do not reflect operating performance. |
in millions of euros |
Net banking income |
Operating expense |
Cost of risk |
Gains or losses on other assets |
Income before tax |
Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
Reported 2024 results | 23,317 | (16,384) | (2,061) | 28 | 4,956 | 3,520 | |
Transformation and reorganization costs | Business lines/ Corporate center | 3 | (208) | (1) | (206) | (153) | |
Disposals | Corporate center | (3) | (3) | (3) | |||
Litigation | Business lines/ Corporate center | (0) | (0) | (0) | |||
2024 results excluding exceptional items | 23,314 | (16,176) | (2,061) | 32 | 5,165 | 3,675 |
in millions of euros |
Net banking income |
Operating expense |
Cost of risk |
Gains or losses on other assets |
Income before tax |
Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
Reported 2023 results | 22,198 | (16,328) | (1,731) | 8 | 4,182 | 2,804 | |
Transformation and reorganization costs | Business lines/ Corporate center | 2 | (213) | (32) | (0) | (242) | (164) |
Disposals | Corporate center | (45) | (45) | (44) | |||
Litigation | Business lines/ Corporate center | 87 | 87 | 87 | |||
2023 results excluding exceptional items | 22,108 | (16,115) | (1,699) | 53 | 4,381 | 2,925 |
6 FINANCIAL REPORT
The scope of consolidation of both groups, organized around the central institution, is presented in the diagram below.
In addition to BPCE, Groupe BPCE includes the Banques Populaires, the Caisses d’Epargne and their respective subsidiaries.
6.1 IFRS consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE as at December 31, 2024
6.1.1 Consolidated income statement
in millions of euros | Notes | 2024 fiscal year | 2023 fiscal year |
Interest and similar income | 4.1 | 56,997 | 50,593 |
Interest and similar expenses | 4.1 | (49,413) | (43,304) |
Commission income | 4.2 | 12,889 | 12,053 |
Commission expenses | 4.2 | (1,854) | (1,736) |
Gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | 4.3 | 2,976 | 2,708 |
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income | 4.4 | 163 | 183 |
Gains (losses) arising from derecognition of financial assets at amortized cost | 4.5 | (4) | 8 |
Revenue from insurance contracts issued | 9.1.1 | 5,061 | 4,811 |
Service expenses from insurance contracts issued | 9.1.2 | (3,785) | (3,482) |
Income and expenses from reinsurance contracts held | 9.1.3 | (175) | (163) |
Net investment income from insurance activities | 9.1.4 | 3,643 | 4,261 |
Finance income or expenses from insurance contracts issued | 9.1.5 | (3,588) | (4,437) |
Finance income or expenses from reinsurance contracts held | 9.1.6 | 82 | 337 |
Cost of credit risk on insurance activities financial investments | 9.1.7 | 9 | (16) |
Income from other activities | 4.6 | 1,294 | 1,385 |
Expenses from other activities | 4.6 | (979) | (1,005) |
Net banking income | 23,317 | 22,198 | |
Operating expenses | 4.7 | (15,239) | (15,218) |
Depreciation, amortization and impairment for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | (1,145) | (1,110) | |
Gross operating income | 6,933 | 5,870 | |
Cost of credit risk | 7.1.1 | (2,061) | (1,731) |
Net operating income | 4,872 | 4,138 | |
Share in net income of associates and joint ventures | 12.4.2 | 57 | 35 |
Gains or losses on other assets | 4.8 | 28 | 8 |
Value adjustments on goodwill | 3.5.2 | 0 | 0 |
Income before tax | 4,956 | 4,182 | |
Income tax | 11.1 | (1,357) | (1,340) |
Net income from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | |
Net income | 3,599 | 2,841 | |
Non-controlling interests | 5.16 | (79) | (38) |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE PARENT | 3,520 | 2,804 |
6.2 Statutory auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements
This is a translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the financial statements of the Company issued in French and it is provided solely for the convenience of English-speaking users. This statutory auditors’ report includes information required by French law, such as information about the appointment of the statutory auditors or verification of the management report and other documents provided to shareholders. This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and professional auditing standards applicable in France.
In compliance with the engagement entrusted to us by your Annual General Meeting , We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Group BPCE for the year ended the December 31, 2024.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and of the financial position of the Group as at December 31, 2024 and of the results of its operations for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.
The opinion expressed above is consistent with the content of our in relation to the Audit Committee.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of professional practice applicable in France. We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to base our opinion.
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Statutory auditors’ responsibilities in relation to the audit of the consolidated financial statements” section of this report.
We conducted our audit engagement in compliance with independence requirements of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce) and the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for statutory auditors, for the period from January 1st, 2024 to the date of our report, and specifically we did not provide any prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014.
In accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 821-53 and R.821-180 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce) relating to the justification of our assessments, we inform you of the key audit matters relating to risks of material misstatement that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period, as well as how we addressed those risks.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, approved in the conditions mentioned above, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on specific items of the consolidated financial statements.
Groupe BPCE is exposed to credit risks. These risks resulting from the inability of its customers or counterparties to meet their financial commitments relate in particular to its customer lending activities.
In accordance with the “impairment” component of IFRS 9, your Group sets up impairments and provisions to cover the risks of expected losses (outstanding under status 1 and 2) or proven losses (outstanding losses under status 3).
The rules for impairment for risks in respect of expected losses require the constitution of a first impairment status materializing an expected loss in 1 year from the origin of a new financial asset classified at amortized cost or fair value by equity and on off-balance sheet commitments; and a second status materializing an expected loss at maturity, in the event of a significant deterioration in credit risk. These impairments for expected losses (statuses 1 and 2) are determined mainly on the basis of models integrating different parameters (probability of default, losses at default, exposures, etc.) and incorporating forward-looking information.
These impairments for expected losses are supplemented, where appropriate, by allocations on a sectoral basis with regard to local specificities.
Outstanding loans bearing proven counterparty risk (status 3) are subject to impairments determined mainly on an individual basis. These impairments are assessed by management on the basis of future recoverable flows, taking into account the estimated available guarantees on each of the appropriations concerned.
We considered that the identification and assessment of credit risk was a key point of the audit given that the provisions induced constitute a significant estimate for the preparation of the accounts, and call for the judgment of management both in the attribution of outstanding loans to the different statuses and in the determination of the parameters and methods for calculating impairments for outstanding loans in statuses 1 and 2,than in the assessment of the individual level of provisioning of outstanding loans in status 3.
The stock of impairments for credit losses on outstanding loans and similar to customers and credit institutions amounted to €14,683 million, of which €1,057 million under status 1, €3,973 million under status 2 and €9,653 million under status 3.
The cost of risk for the 2024 financial year amounted to €2,061 million (compared to €1,731 million for the 2023 financial year).
For further details on accounting policies and exposures, refer to notes 5.5 and 7.1 to the notes .
- verifying the existence of an internal control system allowing the ratings of the various counterparties to be updated at an appropriate frequency;
- verifying the existence of a governance that reviews the adequacy of impairment models, the parameters used to calculate impairment at an appropriate frequency, and analyses the evolution of impairment in accordance with IFRS9 rules;
- assess the appropriateness of the macroeconomic models, parameters and assumptions used for the impairment calculations;
- to carry out counter-calculations on the main types of outstanding loans;
- to carry out controls on the IT system as a whole set up by Groupe BPCE, including a review of the general IT controls, interfaces and on-board controls for specific data used to process information relating to IFRS 9;
- to carry out checks on the tool used to assess the expected impact in terms of credit losses from the application of sectoral downgrades;
- to verify the correct documentation and justification of the sectoral provisions recorded in the group. In this respect, we have (i) assessed the criteria for the group’s identification of the business sectors considered to be more sensitive to the impact of the current economic context, (ii) assessed the appropriate level of the provisions thus estimated.
As part of our audit procedures, we generally reviewed the control framework for identifying exposures classified as status 3, monitoring credit and counterparty risks, assessing non-recovery risks, and determining impairments and related provisions on an individual basis.
Our work consisted of assessing the quality of the monitoring system for sensitive, doubtful and contentious counterparties, as well as the credit review process. In addition, on the basis of a sample of files selected on the basis of materiality and risk criteria, we carried out contradictory analyses of the amounts of impairments and provisions.
We have also appreciated the detailed information in the notes required by IFRS 9 under the “Impairment” component as at December 31, 2024.
Groupe BPCE holds a significant proportion of financial instruments measured at fair value, which are broken down into three levels defined by IFRS 13 according to the fair value determination method used.
rket value is determined according to different approaches depending on the nature and complexity of the instruments: use of directly observable quoted prices (instruments classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy), valuation models with mostly observable parameters (instruments classified as Level 2) and valuation models with mostly unobservable parameters (instruments classified as Level 3).
For the most complex financial instruments, these approaches can therefore involve a significant amount of judgement taking into account:
- the use of internal valuation models;
- the use of valuation parameters that are not observable on the market;
- additional valuation adjustments to take account of certain market, counterparty or liquidity risks.
We considered the measurement of complex Level 2 and Level 3 fair value financial instruments to be a key focus of the audit due to the materiality of the exposures and the use of judgment in the determination of fair value.
We tested the effectiveness of key controls that we considered relevant to our audit, including those related to:
- the validation and periodic review, by the risk department, of valuation models,
- independent verification of valuation parameters,
- the determination of the main valuation adjustments,
- the validation and periodic review of the observability criteria taken into account to classify complex financial instruments in the fair value hierarchy and to take into account the impact on margin on the first day.
We carried out this due diligence with the assistance of our valuation experts, with whom we also carried out independent valuation work consisting of examining, on a sample basis, the assumptions, methodologies and market parameters feeding into the valuation models used to estimate the main valuation adjustments as at 31 December 2024.
We also examined, on the basis of samples, any existing margin call spreads with market counterparties, allowing us to assess the appropriateness of valuations.
Finally, we have assessed the information on the valuation of financial instruments published in the notes.
Groupe BPCE records direct equity contracts as liabilities for its insurance activities in the “retirement savings” classes.
These liabilities are measured using a Variable Fee Approach (VFA) model, which requires the valuation of actuarial liabilities based on significant judgments about the data used, assumptions about future periods, and the result of estimation techniques. These liabilities comprise the following three blocks:
- The estimate of the present value of the estimates of future cash flows ( BE) relating to these valued long-term contracts is based on technical and financial assumptions, and significant judgments:
- The assessment of the risk adjustment (RA) is based on assumptions about the group’s level of confidence in the risk factors associated with the technical liabilities, and on a value-at-risk approach, which is the maximum loss within the defined level of confidenec.
- Finally, the amortization of the Contractual Service Margin (CSM), corresponding to the fraction of CSM recognized as revenue from insurance activities for the year, is determined on the basis of the units of coverage. These hedging units are adjusted to take into account the expected return of the underlying items resulting from so-called “real world” assumptions.
In addition, the internal margins between the banking entities distributing insurance products and the insurance entities are restated.
Due to the sensitivity of the measurement of these liabilities to these key judgments and assumptions, we considered the measurement of the liabilities related to insurance contracts in the savings and retirement classes as a key focus of the audit.
As of December 31, 2024, liabilities related to insurance contracts in the “savings and retirement” classes of business valued under the Variable Fee Approach (VFA) amounted to €112,699 million and those measured under the general approach amounted to €2,848 million. They are broken down as follows:
- the estimated present value of future cash flows is €104,903 million;
- the adjustment for non-financial risk amounted to €2,018 million;
- the margin on contractual services amounted to €8,625 million.
For further details on the accounting principles and valuation of these contracts, refer to Notes 9 and 9.2.7 of the Appendix.
In order to cover the risk of valuation of these liabilities related to insurance contracts in the “savings and retirement” classes, we have implemented the following audit procedures with the assistance of our actuarial specialists:
- We assessed the methodology for assessing the future cash flows (BE), RA and CSM related to these contracts and checked their compliance with the accounting standards in force;
- We assessed the internal control environment of the information systems involved in the processing of technical data, calculations and their transfer to accounting;
- We assessed the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the key controls put in place by the group. In particular, we assessed:
– | The system of controls relating to the validation of the future cash flow projection model; | |
– | Documentation and controls relating to key judgments and assumptions made by the finance department; |
- We have tested on a sample basis and based on our risk assessment, the calculation models used to estimate future cash flows, the adjustment for non-financial risk and CSM, and any material changes to the calculation models;
- We tested the reliability of the data used as a basis for the estimates by means of a sample;
- We tested by sampling the units of coverage and the main so-called “real-world” assumptions used for the recognition of the CSM in the result;
- We performed analytical procedures on developments to identify any significant inconsistent or unexpected variations.
Finally, we assessed the appropriateness of the disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, including the risk sensitivity information and the presentation of restatements relating to internal contractual service margins.
Groupe BPCE notes goodwill in its consolidated financial statements. Indeed, the external growth operations carried out by Groupe BPCE have led it (i) to assess the control arrangements exercised over the acquired entities in accordance with IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ and (ii) to carry out a purchase price allocation exercise in accordance with IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’ . Following this allocation exercise, the unallocated surplus corresponding to the residual identifiable net asset was recorded in goodwill.
These goodwill and acquired intangible assets with an indefinite life are subject to impairment tests at least annually, based on the assessment of the recoverable amount of the cash-generating units (CGUs) to which they are attached or as soon as there are indications of impairment losses. The determination of the recoverable amount is based on the discounting of the estimated future cash flows of the CGU as they result from the medium-term plans drawn up by the entities concerned and assessed by the Group.
We considered impairment testing of goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life to be a key focus of the audit by its very nature, as it requires the exercise of judgment, particularly in determining discount rates, economic scenarios or financial projections.
As of December 31, 2024, goodwill in gross terms amounted to €5,005 million and cumulative impairment losses amounted to €693 million.
The terms of the impairment test implemented by Groupe BPCE as well as the key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount and the sensitivities of the recoverable amounts are described in note 3.5 of the notes.
With the help of our experts, we evaluated the process put in place by Groupe BPCE to identify the indicators of possible impairment loss and carried out a critical review of the methods of implementing impairment tests.
- Comparison of assumptions and parameters with external sources
- examination of the reasonableness, particularly in the current economic and financial context, of the medium-term plans selected for each CGU concerned, involving:
– | the comparison with the group’s strategic plan approved by the management bodies (supervisory board or board of directors); | |
– | the assessment of the coherence and reliability of the main assumptions used to construct them, in particular with regard to the financial trajectories drawn up during past years and actually implemented; | |
– | analysis of sensitivity to different valuation parameters (equity, discount rate, etc.). |
- verification of the consistency of the information published on the results of these impairment tests.
Groupe BPCE is the subject of litigation before the courts, investigations and requests for information from regulatory and tax authorities in various jurisdictions.
The assessment of the resulting legal and non-compliance (including tax) risks is based on management’s estimate at the reporting date.
The recognition of a provision, the determination of its amount and the information communicated in the notes require the exercise of judgment, in particular because of the difficulty of estimating the probability of the risk materialising as well as the outcome and financial consequences of ongoing proceedings.
As a result, we considered the estimation of the allowances for legal and non-compliance risks to be a key focus of the audit given the sensitivity of these allowances to management’s assumptions and options.
Refer to notes 2.3, 5.13 and 11.1 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for more details.
We have taken note of the status of the ongoing proceedings and the main risks identified by the Group, based in particular on regular exchanges with management (and more specifically the Group’s legal, compliance and tax departments) as well as on the review of the documentation made available to us.
We also assessed the reasonableness of the assumptions and data used by management in estimating the amount of allowances recognized at the cut-off date. In particular, we have involved specialists in tax law to critically review the tax risk analyses identified by the Group and the related provisions.
Finally, we checked that the provisions thus valued were correctly recorded in the accounts and the information given in this respect in the notes to the consolidated accounts.
We have also performed, in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the specific verifications required by laws and regulations of the information pertaining to the Group presented in the management report of the Board of Directors.
We have no matters to report as to its fair presentation and its consistency with the consolidated financial statements
FORMAT FOR THE PRESENTATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INTENDED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
We have also proceeded, in accordance with the professional practice standard on the auditor’s due diligence relating to annual and consolidated accounts presented in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF), to verify compliance with this format defined by the European delegated regulation No. 2019/815 of December 17, 2018, in the presentation of the consolidated accounts included in the annual financial report mentioned in Article L.451-1-2 of the Monetary and Financial Code, prepared under the responsibility of the Chairman of the Management Board. As for consolidated accounts, our due diligence includes verifying the compliance of the tagging of these accounts with the format defined by the aforementioned regulation.
Based on our work, we conclude that the presentation of the consolidated accounts included in the annual financial report complies, in all its significant aspects, with the European Single Electronic Format.
Forvis Mazars SA was appointed Statutory Auditors in the first articles of association dated 19 December 2006 of GCE Nao (which became BPCE in July 2009), at its formation. The firms PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit and Deloitte & Associés were appointed as statutory auditors of BPCE by the general assembly, respectively, on July 2, 2009, and May 22, 2015.
, 2024, Forvis Mazars SA was in the 18th year of its uninterrupted mission, including 16 years since the company became a public interest entity, PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit in the 16th year of its uninterrupted mission and Deloitte & Associés was in the 10th year of its uninterrupted mission.
VI. RESPONSIBILITIES OF MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN RELATION TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to goingconcern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless it is expected to liquidate the Company or to cease operations.
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the financial reporting process and the effectiveness of internal control and risks management systems and where applicable, its internal audit, regarding the accounting and financial reporting procedures.
VII. STATUTORY AUDITORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO THE AUDIT OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Our role is to issue a report on the consolidated financial statements. Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.
As specified in Article L.821-55 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce), our statutory audit does not include assurance on the viability of the Company or the quality of management of the affairs of the Company.
As part of an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the statutory auditor exercises professional judgment throughout the audit and furthermore:
- Identifies and assesses the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, designs and performs audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtains audit evidence considered to be sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for his opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
- Obtains an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control.
- Evaluates the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management in the consolidated financial statements.
- Assesses the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. This assessment is based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of his audit report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern. If the statutory auditor concludes that a material uncertainty exists, there is a requirement to draw attention in the audit report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if
- such disclosures are not provided or inadequate, to modify the opinion expressed therein.
- Evaluates the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements and assesses whether these statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
- Obtains sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. The statutory auditor is responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the audit of the consolidated financial statements and for the opinion expressed on these consolidated financial statements.
We submit a report to the Audit Committee which includes in particular a description of the scope of the audit and the audit program implemented, as well as the results of our audit. We also report, if any, significant deficiencies in internal control regarding the accounting and financial reporting procedures that we have identified.
Our report to the Audit Committee includes the risks of material misstatement that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and which are therefore the key audit matters, that we are required to describe in this report.
We also provide the Audit Committee with the declaration provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) N° 537/2014, confirming our independence within the meaning of the rules applicable in France such as they are set in particular by Articles L.821-27 to L.821-34 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce) and in the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for statutory auditors. Where appropriate, we discuss with the Audit Committee the risks that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and the related safeguards.
6.3 IFRS Consolidated financial statements of BPCE at December 31, 2024
6.3.1 Consolidated income statement
in millions of euros | Notes | 2024 fiscal year | 2023 fiscal year |
Interest and similar income | 4.1 | 37,651 | 33,278 |
Interest and similar expenses | 4.1 | (35,360) | (31,528) |
Commission income | 4.2 | 6,575 | 6,029 |
Commission expenses | 4.2 | (1,118) | (1,051) |
Gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | 4.3 | 2,080 | 2,309 |
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income | 4.4 | 108 | 81 |
Gains (losses) arising from derecognition of financial assets at amortized cost | 4.5 | (12) | (9) |
Revenue from insurance contracts issued | 9.1.1 | 4,718 | 4,472 |
Service expenses from insurance contracts issued | 9.1.2 | (3,915) | (3,579) |
Income and expenses from reinsurance contracts held | 9.1.3 | (153) | (155) |
Net investment income from insurance activities | 9.1.4 | 3,295 | 3,861 |
Finance income or expenses from insurance contracts issued | 9.1.5 | (3,257) | (4,056) |
Finance income or expenses from reinsurance contracts held | 9.1.6 | 81 | 336 |
Cost of credit risk on insurance activities financial investments | 9.1.7 | 5 | (15) |
Income from other activities | 4.6 | 1,655 | 1,640 |
Expenses from other activities | 4.6 | (633) | (604) |
Net banking income | 11,722 | 11,009 | |
Operating expenses | 4.7 | (8,094) | (8,001) |
Depreciation, amortization and impairment for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | (552) | (513) | |
Gross operating income | 3,076 | 2,495 | |
Cost of credit risk | 7.1.1 | (607) | (527) |
Net operating income | 2,469 | 1,968 | |
Share in net income of associates and joint ventures | 12.4.2 | 48 | (3) |
Gains or losses on other assets | 4.8 | (14) | (21) |
Value adjustments on goodwill | 3.4.2 | 0 | 0 |
Income before tax | 2,503 | 1,945 | |
Income tax | 11.1 | (724) | (709) |
Net income from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | |
Net income | 1,779 | 1,236 | |
Non-controlling interests | 5.16 | (67) | (7) |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE PARENT | 1,712 | 1,229 |
6.4 Statutory auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements
This is a translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the financial statements of the Company issued in French and it is provided solely for the convenience of English-speaking users. This statutory auditors’ report includes information required by French law, such as information about the appointment of the statutory auditors or verification of the management report and other documents provided to shareholders. This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and professional auditing standards applicable in France.
In compliance with the engagement entrusted to us by your Annual General Meeting, we have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of BPCE (previously Groupe BPCE SA) for the year ended December 31, 2024.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and of the financial position of the Group as at December 31, 2024 and of the results of its operations for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.
We conducted our audit in accordance with professional standards applicable in France. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Statutory Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report.
We conducted our audit engagement in compliance with independence requirements of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce) and the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for statutory auditors, for the period from January 1st, 2024 to the date of our report, and specifically we did not provide any prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014.
In accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 821-53 and R.821-180 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce) relating to the justification of our assessments, we inform you of the key audit matters relating to risks of material misstatement that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period, as well as how we addressed those risks.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, approved in the conditions mentioned above, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on specific items of the consolidated financial statements.
BPCE is exposed to credit risks. These risks, resulting from the inability of its clients or counterparties to meet their financial commitments, particularly affect its customer lending activities.
In accordance with the ‘impairment’ component of IFRS 9 standard, your Group establishes impairments and provisions intended to cover the risks of expected losses (outstandings in statuses 1 and 2) or incurred losses (outstandings in status 3).
The impairment rules for expected loss risks require the establishment of a first impairment status representing an expected loss at 1 year from the origination of a new financial asset classified at amortized cost or fair value through equity and on off-balance sheet commitments; and a second status representing an expected loss at maturity, in case of a significant deterioration in credit risk. These impairments for expected losses (statuses 1 and 2) are determined mainly based on models incorporating various parameters (default probabilities, loss given default, exposures, ...) and including forward-looking information.
Outstandings of credits bearing a proven counterparty risk (status 3) are subject to impairments determined essentially on an individual basis. These impairments are assessed by management based on recoverable future cash flows considering the estimated available guarantees for each of the credits concerned.
We considered the identification and evaluation of credit risk to be a key point of the audit given that the induced provisions constitute a significant estimate for the preparation of the accounts, and call upon management’s judgment both in the attachment of credit outstandings to the different statuses and in the determination of the parameters and calculation modalities of the impairments for outstandings in statuses 1 and 2, as well as in the assessment of the level of individual provisioning of credit outstandings in status 3.
The stock of impairments for credit losses on outstanding loans and similar to customers and credit institutions amounted to €2,862 million, of which €262 million under status 1, €406 million under status 2 and €2,194 million under status 3.
The cost of risk for the 2024 financial year amounted to €607 million (compared to €527 million for the 2023 financial year).
For further details on accounting policies and exposures, refer to notes 5.5 and 7.1 to the notes.
- verifying the existence of an internal control system allowing an appropriate frequency update of the ratings of the different counterparties;
- verifying the existence of governance reviewing at an appropriate frequency the adequacy of impairment models, the parameters used for the calculation of impairments, and analyzing the developments of impairments with respect to IFRS 9;
- assessing the appropriateness of the models, parameters, and macroeconomic assumptions used for the calculations of impairmperforming counter-calculations on the main types of credit outstandings;
- to carry out controls on the IT system as a whole set up by BPCE, including a review of general IT controls, interfaces and on-board controls for specific data used to process information relating to IFRS 9;
In the context of our audit procedures, we have, in general, examined the control system related to the census of exposures classified in status 3, the monitoring of credit and counterparty risks, the assessment of non-recovery risks, and the determination of impairments and provisions on an individual basis.
Our work consisted of assessing the quality of the monitoring system for sensitive, dubious, and litigious counterparties, as well as the credit review process. Furthermore, based on a sample of files selected on materiality and risk criteria, we have carried out contradictory analyses of the amounts of impairments and provisions.
We also appreciated the detailed information required by IFRS 9 standard under the ‘Impairments’ component as of December 31, 2024.
BPCE holds a significant proportion of financial instruments measured at fair value, which are broken down into three levels defined by IFRS 13 according to the fair value determination method used.
Market value is determined according to different approaches depending on the nature and complexity of the instruments: use of directly observable quoted prices (instruments classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy), valuation models with mostly observable parameters (instruments classified as Level 2) and valuation models with mostly unobservable parameters (instruments classified as Level 3).
For the most complex financial instruments, these approaches can therefore involve a significant amount of judgement taking into account:
- the use of internal valuation models;
- the use of valuation parameters that are not observable on the market;
- aditional valuation adjustments to take account of certain market, counterparty or liquidity risks.
We considered the measurement of complex Level 2 and Level 3 fair value financial instruments to be a key focus of the audit due to the materiality of the exposures and the use of judgment in the determination of fair value.
- the validation and periodic review, by the risk department, of valuation models,
- independent verification of valuation parameters,
- the determination of the main valuation adjustments,
the validation and periodic review of the observability criteria taken into account to classify complex financial instruments in the fair value hierarchy and to take into account the impact on margin on the first day.
We carried out this due diligence with the assistance of our valuation experts, with whom we also carried out independent valuation work consisting of examining, on a sample basis, the assumptions, methodologies and market parameters feeding into the valuation models used to estimate the main valuation adjustments as at 31 December 2024.
We also examined, on the basis of samples, any existing margin call spreads with market counterparties, allowing us to assess the appropriateness of valuations.
Finally, we have assessed the information on the valuation of financial instruments published in the notes.
BPCE records direct equity contracts as liabilities for its insurance activities in the “retirement savings” classes.
These liabilities are measured using a Variable Fee Approach (VFA) model, which requires the valuation of actuarial liabilities based on significant judgments about the data used, assumptions about future periods, and the result of estimation techniques. These liabilities comprise the following three blocks:
- The estimate of the present value of the estimates of future cash flows (BE) relating to these valued long-term contracts is based on technical and financial assumptions, and significant judgments:
- The assessment of the risk adjustment (RA) is based on assumptions about the group’s level of confidence in the risk factors associated with the technical liabilities, and on a value-at-risk approach, which is the maximum loss within the defined level of confidence.
- Finally, the amortization of the Contractual Service Margin (CSM), corresponding to the fraction of CSM recognized as revenue from insurance activities for the year, is determined on the basis of the units of coverage. These hedging units are adjusted to take into account the expected return of the underlying items resulting from so-called “real world” assumptions.
In addition, the internal margins between the banking entities distributing insurance products and the insurance entities are restated.
Due to the sensitivity of the measurement of these liabilities to these key judgments and assumptions, we considered the measurement of the liabilities related to insurance contracts in the savings and retirement classes as a key focus of the audit.
As of December 31, 2024, liabilities related to insurance contracts in the “savings and retirement” classes of business valued under the Variable Fee Approach (VFA) amounted to €103,943 million and those measured under the general approach amounted to €2,819 million. They are broken down as follows:
- the estimated present value of future cash flows is €99,442 million;
- the adjustment for non-financial risk amounted to €1,869 million;
- the margin on contractual services amounted to €5,451 million.
For further details on the accounting principles and valuation
In order to cover the risk of valuation of these liabilities related to insurance contracts in the “savings and retirement” classes, we have implemented the following audit procedures with the assistance of our actuarial specialists:
- We assessed the methodology for assessing the future cash flows (BE), RA and CSM related to these contracts and checked their compliance with the accounting standards in force;
- We assessed the internal control environment of the information systems involved in the processing of technical data, calculations and their transfer to accounting;
-
We assessed the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the key controls put in place by the group. In particular, we assessed:
- The system of controls relating to the validation of the future cash flow projection model;
- Documentation and controls relating to key judgments and assumptions made by the finance department;
- We have tested on a sample basis and based on our risk assessment, the calculation models used to estimate future cash flows, the adjustment for non-financial risk and CSM, and any material changes to the calculation models;
- We tested the reliability of the data used as a basis for the estimates by means of a sample;
- We tested by sampling the units of coverage and the main so-called “real-world” assumptions used for the recognition of the CSM in the result;
- We performed analytical procedures on developments to identify any significant inconsistent or unexpected variations.
Finally, we assessed the appropriateness of the disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, including the risk sensitivity information and the presentation of restatements relating to internal contractual service margins.
BPCE notes goodwill in its consolidated financial statements. Indeed, the external growth operations carried out by the group have led it to (i) assess the control arrangements exercised over the acquired entities in accordance with IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ and (ii) carry out a purchase price allocation exercise in accordance with IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’. Following this allocation exercise, the unallocated surplus corresponding to the residual identifiable net asset was recorded in goodwill.
These goodwill and acquired intangible assets with an indefinite life are subject to impairment tests at least annually, based on the assessment of the recoverable amount of the cash-generating units (CGUs) to which they are attached or as soon as there are indications of impairment losses. The determination of the recoverable amount is based on the discounting of the estimated future cash flows of the CGU as they result from the medium-term plans drawn up by the entities concerned and assessed by the group.
We considered impairment testing of goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life to be a key focus of the audit by its very nature, as it requires the exercise of judgment, particularly in determining discount rates, economic scenarios or financial projections.
As of December 31, 2024, goodwill in gross terms amounted to €4,191 million and cumulative impairment losses amounted to €534 million.
The terms of the impairment test implemented by BPCE and the key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount and the sensitivities of the recoverable amounts are described in note 3.4 to the notes.
With the help of our experts, we evaluated the process put in place by BPCE to identify indicators of possible impairment losses and carried out a critical review of the methods of implementing impairment tests.
- Comparison of assumptions and parameters with external sources
-
examination of the reasonableness, particularly in the current economic and financial context, of the medium-term plans selected for each CGU concerned, involving:
- the comparison with the group’s strategic plan approved by the management bodies (supervisory board or board of directors);
- the assessment of the coherence and reliability of the main assumptions used to construct them, in particular with regard to the financial trajectories drawn up during past years and actually implemented;
- analysis of sensitivity to different valuation parameters (equity, discount rate, etc.).
- verification of the consistency of the information published on the results of these impairment tests.
Groupe BPCE is the subject of litigation before the courts, investigations and requests for information from regulatory and tax authorities in various jurisdictions.
The assessment of the resulting legal and non-compliance (including tax) risks is based on management’s estimate at the reporting date.
The recognition of a provision, the determination of its amount and the information communicated in the notes require the exercise of judgment, in particular because of the difficulty of estimating the probability of the risk materialising as well as the outcome and financial consequences of ongoing proceedings.
As a result, we considered the estimation of the allowances for legal and non-compliance risks to be a key focus of the audit given the sensitivity of these allowances to management’s assumptions and options
Refer to notes 2.3, 5.13 and 11.1 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for more details.
We have taken note of the status of the ongoing proceedings and the main risks identified by the Group, based in particular on regular exchanges with management (and more specifically the Group’s legal, compliance and tax departments) as well as on the examination of the documentation made available to us.
We also assessed the reasonableness of the assumptions and data used by management in estimating the amount of allowances recognized at the cut-off date. In particular, we involved specialists in tax law to critically review the tax risk analyses identified by the group and the related provisions.
We have also conducted procedures for the confirmation of ongoing disputes with the group’s legal advisors.
Finally, we checked that the provisions thus valued were correctly recorded in the accounts and the information given in this respect in the notes to the consolidated accounts.
We have also performed, in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the specific verifications required by laws and regulations of the information pertaining to the Group presented in the management report of the Board of Directors.
We have no matters to report as to its fair presentation and its consistency with the consolidated financial statements.
FORMAT OF PRESENTATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INTENDED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
We have also proceeded, in accordance with the professional practice standard on the auditor’s due diligence relating to annual and consolidated accounts presented in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF), to verify compliance with this format defined by the European delegated regulation No. 2019/815 of December 17, 2018, in the presentation of the consolidated accounts included in the annual financial report mentioned in Article L.451-1-2 of the Monetary and Financial Code, prepared under the responsibility of the Chairman of the Management Board. As for consolidated accounts, our due diligence includes verifying the compliance of the tagging of these accounts with the format defined by the aforementioned regulation.
Based on our work, we conclude that the presentation of the consolidated accounts included in the annual financial report complies, in all its significant aspects, with the European Single Electronic Format.
Due to technical limitations inherent in the macro-tagging of consolidated accounts according to the European Single Electronic Format, it is possible that the content of certain tags in the annexed notes may not be reproduced identically to the consolidated accounts attached to this report.
Forvis Mazars SA was appointed Statutory Auditors in the first articles of association dated 19 December 2006 of GCE Nao (which became BPCE in July 2009), at its formation. The firms PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit and Deloitte & Associés were appointed as statutory auditors of BPCE by the general assembly, respectively, on July 2, 2009, and May 22, 2015.
As of December 31, 2024, Forvis Mazars SA was in the 18th year of its uninterrupted mission, including 16 years since the company became a public interest entity, PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit in the 16th year of its uninterrupted mission and Deloitte & Associés was in the 10th year of its uninterrupted mission.
VI. RESPONSIBILITIES OF MANAGEMENT AND THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE FOR THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless it is expected to liquidate the Company or to cease operations.
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the financial reporting process and the effectiveness of internal control and risks management systems and where applicable, its internal audit, regarding the accounting and financial reporting procedures.
Our role is to issue a report on the consolidated financial statements. Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.
As specified in Article L.821-55 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce), our statutory audit does not include assurance on the viability of the Company or the quality of management of the affairs of the Company.
As part of an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the statutory auditor exercises professional judgment throughout the audit and furthermore:
- Identifies and assesses the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, designs and performs audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtains audit evidence considered to be sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for his opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
- Obtains an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control;
- Evaluates the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management in the consolidated financial statements.
- Assesses the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. This assessment is based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of his audit report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern. If the statutory auditor concludes that a material uncertainty exists, there is a requirement to draw attention in the audit report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are not provided or inadequate, to modify the opinion expressed therein.
- Evaluates the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements and assesses whether these statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
- Obtains sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. The statutory auditor is responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the audit of the consolidated financial statements and for the opinion expressed on these consolidated financial statements.
We submit a report to the Audit Committee which includes in particular a description of the scope of the audit and the audit program implemented, as well as the results of our audit. We also report, if any, significant deficiencies in internal control regarding the accounting and financial reporting procedures that we have identified.
Our report to the Audit Committee includes the risks of material misstatement that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and which are therefore the key audit matters, that we are required to describe in this report
We also provide the Audit Committee with the declaration provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) N°537/2014, confirming our independence within the meaning of the rules applicable in France such as they are set in particular by Articles L.821-27 to L.821-34 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce) and in the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for statutory auditors. Where appropriate, we discuss with the Audit Committee the risks that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and the related safeguards.
6.5 BPCE management report
6.5.1 Significant events of 2024
The global economy was resilient in 2024, as it was in 2023, even returning to an increase in activity of 3.2% per year, despite the shrinkage of international trade relative to GDP and the emergence of new major uncertainties. Two events marked the year in particular: the surprise dissolution of the French National Assembly and Donald Trump’s presidential election in the United States. The profound divergence in growth trajectories between the major economic areas, which had already been observed prior to 2023, was reinforced, displaying a striking contrast: the European continent continued to lag behind the strategies of the race for industrial hegemony implemented by China and the United States. Overall, the global economy benefited mainly from the decline in inflation and the exceptional dynamism of private demand in the United States. Inflation on both sides of the Atlantic has been defeated, without a recession being automatically triggered by the aggressive tightening of key rates by the Fed and the ECB since March and July 2022, respectively. The relaxation of fiscal policies, particularly in the United States, which offset the monetary brake, boosted activity. In addition, disinflation has once again boosted the purchasing power of private agents on both sides of the Atlantic.
In 2024, China confirmed a process of structural slowdown, while the US economy exceeded the forecast of a simple soft landing, thanks to the still bold dynamism of its private demand. Conversely, the Eurozone took refuge in a persistently sluggish growth perspective despite signs of improvement in the first half of the year as the energy crisis eased. In the United States, as in China, the dynamics came from abysmal public deficits. In addition to a now less expansionary fiscal policy and the negative effects of the previous monetary tightening, Europe also suffered from a violent lag in its production prices relative to the United States and especially compared to China, due to the repercussions of the energy crisis of 2022. The economic recovery in the Eurozone was, therefore, quite modest in 2024, reaching 0.8%, compared to 0.5% in 2023. The support came mainly from foreign trade, as the contribution of domestic demand remained insufficient, despite disinflation, with household savings rates well above their historical average in the four main countries.
France entered an unknown situation of very marked economic and political uncertainty after the dissolution of the National Assembly on June 9. Its fiscal credibility, already tarnished by an unanticipated public deficit of 5.5% of GDP in 2023 and by the downgrade of its sovereign rating by Standard & Poor’s, the most powerful American agency, then that of Moody’s, became the main victim of ambitious election campaign promises, with no real basis in terms of financing. With Prime Minister Michel Barnier’s government censored on December 4, political uncertainty, despite the appointment of François Bayrou, replaced inflationary fears. The public deficit also slipped again, reaching 6.1% of GDP in 2024. The sovereign spread with Germany reached nearly 80 basis points (bps) after the dissolution of the National Assembly, compared to only 50 bps previously.
French GDP grew by 1.1%, as in 2023. It benefited from the significant growth in public spending and a record contribution from foreign trade, the latter mainly due to the decline in imports. It was artificially boosted by the impact of the Olympic and Paralympic Games in Paris in the third quarter. Conversely, with a wait-and-see policy giving way to mistrust, business investment fell due to tightening financing conditions and increased reluctance on the part of private players. Consumption increased almost as in 2023, even though households experienced clear gains in purchasing power (+2.1% after +0.9%), boosted by the decline in prices. Given the general increase in uncertainty and probably the long-term risk of a tax increase in the face of the drift in public finances, the household savings rate increased to 17.9%, a level 4 points higher than that before the health crisis. Real estate investment by households remained in sharp contraction.
Inflation declined markedly, due to the year-on-year slowdown in the prices of food, manufactured products, energy and services, particularly in telecommunications: 2.0% per year on average, compared with 4.9% in 2023 and 5.2% in 2022. The unemployment rate stabilized at around 7.4%, compared to 7.3% in 2023, reflecting an increase in employment close to that of the active population: 214,000 net jobs were created in one year, for 256,000 additional assets, according to INSEE.
Regarding monetary policy, the resilience of domestic demand and inflation in services in the United States led the Fed to postpone the start of the key rate cuts previously planned for 2024 until September. The Fed made three successive reductions, one of 50 bps in September, which is rather unusual in magnitude, then two of 25 bps in November and December, i.e. a total of 100 bps, bringing key rates at the end of December within the range of 4.25% -4.5%, compared to 5.25% -5.5% previously. The ECB began its monetary easing process on June 6, before the Fed and for the first time in its history, even if it meant causing a temporary rise in the dollar exchange rate against the euro. This decision was motivated by a structural European deficit in productivity gains, the weakness of domestic demand and the more significant decline in inflation on the other side of the Atlantic. Then, three additional cuts of 25 bps were made in September, October, and December, for a total decrease of 100 bps over the year. On December 12, the deposit facility rate, the refinancing rate, and the marginal lending rate were reduced to 3%, 3.15%, and 3.4%, respectively. The 125 bps spread in favor of US key rates, the exceptional economic dynamism of the United States and the anticipation of more favorable growth with the election of Donald Trump have, therefore, fueled the weakness of the euro against the dollar. The latter stood at $1.04 on December 30, 2024, compared to approximately $1.11 at the end of 2023 (12/27). The ECB also announced that it would begin, as of the second half of the year, with the exit of the PEPP asset acquisition program launched during the pandemic, at the rate of a cautious disengagement of €7.5 billion per month.
Despite the sharp decline in inflation, 10-year rates on both sides of the Atlantic have rebounded, after their sharp easing at the end of 2023, due to the postponement of the monetary easing process until the second half of the year. The 10-year OAT averaged at 3% for the year, as in 2023. However, it reached 3.29% on June 28 and ended at 3.19% on December 31, due to an increased risk premium of almost 83 bps with Germany, despite the 100 bps reduction in the ECB’s deposit facility rate. Lastly, the CAC 40 suffered significantly from the dissolution of the National Assembly and the political and budgetary uncertainty. It fell by 2.2% in 2024 (compared to an increase of 16.5% in 2023), reaching 7,380.74 on December 31, compared to 7,543.18 points at the end of 2023.
- Caisse de Refinancement de l’Habitat for €40 million, as part of the annual capital adjustment of this entity reflecting the change in the share of refinancing borrowed by each shareholder;
- Hexarq for €45 million;
- IPaidThat for €28 million.
On April 11, 2024, the Group announced the signing of a memorandum of understanding with Société Générale to acquire the activities of Société Générale Equipment Finance (excluding the activities of SGEF in the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Today, SGEF is one of the European leaders in the leasing of capital equipment, with a wide range of equipment financing solutions and associated services.
Groupe BPCE, which is already the second-largest provider in lease financing in France thanks to BPCE Lease, would become the European leader in capital equipment leasing solutions for manufacturers, dealers, distributors and corporates.
This project will help Groupe BPCE to achieve its international growth ambitions, diversify its revenues and strengthen its ability to create value. The acquisition will be carried out at a price of €1.1 billion (based on the net equity of €0.96 billion at the date of completion of the acquisition) and will represent a limited impact on the CET1 ratio, which is estimated at -40 bps at Groupe BPCE.
The operation was carried out on February 28, 2025, after obtaining the necessary regulatory and competition authorities.
Pursuant to the first and second resolutions of the BPCE Combined General Meeting of December 18, 2024, the General Meeting delegated to the Management Board its authority to decide, with the prior authorization of the Supervisory Board, one or several increases in BPCE’s share capital by issuing Category A shares reserved for Category A shareholders (Caisses d’Epargne), on the one hand, and Category B shares reserved for Category B shareholders (Banques Populaires), on the other, for a period of 18 months. The maximum total amount of share capital increases (including additional paid-in capital) that may be carried out under these delegations may not exceed €4 billion.
2024 was marked by a fall in interest rate in the second half of the year and a tightening of liquidity.
In this context, in its dual role (i) as an issuer on the bond market (to refinance the excess of the Group’s financing needs over its customers’ deposits and to provide the Group with additional share capital and capacity to absorb losses), and (ii) as the organizer/manager of the Group’s internal capital management operations as a central institution, in 2024, BPCE SA issued on the market:
- €1.6 billion in Tier-2 bonds, of which €0.5 billion in Tier-2 “Social Local Economic Development” bonds,
- €6.6 billion in senior non-preferred bonds; these issuances help strengthen Groupe BPCE’s capital and TLAC (Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity) and MREL ratios.
- €0.5 billion for a deeply subordinated Tier-1 loan to replace the call of a deeply subordinated Tier-1 note of the same amount issued by Natixis SA,
- €0.1 billion in Tier-2 instruments issued by Natixis SA,
- €0.06 billion in Tier-2 instruments issued by Banque Palatine.
As a recognized social issuer, BPCE SA issued the first Shared Coupon Bond (OCP) in the amount of €0.4 billion to the Fondation de l’Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP). The innovative nature of this issue lies in its combination of the issuer’s ESG objectives with a charitable financial return for investors.
6.6 BPCE parent company annual financial statements
in millions of euros | Notes | 2024 fiscal year | 2023 fiscal year | |||
Interest and similar income | 3.1 | 20,261 | 15,583 | |||
Interest and similar expenses | 3.1 | (21,059) | (16,414) | |||
Income from variable-income securities | 3.2 | 1,426 | 1,300 | |||
Commission income | 3.3 | 140 | 119 | |||
Commission expenses | 3.3 | (17) | (24) | |||
Net gains or losses on trading book transactions | 3.4 | (8) | 9 | |||
Net gains or losses on available-for-sale securities and equivalent | 3.5 | 28 | 2 | |||
Other banking income | 3.6 | 331 | 324 | |||
Other banking expenses | 3.6 | (34) | (30) | |||
Net banking income | 1,068 | 869 | ||||
Operating expenses | 3.7 | (620) | (607) | |||
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | (10) | (9) | ||||
Gross operating income | 438 | 253 | ||||
Cost of risk | 3.8 | (20) | (1) | |||
Net operating income | 418 | 252 | ||||
Gains or losses on long-term investments | 3.9 | 790 | 36 | |||
Income before tax | 1,208 | 288 | ||||
Non-recurring income | 3.10 | 0 | 0 | |||
Income tax | 3.11 | 262 | 276 | |||
Charges to/reversals from the fund for general banking risks and regulated provisions | 3.12 | (15) | (18) | |||
NET INCOME | 1,455 | 546 |
6.6.1 Balance sheet and off-balance sheet items
Assets | ||||||
in millions of euros | Notes | 12/31/2024 | 12/31/2023 | |||
Cash and amounts due from central banks | 65,650 | 71,337 | ||||
Treasury bills and equivalent | 4.3 | 1,049 | 966 | |||
Loans and advances due from banks | 4.1 | 347,573 | 330,142 | |||
Customer transactions | 4.2 | 2,876 | 2,788 | |||
Bonds and other fixed-income securities | 4.3 | 3,928 | 4,227 | |||
Equities and other variable-income securities | 4.3 | 1,295 | 1,305 | |||
Equity interests and other long-term investments | 4.4 | 2,044 | 2,458 | |||
Investments in affiliates | 4.4 | 26,535 | 25,654 | |||
Intangible assets | 4.5 | 113 | 107 | |||
Property, plant and equipment | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | |||
Other assets | 4.7 | 5,390 | 9,042 | |||
Accrual accounts | 4.8 | 4,772 | 3,233 | |||
TOTAL ASSETS | 461,229 | 451,263 | ||||
Off-balance sheet items | ||||||
in millions of euros | Notes | 12/31/2024 | 12/31/2023 | |||
Commitments given | ||||||
Loan commitments | 5.1 | 3,537 | 4,028 | |||
Guarantee commitments | 5.1 | 25,150 | 24,436 | |||
Securities commitments | 119 | 131 |
Liabilities | ||||||
in millions of euros | Notes | 12/31/2024 | 12/31/2023 | |||
Central banks | 0 | 0 | ||||
Amounts due to banks | 4.1 | 270,717 | 262,497 | |||
Customer transactions | 4.2 | 5,412 | 4,720 | |||
Debt securities | 4.6 | 135,889 | 134,144 | |||
Other liabilities | 4.7 | 1,253 | 1,416 | |||
Accrual accounts | 4.8 | 2,840 | 4,380 | |||
Provisions | 4.9 | 667 | 678 | |||
Subordinated debt | 4.10 | 24,276 | 24,723 | |||
Fund for general banking risks (FGBR) | 4.11 | 65 | 65 | |||
Equity excluding fund for general banking risks | 4.12 | 20,110 | 18,640 | |||
Subscribed capital | 198 | 189 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 16,677 | 15,845 | ||||
Reserves | 35 | 35 | ||||
Revaluation difference | 0 | 0 | ||||
Regulated provisions and investment subsidies | 70 | 55 | ||||
Retained earnings | 1,675 | 1,970 | ||||
Interim dividend | 0 | 0 | ||||
Net income for the fiscal year (+/-) | 1,455 | 546 | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 461,229 | 451,263 | ||||
Off-balance sheet items | ||||||
in millions of euros | Notes | 12/31/2024 | 12/31/2023 | |||
Commitments received | ||||||
Loan commitments | 5.1 | 90,391 | 84,170 | |||
Guarantee commitments | 5.1 | 589 | 1,912 | |||
Securities commitments | 2 | 8 |
6.7 Statutory Auditors’ report on the financial statements
This is a free translation into English of the Statutory Auditors’ report issued in French and is provided solely for the convenience of English speaking readers. This report includes information specifically required by European regulations or French law, such as information about the appointment of Statutory Auditors. This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and professional auditing standards applicable in France.
In compliance with the engagement entrusted to us by your Annual General Shareholders’ Meeting, we have audited the accompanying financial statements of BPCE for the year ended December 31, 2024.
In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and of the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2024 and of the results of its operations for the year then ended in accordance with French accounting principles.
We conducted our audit in accordance with professional standards applicable in France. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Our responsibilities under these standards are further described in the “Responsibilities of the Statutory Auditors relating to the audit of the financial statements” section of our report.
We conducted our audit engagement in compliance with the independence rules provided for in the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce) and the French Code of Ethics (Code de déontologie) for Statutory Auditors for the period from January 1, 2024 to the date of our report, and, in particular, we did not provide any non-audit services prohibited by article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014.
In accordance with the requirements of articles L.821-53 and R.821-180 of the French Commercial Code relating to the justification of our assessments, we inform you of the key audit matters relating to the risks of material misstatement that, in our professional judgment, were the most significant in our audit of the financial statements, as well as how we addressed those risks.
These matters were addressed as part of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and therefore contributed to the opinion we formed as expressed above. We do not provide a separate opinion on specific items of the financial statements
Valuation of associates, equity interests, and long-term investments and the accounting methods of structural operations in 2024
Associates, equity interests and long-term investments are recognized at their acquisition cost and impaired on the basis of their value in use.
BPCE’s main banking subsidiaries are valued on the basis of a discounted multiannual forecasts of expected dividend flows (dividend discount model). Forecasts of expected dividend flows are based on medium-term financial projections prepared by the entities concerned as part of Groupe BPCE’s annual budgeting procedure and drawn up for Group management purposes.
We deemed the valuation of associates, equity interests, and long-term investments to be a key audit matter, as it required the exercise of judgment with regard to the structuring assumptions used to determine business plans and the valuation inputs applied, particularly in the current economic climate.
As of December 31, 2024, associates, equity interests and long-term investments recognized in BPCE’s financial statements amounted to €28,579 million, including an impairment of €5,916 million at December 31, 2024. The impairment of associates, equity interests and long-term investments resulted in a net reversal of €799 million in 2024. For more information on accounting principles and exposures, see Note 4.4 to the financial statements. |
To assess the reasonableness of the estimated value in use of equity interests and long-term investments, with the guidance of our experts, we verified that the estimated values determined by management were based on an appropriate measurement method and reasonable assumptions.
- analyzing the relevance of the valuation methods used;
- examining the assumptions and inputs used according to the profile of each entity, by comparing them to external sources;
-
assessing the reasonableness of the medium-term business plans used for each entity in question, which entailed:
- comparing these business plans with the strategic plans validated by the entities’ governance bodies (Supervisory Board or Board of Directors);
- evaluating the relevance of the main assumptions used to prepare the plans, particularly regarding the financial trajectories developed during past financial years and actually carried out;
- analyzing sensitivity to different valuation inputs (shareholders’ equity, discount rates, etc.);
- verifying the arithmetical accuracy of the calculation of the values of the main subsidiaries.
In accordance with professional standards applicable in France, we have also performed the specific verifications required by French legal and regulatory provisions.
INFORMATION GIVEN IN THE MANAGEMENT REPORT AND IN THE OTHER DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO THE SHAREHOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPANY’S FINANCIAL POSITION AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have no matters to report as to the fair presentation and the consistency with the financial statements of the information given in the Management Board’s management report and in the other documents provided to the shareholders with respect to the Company’s financial position and the financial statements, with the exception of the following item.
- Concerning the fair presentation and the consistency with the financial statements of the information about payment terms referred to in article D.441-6 of the French Commercial Code, we have the following matter to report: as indicated in the management report, this information does not include banking and related transactions, as the Company has decided that such transactions do not fall within the scope of the required information
We attest that the Supervisory Board’s report on corporate governance sets out the information required by articles L.225-37-4 and L.22-10-10 of the French Commercial Code.
Regarding the information related to the elements that your company considered likely to have an impact in the event of a public purchase or exchange offer, provided in accordance with the provisions of article L.22-10-11 of the French Commercial Code, we have verified their compliance with the documents from which they originate and which have been communicated to us. Based on this work, we have no comments to make on this information.
In accordance with French law, we have verified that the required information concerning the purchase of investments and controlling interests has been properly disclosed in the management report.
In accordance with professional standards applicable to the Statutory Auditors’ procedures for annual and consolidated financial statements presented according to the European single electronic reporting format, we have verified that the presentation of the financial statements to be included in the annual financial report referred to in paragraph I of article L.451-1-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code (Code monétaire et financier) and prepared under the responsibility of the Chairman of the Management Board, complies with this format, as defined by European Delegated Regulation No. 2019/815 of December 17, 2018.
On the basis of our work, we conclude that the presentation of the financial statements to be included in the annual financial report complies, in all material respects, with the European single electronic reporting format
Forvis Mazars SA was appointed as Statutory Auditors in the first by-laws dated December 19, 2006, of GCE Nao (whose corporate name became BPCE in July 2009), upon its incorporation. PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit and Deloitte & Associés were appointed as BPCE’s Statutory Auditors by the Annual General Shareholders’ Meetings of July 2, 2009, and May 22, 2015, respectively.
As of December 31, 2024, Forvis Mazars SA was in the eighteenth consecutive year of its engagement, of which sixteen years since becoming a public interest entity. PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit and Deloitte & Associés were in the sixteenth and tenth consecutive year of their engagement respectively
Management is responsible for preparing financial statements giving a true and fair view in accordance with French accounting principles, and for implementing the internal control procedures it deems necessary for the preparation of financial statements that are free of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern, and using the going concern basis of accounting, unless it expects to liquidate the Company or to cease operations.
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the financial reporting process and the effectiveness of internal control and risk management systems, as well as, where applicable, any internal audit systems, relating to accounting and financial reporting procedures.
Our role is to issue a report on the financial statements. Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free of material misstatement. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions taken by users on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.
As specified in article L.821-55 of the French Commercial Code, our audit does not include assurance on the viability or quality of the Company’s management
As part of an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the Statutory Auditors exercise professional judgment throughout the audit. They also:
- identify and assess the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures in response to those risks, and obtain audit evidence considered to be sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for their opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
- obtain an understanding of the internal control procedures relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control;
- evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management and the related disclosures in the notes to the financial statements;
- assess the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. This assessment is based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of the audit report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern. If the Statutory Auditors conclude that a material uncertainty exists, they are required to draw attention in the audit report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are not provided or are inadequate, to issue a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion;
- evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements and assess whether these statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We submit a report to the Audit Committee which includes, in particular, a description of the scope of the audit and the audit program implemented, as well as the results of our audit. We also report any significant deficiencies in internal control that we have identified regarding the accounting and financial reporting procedures.
Our report to the Audit Committee includes the risks of material misstatement that, in our professional judgment, were the most significant for the audit of the financial statements and which constitute the key audit matters that we are required to describe in this report.
We also provide the Audit Committee with the declaration provided for in article 6 of Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014, confirming our independence within the meaning of the rules applicable in France, as defined in particular in articles L.821-27 to L.821-34 of the French Commercial Code and in the French Code of Ethics for Statutory Auditors. Where appropriate, we discuss any risks to our independence and the related safeguard measures with the Audit Committee.
6.8 Controls of accounting and financial reporting quality
6.8.1 Roles and responsibilities in preparing and processing accounting and financial information
The production of accounting and financial information and verifications to ensure its accuracy are performed by the Finance functions of the entities included in the Group’s scope of consolidation.
Each entity has the resources to ensure the quality of accounting and financial data, in particular by seeing that current regulations and Group standards are being properly implemented, and reconciling accounting and operating results, where applicable.
Each entity prepares, on a monthly or quarterly basis, financial statements and regulatory information required at the local level, along with reporting documents for the Finance division.
Within the Group, the preparation and processing of financial and accounting information falls under the responsibility of the Finance function. This responsibility is carried out within the central institution, mainly by four departments of the division:
- The Financial Management department;
- The Performance Oversight department;
- The Regulatory Steering and Prudential Management department (including the Accounting department);
- The Architecture and Reporting department.
In addition to these four departments, the Finance division also includes the Monitoring and Foresight Studies department.
The Finance division collects the accounting and financial data produced by the entities within the Group’s scope of consolidation. It is also responsible for consolidating and verifying these data for use in Group oversight and communication to third parties (auditors, investors, etc.).
In addition to consolidating accounting and financial information, the Finance division has broad control duties:
- It coordinates Asset/liability management by defining the Group’s Asset/liability management rules and standards and ensuring they are properly applied;
- It manages and checks the Group’s balance sheet ratios and structural risks;
- It defines accounting standards and principles applicable to the Group and ensures they are properly applied;
- It coordinates the steering and reporting of the Group’s financial performance in accordance with strategic plan objectives;
- It manages the Pillar II approach and related matters within the Group;
- It monitors the financial planning of Group entities and capital transactions;
- It ensures the reliability of accounting and financial information shared outside the Group;
- It steers planning and strategic operations;
- It manages emergency financial plans in the event of idiosyncratic or systemic crises and coordinates the resolution plan.
Main functions, within the central institution, involved in preparing and publishing accounting and financial information and their responsibilities
Within the Group, the main functions involved in preparing and publishing accounting and financial information are accounting, finance control, reporting, investor relations and financial management.
Within the central institution, these functions are carried out mainly by four departments reporting to the Chief Financial Officer: the Regulatory Steering and Prudential Management department, the Performance Oversight department, the Financial Management department and the Architecture and Reporting department.
Within this department, the main unit contributing to the preparation of accounting and financial information is the Accounting department, which is responsible for preparing the parent company and consolidated financial statements (Groupe BPCE and BPCE) and the associated regulatory reports (in particular COREP and FINREP). Its main duties are:
- Preparing the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE and individual statements of BPCE SA, calculating the regulatory ratios and preparing the corresponding reports;
- Coordinating the accounting process within the Group;
- Providing a regulatory watch on French and IFRS accounting standards applied by the Group in coordination with shareholder institutions, BPCE subsidiaries and the Statutory Auditors;
- Acting as the interface between the supervisory authorities (European Central Bank and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR), the French prudential supervisory authority for the banking and insurance sector) and affiliated institutions in accordance with Article L. 512-107 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and, in particular, to ensure compliance with the regulatory standards and management ratios of affiliated institutions;
- Representing the Group in its dealings with industry bodies (French national accounting standards authority, European Banking Federation, etc.);
- Producing accounting and regulatory statements (including tax) for BPCE SA and the entities under its authority.
Within the Group, the Group Accounting department relies on the accounting functions of each entity, which are responsible for the publication of the parent company financial statements and, where applicable, the consolidated financial statements, regulatory reports and disclosures to the central institution.
The other units of this department are Capital Management and Financial Strategy (in charge of managing solvency issues and the Pillar II approach within the Group and coordinating and monitoring the management of scarce resources within the Group), Taxation and Financial Resilience.
The Performance Oversight department is responsible for producing management information. Its main duties are:
- Coordinating oversight of the financial planning, budget and multi-year rolling forecast process;
- Coordinating oversight of business performance in support of the Retail Banking and Insurance division;
- Analyzing the performance of the Group, its business lines and entities, especially for the publication of each quarter’s results;
- Steering and challenging the subsidiaries’ financial performances to safeguard the Group’s financial ratios;
- Coordinating and steering approaches for the analysis of the Group’s operating costs;
- Helping prepare the Group’s strategic and financial plans;
- Managing the expenses of the central institution;
- Coordinating the finance control process within the Group.
The Performance Oversight department relies on the Group’s Management Control functions, which are responsible for the operational management of each entity and for the production of management information for both the entity and the central institution.
The Architecture and Reporting department is responsible for securing the key IS Finance & Risk applications, ensuring the reliability of complex production processes (transformed data with the preparation of regulatory and management reports) and ensuring that these processes comply with BCBS 239 principles. Its main duties are:
- Making strategic choices regarding the design and construction of data bases as well as regulatory and management processes based on the main risk and financial calculators, in current, ad hoc and crisis situations, while ensuring the coordination of all related projects;
- Operating, through its technological fiber, complex production systems (Finance and Risk production, treasury systems and banking activities) and pool project efforts for other business lines;
- Guaranteeing a centralized and consistent vision across the entire IS Finance & Risk chain;
- Simplifying, harmonizing, integrating and pooling in a logic of operational efficiency and process security by relying on technological levers;
- Implementing innovative tools (simulations, proactive exercises, data analysis, etc.) and promoting an open innovation approach (Artificial Intelligence, Green Finance, etc.) directly linked to the ongoing search for operational efficiency;
- Accelerating the implementation of responses to regulatory recommendations and requirements (e.g. coordination of BCBS 239 into LOD1 and the ECB Data Finance/Risk dialog).
The Financial Management department is responsible for the optimal and sustainable management of liquidity and refinancing and is also in charge of financial communication. Its main duties are:
- Organizing, coordinating and supervising the refinancing of Groupe BPCE on the financial markets in order to ensure, at the best possible price, the realization of a sustainable refinancing plan over time, making it possible to finance the various activities of the Group over a duration consistent with the assets created and to allocate this liquidity to the various business lines and to control its use and evolution;
- Managing the optimization of scarce resources, collateralized refinancing, collateral management and green refinancing strategy;
- Producing regulatory ratios and ensuring compliance with them, as well as internal constraints resulting in particular from stress tests guaranteeing the sustainability of the refinancing of the Group’s business model even in the event of a crisis;
- Developing the Group’s interest rate and liquidity risk management system and its application to the entities;
- Coordinating and producing presentations of quarterly results, the financial structure and the development of the Group’s business lines to enable third parties to form an opinion on its financial strength, profitability and outlook;
- Coordinating and preparing the presentation of extra-financial information (universal registration document and its quarterly amendments) filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, and the Pillar III report, integrating the contributions of other BPCE functions;
- Organizing relations with institutional investors, financial analysts and rating agencies by ensuring coordination with the other rated entities of the Group;
- Organizing and maintaining relationships with credit investors likely to hold and/or acquire debt instruments (short, medium or long term) issued by BPCE or Natixis.
6.9 Persons responsible for auditing the financial statements
6.9.1 Statutory audit system
Within the Group, the main rules that govern the statutory audit system and aim to guarantee Statutory Auditor independence in Groupe BPCE companies are defined in the Framework for Statutory Auditor Assignments at Groupe BPCE, updated and validated by the Supervisory Board of BPCE.
- The rules governing the selection of Statutory Auditors for the Group and its entities;
- The rules governing the services that may be provided by Statutory Auditors (or their networks);
- The role of Audit Committees with respect to monitoring the system.
On the appointment of group Statutory Auditors: in line with the regulations in force, the Group recommends that each group company continues to designate at least one network of Statutory Auditors that certify BPCE’s consolidated and parent company financial statements to ensure there is a consistent, harmonized financial audit system available across the Group. However, each company’s audit committee retains the authority to select Statutory Auditors subject to the approval of the company’s General Meeting.
On the prior approval of services other than financial statement certification: in line with the opinion provided by the Haute autorité de l’audit (H2A), the audit committee of BPCE introduced a prior approval procedure, for a one year period, of an exhaustive list of categories of services other than financial statement certification. These provisions, which are set out in the annexes to the Framework for Statutory Auditor Assignments, are reviewed annually by the BPCE Audit Committee and communicated to all Group entities.
- Examines the services rendered by the Statutory Auditors. Aside from the prior approval of services other than financial statement certification in compliance with provisions that have been defined in the Framework for Statutory Auditor Assignments, the committee examines the fees and types of services rendered as recorded in each company’s income statement;
- Ensures compliance with the principles laid out in the Framework for Statutory Auditor Assignments, rules governing the rotation of Statutory Auditors and the rotation of signatory partners and the implementation of a Statutory Auditor selection procedure at the end of each maximum term of office;
- This approach relies on the permanent control system (Financial Control function). A Group standard on the control of the independence of the Statutory Auditors, validated by the standards and methods committee, specifies the role of this function in this area and the main procedures it must implement. The work carried out within this framework is presented to each company’s Audit Committee and, on a consolidated basis, to the Group Audit Committee.
7 RISK FACTORS & RISK MANAGEMENT
Some disclosures required under IFRS 7 & IFRS 17 on the nature and the extent of various risks are presented in this report and covered by the Statutory Auditor’s opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Such disclosures are flagged by the statement “Information provided in the respect of IFRS 7” & “Information provided in the respect of IFRS 17” and should be interpreted as an integral part of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7.1 Key figures
- According to CRR/CRD IV regulations.
- Reserves net of prudential restatements.
- Including settlement-delivery risk.
- Based on FSB TLAC term sheet dated November 9, 2015.
- Following the recipt of the MREL 2024 annual letter.
a | b | c | d | e | ||
in millions of euros | 12/31/2024 | 09/30/2024 | 06/30/2024 | 03/30/2024 | 12/31/2023 | |
AVAILABLE CAPITAL | ||||||
1 | Common Equity Tier-1 (CET1) capital | 73,847 | 72,359 | 71,453 | 71,491 | 71,246 |
2 | Tier-1 capital | 73,847 | 72,359 | 71,453 | 71,491 | 71,246 |
3 | Total capital | 86,057 | 84,625 | 84,412 | 84,573 | 83,411 |
RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS | ||||||
4 | Total risk-weighted assets | 456,591 | 446,184 | 458,329 | 458,996 | 457,606 |
CAPITAL RATIOS (AS A PERCENTAGE OF RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS) | ||||||
5 | Common Equity Tier-1 ratio | 16.17% | 16.22% | 15.59% | 15.58% | 15.57% |
6 | Equity Tier-1 ratio | 16.17% | 16.22% | 15.59% | 15.58% | 15.57% |
7 | Total capital ratio | 18.85% | 18.97% | 18.42% | 18.43% | 18.23% |
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS TO ADDRESS RISKS OTHER THAN THE EXCESSIVE LEVERAGE RISK (AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS) | ||||||
EU 7a | Additional capital requirements to address risks other than excessive leverage risk | 2.10% | 2.10% | 2.10% | 2.10% | 2.00% |
EU 7b | of which: to be met with CET1 capital | 1.18% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 1.13% |
EU 7c | of which: to be met with Tier-1 capital | 1.58% | 1.58% | 1.58% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
EU 7d | Total SREP capital requirement | 10.10% | 10.10% | 10.10% | 10.10% | 10.00% |
OVERALL BUFFER REQUIREMENT AND OVERALL CAPITAL REQUIREMENT (AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS) | ||||||
8 | Capital conservation buffer | 2.50% | 2.50% | 2.50% | 2.50% | 2.50% |
EU 8a | Conservation buffer due to macro-prudential or systemic risk at the level of a Member State | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
9 | Institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.89% | 0.47% |
EU 9a | Systemic risk buffer | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
10 | Global systemically important institution buffer | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
EU 10a | Other systemically important institution buffer | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
11 | Overall buffer requirement | 4.40% | 4.40% | 4.40% | 4.39% | 3.98% |
EU 11a | Overall capital requirements | 14.50% | 14.50% | 14.50% | 14.49% | 13.98% |
12 | CET1 capital available after compliance with total SREP capital requirements | 8.60% | 8.64% | 8.01% | 8.00% | 8.07% |
LEVERAGE RATIO | ||||||
13 | Total exposure measure | 1,435,845 | 1,427,943 | 1,422,570 | 1,413,789 | 1,413,461 |
14 | Leverage ratio | 5.14% | 5.07% | 5.02% | 5.06% | 5.04% |
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS TO ADDRESS THE EXCESSIVE LEVERAGE RISK (AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL EXPOSURE MEASURE) | ||||||
EU 14a | Additional capital requirements to address the excessive leverage risk | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EU 14b | of which: to be met with CET1 capital | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EU 14c | Total SREP leverage ratio requirement | 3.00% | 3.00% | 3.00% | 3.00% | 3.00% |
LEVERAGE RATIO BUFFER REQUIREMENT AND OVERALL LEVERAGE RATIO REQUIREMENT (AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL EXPOSURE MEASURE) | ||||||
EU 14d | Leverage ratio buffer requirement | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
EU 14e | Overall leverage ratio requirement | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.50% |
LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO | ||||||
15 | Total High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) (weighted average value) | 206,456 | 207,930 | 206,317 | 205,529 | 211,590 |
EU 16a | Cash outflows – Total weighted value | 234,163 | 229,714 | 227,209 | 223,049 | 224,243 |
EU 16b | Cash inflows – Total weighted value | 95,804 | 90,601 | 85,682 | 80,899 | 78,615 |
16 | Total net cash outflows (adjusted value) | 138,359 | 139,114 | 141,527 | 142,150 | 145,629 |
17 | Liquidity coverage ratio | 149.33% | 149.60% | 145.94% | 144.70% | 145.11% |
NET STABLE FUNDING RATIO | ||||||
18 | Total available stable funding (ASF) | 885,232 | 871,263 | 870,202 | 864,578 | 856,936 |
19 | Total required stable funding (RSF) | 825,703 | 814,278 | 801,679 | 800,744 | 797,016 |
20 | NSFR ratio | 107.21% | 107.00% | 108.55% | 107.97% | 107.52% |
7.1.1 Types of risk
Risk macro-categories | Definition |
Credit and counterparty risk | |
• Credit risk | The risk of loss from the inability of clients, issuers or other counterparties to honor their financial commitments. It includes counterparty risk related to market transactions (replacement risk) and securitization activities. It can be exacerbated by concentration risk. |
• Securitization risks | Transactions for which the credit risk inherent in a set of exposures is housed in a dedicated structure (generally a mutual fund or “conduit”) and then divided into tranches for acquisition by investors. |
Financial risks | |
• Market risk | The risk of loss of value on financial instruments resulting from changes in market inputs, from the volatility of these inputs or from the correlations between these inputs. Inputs include exchange rates, interest rates and prices of securities (equities, bonds), commodities, derivatives or any other assets, such as real estate assets. |
• Liquidity risk | The risk that the Group cannot meet its cash requirements or collateral requirements when they fall due and at a reasonable cost. |
• Structural interest rate risks | The risk of loss in interest income or in the value of a fixed-rate structural position in the event of changes in interest rates. Structural interest rate risks are associated with commercial activities and proprietary transactions. |
• Credit spread risk | The risk associated with a decline in the creditworthiness of a specific issuer or a specific category of issuers. |
• Foreign exchange risk | The risk of loss in interest income or in the value of a fixed-rate structural position in the event of changes in exchange rates. Structural interest rate and exchange rate risks are associated with commercial activities and proprietary transactions. |
Non-financial risks | |
• Non-compliance risk | The risk of a legal, administrative or disciplinary penalty, material financial loss or reputational risk arising from a failure to comply with the provisions specific to banking and financial activities (whether these are stipulated by directly applicable national or European laws or regulations), with professional or ethical standards, or instructions from executive management, notably issued in accordance with the policies of the supervisory body. |
• Operational risk | The risk of losses arising from the inadequacy or failure of internal processes, people and systems or from external events, including legal risk. Operational risk includes risks related to events with a low probability of occurrence but a high impact, the risks of internal and external fraud defined by the regulations, and risks related to the model. |
• Insurance underwriting risk | In addition to asset-liability risk management (interest rate, valuation, counterparty and exchange rate risks), these risks include pricing risk in respect of mortality risk premiums and structural risks related to life and non-life insurance activities, including pandemics, accidents and disasters (earthquakes, hurricanes, industrial accidents, terrorist acts and military conflicts). |
• Model risk | Model risk is defined as the risk of adverse consequences - financial loss and/or possible damage to the Group’s reputation - resulting from model-based decisions due to errors in the design, implementation or use of these models. |
• Legal risk | Legal risk defined in French regulations as the risk of any dispute with a counterparty, resulting from any inaccuracy, lacunae or insufficiency that may be attributable to the company in respect of its operations. |
• Reputational risk | Reputational risk is defined as the risk of damage to the trust of the company, its customers, counterparties, suppliers, employees, shareholders, supervisors or any other third party whose trust, in any capacity whatsoever, is a necessary condition for the normal continuation of the activity. |
Strategic business and ecosystem risks | |
• Solvency risk | The risk that the company will be unable to honor its long-term commitments and/or ensure the continuity of its ordinary operations in the future. |
• ESG risks | Environmental, social and governance risks: direct and indirect risks (i.e. via assets/liabilities held) arising from extreme or chronic physical risk events related to climate and the environment (loss of biodiversity, pollution, etc.), risks related to the transition to a low-carbon economy with lower environmental impact (regulatory, technological or stakeholder behavior changes), risks related to social issues (rights, well-being, interests of people and stakeholders) or corporate governance issues (ethics and culture, supplier relations, business conduct). These risks are expressed through the main risk categories to which Groupe BPCE is exposed. |
7.2 Risk factors
The banking and financial environment in which Groupe BPCE operates is exposed to numerous risks and requires the implementation of an increasingly demanding and strict policy to control and manage these risks.
Some of the risks to which Groupe BPCE is exposed are set out below. However, this is not a comprehensive list of all of the risks incurred by Groupe BPCE in the course of conducting its business or given the environment in which it operates. The risks presented below are those identified to date as significant and specific to Groupe BPCE, and liable to have a material adverse impact on its business, financial position and/or results. For each of the risk sub-classes listed below, the risk factor considered to date by Groupe BPCE as the most significant is listed first.
The risks presented below are those identified to date as liable to have an adverse impact on the businesses of BPCE SA.
The risk factors described below are presented as of the date of this document and the situation described may change, even significantly, at any time.
Groupe BPCE is exposed to credit and counterparty risks that could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial position and income.
Groupe BPCE is significantly exposed to credit and counterparty risk through its financing or market activities. The Group could thus incur losses in the event of default by one or more counterparties, in particular if the Group encounters legal or other difficulties in exercising its collateral or if the value of the collateral does not allow it to fully cover the exposure in the event of a default. Despite the due diligence carried out by the Group aimed at limiting the effects of having a concentrated credit portfolio, both in units and sectors, counterparty defaults may be amplified within a specific economic sector or world region by the effects of interdependence between these counterparties. Default by one or more major counterparties could thus have a material adverse effect on the Group’s cost of risk, results and financial position.
For information, on December 31, 2024, Groupe BPCE’s gross exposure to credit risk amounted to €1,511 billion, with the following breakdown for the main types of counterparty: 37% for retail customers, 30% for corporates, 16% for central banks and other sovereign exposures, and 6% for the public sector and similar entities. The credit risk-weighted assets amounted to €398 billion (including counterparty risk).
The main economic sectors to which the Group was exposed in its non-financial companies portfolio were Real Estate (38% of gross exposures at December 31, 2024), Wholesale and Retail Trade (11%), Finance/Insurance (10%) and Specialized, Scientific and Technical Activities (6%).
Groupe BPCE develops its activities mainly in France. The Group’s gross exposure (gross carrying amount) to France was €1,070 billion, representing 82% of the total gross exposure. The remaining exposures were mainly concentrated in the United States, for 5%, with other countries accounting for 12% of the total gross exposures.
For further information, please see Chapters 5 “Credit risks” and 6 “Counterparty risk” in this document.
A substantial increase in impairments or provisions for expected credit losses recognized in Groupe BPCE’s accounts could have a material adverse effect on its results and financial position.
In the course of its activities, Groupe BPCE regularly recognizes charges for impairments in order to reflect, if necessary, actual or potential losses on its portfolio of loans and advances, on its portfolio of fixed-income securities (at amortized cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income) and in respect of its commitments given. These impairments are booked in the income statement under “Cost of risk”. Groupe BPCE’s total charges for asset impairments are based on the Group’s measurement of past losses on loans, volumes and types of loans granted, industry standards, loans in arrears, economic conditions and other factors associated with the recoverability of various types of loans. While Groupe BPCE makes every effort to set aside a sufficient level of provisions for asset impairment expenses, its lending activities may cause it, in the future, to have to increase its expenses for losses on loans, due to a rise in non-performing loans or for other reasons such as the deterioration of market conditions or factors affecting certain countries. Any substantial increase in charges for losses on loans, material change in Groupe BPCE’s estimate of the risk of loss associated with its portfolio of loans, or any loss on loans exceeding past impairment expenses, could have an adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s results and financial position.
For information, Groupe BPCE’s cost of risk amounted to €2,061 million in 2024 compared to €1,731 million in 2023, with credit risks accounting for 87% of Groupe BPCE’s risk-weighted assets. On the basis of gross exposures, 37% relate to retail customers and 30% to corporate customers (of which 68% of exposures are located in France).
Consequently, the risk associated with a significant increase in impairment expenses on assets booked to Groupe BPCE’s loans and advances portfolio is significant in terms of impact and probability, and is therefore monitored carefully and proactively. In addition, prudential requirements supplement these provisioning mechanisms via the prudential backstop process, which results in a deduction in equity of non-performing loans beyond a certain maturity in line with the quality of the guarantees and according to a regulatory timetable defined by regulatory texts.
A decline in the financial strength and performance of other financial institutions and market players may have an unfavorable impact on Groupe BPCE.
Groupe BPCE’s ability to execute transactions may be affected by a decline in the financial strength of other financial institutions and market players. Financial institutions are closely interconnected owing to their trading, clearing, counterparty and financing operations. A default by a significant sector player (systemic risk), or even mere rumors or concerns regarding one or more financial institutions or the financial industry in general, may lead to a general contraction in market liquidity and subsequently to losses or further defaults in the future. Groupe BPCE is directly or indirectly exposed to various financial counterparties, such as investment service providers, commercial or investment banks, clearing houses and CCPs, mutual funds, hedge funds, and other institutional clients, with which it regularly conducts transactions. The default or failure of any such counterparties may have an adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s financial position. Moreover, Groupe BPCE may be exposed to the risk associated with the growing involvement of operators subject to little or no regulation in its business segment and to the emergence of new products subject to little or no regulation (including in particular crowdfunding and trading platforms). This risk would be exacerbated if the assets held as collateral by Groupe BPCE could not be sold or if their selling price would not cover all of Groupe BPCE’s exposure to defaulted loans or derivatives, or in the event of fraud, embezzlement or other misappropriation of funds committed by financial sector participants in general to which Groupe BPCE is exposed, or if a key market operator such as a CCP defaults.
In addition, the distribution risk in the event of market difficulties or a deterioration in the economic environment may entail a potential loss in a severe scenario.
The exposures to “financial institutions” represented 4% of Groupe BPCE’s total gross exposures of €1,511 billion at December 31, 2024. In geographic terms, 67% of gross exposures to “institutions” are located in France.
Significant changes in interest rates may have a material adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s net banking income and profitability.
Groupe BPCE’s net interest margin over a given period represents a significant portion of its revenues. Consequently, changes in the margin have a significant impact on Groupe BPCE’s net banking income and profitability for the period. The costs of the resource as well as the conditions of return on the asset, in particular those attached to new production, are therefore very sensitive elements, in particular to factors that may be beyond Groupe BPCE’s control, as these significant changes could entail significant temporary or long-term repercussions, even if a rise in interest rates is expected to be generally favorable in the medium to long term.
The recent environment has been marked by a sharp rise in interest rates initiated by the European Central Bank at the end of 2022, maintaining them at very high levels during 2023, exposure to interest rate risk and more generally to price risk was thus reinforced by the combination of unfavorable factors, namely the marked increase in regulated rates, the reallocation of part of the savings following the rapid exit from the low interest rate environment, the rise in interbank spreads, while, conversely, the rate of new loans was temporarily constrained by the level of the usury rate in 2022 and 2023. While inflation has begun a gradual decline, global central banks including the European Central Bank (ECB), after completing their monetary policy tightening cycle at the end of 2023, initiated a cycle of gradual reductions in key rates during 2024. The European Central Bank (ECB) announced its first rate cut (-25 bps) in June 2024, and the US Federal Reserve in September 2024. Despite this cautious start to the rate-cutting cycle, short-term and long-term interest rates remain at high levels not seen since 2008. Indeed, the ECB’s rates are in the range of 3.0%-3.15%, while the US Federal Reserve (FED) has lowered its key rates in the range of 4.25%-4.5%.
At the same time, the Livret A savings account rate, to which Groupe BPCE is exposed due to the regulated savings accounts held by its customers, has experienced a trajectory similar to that of inflation with a rapid increase and then stability at 3% since February 2023 (rate announced stable until February 2025). From February 2025, the Livret A savings account rate was reduced to 2.4%.
The corollary of this atypical situation, in terms of intensity and economic impact, was a significant reduction in Groupe BPCE’s bank loan production in 2024 after a peak in activity in the first months of the inflationary period. This situation has resulted in an 11% decrease in loan production with a more marked effect on home loans to households with -21% between 2023 and 2024, after the sharp decline already observed between 2022 and 2023 to -44%.
As a result of the increase in the average resource cost on the customer balance sheet for the two main regional banking networks (Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne), Groupe BPCE gradually passed on the rate increase levels observed in 2024 to the rates of new home loans and other fixed-rate consumer and corporate loans.
On the other hand, customers have continued to gradually switch their low-interest accounts to higher-yielding products (regulated passbook accounts and term accounts). In this context of squeezed margins, given the speed with which the rapid rate increases were being passed on, Groupe BPCE adjusted its interest rate hedging policy by increasing the volume of its interest rate swaps (macro-hedging) so as to protect the value of its balance sheet and its future net interest margin.
Consequently, even if the context of rising rates is generally favorable in the medium to long term, these significant changes can have major repercussions, whether temporary or lasting. Groupe BPCE’s interest rate risk indicators reflect this exposure.
The sensitivity of the net present value of Groupe BPCE’s balance sheet to a +/-200 bps variation in interest rates remained lower than the 15% Tier-1 limit. At December 31, 2024, Groupe BPCE’s sensitivity to Tier-1 interest rate increases stood at -9.62% compared to -10.8% at December 31, 2023. This indicator, calculated according to a static approach (contractual or conventional flow of all balance sheet items) and in a stress scenario (immediate and significant interest rate shock), makes it possible to highlight the distortion of the balance sheet over a long horizon.
To better control the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk, this approach must be supplemented by a dynamic approach (including new production forecasts). Following regulatory changes and modifications of its management system, since 2023 Groupe BPCE has deployed an internal revenue sensitivity indicator on the commercial banking networks and the Supervisory Outlier Test (SOT) Net Interest Margin (NIM) regulatory indicator at Group level, in addition to its internal indicators. The introduction of the SOT NIM supplements the information communicated as part of the interest rate risk management system by a margin view over a one-year horizon, and must be published in the financial statements, even if it will not directly generate a Pillar I expense. At December 31, 2024, the most penalizing scenario for the Group in terms of the SOT NIM was the downside scenario. The indicator stands at -1.2% and remains below the 5% limit compared to the first quarter.
The dynamic approach in terms of sensitivity of future revenues is reinforced by a multi-scenario vision allowing a broader approach by taking into account the uncertainties related to business forecasts (new activity and changes in customer behavior), possible changes in commercial margin, etc. This is achieved through the sensitivity of the Group’s revenues by measuring the change in the Group’s forecast net interest margin at one year according to four scenarios (rise in rates, decline in rates, steepening of the yield curve, flattening of the yield curve) compared to the core scenario. This revenue sensitivity indicator covers all commercial banking activities and aims to estimate the sensitivity of the institutions’ results to interest rate fluctuations.
Groupe BPCE is dependent on its access to funding and other sources of liquidity, which may be limited for reasons outside its control, thus potentially having a material adverse impact on its results.
Access to short-term and long-term funding is critical for the conduct of Groupe BPCE’s business. Non-collateralized sources of funding for Groupe BPCE include deposits, issues of long-term debt and short/medium-term negotiable debt securities, banks loans and credit lines. Groupe BPCE also uses secured funding, notably through repurchase agreements and the issuance of covered bonds or securitization via dedicated vehicles or conduits. Geopolitical instabilities in the world with variable rate tranches can have an impact on payment arrears and default rates as well as on final legal maturities. If Groupe BPCE were unable to access the secured and/or unsecured debt market at conditions deemed acceptable, or incurred an unexpected outflow of cash or collateral, including a significant decline in customer deposits, its liquidity may be negatively affected. Furthermore, if Groupe BPCE were unable to maintain a satisfactory level of customer deposits (e.g. in the event its competitors offer higher rates of return on deposits), it may be forced to obtain funding at higher rates, which would reduce its net interest margin and results.
Groupe BPCE’s liquidity, and therefore its results, may also be affected by unforeseen events outside its control, such as general market disruptions, which may in particular be related to geopolitical or health, a resurgence of financial crises, operational hardships affecting third parties, negative opinions on financial services in general or on the short/long-term outlook for Groupe BPCE, changes in Groupe BPCE’s credit rating, or even the perception of the position of the Group or other financial institutions among market operators.
Groupe BPCE’s access to the capital markets, and the cost of long-term unsecured funding, are directly related to changes in its credit spreads on the bond and credit derivatives markets, which it can neither predict nor control. Liquidity constraints may have a material adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s business, financial position, results and ability to meet its obligations to its counterparties. Similarly, a change in the monetary policy stance, in particular that of the European Central Bank, may impact Groupe BPCE’s financial position.
However, to deal with these risk factors, Groupe BPCE has significant liquidity reserves made up of cash deposits with central banks and available securities and receivables eligible for central bank refinancing mechanisms. Groupe BPCE’s liquidity reserve amounted to €302 billion at December 31, 2024 covering 177% short-term funding and short-term maturities of MLT debt compared to 161% at December 31, 2023. The LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) averaged 149% over 12 months on December 31, 2024 versus 145% at December 31, 2023. Given the importance of these risks for Groupe BPCE in terms of impact and probability, these risks are monitored proactively and closely, with Groupe BPCE also pursuing a very active policy of diversifying its investor base.
Downgraded credit ratings could have an adverse impact on BPCE’s funding cost, profitability and the continuity of some businesses.
Groupe BPCE’s long-term ratings at December 31, 2024, were A+ for Fitch ratings, A1 for Moody’s, A+ for R&I and A+ Standard and Poor’s, which revised this rating upwards in July 2024, thus demonstrating its assessment of the Group’s solidity. The decision to downgrade these credit ratings may have a negative impact on the funding of BPCE and its affiliates active in the financial markets. A ratings downgrade may affect Groupe BPCE’s liquidity and competitive position, increase funding costs, limit access to financial markets and trigger obligations under some bilateral contracts governing trading, derivative and collateralized funding transactions, thus adversely impacting its profitability and business continuity.
Furthermore, BPCE’s unsecured long-term funding cost is directly linked to its credit spreads (the yield spread over and above the yield on government issues with the same maturity that is paid to bond investors), which in turn are heavily dependent on its ratings. An increase in credit spreads may raise BPCE’s funding cost. Shifts in credit spreads are correlated to the market and sometimes subject to unforeseen and highly volatile changes. Accordingly, a change in perception of an issuer solvency due to a rating downgrade could have an adverse impact on that issuer’s profitability and business continuity.
Groupe BPCE is exposed to credit spread risk at the level of its assets in a scenario of widening credit spreads, on its portfolio of securities at fair value or at amortized cost. The Group holds a significant bond portfolio eligible for the liquidity reserve, mainly composed of sovereign and corporate bonds, which makes its valuation sensitive to changes in the credit spreads of its securities.
Market fluctuations and volatility could expose Groupe BPCE, and in particular its major corporate & investment banking business lines (Natixis CIB and Natixis IM), to favorable or unfavorable fluctuations in its trading and investment activities, which could adversely affect Groupe BPCE’s results of operations and financial position.
In the course of its third-party trading or investment activities, Groupe BPCE may carry positions in the bond, currency, commodity and equity markets, and in unlisted securities, real estate assets and other asset classes. These positions may be affected by volatility on the markets (especially the financial markets), i.e. the degree of price fluctuations over a given period on a given market, regardless of the levels on the market in question. Certain market configurations and fluctuations may also generate losses on a broad range of trading and hedging products used, including swaps, futures, options and structured products, which could adversely impact Groupe BPCE’s operating results and financial position. Similarly, extended market declines and/or major crises may reduce the liquidity of certain asset classes, making it difficult to sell certain assets and in turn generating material losses.
The market risk-weighted assets totaled €13 billion, i.e. around 4% of Groupe BPCE’s total risk-weighted assets, on December 31, 2024. For information, the weight of Corporate & Investment Banking activities in the Group’s net banking income was 19% for the year 2024. For more detailed information and examples, see Note 10.1.2 “Analysis of financial assets and liabilities classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE, included in the Universal Registration Document.
Groupe BPCE’s revenues from brokerage and other activities associated with fee and commission income may decrease in the event of market downturns.
A market downturn is liable to lower the volume of transactions (particularly financial services and securities transactions) executed by Groupe BPCE entities for their customers and as a market maker, thus reducing the net banking income from these activities. In particular, in the event of a decline in market conditions, Groupe BPCE may record a lower volume of customer transactions and a drop in the corresponding fees, thus reducing revenues earned from this activity. Furthermore, as management fees invoiced by Groupe BPCE entities to their customers are generally based on the value or performance of portfolios, any decline in the markets causing the value of these portfolios to decrease or generating an increase in the amount of redemptions would reduce the revenues earned by these entities through the distribution of mutual funds or other products (for the Caisses d’Epargne and the Banques Populaires) or through asset management activities. In addition, any deterioration in the economic environment could have an unfavorable impact on the seed money contributed to asset management structures with a risk of partial or total loss.
Even where there is no market decline, if funds managed for third parties throughout Groupe BPCE and other Groupe BPCE products underperform the market, redemptions may increase and/or inflows decrease as a result, with a potential corresponding impact on revenues from the asset management activities.
In 2024 the total net amount of fees and commissions received was €11,036 million, representing 47% of Groupe BPCE’s net banking income. For more detailed information on the amounts of fees and commissions received by Groupe BPCE, see Note 4.2 “Fee and commission income and expenses” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE in the Universal Registration Document.
Changes in the fair value of Groupe BPCE’s portfolios of securities and derivative products, and its own debt, are liable to have an adverse impact on the net carrying amount of these assets and liabilities, and as a result on Groupe BPCE’s net income and equity.
The net carrying amount of Groupe BPCE’s securities, derivative products and other types of assets at fair value, and of its own debt, is adjusted (at balance sheet level) at the date of each new financial statement. These adjustments are predominantly based on changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities during an accounting period, i.e. changes taken to profit or loss or recognized directly in other comprehensive income. Changes recorded in the income statement, but not offset by corresponding changes in the fair value of other financial instruments, have an impact on net banking income and thus on net income. All fair value adjustments have an impact on equity and thus on Groupe BPCE’s capital adequacy ratios. Such adjustments are also liable to have an adverse impact on the net carrying amount of Groupe BPCE’s assets and liabilities, and thus on its net income and equity. The fact that fair value adjustments are recorded over an accounting period does not mean that additional adjustments will not be necessary in subsequent periods.
At December 31, 2024 total financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit or loss amounted to €231 billion (with €218 billion in financial assets at fair value held for trading) and €219 billion (with €175 billion in financial liabilities at fair value held for trading) respectively. For more detailed information, see also Note 4.3 “Gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss”, Note 4.4 “Gains (losses) on financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income before tax”, Note 5.2 “Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss” and Note 5.4 “Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE in the Universal Registration Document.
In the event of non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, Groupe BPCE could be exposed to significant fines and other administrative and criminal penalties that could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, activities and reputation.
The risk of non-compliance is defined as the risk of sanction –judicial, administrative or disciplinary – but also of financial loss or damage to reputation, resulting from non-compliance with laws and regulations, professional standards and practices, and ethical standards specific to banking and insurance activities, whether national or international.
The banking and insurance sectors are subject to increased regulatory oversight, both nationally and internationally. Recent years have seen an increase in the volume of new regulations that have introduced significant changes affecting relationships between investment service providers and customers or investors (e.g. MIFID II, PRIIPS, the Insurance Distribution Directive, Market Abuse Regulation, Personal Data Protection Regulation, Benchmark Index Regulation, etc.). These new regulations have major impacts on the company’s operational processes.
In terms of financial security, the regulatory framework on the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism is part of a European trajectory. The Anti-Money Laundering (AML) package, currently in trialogue, will significantly harmonize and raise the level of requirements for regulated professions, particularly the financial sector. This package includes a systemic change in the supervision function due to the establishment, in 2024, of a new European authority, the AML Authority. It will have dual powers: (i) in terms of supervision. By 2027, it will have around 40 entities under its direct supervision, and will supervise the rest of the financial sector indirectly via national authorities, and (ii) in terms of coordinating the EU’s financial intelligence units (FIUs). The gradual increase in the EBA’s powers in AML-CTF areas also confirms the trend towards bringing these regulations into line with prudential rules, in terms of consolidated supervision requirements for banking groups.
The risk of non-compliance could result, for example, in the use of inappropriate means to promote and market the bank’s products and services, inadequate management of potential conflicts of interest, disclosure of confidential or privileged information, failure to comply with due diligence when dealing with suppliers, failure to comply with legal and regulatory obligations to detect financial transactions likely to derive from criminal offenses (e.g.: corruption, tax fraud, drug trafficking, concealed work, the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, etc.) committed by customers and linked to acts of terrorism. The risk of non-compliance may also lead to failures in the implementation of international sanctions (embargoes, asset freezes on individuals targeted by national measures applicable in the jurisdictions in which Groupe BPCE is present, European Union restrictions, or extraterritorial sanctions from certain foreign authorities).
Within BPCE, the Compliance function is responsible for overseeing the system for preventing and managing non-compliance risks. Despite this system, Groupe BPCE remains exposed to the risk of fines or other significant sanctions from the regulatory and supervisory authorities, as well as civil or criminal legal proceedings that could have a significant adverse impact on its financial position, activities and reputation.
Any interruption or failure of the information systems belonging to Groupe BPCE or third parties, particularly external service providers may generate losses (including commercial losses) and may have a material adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s results.
As is the case for the majority of its competitors, Groupe BPCE is highly dependent on information and communication systems, as a large number of increasingly complex transactions are processed in the course of its activities. Any failure, interruption or malfunction in these systems may cause errors or interruptions in the systems used to manage customer accounts, general ledgers, deposits, transactions and/or to process loans. For example, if Groupe BPCE’s information systems were to malfunction, even for a short period, the affected entities would be unable to meet their customers’ needs in time and could thus lose transaction opportunities. Similarly, a temporary failure in Groupe BPCE’s information systems despite back-up systems and contingency plans could also generate substantial information recovery and verification costs, or even a decline in its proprietary activities if, for example, such a failure were to occur during the implementation of a hedging transaction. The inability of Groupe BPCE’s systems to adapt to an increasing volume of transactions may also limit its ability to develop its activities and generate losses, particularly losses in sales, and may therefore have a material adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s results.
Groupe BPCE is also exposed to the risk of malfunction or operational failure by one of its clearing agents, foreign exchange markets, clearing houses, custodians or other financial intermediaries or external service providers that it uses to carry out or facilitate its securities transactions. As interconnectivity with its customers continues to grow, Groupe BPCE may also become increasingly exposed to the risk of the operational malfunction of customer information systems. Groupe BPCE’s communication and information systems, and those of its customers, service providers and counterparties, may also be subject to failures or interruptions resulting from cybercriminal or cyberterrorist acts. For example, as a result of its digital transformation, Groupe BPCE’s information systems are becoming increasingly open to the outside (cloud computing, big data, etc.). Many of its processes are gradually going digital. Use of the Internet and connected devices (tablets, smartphones, apps used on tablets and mobiles, etc.) by employees and customers is on the rise, increasing the number of channels serving as potential vectors for attacks and disruptions, and the number of devices and applications vulnerable to attacks and disruptions. Consequently, the software and hardware used by Groupe BPCE’s employees and external agents are constantly and increasingly subject to cyberthreats. As a result of any such attacks, Groupe BPCE may face malfunctions or interruptions in its own systems or in third-party systems that may not be adequately resolved. Any interruption or failure of the information systems belonging to Groupe BPCE or third parties may generate losses (including commercial losses) due to the disruption of its operations and the possibility that its customers may turn to other financial institutions during and/or after any such interruptions or failures.
The risk associated with any interruption or failure of the information systems belonging to Groupe BPCE or third parties is significant for Groupe BPCE in terms of impact and probability, and is therefore carefully and proactively monitored.
Lastly, it is necessary to note the risk of outsourcing, particularly in external IT services or more generally in connection with critical and important external services within the meaning of French regulations.
Reputational and legal risks could unfavorably impact Groupe BPCE’s profitability and business outlook.
As a major player in the financial system, Groupe BPCE relies on the notion of a trusted third party for the general public, its individual customers, companies, investors and all economic players. Damage to Groupe BPCE’s reputation, particularly when associated with an unfavorable media campaign, could compromise the relationship of trust between the Group and both internal and external stakeholders.
Groupe BPCE is exposed to reputational risks due to the diversity of its international banking, financial and insurance activities. This risk may arise following criticism concerning, in particular, the promotion and marketing of its products and services, the nature of the financing and investments made, as well as the reputation of the Group’s partners. In addition, concerns may arise around BPCE’s environmental strategy and social policies or its governance.
In addition, Groupe BPCE’s reputation could also be compromised by the actions of external entities, such as cybercrime or cyber-terrorism, internal or external fraud, or the misappropriation of funds. BPCE could restrict its ability to enter into new relationships or maintain existing relationships with its counterparties, customers or service providers and weaken its attractiveness to employees and candidates, this negatively impacting its financial position and business outlook.
Inadequate management of reputational risk would limit the mitigation of negative impacts and could also increase Groupe BPCE’s legal risk. This could lead to an increase in the number of legal actions and the risk of being ordered to pay damages, while exposing the Group to sanctions from regulatory authorities. For more information, please refer to the “Legal Risks” chapter of this document. Like reputational risk, these litigations could also have repercussions on Groupe BPCE’s financial position and its business outlook.
Unforeseen events, such as a serious natural disaster, events related to climate risk (physical risk directly associated with climate change), pandemics, attacks or any other emergency situation can cause an abrupt interruption in the operations of Groupe BPCE entities, affecting in particular the Group’s core business lines (liquidity, payment instruments, securities services, loans to individual and corporate customers, and fiduciary services) and trigger material losses, if the Group is not covered or not sufficiently covered by an insurance policy. These losses could relate to material assets, financial assets, market positions or key employees, and have a direct and potentially material impact on Groupe BPCE’s net income. Moreover, such events may also disrupt Groupe BPCE’s infrastructure, or that of a third party with which Groupe BPCE does business, and generate additional costs (relating in particular to the cost of re-housing the affected personnel) and increase Groupe BPCE’s costs (such as insurance premiums). Such events may invalidate insurance coverage of certain risks and thus increase Groupe BPCE’s overall level of risk.
At December 31, 2024, the majority of Groupe BPCE’s operational risk losses were in the business line “Payment and settlement” at 41%. They concentrated on the Basel category “External fraud” for 37%.
The failure or inadequacy of Groupe BPCE’s risk management and hedging policies, procedures and strategies may expose it to unidentified or unexpected risks which may trigger unforeseen losses.
Groupe BPCE’s risk management and hedging policies, procedures and strategies may not succeed in effectively limiting its exposure to all types of market environments or all kinds of risks, and may even prove ineffective for some risks that the Group was unable to identify or anticipate. Furthermore, the risk management techniques and strategies employed by Groupe BPCE may not effectively limit its exposure to risk and do not guarantee that overall risk will actually be lowered. These techniques and strategies may prove ineffective against certain types of risk, in particular risks that Groupe BPCE had not already identified or anticipated, given that the tools used by Groupe BPCE to develop risk management procedures are based on assessments, analyses and assumptions that may prove inaccurate or incomplete. Some of the indicators and qualitative tools used by Groupe BPCE to manage risk are based on the observation of past market performance. To measure risk exposures, the risk management department analyzes these observations, particularly statistically.
These tools and indicators may not be able to predict future risk exposures leading to model risk. For example, these risk exposures may be due to factors that Groupe BPCE may not have anticipated or correctly assessed in its statistical models or due to unexpected or unprecedented shifts in the market. This would limit Groupe BPCE’s risk management capability. As a result, losses incurred by Groupe BPCE may be higher than those anticipated on the basis of past measurements. Moreover, the Group’s quantitative models cannot factor in all risks. While no significant problem has been identified to date, the risk management systems are subject to the risk of operational failure, including fraud. Some risks are subject to a more qualitative analysis, which may prove inadequate and thus expose Groupe BPCE to unexpected losses. Groupe BPCE is also exposed to the risk of cybercrime. Cybercrime refers to a set of malicious and/or fraudulent acts using digital means, including those based on artificial intelligence (AI), to achieve higher levels of persuasion, in order to access data (personal, banking, insurance, technical or strategic), processing and users to cause significant harm to a company and its employees, partners, customers and counterparties.
Actual results may vary compared to assumptions used to prepare Groupe BPCE’s financial statements, which may expose it to unexpected losses.
In accordance with current IFRS standards and interpretations, Groupe BPCE must use certain estimates when preparing its financial statements, in particular accounting estimates relating to the determination of impairment for credit risk and provisions for employee benefits or provisions for litigation, estimates relating to the determination of the fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities, etc. If the values used for the estimates by Groupe BPCE prove to be materially inaccurate, in particular in the event of major and/or unexpected market trends, or if the methods used to calculate these values are modified due to future changes in IFRS standards or interpretations, Groupe BPCE may be exposed to unexpected losses.
Information on the use of estimates and judgments is provided in Note 2.3 “Use of estimates and judgments” to the Group’s consolidated financial statements included in the Universal Registration Document.
Environmental, Social and Governance risks (ESG), together with their repercussions for economic players, could adversely affect Groupe BPCE’s activities, results and financial position.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risks are a set of risk factors arising from the impacts of climate change, environmental issues (biodiversity, pollution, natural resources, water), social issues (respect for human rights, well-being and the interests of people and stakeholders) and governance issues (ethics and corporate culture, business practices, supplier relations). These risks are likely to materialize in the short, medium or long term. They are factors that aggravate other categories of risk to which Groupe BPCE is exposed (credit and counterparty risk, market risk, operational risk, structural balance sheet risk, risk related to insurance activities, strategic risk, legal risk, compliance risk and reputation risk). Groupe BPCE is mainly exposed to ESG risks indirectly through its customers and counterparties and its investments, either on its own behalf or on behalf of third parties. It is also directly exposed to these risks through its own business activities.
Environmental risks include physical risks and transition risks: Physical risks result from damage directly caused to people and property by events related to climate and environmental changes. These risks can be related to acute events, linked to extreme conditions circumscribed in time and space (such as heat waves, landslides, floods, late frosts, fires, storms, situations of water stress or air, water or soil pollution) or to chronic events of a more gradual and diffuse nature (such as changes in rainfall patterns, rise in sea levels and average temperatures, loss of biodiversity, the depletion of natural resources). Physical risks are likely to affect a wide variety of geographical areas and economic sectors and impact the business, assets and financial profile of the counterparties to which Groupe BPCE is exposed, particularly through its financing, investment or insurance activities. Groupe BPCE is also likely to be directly affected by climatic or environmental events that affect its operating sites, employees or suppliers. Transition risks result from adjustments made by economic players and stakeholders during the transition to a low-carbon economy that is more respectful of environmental balances. These adjustments are reflected in regulatory, technological or socio-demographic changes that may affect the business models, operating models and financial profiles of economic players as well as the value of the assets to which Groupe BPCE is exposed, particularly through its financing and investment activities. Groupe BPCE is also directly exposed to transition risks through regulatory changes and changes in stakeholder expectations, particularly with regard to its product and service offering as well as its voluntary commitments.
Social risks arise from issues related to the rights, well-being, and interests of people and stakeholders (company and value chain employees, communities concerned, consumers and end users). Through their potential impact on activities (work organization, supply chains, products, etc.) and the associated reputation issues, these risks are likely to affect the financial profile of the counterparties to which Groupe BPCE is exposed, particularly through its financing and investment activities. They may also lead to increased reputation risk for Groupe BPCE, either directly or through its counterparties.
Governance risks include issues related to ethics and corporate culture (governance structure, business integrity and transparency, etc.), supplier relationship management, influence activities and business conduct practices. Through their potential impact on activities (corporate governance standards, control systems, commercial practices, etc.) and the associated reputation issues, these risks are likely to affect the financial profile of the counterparties to which Groupe BPCE is exposed, in particular through its financing and investment activities. They may also lead to increased reputation risk for Groupe BPCE, either directly or through its counterparties.
Overall, Environmental, Social and Governance risks could adversely affect Groupe BPCE’s business, results and financial position.
Groupe BPCE may be vulnerable to political, macro-economic and financial environments or to specific circumstances in its countries of operation.
Some Groupe BPCE entities are exposed to country risk, which is the risk that economic, financial, political or social conditions in a country (particularly in countries where the Group conducts business) may affect their financial interests. Groupe BPCE predominantly does business in France (77% of net banking income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024) and North America (13% of net banking income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024), with other European countries and the rest of the world accounting for 3% and 7%, respectively, of net banking income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Note 12.6 “Locations by country” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE, contained in the 2024 Universal Registration Document, lists the entities established in each country and gives a breakdown of net banking income and income before tax by country of establishment.
A significant change in the political or macro-economic environment of such countries or regions may generate additional expenses or reduce profits earned by Groupe BPCE.
The economic outlook remains weakened by the uncertainties and downward risks that surround them, especially when they are increasing against a backdrop of geopolitical tensions. In particular, two major events marked the year 2024, the effects of which may extend into 2025 and beyond: the surprise dissolution of the French National Assembly on June 9 and the presidential election of Donald Trump in the United States on November 5. Generally, the extent of the imbalances to be eliminated can also always tip the developed economies into a downward spiral, whether it is the significance of public and private debts on both sides of the Atlantic and in China, the resurgence of an inflationary expectation mechanism or the heterogeneity of geographical and sectoral situations, combined with overlapping global risks, thus fueling the return of the risk of financial instability. In addition, there is the potential occurrence of natural disasters or health risks. Joint threats mainly concern geopolitical and economic uncertainties: the context of the war waged by Russia against Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East; the still latent risks of tensions between Taiwan and China; the availability of nuclear weapons in Iran; the Sino-US geostrategic confrontation and the development of protectionist trends, particularly in the US; the deepening economic decline in Europe, Germany and France, in the face of the strategies of the race for industrial hegemon implemented by China and the United States; the emergence of Eurosceptic and protectionist governments in several major European economies; even the behavior of European and French consumers, whose savings rate remains well above its pre-health crisis level.
France entered a situation of political instability after the dissolution of the National Assembly. The business climate, which declined in the summer just after the dissolution, remained below its long-term average. Its fiscal credibility, already tarnished by an unanticipated public deficit of 5.5% of GDP in 2023 and by the downgrade of its sovereign rating on May 31 by Standard & Poor’s, the most powerful American agency (rating downgraded to AA-, from AA since 2013), then Moody’s rating on December 4 (Aa3 from Aa2), became the main victim of ambitious election campaign promises, with no real basis in terms of financing. With the censorship of the government of Prime Minister Michel Barnier on December 4, political instability took over from inflationary fears, despite the appointment of François Bayrou. It has increased, fueling the budgetary uncertainty it generates. The public deficit once again increased, reaching 6.1% of GDP in 2024. In addition to maintaining the widening of the sovereign yield spread with Germany by nearly 80 basis points (bps), compared to only 50 bps before the dissolution of the National Assembly, this shock would have already cost 0.1 point of GDP in lost growth in 2024 according to the Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques (OFCE), which was mainly due to lower private investment.
Once again, 2025 has begun amidst a period of radical geopolitical, political and economic uncertainty, particularly in France, where the political situation remains very uncertain, despite the constitution of a government before the Christmas holidays by the new Prime Minister François Bayrou. Internationally, the impact of the election of the new US President remains to be seen, whether it is the rapid implementation of customs measures that could slow global trade – by leading to tensions. widespread commercialization and strong potential for retaliation from China – the risk of losses in economic efficiency and price increases (and therefore of persistently higher interest rates) or the favorable magnitude of the planned fiscal expansion. Added to this is the reaction of monetary policy to the potential resurgence of inflationary seeds and to Donald Trump’s desire to drive down the dollar.
We can also see a deepening of the economic decline in Europe, Germany and France, due to a loss of competitiveness – also linked to higher energy costs than on the other side of the Atlantic – and to the attractiveness of the Eurozone, in view of the race for industrial hegemony between the two main competitors, China and the United States. The race between the American champion and the Chinese outsider involves a budgetary headlong rush which is set to continue through 2025 and into 2026. Systems to support American industry, such as the Chips Act and the IRA, greatly increase the attractiveness of investments from the United States. The profitability gap in their favor could result in Europe losing out to the United States on key localization projects. As for the Chinese offensive, it is based on price competitiveness, coupled with a rise in technological range. Europe, which has suffered a largely specific energy crisis with the economic sanctions against Russia, has seen the price of its exports increase by more than 30% since the end of 2019, against a maximum of 5% for Chinese exports. In addition, the need to restore a certain fiscal discipline in the Member States of the Eurozone, after the overrun in public finances which was justified by the pandemic, could lead certain countries, such as Italy and France, to present debt and public deficit reduction plans. This would then gradually involve a restriction on public spending, likely to cause a drop in demand.
Across the Atlantic, the Trump program is based on four main areas, namely deregulation, protectionism, reduction in taxation and public spending, and finally the control of migration flows. It would be moderately inflationary in the short term in 2025 but favorable to growth, while widening public and commercial deficits (to more than 6% of GDP?). If the increase in tariffs is only 10%, it can probably be offset by the appreciation of the dollar and by the margins of exporters and distributors. Moreover, following the example of the first presidential term, it is not impossible that the anxiety-provoking statements of protectionism are more of a negotiating technique aimed at forcing Europe to take responsibility for financing its own defense and for China to strengthen its internal demand. The most significant protectionist measure, which would only take effect in 2026, concerns the 60% increase in customs duties vis-à-vis the Middle Kingdom, whose economy is tending to change (significant decline in the weight of real estate in favor of cutting-edge industries and technological services). In retaliation, while avoiding a war on increased customs duties, China may then make it more difficult to export certain strategic inputs such as Gallium, Germanium and Antimony.
In addition, the economic development of Europe’s main trading partners, in particular China, could also present risks. Chinese public and private over-indebtedness is slowing down the country’s ability to keep pace with growth. 10 years after the announcement of the China 2025 plan, which aimed for industrial pre-eminence in 10 key sectors, China’s leadership is still only asserted at the cost of increased trade tensions with its American, Asian and European partners and the instability of the Chinese financial system.
In addition, other perennial sources of instability, such as the continuation of the war in Ukraine, the situation in the Middle East or the Red Sea, could cause tensions on oil and gas prices and shipping costs, resulting in upwards risk on inflation and downwards risk on activity. A scenario in which Ukraine is abandoned in its struggle against Russia could also create the conditions for a climate of concern for Europe. Without going as far as an invasion of Taiwan by China, a major escalation of tensions between these two countries is likely to lead to the implementation of severe sanctions against China, such as the freezing of all Chinese assets and the disconnection of China from all SWIFT platforms, similar to what happened in Russia after the invasion of Ukraine. This poses a major risk for the global economy, particularly for trade flows through the Taiwan Strait. It is used by almost half of the world’s container ships, connecting the electronic equipment factories (leading semiconductors) in East Asia to the rest of the world. This corridor is also used to supply the continent with natural gas and oil. All this could still cause a deep recession, especially in Europe.
In France, in addition to a significant risk of an additional increase in the interest rate risk premium vis-à-vis Germany and a continued drift in public spending, a wait-and-see attitude may turn into mistrust, due to political instability. It may lead to rather cautious spending behavior by households and businesses, despite the a priori favorable effect of less budgetary consolidation. In particular, savings incentives may remain strong, slowing the expected decline in the household savings rate, due to a need for precaution, with rising unemployment and individual customers’ concern about budgetary imbalances. Regarding companies, the proportion of business leaders who have said that they are postponing their planned investments and hires has increased significantly, according to the BPI France and Rexecode survey on SMEs and mid-sized companies in November 2024. Moreover, despite the relative maintenance of margin levels for all non-financial companies, the increase in financing costs is weighing on corporate profits. The latter fell to a historically low level in 2024. This could even result in an accentuation of the decline in productive investment, despite the improvement in monetary and financial conditions and the trend towards investment in digital and energy transitions. Furthermore, the rather modest improvement in household spending, the main driver of activity, would then be insufficient to counteract the increased prudence of companies in terms of employment, management of inventories and investment, due to the environment of still high interest rates, the deterioration of the cash position of VSEs/SMEs and the rise in insolvencies. In particular, nearly 66,500 companies have failed, reaching the highest level since at least 2009, according to a 2024 report prepared by BPCE L’Observatoire. In the fourth quarter of 2024 alone, 17,966 insolvencies were recorded, according to this source. This record number of insolvencies, which could have dangerous consequences, particularly in terms of jobs, constitutes a warning for economic and political players as we enter 2025, which already promises to be difficult on an economic level and uncertain on a political and budgetary level: 68,000 insolvencies are expected and 240,000 jobs are at r
However, the identical renewal of the services voted in the last Finance Law, in addition to the capacity of the French State to raise taxes and take on debt to finance itself as well as the Social Security must a priori lead to an ex-ante reduction in the budget deficit, hence a reduction in the budget impulse. The Finance Act for 2025 was adopted on February 5, 2025, and provides for an exceptional contribution on the profits of large companies that will only apply to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (an exceptional contribution of 41.20%, increasing the rate effective tax rate to 36.2%). The corporate income tax rate remained at 25.83% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
The consensus forecasts presented for 2025, particularly for France, therefore reproduce the economic trends already at work, without necessarily integrating specific measures likely to be taken by the new government, nor the effects of an even more prolonged wait-and-see period, in the event of a misunderstood direction of economic policy.
Lastly, the physical risks related to extreme climate events (heat waves, fires, droughts, floods, etc.) or environmental degradation as well as the risks associated with the transition to an economy with a lower environmental impact are likely to have a material impact on people, companies and public players and have a negative impact on the French economy.
For more detailed information, see Sections 5.2 “Economic and financial environment” and 5.8 “2025 economic outlook” in the 2024 Universal Registration Document.
The risk of a pandemic (such as the coronavirus – Covid-19) and its economic consequences may adversely impact the Group’s activities, results and financial position.
The emergence of Covid-19 in late 2019 and rapid spread of the pandemic across the globe led to a deterioration in economic conditions in multiple business segments, a deterioration in the financial position of economic players, while also disrupting the financial markets. In response, many affected countries were forced to implement preventive health measures (closed borders, lockdown measures, restrictions on certain economic activities, etc.). Government (guaranteed loans, tax and social assistance, etc.) and banking (moratoriums) schemes were put in place. Some counterparties emerged weakened from this unprecedented period.
Massive fiscal and monetary policy measures to support activity were put in place between 2020 and 2022, notably by the French government (State-guaranteed loans for businesses and professional customers on the one hand, for individual customers on the other hand, short-time working measures as well as numerous other fiscal, social and bill-paying measures) and by the European Central Bank (more abundant and cheaper access to very large refinancing packages) with a restrictive monetary policy on rates over the last few quarters. Groupe BPCE has participated in the French State-guaranteed loan program in the interest of financially supporting its customers and helping them overcome the effects of this crisis on their activities and income (e.g. automatic six-month deferral on loans to certain professional customers and micro-enterprises/SMEs). There is no way to guarantee, however, that such measures will be enough to offset the negative impacts of the pandemic on the economy or to fully stabilize the financial markets over the long term. In particular, the repayment of State-guaranteed loans may lead to defaults on the part of borrowers and financial losses for Groupe BPCE up to the portion not guaranteed by the State.
On June 26, 2024, Groupe BPCE presented its strategic plan “VISION 2030” based on three pillars: (i) forging our growth for the long term, (ii) giving our customers trust in their future, and (iii) expressing our cooperative values in all territories. The first pillar aims to make Groupe BPCE a leading banking group promoting diversified growth, open to partnerships, and capable of achieving high levels of performance. The second pillar aims to make the Group into a facilitator for access to housing for all, and for all types of needs, to be the go-to player for territorial competitiveness, to protect customers at every moment and stage in their lives, and to simplify client relationship models (from 100% physical to 100% digital), notably with the help of AI. The third pillar aims to give full expression to the cooperative values promoted by the Group, which draws its strength from its multifaceted activities and the range of its expertise, from its positive global impact, and from its cooperative shareholders and employees, proud and committed in their day-to-day lives. The new growth model is being implemented in three major geographical circles – France, Europe and the rest of the World – and is based on organic growth, acquisitions, and partnerships.
This strategic vision is accompanied by a trajectory for 2026 based on a macroeconomic scenario that assumes, from 2025 onwards, a rebound in economic growth at rates that may vary from one geographical region to the next, a moderate fall in inflation in 2025 and 2026, a fall in the three-month Euribor and relative stability in long-term interest rates (10-year OAT).
The success of the 2026 financial trajectory is grounded in a large number of initiatives to be rolled out within the various business lines of Groupe BPCE. Although most of the goals defined in the strategic plan are expected to be achieved, some may not, owing to changes in the economic environment or possible changes in accounting and/or tax regulations. If Groupe BPCE does not achieve these goals, the 2026 financial trajectory could be affected.
Groupe BPCE may encounter difficulties in adapting, implementing and incorporating its policy governing acquisitions or joint ventures.
Groupe BPCE may consider acquisition or partnership opportunities in the future. Although Groupe BPCE carries out an in-depth analysis of any potential acquisitions or joint ventures, in general it is impossible to carry out an exhaustive appraisal in every respect. As a result, Groupe BPCE may have to manage initially unforeseen liabilities. Similarly, the results of the acquired company or joint venture may prove disappointing and the expected synergies may not be realized in whole or in part, or the transaction may give rise to higher-than-expected costs. Groupe BPCE may also encounter difficulties with the consolidation of new entities. The failure of an announced acquisition or failure to consolidate a new entity or joint venture may place a strain on Groupe BPCE’s profitability. This situation may also lead to the departure of key employees. In the event that Groupe BPCE is obliged to offer financial incentives to its employees in order to retain them, this situation may also lead to an increase in costs and a decline in profitability. Joint ventures also expose Groupe BPCE to additional risks and uncertainties such as dependency on systems, controls and persons that would be outside its control and may, in this respect, see its liability incurred, suffer losses or incur damage to its reputation. Moreover, conflicts or disagreements between Groupe BPCE and its partners may have a negative impact on the targeted benefits of the joint venture.
At December 31, 2024, the total investments accounted for using the equity method amounted to €2.1 billion and that of goodwill amounted to €4.3 billion. For further information, please refer to Note 12.4.1 “Partnerships and associates” and Note 3.5 “Goodwill” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE, included in the Universal Registration Document.
Intense competition in France, Groupe BPCE’s main market, or internationally, may cause its net income and profitability to decline.
Groupe BPCE’s main business lines operate in a very competitive environment both in France and other parts of the world where it does substantial business. This competition is heightened by consolidation, either through mergers and acquisitions or cooperation and arrangements. Consolidation has created a certain number of companies which, like Groupe BPCE, can offer a wide range of products and services ranging from insurance, loans and deposits to brokerage, investment banking and asset management. Groupe BPCE is in competition with other entities based on a number of factors, including the execution of transactions, products and services offered, innovation, reputation and price. If Groupe BPCE is unable to maintain its competitiveness in France or in its other major markets by offering a range of attractive and profitable products and services, it may lose market share in certain key business lines or incur losses in some or all of its activities.
For example, at December 31, 2024, in France, Groupe BPCE was the 1st bank for SMEs(1) and 2nd for individual, professional and self-employed customers. The Group had a 26% market share in home loans(2). For Retail Banking and Insurance, loan outstandings amounted to €724 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to €719 billion at December 31, 2023, with savings deposits(3) of €937 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to €918 billion at December 31, 2023 (for more information on the contribution of each business line, and each network, see section 5.4.2. “The Group’s business lines” of the 2024 Universal Registration Document).
- 2023 Kantar SME-SMI survey.
- Market share: 21.9% in household deposits/savings and 26.3% in home loans (Banque de France Q3 2024). Penetration rate of 38.4% (rank 2) among professionals and individual entrepreneurs (2021-2022 Pépites survey, CSA).
- Balance sheet and financial savings.
In addition, any slowdown in the global economy or in the economies in which Groupe BPCE’s main markets are located is likely to increase competitive pressure, in particular through increased pressure on prices and a contraction in the volume of activity of Groupe BPCE and its competitors. New, more competitive rivals subject to separate or more flexible regulation or other prudential ratio requirements could also enter the market. These new market participants would thus be able to offer more competitive products and services. Advances in technology and the growth of e-commerce have made it possible for institutions other than custodians to offer products and services that were traditionally considered as banking products, and for financial institutions and other companies to provide electronic and internet-based financial solutions, including electronic securities trading. These new entrants may put downward pressure on the price of Groupe BPCE’s products and services or affect Groupe BPCE’s market share. Advances in technology could lead to rapid and unexpected changes on Groupe BPCE’s markets of operation. Groupe BPCE’s competitive position, net income and profitability may be adversely affected should it prove unable to adequately adapt its activities or strategy in response to such changes.
Groupe BPCE’s ability to attract and retain skilled employees is paramount to the success of its business and failing to do so may affect its performance.
The employees of Groupe BPCE entities are the Group’s most valuable resource. Competition to attract qualified employees is fierce in many areas of the financial services sector. Groupe BPCE’s earnings and performance depend on its ability to attract new employees and retain existing employees. The current upheavals (technological, economic and customer requirements), particularly in the banking sector, demand major efforts to support and train employees. Without enough support, this could prevent Groupe BPCE from taking advantage of potential opportunities in terms of sales or efficiency, which could in turn affect its performance.
Groupe BPCE could be exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks that may have a negative impact on its results and financial position if its model-based risk measurement system should fail.
Groupe BPCE’s risk measurement system is based specifically on the use of models. Groupe BPCE’s portfolio of models mainly includes the Corporate & Investment Banking market models and the credit models of Groupe BPCE and its entities. The models used for strategic decision-making and risk management monitoring (credit, financial (ALM and market), operational including compliance and climatic) could fail, exposing BPCE to unidentified or unanticipated risks that could result in significant losses.
At December 31, 2024, net banking income from insurance activities increased by 10% (+€61 million) to €694 million compared to €633 million for 2023.
A deterioration in market conditions, in particular excessive fluctuations in interest rates (both upwards and downwards) and/or a deterioration in spreads or equity markets, or an increase in reinsurance costs could have a significant adverse impact on the financial position and solvency of Life and Non-Life insurance companies.
The main risk to which Groupe BPCE’s insurance subsidiaries are exposed is financial risk. Exposure to this risk is mainly linked to the capital guarantee on the scope of euro funds for savings products and to unrealized capital gains or losses on portfolio investments.
Among financial risks, interest-rate risk is structurally significant due to the predominantly bond-based composition of assets backing commitments. Significant fluctuations in interest rates may have the following consequences:
- in the case of higher rates: reduce the competitiveness of the euro-denominated offer (by making new investments more attractive) and trigger waves of redemptions and major arbitrages on unfavorable terms with unrealized capital losses on outstanding bonds;
- in the case of lower rates: in the long term, make the return on general funds too low to enable them to honor their capital guarantees.
As a result of asset allocation, the widening of spreads and the decline in the equity markets could also have a significant unfavorable impact on the results of Groupe BPCE’s insurance activities, through the decline in the valuation of investments at fair value through profit or loss, as well as the constitution of provisions for impairment .
Moreover, the increase in claims and extreme events, particularly environmental events, could lead to an increase in reinsurance, reducing the overall profitability of the insurance activities.
A mismatch between the level and cost of claims anticipated by insurers, on the one hand, and premiums and provisions on the other, could have a significant adverse impact on the results and financial position of the non-life, personal protection and surety portion of its insurance activities.
The main risk to which Groupe BPCE’s insurance subsidiaries are exposed in connection with these latter activities is underwriting risk. This risk arises from the mismatch between, on the one hand, the claims actually incurred and the sums actually paid out as compensation for them and, on the other hand, the assumptions used by subsidiaries to set their product rates and establish technical provisions for potential compensation.
Companies use both their own experience and industry data to establish loss ratio and actuarial estimates, including the pricing of insurance products and the establishment of related technical provisions. However, reality may differ from these estimates, and unforeseen risks such as pandemics or natural disasters could result in higher-than-expected payments to policyholders. In this respect, changes in climate phenomena (known as “physical” climate risks) are subject to particular vigilance.
In the event of claims exceeding the underlying assumptions initially used to establish provisions, or if events or trends lead to changes in the underlying assumptions, companies could be exposed to greater liabilities than anticipated, which could adversely affect their results and financial position. This could be the case in connection with the climatic hazards described above.
The various actions implemented in recent years, particularly in terms of financial coverage, reinsurance, business diversification and investment management, have contributed to the resilience of the solvency of Groupe BPCE’s insurance subsidiaries.
Groupe BPCE is subject to many regulation in France and in several other countries around the world where it operates; regulatory measures and changes could have a material adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s business and results.
The business and results of Groupe BPCE entities may be materially impacted by the policies and actions of various regulatory authorities in France or the European Union, other governments of the European Union, the United States, foreign governments and international organizations. Such constraints may limit the ability of Groupe BPCE entities to expand their businesses or conduct certain activities. The nature and impact of future changes in such policies and regulatory measures are unpredictable and are beyond Groupe BPCE’s control. Moreover, the general political environment has evolved unfavorably for banks and the financial industry, resulting in additional pressure on the part of legislative and regulatory bodies to adopt more stringent regulatory measures, despite the fact that these measures may have adverse consequences on lending and other financial activities, and on the economy. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the new legislative and regulatory measures, it is not possible to predict what impact they will have on Groupe BPCE; however, this impact may be highly adverse.
Groupe BPCE may have to reduce the size of some of its activities to comply with new requirements. New measures are also liable to increase the cost of compliance with new regulations. This could cause revenues and consolidated profit to decline in the relevant business lines, sales to decline in certain activities and asset portfolios, and asset impairment expenses.
The new banking package (CRR III/CRD VI directive) was published on June 19, 2024 in the Official Journal of the European Union. This banking package implements the last phase of the Basel III regulatory reform in the European Union. Most of the provisions of the CRR III are applicable from January 1, 2025. However, the rules relating to market risks have been postponed for one year to January 1, 2026. The implementation of these reforms may result in higher capital and liquidity requirements, which could impact Groupe BPCE funding costs.
On November 26, 2024, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”), in consultation with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and national authorities, reported the 2024 list of global systemically important banks (“G-SIBs”). Groupe BPCE is classified as a G-SIB by the FSB. Groupe BPCE also appeared on the list of global systemically important financial institutions (G-SIFIs) in 2024.
These regulatory measures, which may apply to various Groupe BPCE entities, and any changes in such measures may have a material adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s business and results.
Legislation and regulations have recently been enacted or proposed in recent years with a view to introducing a number of changes, some permanent, in the global financial environment. These new measures, aimed at avoiding a new global financial crisis, have significantly altered the operating environment of Groupe BPCE and other financial institutions, and may continue to alter this environment in the future. Groupe BPCE is exposed to the risk associated with changes in legislation and regulations. These include the new prudential backstop rules, which measure the difference between the actual provisioning levels of defaulted loans and guidelines including target rates, depending on the age of the default and the presence of guarantees.
In today’s evolving legislative and regulatory environment, it is impossible to foresee the impact of these new measures on Groupe BPCE. The development of programs aimed at complying with these new legislative and regulatory measures (and updates to existing programs), and changes to the Group’s information systems in response to or in preparation for new measures generates significant costs for the Group, and may continue to do so in the future. Despite its best efforts, Groupe BPCE may also be unable to fully comply with all applicable laws and regulations and may thus be subject to financial or administrative penalties. Furthermore, new legislative and regulatory measures may require the Group to adapt its operations and/or may affect its results and financial position. Lastly, new regulations may require Groupe BPCE to strengthen its capital or increase its total funding costs.
The late publication of regulatory standards could also lead to delays in their implementation in Groupe BPCE’s tools.
The risk associated with regulatory measures and subsequent changes to such measures is significant for Groupe BPCE in terms of impact and probability, and is therefore carefully and proactively monitored.
BPCE may have to help entities belonging to the financial solidarity mechanism in the event they experience financial difficulties, including entities in which BPCE holds no economic interest.
As the central institution of Groupe BPCE, BPCE is responsible for ensuring the liquidity and solvency of each regional bank (Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne) and the other members of the group of affiliates. The group of affiliates includes BPCE subsidiaries, such as Natixis, Crédit Foncier de France, Oney and Banque Palatine. In the case of Groupe BPCE, all the institutions affiliated with the central institution of Groupe BPCE benefit from a guarantee and solidarity system whose purpose, in accordance with Articles L. 511-31, L. 512-107-5 and L. 512-107-6 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, is to guarantee the liquidity and solvency of all affiliated institutions and to organize financial solidarity within the Group.
This financial solidarity is based on legislative provisions establishing a legal principle of solidarity, imposing a performance obligation on the central institution to restore the liquidity or solvency of affiliates in difficulty and/or all affiliates of the Group. By virtue of the unlimited nature of the principle of solidarity, BPCE is entitled at any time to ask any one or several or all of the affiliates to contribute to the financial efforts that may be necessary to restore the situation, and may, if necessary, mobilize all the cash and equity capital of the affiliates in the event of difficulty for one or more of them.
The three guarantee funds created to cover Groupe BPCE’s liquidity and insolvency risks are described in Note 1.2 “Guarantee mechanism” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE included in this Universal Registration Document. At December 31, 2024, the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne funds each contained €450 million. The Mutual Guarantee Fund holds €197 million in deposits per network. The regional banks are obligated to make additional contributions to the guarantee fund on their future profits. While the guarantee fund represents a substantial source of resources to fund the solidarity mechanism, there is no guarantee these revenues will be sufficient. If the guarantee funds prove insufficient, BPCE, due to its missions as a central institution, will have to do everything necessary to restore the situation and will have the obligation to make up the deficit by implementing the internal solidarity mechanism that it has put in place, by mobilizing its own resources, and may also make unlimited use of the resources of several or all of its affiliates.
As a result of this obligation, if a member of the Group were to encounter major financial difficulties, the event underlying these financial difficulties could have a negative impact on the financial position of BPCE and that of the other affiliates thus called upon to provide support under the legal principle of financial solidarity.
Investors in BPCE’s securities could suffer losses if BPCE and all of its affiliates were to be subject to liquidation or resolution procedures.
The EU regulation on the Single Resolution Mechanism No. 806/ 214 and the EU Directive for the recovery and resolution of banks No. 2014/59, as amended by EU Directive No. 2019/879 (the “BRRD”), as transposed into French law in Book VI of the French Monetary and Financial Code, give the resolution authorities the power to impair BPCE securities or, in the case of debt securities, to convert them to capital.
Resolution authorities may write down or convert capital instruments, such as BPCE’s Tier-2 subordinated debt securities, if the issuing institution or the group to which it belongs is failing or likely to fail (and there is no reasonable prospect that another measure would avoid such failure within a reasonable time period), becomes non-viable, or requires extraordinary public support (subject to certain exceptions). They shall write down or convert additional capital instruments before opening a resolution proceeding, or if doing so is necessary to maintain the viability of an institution. Any write-down of capital instruments shall be effected in order of seniority, so that Common Equity Tier-1 instruments are to be written down first, then additional Tier-1 instruments are to be written down, followed by Tier-2 instruments. Additional capital instruments must be converted in order of priority, such that additional Tier-1 instruments are converted first followed by Tier-2 instruments. If the write-down or conversion of capital instruments is not sufficient to restore the financial health of the institution, the bail-in power held by the resolution authorities may be applied to write down or convert eligible liabilities, such as BPCE’s senior non-preferred and senior preferred securities.
At December 31, 2024, total Tier-1 capital amounted to €73.8 billion and Tier-2 prudential capital to €12.2 billion. Senior non-preferred debt instruments amounted to €36.4 billion at that date, of which €32.5 billion had a maturity of more than one year and were therefore eligible for TLAC and MREL.
As a result of the complete legal solidarity, and in the extreme case of a liquidation or resolution proceeding, one or more affiliates may not find itself subject to court-ordered liquidation, or be affected by resolution measures within the meaning of the “BRRD”, without all affiliates and BPCE also being affected. In accordance with Articles L. 613-29 and L. 613-55-5 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, the judicial liquidation proceedings and resolution measures are therefore brought in a coordinated manner with regard to the central institution and all of its affiliates.
Article L.613-29 also provides that, in the event of court-ordered liquidation proceedings being brought against all affiliates, the external creditors (of the same rank or enjoying identical rights) of all affiliates would be treated equally according to the ranking of the creditors and regardless of whether they are attached to a particular affiliated entity. As a result, investors in AT1 instruments and other securities of the same rank would be more affected than holders of Tier-2 and other securities of the same rank, which in turn would be more affected than investors in external senior non-preferred debt, which in turn would be more affected than investors in external senior preferred debt. Similarly, in the event of resolution, and in accordance with Article L. 613-55-5 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, identical depreciation and/or conversion rates would be applied to debts and receivables of the same rank, regardless of their attachment to a particular affiliated entity in the order of the hierarchy recalled above.
Due to the systemic nature of Groupe BPCE and the assessment currently made by the resolution authorities, resolution measures would be more likely to be taken than the opening of judicial liquidation proceedings. A resolution procedure may be initiated against BPCE and all affiliated entities if (i) the default of BPCE and all affiliated entities is proven or foreseeable, (ii) there is no reasonable expectation that another measure could prevent this failure within a reasonable timeframe, and (iii) a resolution measure is required to achieve the objectives of the resolution: (a) guarantee the continuity of critical functions, (b) avoid material adverse impacts to financial stability, (c) protect State resources by minimizing the use of exceptional public financial support and (d) protect client funds and assets, particularly those of depositors. Failure of an institution means that it does not respect requirements for continuing authorization, it is unable to pay its debts or other liabilities when they fall due, it requires extraordinary public financial support (subject to limited exceptions), or the value of its liabilities exceeds the value of its assets.
In addition to the bail-in power, resolution authorities are provided with broad powers to implement other resolution measures with respect to failing institutions or, under certain circumstances, their groups, which may include (without limitation): the total or partial sale of the institution’s business to a third party or a bridge institution, the separation of assets, the replacement or substitution of the institution as obligor in respect of debt instruments, modifications to the terms of debt instruments (including altering the maturity and/or the amount of interest payable and/or imposing a temporary suspension on payments), discontinuing the listing and admission to trading of financial instruments, the dismissal of managers or the appointment of a temporary administrator (administrateur spécial) and the issuance of new equity or own funds.
The exercise of the powers described above by resolution authorities could result in the partial or total write-down or conversion to equity of the capital instruments and the debt instruments issued by BPCE, or may substantially affect the amount of resources available to BPCE to make payments on such instruments, potentially causing BPCE investors to incur losses.
Tax legislation and its application in France and in countries where Groupe BPCE operates are likely to have an adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s results.
As a multinational banking Group that carries out large and complex international transactions, Groupe BPCE (particularly Natixis) is subject to tax legislation in a large number of countries throughout the world, and structures its activity in compliance with all applicable tax regulations. Changes in tax schemes by the competent authorities in these countries could materially impact Groupe BPCE’s results. Groupe BPCE manages its activities with a view to creating value from the synergies and sales capabilities of its various constituent entities. It also strives to structure the financial products sold to its customers by factoring in their tax consequences and ensuring their full tax compliance. The structure of intra-group transactions and financial products sold by entities of Groupe BPCE are based on its own interpretations of applicable tax regulations and laws, generally based on opinions given by independent tax experts, and, as needed, on decisions or specific interpretations by the competent tax authorities. It is possible that in the future tax authorities may challenge some of these interpretations, as a result of which the tax positions of Groupe BPCE entities may be disputed by the tax authorities, potentially resulting in tax re-assessments, which may in turn have an adverse impact on Groupe BPCE’s results. In France, the Barnier government being overthrow meant that the Finance Act for 2025 was not adopted before the end of 2024, which created uncertainty about the taxation levels of activities exercised in France by Groupe BPCE in respect of the 2024 fiscal year. The Finance Act for 2025 was adopted on February 5, 2025, and provides for an exceptional contribution on the profits of large companies that will only apply to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (an exceptional contribution of 41.20%, increasing the effective tax rate to 36.2%). The corporate income tax rate remained at 25.83% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
7.3 Risk management system
7.3.1 Adequacy of risk management systems
The Group Risk and Compliance Committee, chaired by the Chairman of the Management Board, met five times in 2024 to review the adequacy of Groupe BPCE’s risk management systems, and validated the annual review of the Group’s risk policies. These systems cover all risks, as described in the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014 on internal control as amended by the Order of February 25, 2021.
7.4 Capital management and capital adequacy
7.4.1 Regulatory framework
Credit institutions’ capital is regularly monitored in accordance with regulations defined by the Basel Committee.
These regulations were reinforced following the introduction of Basel III, with an increase in the level of regulatory capital requirements and the introduction of new risk categories.
The Basel III recommendations were incorporated in EU directive 2013/36/EU (Capital Requirements Directive – CRD IV) and Regulation No. 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation – CRR) of the European Parliament and of the Council, as amended by Regulation (EU) No. 2019/876 (the “CRR2”). As of January 1, 2014, all EU credit institutions are subject to compliance with the prudential requirements set out in these texts.
- the Common Equity Tier-1 (CET1) ratio;
- the Tier-1 ratio, i.e. CET1 plus Additional Tier-1 (AT1) capital;
- the total capital ratio, i.e. Tier-1 plus Tier-2 capital; and
- as of January 1, 2016, the capital buffers which can be used to absorb losses in the event of tensions.
– a capital conservation buffer, comprised of Common Equity Tier-1, aimed at absorbing losses in times of serious economic stress,
– a countercyclical buffer, aimed at protecting the banking sector from periods of excess aggregate credit growth. This Common Equity Tier-1 surcharge is supposed to be adjusted over time in order to increase capital requirements during periods in which credit growth exceeds its normal trend and to relax them during slowdown phases,
– a systemic risk buffer for each Member State aimed at preventing and mitigating the systemic risks that are not covered by regulations (low for Groupe BPCE),
– the different systemic risk buffers aimed at reducing the risk of failure of systemically important financial institutions. These buffers are specific to each bank. Groupe BPCE is on the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) and global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs). As these buffers are not cumulative, the highest buffer applies.
- credit and dilution risk-weighted assets;
- capital requirements for the prudential supervision of market risk and operational risk, multiplied by 12.5.
In 2024, Groupe BPCE is required to observe a minimum Common Equity Tier-1 ratio of 4.5% under Pillar I, a minimum Tier-1 capital ratio of 6% and, lastly, a minimum total capital ratio of 8%.
Alongside Pillar I minimum capital requirements, Groupe BPCE is subject to additional Tier-1 capital requirements:
- as of January 1, 2019, the Tier-1 capital conservation buffer is 2.5% of the total amount of risk exposures;
- Groupe BPCE’s countercyclical buffer equals the EAD-weighted average of the buffers defined for each of the Group’s countries of operation. Groupe BPCE’s maximum countercyclical buffer as from January 1, 2019 is 2.5%;
- the G-SII buffer has been set at 1% for the Group;
- the systemic risk buffer is applied to all exposures located in the Member State setting this buffer and/or to sectoral exposures located in the same Member State. As most of Groupe BPCE’s exposures are located in countries whose systemic risk buffer has been set at 0%, the Group considers that this rate will be very close to 0%.
Credit institutions must comply with the prudential requirements, which are based on three pillars that form an indivisible whole:
Pillar I sets minimum requirements for capital. It aims to ensure that banking institutions hold sufficient capital to provide a minimum level of coverage for their credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The bank can use standardized or advanced methods to calculate its capital requirement.
2023 | 2024 | |||
Minimum regulatory capital requirements | ||||
Common Equity Tier-1 (CET1) capital | 4.5% | 4.5% | ||
Total Tier-1 capital (T1 = CET1 + AT1) | 6.0% | 6.0% | ||
Regulatory capital (T1 + T2) | 8.0% | 8.0% | ||
Additional requirements | ||||
Capital conservation buffer | 2.5% | 2.5% | ||
G-SII buffer applicable to Groupe BPCE (1) | 1.0% | 1.0% | ||
Maximum countercyclical buffer applicable to Groupe BPCE (2) | 2.5% | 2.5% | ||
Maximum total capital requirements for Groupe BPCE | ||||
Common Equity Tier-1 (CET1) capital | 10.5% | 10.5% | ||
Total Tier-1 capital (T1 = CET1 + AT1) | 12.0% | 12.0% | ||
Regulatory capital (T1 + T2) | 14.0% | 14.0% |
- G-SII buffer: global systemic buffer.
- The countercyclical buffer requirement is calculated quarterly.
Pillar II establishes a process of prudential supervision that complements and strengthens Pillar I.
- an analysis by the bank of all of its risks, including those already covered by Pillar I;
- an estimate by the bank of the capital requirement for these risks;
- a comparison by the banking supervisor of its own analysis of the bank’s risk profile with the analysis conducted by the bank, in order to adapt its choice of prudential measures where applicable, which may take the form of capital requirements exceeding the minimum requirements or any other appropriate technique.
7.5 Credit risk
Foreword
The Group Risk division strengthened its risk management framework in 2024, particularly for Real Estate Professionals and Retail Professionals. In addition, in line with the difficulties encountered by the commercial real estate sector, reinforced monitoring has been implemented in this sector (dedicated ad hoc study, reporting of risk areas observed locally by the institutions, etc.).
7.6 Counterparty risk
7.6.1 Counterparty risk management
Counterparty risk is the credit risk generated on market, investment and/or settlement transactions. It is the risk of the counterparty not being able to meet its obligations to Group institutions.
It is also related to the cost of replacing a derivative instrument if the counterparty defaults, and is similar to market risk given default.
Counterparty risk also arises on cash management and market activities conducted with customers, and on clearing activities via a clearing house or external clearing agent.
Exposure to counterparty risk is measured using the internal ratings-based approach and standardized approach.
In economic terms, Groupe BPCE and its subsidiaries measure counterparty risk for derivative instruments (swaps or structured products, for instance) using the internal model method for the Global Financial Services (GFS) scope, or the mark-to-market method for the other institutions. In order to perfect the economic measurement of the current and potential risk inherent in derivatives, a tracking mechanism based on a standardized economic measurement is currently being instituted throughout Groupe BPCE.
GFS uses an internal model to measure and manage its own counterparty risk. Using Monte Carlo simulations for the main risk factors, this model measures the positions on each counterparty and for the entire lifespan of the exposure, taking netting and collateralization criteria into account.
The model thus determines the Expected Positive Exposure (EPE) profile and the Potential Future Exposure (PFE) profile, the latter being the main indicator used by GFS for assessing counterparty risk exposure. This indicator is calculated as the 97.7% percentile of the distribution of exposures for each counterparty.
Since 2021, the counterparty risk assessment model developed by GFS (PFE) has been deployed on the Group’s exposures beyond GFS. In particular, 2022 made the assessment more reliable. The Group’s entities, excluding GFS, continue to use the standard model for assessing the capital requirements for counterparty risk.
Group ceilings and limits regulate counterparty risk. These are validated by the Group Credit and Counterparty Committee.
Use of clearing houses and forward financial instruments (daily margin calls under ISDA agreements, for example) govern relations with the main customers (mainly GFS/Natixis). Accordingly, the Group has implemented the EMIR requirements.
The principles of counterparty risk management are based on: |
• a risk measurement determined according to the type of instrument in question, the term of the transactions, and whether or not any netting and collateralization agreements are in place; • counterparty risk limits and allocation procedures; • a value adjustment in respect of counterparty risk: the CVA (Credit Value Adjustment) represents the market value of a counterparty’s default risk (see section below); • incorporation of wrong-way risk: wrong-way risk refers to the risk that a given counterparty exposure is heavily correlated with the counterparty’s probability of default. |
|
From a regulatory standpoint, counterparty risk is represented by: |
• specific wrong-way risk, i.e. the risk generated when, due to the nature of the transactions entered into with a counterparty, there is a direct link between its credit quality and the amount of the exposure; • general wrong-way risk, i.e. the risk generated when there is a correlation between the counterparty’s credit quality and general market factors. |
The goal is to enable the bank to better understand the exposure to counterparty credit risk and thus improve the management of such exposure. Specific wrong-way risk is subject to a specific capital requirement, while general wrong-way risk is assessed using the WWR stress scenarios defined for each asset class.
In the event the Bank’s external credit rating is downgraded, it may be required to provide additional cash or collateral to investors under agreements that include rating triggers. In particular, in calculating the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR), the amounts of these additional cash outflows and additional collateral requirements are measured. These amounts comprise the payment the bank would have to make within 30 calendar days in the event its credit rating were downgraded by as much as three notches.
The valuation of financial instruments traded over-the-counter by Groupe BPCE with external counterparties in its capital markets businesses (mainly GFS) and ALM activities include credit valuation adjustments. The CVA is an adjustment to the valuation of the trading book aimed at factoring in counterparty credit risks. It thus reflects the expectation of loss in fair value terms on the existing exposure to a counterparty due to the potential positive value of the contract, the counterparty’s probability of default and the estimated collection rate.
7.7 Securitization transactions
7.7.1 Regulatory framework and accounting methods
Two European regulations aimed at facilitating the development of the securitization market, preventing risks and ensuring the stability of the financial system, were published in the Official Journal of the European Union on December 28, 2017. The objective of both regulations is to govern securitization transactions in the European Union.
Sets a general framework for securitization (the previous rules were spread out in three different directives and two regulations). Establishes appropriate due diligence, risk retention and transparency requirements for parties to securitization transactions, sets loan approval criteria, lays down requirements for selling securitizations to retail clients, and prohibits re-securitization.
This regulation establishes a specific framework for STS (simple, transparent, and standardized) securitization by defining the criteria for transactions to meet in order to qualify as securitizations and the obligations arising from such qualification, such as the obligation to notify European Securities and Markets Authority’s securitization programs.
It amends the provisions of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 pertaining to securitization, including in particular the prudential requirements applicable to credit institutions and investment firms acting as originators, sponsors or investors in securitization transactions. Deals in particular with:
- STS securitizations, and the method for calculating the associated risk-weighted exposure amounts;
- the hierarchy of methods for calculating RWAs and determining the related parameters;
- external credit assessments (performed by external rating agencies).
Hierarchy of methods: securitization capital requirements are calculated in accordance with a hierarchy of methods applied in the order of priority set by the European Commission:
- SEC-IRBA (Securitization Internal Ratings Based Approach): uses the bank’s internal rating models, which shall have been approved beforehand by the supervisor. SEC-IRBA calculates regulatory capital requirements in relation to underlying exposures as if these had not been securitized, and then applies certain pre-defined inputs;
- SEC-SA (Securitization Standardized Approach): this method is the last chance to use a formula defined by the supervisor, using as an input the capital requirements that would be calculated under the current Standardized Approach (calculates regulatory capital requirements in relation to underlying exposures – based on their class – and then applies the ratio of defaulted underlying exposures to the total amount of underlying exposures);
- SEC-ERBA (Securitization External Ratings Based Approach): based on the credit ratings of securitization tranches determined by external rating agencies.
If none of these three methods is applicable (SEC-IRBA, SEC-ERBA, SEC-SA), then the risk weight applied to the securitization is 1,250%.
- introduction of new risk inputs: maturity and thickness of the tranche;
- higher risk weight floor: 15%;
- preferential regulatory treatment for STS securitization exposures;
- risk weight floor lowered to 10% (versus 15%);
- SEC-ERBA: STS differentiated risk weight table.
The European regulation defining the new general framework for securitization and creating a clear set of criteria for Simple, Transparent and Standardized (STS) securitizations, as well as the related amendments to the CRR, were published in the Official Journal of the European Union on December 28, 2017, with an effective date of January 2019.
Securitization transactions in which Groupe BPCE is an investor (i.e. the Group invests directly in some securitization positions, provides liquidity, and is a counterparty for derivatives exposures or guarantees) are recognized in accordance with the Group’s accounting principles, as referred to in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Securitization positions are predominantly recorded under “Securities at amortized cost” and “Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income”.
Securitization positions classified as “Securities at amortized cost” are measured after their initial recognition at amortized cost based on the effective interest rate. Any position booked to “Securities at amortized cost” is impaired under “Cost of credit risk” in respect of Stage 1 or Stage 2 expected credit losses following a significant increase in credit risk.
Where a position booked to “Securities at amortized cost” is transferred to Stage 3 (defaulted exposures), the impairment is recorded under “Cost of credit risk” (Note 7.1.2 to the financial statements – “Change in gross carrying amounts and expected credit losses on financial assets and commitments”).
In the event of disposal, the Group recognizes the gains (losses) on disposal in the income statement under “Net gains (losses) arising from the derecognition of financial assets at amortized cost”. Except in the case where the receivable is in default: in the latter case, it is recognized under “Cost of credit risk”.
Securitization positions classified as “Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income” are remeasured at their fair value at the closing date.
Interest income accrued or received on debt instruments is recognized in income based on the effective interest rate under “Interest and similar income” in net banking income (NBI), while changes in fair value (excluding revenues) are recorded on a separate line in other comprehensive income under “Gains and losses recognized directly in other comprehensive income”. They are impaired in respect of Stage 1, 2 or 3 expected credit losses, in accordance with the same methodology used for positions classified as “Securities at amortized cost”. This impairment is recorded on the liabilities side of the balance sheet under other comprehensive income recyclable to profit or loss, with a corresponding entry to “Cost of credit risk” in the income statement (Note 7.1.2 to the financial statements – “Change in gross carrying amounts and expected credit losses on financial assets and commitments”).
If the position is sold, the Group recognizes the capital gains (losses) on disposal in profit or loss under “Gains (losses) on financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income before tax” unless the position is in Stage 3. In such a case, the loss is recognized in “Cost of credit risk”.
Securitization positions classified as “Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” are measured at fair value, at both the initial recognition date and the reporting date. Changes in fair value over the period, interest, and gains (losses) on disposals related to securitization positions are recognized in “Gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss”.
Synthetic securitization transactions such as Credit Default Swaps are subject to accounting recognition rules specific to trading derivatives (Note 5.2 to the financial statements – “Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss”).
In accordance with IFRS 9, securitized assets are derecognized when Groupe BPCE has transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset.
If the Group transfers the cash flows of a financial asset but neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset, and has not retained control of the financial asset, the Group derecognizes the financial asset and then recognizes separately, if necessary, as assets or liabilities any rights and obligations created or retained in the transfer. If the Group retains control of the financial asset, it continues to recognize the financial asset to the extent of its continuing involvement in the financial asset.
When a financial asset at amortized cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income is fully derecognized, a gain or loss on disposal is recorded in the income statement. The amount is equal to the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the value of the consideration received, corrected for impairment, and where applicable for any unrealized profit or loss previously recognized directly in other comprehensive income.
Given the relatively low value of the assets in question and relative infrequency of securitization transactions, assets pending securitization continue to be recognized in their original portfolio. Specifically, they continue to be recognized under “Loans and advances to customers at amortized cost” when that is their original classification. For synthetic securitization transactions, assets are not derecognized as long as the institution retains control over them. The assets continue to be recognized in accordance with their original classification and valuation method. Consolidation or non-consolidation of securitization vehicles is analyzed in accordance with IFRS 10 based on the institution’s ties with the vehicle. These principles are reiterated in Note 3.2.1 to the financial statements – “Entities controlled by the Group”.
- originator: either an entity which, on its own or through affiliates, was directly or indirectly involved in the original agreement which created the obligations (or contingent obligations) of the obligor, giving rise to the securitization transaction or arrangement; or an entity that purchases a third party’s on-balance sheet exposures and then securitizes them.
- sponsor: an institution other than an originator institution that establishes and manages an asset-backed commercial paper program or other securitization scheme that purchases exposures from third-party entities.
- investor: the Group’s position when it holds securitization positions in which it has invested, but in which it does not act as originator or sponsor. These are mainly tranches acquired in programs initiated or managed by external banks.
Traditional securitization: the economic transfer to investors of financial assets such as loans or advances, transforming these loans into financial securities issued on the capital market via SSPEs (securitization special purpose entities).
Synthetic securitization: in a synthetic transaction, ownership of the asset is not transferred but the risk is transferred through a financial instrument, i.e. the credit derivative.
Re-securitization: a securitization in which the credit risk associated with a portfolio of underlying assets is divided into tranches and for which at least one of the underlying asset exposures is a securitization position.
Tranche: a contractually established segment of the credit risk associated with an exposure or number of exposures.
Liquidity facility: the securitization position arising from a contractual agreement to provide funding to ensure timeliness of cash flows to investors.
Originator: either an entity which, on its own or through affiliates, was directly or indirectly involved in the original agreement which created the obligations (or contingent obligations) of the obligor, giving rise to the securitization transaction or arrangement; or an entity that purchases a third party’s on-balance sheet exposures and then securitizes them.
7.9 Liquidity, interest rate and exchange rate risks
7.9.1 Governance and structure
Like all credit institutions, Groupe BPCE is exposed to structural liquidity, interest rate and exchange rate risks.
These risks are closely monitored by the Group and its institutions to secure immediate and future income, balance the balance sheets and promote the Group’s development.
The Audit Committee and Supervisory Board of Groupe BPCE are consulted on general ALM policy and are informed of major decisions taken regarding liquidity, interest rate and exchange rate risk management. The implementation of the chosen policy is delegated to the Group Asset/Liability Management Committee.
Each year, Supervisory Board of Groupe BPCE validates the main lines of the ALM policy, i.e. the principles of market risk measurements and levels of risk tolerance. It also reviews the risk limit system each year.
Each quarter, the Audit Committee of Groupe BPCE is informed of the Group’s position through management reports containing the main risk indicators.
The Group Asset/Liability Management Committee, chaired by the Chairman of the Management Board of BPCE, is responsible for the operational implementation of the defined policy. It meets every two months and its main duties are as follows:
- determine the Group’s general policy on liquidity and transformation risk;
- examine the consolidated view of the structural risks of the Group and its various entities, as well as changes in the balance sheet;
- define the structural risk limits of the Group and the liquidity pools and monitor them (with the approval of the Risk division);
- approve the allocation to liquidity pools and the limits;
- monitor liquidity consumption at Group and liquidity pool level;
- approve the Groupe BPCE’s global MLT and ST annual refinancing program and monitor it overall;
- approve the investment and allocation criteria as well as the desired overall profile of the Group’s liquidity reserve.
The structural liquidity, interest rate and exchange rate risk management policy is jointly implemented by the Asset/Liability Management division (oversight of funding plan implementation, management of liquidity reserves, cash management, calculation and monitoring of the various risk indicators) and the Risk division (validation of the control framework, validation of models and agreements, controls of compliance with rules and limits). The Group Financial Management department and the Group Risk division are responsible for adapting this framework to their respective functions.
The adaptation of the operational management framework within each institution is subject to validation by the Board of Directors, the Steering Board and/or the Supervisory Board. Each institution has a special operational committee that oversees implementation of the funding strategy, Asset/Liability management and management of liquidity, interest rate and exchange rate risks for the institution, in line with rules and limits set at Group level. The Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks implement the risk management system using a shared Asset/Liability management tool.
7.10 Legal risks
7.10.1 Legal and arbitration proceedings
On October 9, 2015, a company operating in the meal voucher industry lodged a complaint with the French Competition Authority (Autorité de la concurrence) to contest industry practices with respect to the issuance and acceptance of meal vouchers. The complaint targeted several French companies operating in the meal voucher industry, including Natixis Intertitres, which became Bimpli at the end of 2022.
In its decision of December 17, 2019, the French Competition Authority ruled that Natixis Intertitres had participated in a practice covering the exchange of information and a practice designed to keep new entrants out of the meal voucher market.
Natixis Intertitres was fined €4,360,000 in its own right, along with two other fines totaling €78,962,000, jointly and severally with Natixis who was its parent company.
Since the alliance concluded between Groupe BPCE and Swile on December 14, 2022, Bimpli has been owned by a third party outside the Group.
The Paris Court of Appeal confirmed the decision of the Competition Authority by a judgment delivered on November 16, 2023.
Bimpli and Natixis filed an appeal against this decision on December 20, 2023, along with other French companies in the meal voucher sector.
Although the Group still considers that it has serious arguments to contest these decisions, a provision was made in the Group’s financial statements in 2023, in the amount of the estimated risk.
At the end of 2024, Swile (which became BIMPLI on January 1 following a merger-acquisition transaction) and Natixis were summoned – alongside other players in the meal voucher market – before the Paris Commercial Court, by several plaintiffs wanting to obtain compensation for the alleged damages caused by the practices sanctioned by the Competition Authority, including those of Natixis Intertitres.
At this stage, and subject to the legal appraisals requested by the plaintiffs, the total amount of the sums requested is €420,802,622, in addition to €2,475,000 for appraisal costs and €4,060,000 in respect of Article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure. All these proceedings are currently pending before the Paris Commercial Court.
7.11 Non-compliance and security risks
In accordance with the legal and regulatory requirements mentioned above, and with the professional standards and control charters governing Groupe BPCE, the functions managing compliance risk are organized as part of the internal control system of all Groupe BPCE institutions and subsidiaries as a whole.
The Group Compliance division, which reports to the Groupe BPCE Corporate Secretary’s Office, performs its duties independently of the operational departments and the other Internal Control departments with which it collaborates.
The Compliance division, “Compliance Verification function” defined by the EBA and included in the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014, amended by the Ministerial Order of February 25, 2021, is responsible for the prevention, detection, measurement and monitoring of non-compliance risks to ensure their control.
The Group Compliance division carries out its duties within the framework of business line operations.
It helps regulate, manage, control and guide the functions Group institutions. The Compliance Officers appointed within the various direct subsidiaries of BPCE SA and subject to the regulatory banking and financial supervision system, report to it through a strong functional link.
The Group Compliance division carries out all actions designed to strengthen the compliance of products, services and marketing processes, customer protection, compliance with ethical rules, the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism, the fight against market abuse, the monitoring of transactions and compliance with sanctions and embargoes. It monitors compliance risks throughout the Group. As such, it builds and revises the standards proposed for the governance of Groupe BPCE, shares best practices and coordinates working groups consisting of departmental representatives.
The dissemination of the culture of non-compliance risk and consideration of the legitimate interests of customers is also reflected in the training of employees in the sector and the awareness-raising of other BPCE departments.
- draws up the Group’s non-compliance risk management systems (risk mapping and DMR) and supervises the permanent control system relating to non-compliance risks;
- prepares internal risk prevention reports for the Group’s Risk Executive Committees and the Supervisory Body’s Risk Committees;
- determines and validates, in conjunction with HR, the content of training materials intended for the Compliance function;
- coordinates the training of Directors/Heads of Compliance through a dedicated system;
- leads the compliance function of the entities through thematic national days focusing on specialist topics relating to banking and insurance compliance, investment services compliance, financial security, conduct and ethics;
- draws on the expertise of the Compliance functions of Group institutions via theme-based working groups, in particular to develop and implement compliance standards.
In addition, BPCE SA Compliance reports to Group Compliance and manages and supervises the Compliance of entities in the Financial Services and Expertise division (FSE), the Payments and Digital division and the Insurance division and the other subsidiaries reporting to BPCE, including Palatine, Natixis Algérie and BPCE International.
7.11.1 Compliance
Group Compliance includes a division in charge of supervising the compliance systems of the Group’s entities and areas of expertise (Banking Compliance and Non-Life Insurance, Financial Savings Compliance, Financial Security, Conduct and Ethics).
1. Measurement and supervision of non-compliance risk | 2. Product governance and supervision | |
Non-compliance risks are analyzed, measured, monitored and managed in accordance with the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014 (amended February 25, 2021), with the aim of:
|
|
- | A significant development was introduced in Q1 2024 throughout the Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne networks, enabling the automated sending of email or SMS notifications for NPAI customers (capable adults, emancipated minors or minors in legal administration, and self-employed customers). It allows, in fact, to significantly expand regulatory information both on the annual inactivity status, as well as on the deposit (information prior to the closing of accounts and the transfer to the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations). | |
- | In terms of managing safe deposit box inactivity, community IT work on the Banques Populaire network side is continuing to better identify them and thus strengthen the existing system. |
Ongoing improvements to the systems in place. In particular, actions have been taken to improve the effective repayment terms, ensure the repayment of costs incurred and specify the information provided to customers.
Continued implementation of the multi-holding control measures for regulated savings products provided for by Decree No. 2021-277 of March 12, 2021, on the control of the holding of regulated savings products, which will come into force no later than January 1, 2026.
Implementation of the Ministerial Orders of November 10 and December 20, 2022 amending Article 2B of decision 69-02 concerning movements in savings accounts and participation in the work of the CFONB on the subject.
Continuation of several major actions in 2024 with the aim of anchoring the reflexes of systematic updating of Customer Knowledge: raising awareness of networks and management through indicators as well as the deployment of a new campaign to update the knowledge of our remote customers.
In addition, new indicators were developed and delivered in 2024 to improve the global monitoring and management of Customer Knowledge (KYC).
The Group has continued to improve and strengthen its systems for Customer Protection, Product Governance and Supervision, Market Integrity and Transparency, and Sustainable Finance.
- Updating the body of standards relating to Investor Protection and Product Governance and Supervision in accordance with the Green Industry Law and ACPR recommendation 2024-01;
- The duty of information and advice in terms of sustainable finance;
- Improving the quality of regulatory reporting in accordance with the EMIR-REFIT 2 regulation.
- Regarding the “Whistleblower” system:
In the context of legislation that offers much more protection for more whistleblowers (see act of March 21, 2022) and to meet the requirements of act 2017-399 on the duty of care of parent and subcontracting companies, Groupe BPCE has chosen to use the same tool for all Group entities, regardless of the country in which they operate (Europe, the United States, etc.) and regardless of their business line (Retail Banking, Corporate & Investment Banking, etc.).
This system allows for the collection of reports on a secure platform directly accessible by a URL link (https://www.groupebpce.com). The whistleblowing system is open to all employees and third parties, who can express their concerns if they are aware of serious violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, personal health and safety, or the environment.
The platform offers all the guarantees in terms of data security and respects the highest standards in terms of confidentiality and respect for anonymity.
Groupe BPCE entities protect whistleblowers. Under no circumstances may they be subject to any disciplinary action or legal proceeding, provided they have acted without direct financial compensation and in good faith.
Group employees regularly receive training on customer protection issues to maintain the required level of customer service quality. These training sessions are aimed at promoting awareness of compliance and customer protection among new hires and/or sales team employees.
Ethics and compliance training, entitled “Fundamentals of professional ethics”, has been set up for all Group employees. BPCE has also established a Code of Good Conduct and Ethics, rolled out to all Groupe BPCE entities.
Since the end of 2014, the Group has gradually complied with the requirements set out in Article 2 of the Ministerial Order of September 9, 2014, implementing Title I of act No. 2013-672 of July 26, 2013, on the separation and regulation of banking activities (SRAB act), amended by the Ministerial Order of March 18, 2019.
In conjunction with the work done in accordance with the SRAB act, a compliance program was adopted and implemented as from July 2015 in response to the Volcker Rule (Section 619 of the US Dodd-Frank act) This program, which takes a broader approach than French law, aims to map all of the BPCE SA group’s financial and commercial activities to ensure compliance with US regulations. The Volcker Rule was amended in 2020, giving rise to new Volcker 2.0 and 2.1 provisions that relax the existing system.
7.12 Security risks
7.12.1 Business continuity
The management of business interruption risks is addressed by the Group’s legal entities in the form of an analysis of the risks associated with the activities carried out. This analysis makes it possible to prioritize their restart. At the same time, the identification of the various possible risk events guides the Legal Entity in the business continuity responses to be provided and the preparation of the actions to be taken in the event of the occurrence of the risk event.
The Group Business Continuity department, which reports to the Group Security division, performs its tasks independently of operational divisions. These include:
- managing Group business continuity and coordinating the Group Business Continuity function;
- coordinating the Group’s crisis management;
- managing the implementation of the Group Contingency and Business Continuity Plans (CBCPs) and keeping them operational;
- ensuring compliance with regulatory provisions governing business continuity;
- participating in the Group’s internal and external bodies.
7.13 Operational risks
7.13.1 Operational risk management
Groupe BPCE has set up a system for measuring non-financial risks through the standardized use of indicators. These cover the indicators of the RAF system, the indicators resulting from the amended Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014, but also qualitative indicators aimed at measuring the industry’s adherence to operational risk standards.
The Group’s operational risk policy consists of keeping all of these indicators below the set limits, by entity and on a consolidated basis. In the event of an overrun, appropriate measures and corrective actions must be taken by the business lines owning the risks to remedy the possible failures. These measures and corrective actions must be monitored by the committee in charge of operational risks.
The Group Operational Risk division (DROG) – part of the Group Risk division – is in charge of identifying, measuring, monitoring and managing the operational risks incurred in all activities and functions undertaken by Group institutions and subsidiaries.
- a central organization and a network of operational risk managers and officers, working in all activities, entities and subsidiaries of Group institutions and subsidiaries;
- a methodology based on a set of standards and an OR tool used throughout the Group.
The Operational Risk function operates in all structures consolidated or controlled by the institution or the subsidiary (banking, financial, insurance, etc.);
- in all activities exposed to operational risks, including outsourced activities, within the meaning of Article 10 q and Article 10 r of the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014 as amended, “outsourced activities and services or other critical or essential operational tasks”.
The Group Non-Financial Risk Committee defines the risk policy rolled out to the institutions and subsidiaries, and the DROG ensures that the policy is applied throughout the Group.
The operational risk management system is part of the Risk Assessment Statement (RAS) and Risk Assessment Framework (RAF) systems defined by the Group. These systems and indicators are adapted at the level of each Group institution and subsidiary.
The mapping methodology is part of the Group’s permanent control system and includes the Operational Risk, Compliance, Information System Security, Personal and Property Safety and Permanent Control functions.
Measurement of risk exposure is based on a forward-looking model, which quantifies and classes risk scenarios and thus provides the Non-Financial Risk Committees with the necessary elements to define their risk tolerance.
Risk-predictive indicators are produced from the main risks identified in the non-financial risk map.
Risk supervision and monitoring were improved through the drafting of reports aimed at providing a uniform measurement to the Group as a whole of its risk exposure and cost of risk.
BPCE’s Operational Risk function ensures that the structure and systems in place at the institutions and subsidiaries allow them to achieve their objectives and fulfill their duties.
- coordinates the function and performs risk supervision and controls at the institutions/subsidiaries and their subsidiaries;
- centralizes and analyzes the Group’s exposure to non-financial risks, verifies the implementation of corrective actions decided by the Operational Risk Committee and reports any excessive implementation times to Executive Management;
- performs controls to ensure that Group standards and methods are observed by the institutions and subsidiaries;
- performs a regulatory watch, distributes and relays operational risk alerts due to incidents with the potential to spread to the appropriate institutions/subsidiaries;
- prepares reports, by institution or subsidiary, for the Group and the regulatory authorities (COREP OR), analyzes the reports and content of the OR committees of the institutions and subsidiaries, and notifies the Group Non-Financial Risk Committee of any inadequate systems and/or excessive risk exposure, which in turn notifies the institution in question.
1. At the level of each group institution | 2. At Groupe BPCE level |
The Operational Risk Committee is responsible for adapting the operational risk management policy and ensuring the relevance and effectiveness of the operational risk management system. Accordingly, it:
|
The Group Non-Financial Risk Committee meets quarterly and is chaired by a member of the Executive Management Committee. Its main duties are to define the OR standard, ensure that the OR system is deployed at the Group entities, and define the Group OR policy. Accordingly, it:
|
7.14 Insurance, Asset Management, Financial Conglomerate Risks
The quantitative information relating to IFRS 17 impacts mentioned in the paragraphs “Insurance, Asset Management, Financial Conglomerate Risks” below is presented in Chapter 5 “Finance” of the Universal Registration Document (URD).
The Non-Banking Equity Risk department of the Group Risk division consisted of four units (two business line units and two cross-business units):
- Group Insurance Risks;
- Group Asset Management Risks;
- Financial Conglomerate;
- Stress Tests & Methodologies.
Articulating the missions of each division makes it possible to address the challenges of Complementary Conglomerate Monitoring. Monitoring of the risks inherent in the Insurance and Asset Management entities is supplemented by a capacity for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the interactions between Business Lines and repercussions on the Group.
Insurance risk is the probability of damage or accident occurring during the insurance coverage period. This risk differs according to the insurance products concerned. Depending on the insurance products concerned, the risk varies according to changes in macro-economic factors, changes in customer behavior, changes in public health policy, pandemics, accidents and natural disasters (e.g. earthquakes, industrial accidents or acts of terrorism or war). The credit insurance business is also exposed to credit risk.
Managing insurance risks requires monitoring of the inherent technical risks, while paying particular attention to the financial risks incurred through assets under representation. In addition to protecting the balance sheet and income statement of insurance companies, the aim is to guarantee their solvency and liquidity.
To this end, the Group’s companies have put in place systems for measuring, reporting and managing risks. These systems comply with the regulatory requirements in effect since January 1, 2016 with the application of the Solvency II directive (Pillar I Quantitative Solvency Requirements, Pillar II Governance & ORSA, and Pillar III Prudential Reporting and Public Information).
As of January 1, 2023, the Group’s companies have been subject to IFRS 17, which harmonizes and updates the recognition, measurement and presentation of commitments in liabilities.
This recognition of liabilities under IFRS 17, concomitant with the recognition of assets under IFRS 9, could lead to greater variability in results compared to IFRS 4 and IAS 39, and conversely it could reduce that of OCI.
In this context, the Group Risk division (DRG) ensures, in coordination with the banking parent companies (BRED, Oney, CASDEN), the operation of the insurance risk monitoring systems within the main companies in which the Group is the reference shareholder. BPCE Assurances, Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions (CEGC), PREPAR Assurance, Oney Insurance and Oney Life; in addition, coordination is ensured with Parnasse Garanties and its parent company CASDEN, and with Surassur.
Since 2011, the Group has deployed an insurance risk unit. This meets the requirements of the Financial Conglomerates directive 2002/87/EC (FICOD) and its transposition into French law by the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014 on the supplementary supervision of financial conglomerates, through the Group’s cross-functional insurance risk monitoring system, while at the same time ensuring functional and regulatory interoperability between the banking and insurance sectors. The principle of subsidiarity applies to the sector, with controls carried out first by the insurance companies, then at the level of the Risk divisions of the parent companies of the companies, and finally by the Group Risk division.
- coordination of the sector: Insurance Risk Monitoring Committees (CSRA) meet every quarter and are supplemented by frequent discussions with the companies and, where applicable, their parent companies. The Group Risk division also participates in the main Risk Committees of companies reporting directly to BPCE SA. It is also involved in the monitoring and review of Risk Appetite indicators, at Group level, but also at the level of each company. Lastly, it produces a quarterly note summarizing the main risk indicators of the companies and their risk news, which can be reported to the Group Risk and Compliance Committee;
- analysis of the main risk areas: Specific studies are carried out in connection with actual or prospective risks, whether of an economic, financial, regulatory or normative nature (impacts of the interest rate regime and higher inflation, impacts of the transition to IFRS 17 and 9, strengthened analysis of risks relating to real estate markets, etc.);
- the division is also involved in the review of new insurance products distributed by the Group by giving a risk opinion on the insurance products and new distribution processes offered.
- the Personal Insurance business, focused on developing portfolios of life insurance and endowment policies for investment and retirement purposes, as well as personal protection insurance portfolios;
- the non-life insurance business, focused on developing portfolios for Auto and Multi-Risk Home insurance, personal accident insurance, legal protection, healthcare and property & casualty insurance.
Given the predominance of the investment solutions activity, the main risks to which BPCE Assurances is exposed are financial. The company is also exposed to underwriting risks (life and non-life), as well as counterparty risk.
Market risk is largely borne by subsidiary BPCE Vie on the financial assets that underpin its commitments with guaranteed principal and returns (€74.7 billion). The company is exposed to asset impairment risk (fall in the equity or real estate market) as well as the risk significant changes in interest rates.
A rapid rise in interest rates is likely to reduce the attractiveness of euro-denominated life insurance policies compared to other types of investments. However, this risk is limited due to the prospect of inflows and the reserves set aside to reduce the portfolio’s exposure to rising interest rates. This risk also gradually decreases as interest rates stabilize as bonds mature and assets are replaced with higher rates.
Conversely, a drop in interest rates would be liable to generate insufficient returns to cover the capital and guaranteed rates. In response to this risk, for several years BPCE Vie has only sold contracts with zero guaranteed minimum rates (“GMR”) (more than 97% of commitments) and, since mid-2021, new contracts include a gross capital guarantee on management fees on outstandings. The average GMR (taking into account these contracts for which the guarantee is reduced by management fees) is -0.04%.
To manage market risk, the sources of return have been diversified, namely via investments in new asset classes (funding the economy, infrastructure, etc.). This diversification is managed by a strategic allocation, defined on a yearly basis, that takes into account regulatory constraints, commitments to policyholders and commercial requirements.
Credit risk arises mainly from BPCE Vie’s strong allocation of bonds denominated euros. It results from fluctuations affecting the level or volatility of credit spreads and thus the valuation of the company’s assets. This risk is managed by monitoring exposures by rating, geographic area and sector, and compliance with BPCE Assurances’ internal standards and limits. A qualitative analysis of securities placed under surveillance with different alert levels is also carried out.
On December 31, 2024, 77% of the BPCE Assurances’ fixed-income portfolio was invested in securities rated A or higher. It is composed of fixed income assets diversified by geographic area and sector. A significant portion of the portfolio’s investments are made with French and sovereign issuers.
The main life insurance underwriting risk is exposed is associated with the investment solutions activity in euros. In a situation of sharp rise in interest rates, the major risk corresponds to a risk of massive redemptions: the company could be forced to sell assets at an inopportune time, thus exposing itself to a risk of financial loss, as well as to the loss of future margins on redeemed policies. If the level of interest rates stabilizes, the risk of massive redemptions would gradually be reduced (the assets of euro-denominated funds benefiting from the level of interest rates). Conversely, in a situation of very low interest rates, BPCE Assurances is subject to the risk of a drop in redemptions.
The non-life insurance underwriting risk to which BPCE Assurances is exposed is borne by its subsidiary BPCE Assurances IARD:
- premium risk: to ensure that the premiums paid by the policyholders match the transferred risk, BPCE Assurances IARD implemented a portfolio monitoring policy whereby each policy is given a score based on its track record over three years. The score factors in types of claims, number of claims, their cost and other variables specific to the activity in question (degree of liability and bonuses/penalties for auto insurance, for instance). This supervision policy also helps to detect potential risks arising from large claims, and to arrange adequate reinsurance coverage;
- risk of loss: each time inventory is taken, an actuarial assessment of the provisions for claims payable is conducted based on methods widely recognized by the profession and required by the regulator;
- disaster risk: disaster risk is the exposure to an event of significant magnitude generating a multitude of claims (storm, risk of civil liability, etc.). This risk is therefore reinsured either through the government in the event of a natural disaster or an attack, for example, or through private reinsurers, specifically in the event of a storm or a civil liability claim.
The counterparty risk to which BPCE Assurances is exposed mainly concerns reinsurance counterparties. The selection of reinsurers is a key component of managing this risk:
- BPCE Assurances deals with reinsurers that are subject to a financial rating by at least one of the three internationally recognized rating agencies, and that have a Standard & Poor’s equivalent rating of A- or higher;
- using several reinsurers ensures counterparty diversification and limits counterparty risk.
Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions is the Group’s Security and Guarantee insurance entity. It is exposed to underwriting risk, market risk, reinsurer default risk and operational risk.
In 2024, new home loans guaranteed by CEGC recorded a new slowdown, although it recovered in the second half of the year. Claims made in 2024 remained under control at 20% of earned premiums (“claims to premiums”, gross reinsurance ratio).
Under the Solvency II prudential regime, CEGC uses a partial internal model approved by the ACPR. It meets the robustness requirement applicable to home loan guarantors.
In 2024, CEGC covered the Solvency Capital Requirement, thanks to its Tier-1 and Tier-2 capital, as well as its reinsurance coverage.
Underwriting risk is the main risk incurred by CEGC. It is essentially a counterparty risk, as the commitments given by CEGC to beneficiaries of guarantees result in direct exposure to individual or corporate insured parties. These commitments are regulated and provisioned under liabilities in the balance sheet. They amounted to €3.2 billion on December 31, 2024 (-2.4% compared to end-2023AMOUNT OF CEGC REGULATED COMMITMENTS (IN MILLIONS OF EUROS)
CEGC activities | 12/31/2024 |
Change at 12/31/2024 compared to 12/31/2023 |
Individual customers | 2,821 | (2.0%) |
Single-family home builders | 89 | (2.8%) |
Property administrators – Realtors | 14 | 1.0% |
Corporate customers | 30 | (42.1%) |
Real estate developers | 33 | 41.8% |
Small businesses | 109 | (1.4%) |
Social Economy – Social Housing | 63 | 0.3% |
Structured collateral | 3 | (69.0%) |
TOTAL | 3,161 | (2.4%) |
Under IFRS, Best Estimate provisions are measured using default rate parameters that are used to determine future claims and claim rates.
CEGC’s short-term investment portfolio totaled over €3.8 billion on its balance sheet on December 31, 2024 hedging underwriting provisions.
Market risk associated with the short-term investment portfolio is limited by the company’s investment choices.
The company’s risk limits are set out in the financial management charter and the asset management agreement established with Ostrum. As an insurance company, CEGC does not require funding since insurance premiums are collected before the disbursement of claims. Nor does CEGC carry transformation risk: the investment portfolio is entirely backed by own funds and technical reserves.
12/31/2024 | 12/31/2023 | |||||
in millions of euros |
Balance sheet value, net of provision |
in % | Mark to market |
Balance sheet value, net of provision |
in % | Mark to market |
Equities | 145 | 3.8% | 152 | 103 | 2.60% | 112 |
Bonds | 3,043 | 79.0% | 2,845 | 2,895 | 71.60% | 2,667 |
Diversified | 111 | 2.9% | 113 | 107 | 2.60% | 107 |
Cash | 277 | 7.2% | 285 | 658 | 16.30% | 662 |
Residential mortgages | 181 | 4.7% | 193 | 197 | 4.90% | 207 |
FCPR | 33 | 0.9% | 52 | 31 | 0.80% | 49 |
Private debt | 54 | 1.4% | 55 | 50 | 1.20% | 49 |
Other | 6 | 0.2% | 11 | 3 | 0.10% | 2 |
OVERALL | 3,852 | 100% | 3 705 | 4,044 | 100% | 3,857 |
The chart below shows the sectoral breakdown of the bond portfolio between sovereign bonds, financial bonds, obligations foncières and other corporate bonds at the end of 2024.
At December 31, 2024, the proportion of bonds with a rating above A- was 84%, in line with the company’s financial management charter, and more than 99% of the securities held were classified as “Investment grade”.
CEGC hedges its liability portfolio by implementing a reinsurance program tailored to its activities.
In loan guarantees, reinsurance is used as a tool for regulatory capital management. It protects guarantee beneficiaries in the event of an economic recession leading to a loss of up to 2% of guaranteed loan outstandings.
In the corporate segments, the program is used to protect CEGC’s capital by hedging against high-intensity risks. It has been calibrated to cover three major individual loss events (loss due to the financial failure of a counterparty or a group of counterparties) with the potential to significantly impact CEGC’s income statement. Reinsurer default risk is governed by counterparty concentration and rating limits. CEGC’s reinsurance programs are underwritten by a broad panel of international reinsurers with a minimum rating of A on the S&P scale.
- PREPAR-VIE, created in 1984, a public limited company with a Management Board and a Supervisory Board;
- PREPAR-IARD, created in 1990, a public limited company with a Board of Directors.
They are wholly-owned subsidiaries of BRED Banque Populaire, of which they form the Insurance division.
PREPAR Assurance offers personal and property insurance policies, mainly with BRED customers, and incidentally with other distribution channels (company employees, brokers, French property investment funds).
- open-ended savings contracts, in the form of life insurance or capitalization;
- pension policies in a specific tax framework (“Madelin”, PERP and PERI policies);
- “Whole life” contracts, as part of the financing of funerals;
- personal risk insurance contracts such as creditor insurance or “term life insurance”;
- “Health/sick leave” guarantees;
- “Financial loss” guarantees;
- “Accidental death” guarantees.
At 31 December 2024, PREPAR-VIE, considered as the parent company of the PREPAR Assurance group, managed approximately 238,000 savings contracts, for a total outstanding of €8.2 billion and 746,000 personal risk insurance contracts.
- market risk: PREPAR-VIE’s portfolio of assets is diversified to address the ALM management issues specific to an entity mainly marketing savings contracts. As a result, PREPAR-VIE is highly exposed to market risk and more specifically to interest rate, equity, real estate and spread sub-risks;
- credit risk: mainly related to bond investments and their receivables;
- life insurance underwriting risk: as a company mainly marketing savings contracts, PREPAR-VIE is subject to mortality, fee and surrender sub-risks.
- non-life insurance underwriting risk: the financial loss guarantees marketed by PREPAR-IARD are subject to non-life underwriting risk, premium and provisioning risk, as well as catastrophe risk;
- counterparty risk.
Like the system adopted for the Insurance business line, the operation of this system is based on subsidiarity with the Risk divisions of the parent banks and business lines; in particular, Natixis Investment Managers, which consolidates most of the Group’s assets under management.
By setting up an Asset Management Risk System, the Group Risk division pursues the following main objectives:
- identify the major risks that could impact the Group’s solvency trajectory as a Financial Conglomerate to cover its banking or Conglomerate prudential ratios;
- be associated with the contributions of the sector during Group exercises (ICAAP, PPR, Stress Tests, etc.) so as to identify the risks of the business model on the contribution to results and equity, quantify them and prioritize them;
- organize the management of the system by specifying a risk review and setting up a formal quarterly meeting;
- inform Executive Management by presenting a summary of the review of the risks of our asset management activities to the Group Risk and Compliance Committee.
In the Asset Management business line, the Risk division formally ensures: the coordination of the risk system (cross-functional or focus workshops); running cross-functional projects related to the banking sector; information to Executive Management with a summary report for the members of the Group Risk and Compliance Committee.
Due to its large majority, the system relies mainly on Natixis Investment Managers. The re-use of existing work and methodologies locally is favored to establish supervision at the Group level. The key risk monitoring indicators are determined with NIM in coordination with GFS.
BPCE’s Group Risk division focuses on risks that may affect the Group such as redemption risk and the associated potential step-in risk, seed money and operational risks (based on the Group’s OR), including through stress tests of NIM and economic capital review. GFS’ Risk division regularly monitors NIM’s risks through its role as direct parent company.
The Group Risk division, together with GFS and/or NIM, anticipates the impacts of consultations and regulatory changes.
The system also provides for the implementation of an annual review for asset management companies that are not significant at the Group level but significant for their direct parent banking companies for the following entities: Palatine AM and Promepar AM.
Groupe BPCE, identified by the ACPR/ECB as a financial conglomerate due to the absolute and relative size of its banking and insurance activities, is subject to the related additional monitoring requirements(1). Since the entry into force of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the ECB has coordinated the supervision of predominantly banking financial conglomerates.
The Complementary Conglomerate Monitoring function was officially created in 2017 following the validation by the Management Board of the function’s mission statement. The latter identifies the macro-objectives and stakeholders within the Group. The roles, responsibilities and interactions between each of the players in the sector have been defined. Depending on the themes, committees are organized three to four times a year.
The regulation related to the conglomerate requires an overview of the entire accounting consolidation scope (banking, insurance, Asset Management and non-financial sector). Additional monitoring focuses on:
- capital adequacy of the financial conglomerate;
- monitoring of intra-group transactions between the various entities of the conglomerate;
- monitoring the concentration of risks;
- risk management procedures and internal control system.
- the financial conglomerate approach aims to capture the main interactions between the banking, insurance and asset management sectors that could, due to an exogenous or endogenous event, impact the Group’s risk profile and its main trajectories (results, solvency, liquidity);
- it makes it possible to consolidate the banking and insurance sector metrics, in particular capital requirements;
- the complementary supervision is based mainly on the banking system as a whole, and on the insurance and asset management risks.
The conglomerate’s excess equity is monitored in the Group’s RAF (Risk Appetite Framework). In order to provide a forward-looking view of the Group’s solvency through the financial conglomerate’s reading grid, Groupe BPCE projects the excess equity over several years under different scenarios.
As part of the overhaul of Conglomerate reports on intragroup transactions and risk concentration, the department is supporting the Group Accounting department for its operational implementation. These reports will enable enhanced monitoring of the risks of contagion between the various entities of the conglomerate and the concentration of risks, in the spirit of the additional monitoring requirements.
The entire system, in its main dimensions – Insurance, Asset Management, Banking, Financial Conglomerate – is the subject of presentations and discussions with the joint ECB/ACPR supervision team, in particular at meetings dedicated to the JST (Joint Supervisory Team). In particular, the organization of the risk management system, as well as the main analyses and points of attention brought to the attention of the Group’s Executive Management during the year, are reviewed.
- Directive 2002/87/EC of December 16, 2002 (as amended) on the additional supervision of credit institutions, insurance companies and investment firms belonging to a financial conglomerate, transposed into French law by the Order No. 2004-1201 of November 12, 2004, and the Ministerial Order of November 3, 2014 on the additional supervision of financial conglomerates.
In a conglomerate approach, a global and integrated system of solvency trajectories and stress tests has been developed. This system encompasses and is based on the three regulations Solvency II, Basel III and Financial Conglomerate. The application of common assumptions in these three dimensions provides a holistic view of the Group’s solvency.
- the coordination of insurance sector Stress Tests, in particular ORSA(1) (Pillar II of Solvency II); from the determination of stress assumptions to the analysis of results at Group level;
- the design of methodologies for linking the insurance sector to the prudential banking group;
- the analysis of contagion mechanisms and regulatory and economic interactions between the various sectors of the Group as a financial conglomerate.
The Group’s insurance companies are included in the banking IST (Internal Stress Tests) as part of the ICAAP (Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process) normative approach(2). The modeling includes:
- the simulation of Solvency II ratios, SCR and MCR, in order to objectify any capital requirements;
- the simulation of “IFRS variables” that impact the bank solvency ratio in accordance with prudential specifications (net income retained or distributed, OCI, value and difference in equity method);
- the fees and commissions paid by companies to the Group’s distribution payment networks or asset managers.
As part of ICAAP’s economic approach, the Non-Banking Equity Risk department of the Group Risk division:
- developed, and if necessary modified, the Economic Capital model for Insurance Risk in coordination with the companies and the Group Finance division. It carries out the related quarterly production (costing and analysis);
- coordinated, with GFS and Natixis IM, the review of Economic Capital models related to NIM’s activity. It monitors the action plan shared with all stakeholders at the end of the review (in order to adapt certain methodologies to the specific features of Asset Management in terms of both risks and business model).
More generally, the Non-Banking Equity Risk department provides its quantitative and methodological expertise on the risks of non-banking activities, to support or challenge work carried out by the business lines and/or the Group (actuarial expertise, company ALM topics, EBA stress tests, quantification of the impact of physical climate risk, etc.).
7.15 Model risks
Introduction
Groupe BPCE aims to optimize returns while operating within the risk appetite limits set by the Board of Directors by monitoring each type of risk and, in particular, the model risk as well as the associated regulatory obligations.
Simplification and underlying assumptions sometimes come at the expense of accuracy and structural integrity in stressed environments. Groupe BPCE is therefore exposed to a model risk.
Model risk is the risk of financial loss or damage to the Group’s reputation resulting from defects in the design, implementation or use of models.
- model uncertainty risk: this risk is inherent in the quantitative method, system or approach used to approximate or represent the observation;
- model risk as an operational risk (see § 6.13): this is the risk of economic or reputational loss related to errors in the development, implementation or use of the model.
7.16 Environmental, social and governance risks
7.16.1 Definition and reference framework
The management of environmental, social and governance risks within Groupe BPCE is part of a threefold framework:
- the regulatory and legislative framework, which includes all the texts in force in the jurisdictions in which Groupe BPCE operates. In France, these include the European Taxonomy or the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) as well as texts stemming from banking or insurance regulations and by extension the European Central Bank’s guide on managing climate and environmental risks;
- the framework of standards and best market practices and in particular international references such as the Sustainable Development Goals, the United Nations Global Compact and even the Paris Agreements on climate change;
- the voluntary commitments made by Groupe BPCE directly through sectoral ESG policies in sensitive sectors or as part of market initiatives such as the Net Zero Banking Alliance, the Net Zero Asset Manager Initiative on asset management activities and the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance for its activities policy, which governs commitments to align greenhouse gas emissions trajectories with carbon neutrality by 2050, and the Principles for Responsible Banking.
Groupe BPCE’s environmental, social and governance risk management system aims to ensure compliance with the methodological standards and constraints set by this reference framework while still reflecting Groupe BPCE’s risk appetite.
- Physical risks arising from the impacts of extreme or chronic climatic or environmental events (biodiversity, pollution, water, natural resources) on the activities of Groupe BPCE or its counterparties;
- Transition risks arising from the impacts of the transition to a low-carbon economy, or one with a lower environmental impact, on Groupe BPCE or its counterparties, including regulatory changes, technological developments, and the behavior of stakeholders (including consumers).
Social risks arise from the impacts of social factors on Groupe BPCE’s counterparties, including issues related to the rights, well-being and interests of individuals and stakeholders (the Company’s workforce, employees of the Company’s value chain, communities concerned, end users and final consumers).
Governance risks arise from the impacts of governance factors on Groupe BPCE’s counterparties, including issues related to ethics and corporate culture (governance structure, business integrity and transparency, etc.), managing supplier relationships and influencing business practices.
As part of its strategic business line planning and management and the management of its risks, Groupe BPCE uses climate scenarios to assess the challenges associated with short-, medium- and long-term climate risks.
These scenarios come from leading institutions in scientific research on the climate, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) or the International Energy Agency (IEA).
Groupe BPCE mainly uses the SSP2-4.5 scenario to define a medium or “middle of the road” trend. This scenario represents a “middle of the road” pathway that extrapolates past and current global development into the future. Income trends in different countries diverge considerably. There is some cooperation between States, but it is limited. Global population growth is moderate and stabilizes in the second half of the century. Environmental systems are facing a certain deterioration. With regard to greenhouse gas emissions, this scenario represents the average trajectory of future greenhouse gas emissions and assumes that climate protection measures are taken.
For its risk assessment needs in a deteriorated context, Groupe BPCE also relies on the SSP5-8.5 scenario. This scenario assumes development from fossil fuels. Global markets are increasingly integrated, resulting in innovations and technological advances. The social and economic development, however, is based on an intensified exploitation of fossil fuel resources with a high percentage of coal and an energy-intensive lifestyle worldwide. The global economy is growing and local environmental problems such as air pollution are being tackled successfully. With regard to greenhouse gas emissions, this scenario reflects the failure of mitigation policies and the continuity of trends in primary energy consumption and energy mix.
In defining its decarbonization objectives and trajectories, Groupe BPCE also relies on the scenarios of the International Energy Agency. These scenarios, specific to each sector, determine the technological breakthroughs necessary to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
Wishing to contribute to the achievement of global carbon neutrality by 2050 by relying on science, Groupe BPCE generally relies on the Net Zero Emissions 2050 scenario (NZE 2050 scenario) of the International Energy Agency published in 2021 to define the targets for aligning its exposure portfolios with the sectors with the most carbon-emitting sectors. This scenario plots sector trajectories compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C, in accordance with the most ambitious objectives of the Paris Agreement. When this scenario is not sufficiently precise and granular to be reconciled with the composition of certain sector portfolios, the Group may have to use alternative scenarios by ensuring the quality of the organizations that produce them and their compatibility with the ≤1.5°C target without or with limited overshoot of the global carbon budget.
While the reference base generally used is the International Energy Agency curve, the use of scientific reference curves adapted to each sector and the geographies in which Groupe BPCE’s activities are present has made it possible to take into account the specificities of the sectors considered. These scientific scenarios are usually expressed in emission intensity. They are also used by the vast majority of the customers that Groupe BPCE finances in these sectors. This shared use of a scientific reference base makes it possible to optimize the dialog between the bank and its customers.
Groupe BPCE has developed a knowledge base shared between the main internal stakeholders in the ESG risk management system (in particular the Impact Department and the ESG Risk Department). This knowledge base is intended to serve as a reference framework within Groupe BPCE on ESG issues related to the main economic sectors and to feed into the work carried out downstream to integrate ESG risks into strategic discussions and the various Groupe BPCE risk management systems.
This knowledge base takes the form of sectoral factsheets bringing together the main ESG issues of the most ESG-sensitive economic sectors. They are based on the current state of scientific, technological and social knowledge gathered by Groupe BPCE’s experts. A regular system enhancement process is expected to be in place from 2025 onward.
The acquisition, dissemination and use within Groupe BPCE of data related to the ESG characteristics of its counterparties and its own activities is a critical issue, particularly for the purposes of managing portfolios and monitoring ESG risks, but also the enhancement of customer knowledge to implement useful support actions, according to the customer segment.
Depending on its needs and available data, Groupe BPCE has several channels for acquiring ESG data on its counterparties:
- the direct collection of data from its counterparties through specific questionnaires and dedicated strategic dialogs;
- the collection of data from non-financial information published by its counterparties, for example in their sustainability report or, from 2025, in their CSRD report for the European companies concerned;
- the use of public databases (open data), made available by governmental institutions such as the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME) or specialist non-governmental organizations (NGOs) such as World Wildlife Fund (WWF) or Urgewald;
- the use of specialized external data providers such as non-financial or general rating agencies.
In the absence of counterparty-specific data, Groupe BPCE may use approximations (e.g. sector averages) and estimates to assess the trajectory of its portfolios and its risks. This type of approach is used, in particular, in portfolios related to individual customers, professionals, and small companies, for whom the issues of data availability and quality are particularly acute.
To address these challenges, Groupe BPCE has defined a governance framework specific to ESG data and developed a dedicated program to implement an infrastructure and processes for collecting, storing, and disseminating structured and consistent ESG data within the Group. This program, in particular, involves mapping ESG data needs and creating an associated roadmap aimed at gradually improving the availability and quality of the ESG data used by the Group.
8.1 Charter of incorporation and articles of association
8.1.1 General information
A French limited liability company (société anonyme) with a Management Board and a Supervisory Board, governed by its articles of association, the regulations applicable to commercial companies, and the French Monetary and Financial Code.
The company was incorporated on January 22, 2007, the date on which BPCE, a non-trading company, was formed to hold the assets contributed by the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne groups. The company’s duration is 99 years.
Paris Trade and Companies Register Number 493455042 (this number is listed on Page 1 of BPCE’s articles of association).
BPCE, founded by the French act of June 18, 2009, is the central institution of Groupe BPCE, a cooperative banking group.
As such, it represents the credit institutions affiliated with it. The affiliated institutions, within the meaning of Article L. 511-31 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, are:
- the 14 Banques Populaires and their 31 mutual guarantee companies (SCM), whose sole corporate purpose is to guarantee loans issued by the Banques Populaires;
- the 15 Caisses d’Epargne, whose share capital is held by 175 Local Savings Companies (LSC);
- Natixis; Banque BCP SAS (France); Banque de Tahiti; Banque de Nouvelle-Calédonie; Banque Palatine; Crédit Foncier de France; Compagnie de Financement Foncier; Cicobail; Société Centrale pour le Financement de l’Immobilier (SOCFIM); BPCE International; Batimap; Batiroc Bretagne Pays de Loire; Capitole Finance-Tofinso; Comptoir Financier de Garantie; BPCE Lease Nouméa; BPCE Lease Réunion; BPCE Lease Tahiti; Sud-Ouest Bail; Oney Bank.
The company’s role is to guide and promote the business and expansion of the cooperative banking group comprising the Banque Populaire network, Caisse d’Epargne network, the affiliated entities and, in general, the other entities under its control.
-
to be the central institution for the Banque Populaire network, the Caisse d’Epargne network and the affiliated entities, as provided for by the French Monetary and Financial Code. Pursuant to Articles L. 511-31 et seq. and Article L. 512-107 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, it is responsible for:
- defining the Group’s policy and strategic guidelines as well as those of each of its constituent networks,
- coordinating the sales policies of each of its networks and taking all measures necessary for the Group’s development, including acquiring or holding strategic equity interests,
- representing the Group and each of its networks to assert its shared rights and interests, including before the banking sector institutions, as well as negotiating and entering into national and international agreements,
- representing the Group and each of its networks as an employer to assert its shared rights and interests, as well as negotiating and entering into collective industry-wide agreements,
- taking all measures necessary to guarantee the liquidity of the Group and each of its networks and, to that end, determining rules for managing the Group’s liquidity, including by defining the principles and terms and conditions of investment and management of the cash flows of its constituent entities and the conditions under which these entities may carry out transactions with other credit institutions or investment companies and carry out securitization transactions or issue financial instruments, and performing any financial transaction necessary for liquidity management purposes,
- taking all measures necessary to guarantee the solvency of the Group and each of its networks, including implementing the appropriate Group internal financing mechanisms and setting up a Mutual Guarantee Fund shared by both networks, for which it determines the rules of operation, the terms and conditions of use in addition to the funds provided for in Articles L. 512-12 and L. 512-86-1, as well as the contributions of affiliated entities for its initial allocation and reconstitution,
- defining the principles and conditions for organizing the internal control system of the Group and each of its networks, as well as controlling the organization, management and quality of the financial position of affiliated entities, including through on-site checks within the scope defined in paragraph 4 of Article L. 511-31,
- defining the risk management policy and principles and the limits thereof for the Group and each of its networks, and ensuring permanent risk supervision on a consolidated basis,
- approving the articles of association of affiliated entities and local savings companies and any changes thereto,
- approving the persons called upon, in accordance with Article L. 511-13, to determine the business orientation of its affiliated entities,
- calling for the financial contributions required to perform its duties as a central institution,
- ensuring that the Caisses d’Epargne duly fulfill the duties provided for in Article L. 512-85;
- to be a credit institution, officially approved to operate as a bank. On this basis, it exercises, both in France and other countries, the prerogatives granted to banks by the French Monetary and Financial Code, and provides the investment services described in Articles L. 321-1 and L. 321-2 of said Code; it exercises the function of central bank for the networks and more generally for the Group;
- to act as an insurance intermediary, and particularly as an insurance broker, in accordance with the regulations in force;
- to act as an intermediary for real estate transactions, in accordance with the regulations in force;
- to acquire stakes, both in France and abroad, in any French or foreign companies, groups or associations with similar purposes to those listed above or with a view to the Group’s expansion, and more generally, to undertake any transactions relating directly or indirectly to these purposes that are liable to facilitate the achievement of the company’s purposes or its expansion.
8.2 Share capital
8.2.1 Amount of share capital
On December 31, 2024, the share capital was set at one hundred and ninety-seven million, eight hundred and fifty-six thousand, eight hundred and eighty euros (€197,856,880). It is divided into 39,571,376 fully paid-up shares with a nominal value of five euros (€5) each, divided into two categories:
- The 19,785,688 category A shares are authorized and fully paid up. They were issued at a nominal value of €5 each and there was no reconciliation of the number of category A shares outstanding at the beginning and end of the fiscal year.
- The 19,785,688 category B shares are authorized and fully paid up. They were issued at a nominal value of €5 each and there was no reconciliation of the number of category B shares outstanding at the beginning and end of the fiscal year.
Since February 19, 2025, the share capital has been set at €207,603,030 (two hundred and seven million six hundred and three thousand and thirty euros). It is divided into 41,520,606 fully paid-up shares with a nominal value of five euros (€5) each, divided into two categories:
- The 20,760,303 category A shares are authorized and fully paid up. They were issued at a nominal value of €5 each and there was no reconciliation of the number of category A shares outstanding at the beginning and end of the fiscal year;
- The 20,760,303 category B shares are authorized and fully paid up. They were issued at a nominal value of €5 each and there was no reconciliation of the number of category B shares outstanding at the beginning and end of the fiscal year.
With the authorization of the Supervisory Board of February 5, 2025, the Management Board decided, on February 11, 2025, to use the delegations granted by the Combined General Meeting of December 18, 2024 and to carry out a capital increase, with cancellation of preferential subscription rights, by way of the issue of 974,615 category A shares to be subscribed by category A shareholders and 974,615 category B shares to be subscribed by category B shareholders, for a total amount (including additional paid-in capital) of €1,299,999,963.90, to be subscribed between February 12, 2025 and February 18, 2025 (inclusive).
On February 19, 2025, the Management Board noted that 15 category A shareholders had subscribed for all of the 974,615 category A shares and 14 category B shareholders had subscribed for all of the 974,615 category B shares of a nominal value of five euros each and that, as the share capital resulting from the share capital increase amounted to €9,746,150, BPCE’s share capital was thus increased, as of February 19, 2025, from €197,856,880 to €207,603,030.
There are no shares not representing capital, no shares held as treasury shares by BPCE and no convertible securities, exchangeable securities or securities with warrants.
The company did not pledge its own shares over the course of the 2024 fiscal year and since January 1, 2025.
In the absence of a BPCE stock option plan within the meaning of Article R. 225-138 of the French Commercial Code and in the absence of any share buyback transactions referenced in Articles R. 228-90 and R. 228-91 of the French Commercial Code, the disclosures arising thereunder are not applicable to BPCE.
8.3 Ownership structure and distribution of voting rights
8.3.1 Ownership structure from February 19, 2025
Situation from 02/19/2025 | |||
Shareholders | Number of shares | % share capital(1) | % voting rights(2) |
CEP Aquitaine Poitou-Charentes | 1,568,276 | 3.78% | 3.78% |
CEP d’Auvergne et du Limousin | 815,996 | 1.97% | 1.97% |
CEP Bourgogne Franche-Comté | 1,085,931 | 2.62% | 2.62% |
CEP Bretagne Pays de Loire | 1,445,856 | 3.48% | 3.48% |
CEP Côte d’Azur | 833,584 | 2.01% | 2.01% |
CEP Grand Est Europe | 1,914,566 | 4.61% | 4.61% |
CEP Hauts-de-France | 2,339,137 | 5.63% | 5.63% |
CEP Île-de-France | 2,888,635 | 6.96% | 6.96% |
CEP Languedoc-Roussillon | 885,096 | 2.13% | 2.13% |
CEP Loire-Centre | 963,211 | 2.32% | 2.32% |
CEP Loire Drôme Ardèche | 661,287 | 1.59% | 1.59% |
CEP de Midi-Pyrénées | 1,008,492 | 2.43% | 2.43% |
CEP Normandie | 1,050,109 | 2.53% | 2.53% |
CEPAC Caisse d’Epargne | 1,597,872 | 3.85% | 3.85% |
CEP Rhône-Alpes | 1,702,255 | 4.10% | 4.10% |
Total category A shares | 20,760,303 | 50.00% | 50.00% |
BPR Alsace Lorraine Champagne | 2,331,098 | 5.61% | 5.61% |
BPR Aquitaine Centre Atlantique | 1,307,323 | 3.15% | 3.15% |
BPR Auvergne Rhône Alpes | 2,302,729 | 5.55% | 5.55% |
BPR Bourgogne Franche-Comté | 1,438,424 | 3.46% | 3.46% |
BRED BP | 2,053,649 | 4.95% | 4.95% |
BPR Grand Ouest | 1,910,239 | 4.60% | 4.60% |
BPR Méditerranée | 845,409 | 2.04% | 2.04% |
BPR du Nord | 584,786 | 1.41% | 1.41% |
BPR Occitane | 1,634,291 | 3.94% | 3.94% |
BPR Rives de Paris | 1,854,591 | 4.47% | 4.47% |
BPR du Sud | 1,091,651 | 2.63% | 2.63% |
BPR Val de France | 1,789,480 | 4.31% | 4.31% |
CASDEN | 1,188,522 | 2.86% | 2.86% |
Crédit Coopératif | 428,110 | 1.03% | 1.03% |
Unallocated shares | 1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Total category B shares | 20,760,303 | 50.00% | 50.00% |
OVERALL | 41,520,606 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
- Percentage of the share capital corresponds to the theoretical voting rights.
- Percentage of voting rights takes into account the treasury shares held by BPCE and corresponds to the voting rights exercisable.
8.4 General Meetings
8.4.1 Combined General Meeting of December 18, 2024
A Combined General Meeting of BPCE, chaired by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board, was held on December 18, 2024. The Management Board submitted five resolutions.
Shareholders and various other persons to whom the law recognizes the same right were able to exercise their right to information within the time limits and under the conditions laid down by law.
First resolution: Delegation of authority granted to the Management Board to proceed, with cancellation of shareholders’ preferential subscription rights, with one or more issues of category A shares reserved for category A Shareholders, subject to the adoption of the second resolution.
The General Meeting, voting under the conditions of quorum and majority required for Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meetings, having reviewed the Management Board’s report and the Statutory Auditors’ report, and having noted that the Company’s share capital has been fully paid up, in accordance with the provisions of Articles L. 225-129 et seq. of the French Commercial Code and Article L. 225-138 of the aforementioned code, and subject to the adoption of the second resolution submitted for the approval of this meeting:
- delegates to the Management Board its authority to decide, with the prior authorization of the Supervisory Board, in the proportion and at the dates and according to the schedules that it will decide, one or more increases in the Company's share capital through the issue of category A shares reserved for category A Shareholders (as such term is defined in the Company’s articles of association);
- resolves that the maximum total amount of share capital increases that may be carried out pursuant to this delegation and the second resolution of this meeting (nominal amount and additional paid-in capital included) may not exceed four billion euros (€4,000,000,000);
- resolves to cancel the preferential subscription rights of the Company’s shareholders to the category A shares that may be issued under this delegation, the subscription of which is reserved for category A Shareholders;
- resolves that the subscription price of the category A shares that may be issued under this delegation will be set by the Management Board on the basis of the valuation of the Company’s share on the date on which the decision to carry out the capital increase;
- resolves that the category A shares shall be fully paid up upon subscription by payment in cash and by delivery of a subscription form; and
- resolves that the new category A shares to be issued under this delegation will be subject to all the provisions of the Company’s articles of association, will be fully assimilated to the previously issued category A shares and will enjoy the rights attached to the category A shares.
The General Meeting grants full powers to the Management Board to implement this delegation, and in particular:
- determine the characteristics, including the amount of the capital increase, the issue price as well as the amount of the additional paid-in capital that may be requested at the time of issue (within the limit of the ceilings set out above), and the terms and conditions of any issue carried out pursuant to this delegation, as well as the terms and conditions for the payment of the category A shares issued, and in particular to set the opening and closing dates of the subscription periods for category A shares;
- determine the number of category A shares issued under this delegation to which each category A Shareholder may subscribe, within the limits set above;
- close the subscription to any issue early in accordance with legal and regulatory conditions;
- receive subscription forms and deposit funds;
- use, in the order it deems appropriate, one of the options conferred by Article L. 225-134 of the French Commercial Code;
- record, at the end of the subscription period for any issue, in light of the custodian’s certificate, the completion of the capital increase;
- make any corresponding amendment to the Company’s articles of association;
- allocate, at its sole decision and if it deems it appropriate, the costs, duties and fees resulting from the completion of any issue to the amount of the related additional paid-in capital and to deduct from this amount the necessary sums to increase the legal reserve to one-tenth of the new share capital after each issue of category A shares;
- in general, enter into all agreements to successfully complete the planned issues, take all measures and decisions and carry out all formalities necessary for the issue and the financial servicing of the category A shares issued under this delegation and the exercise of the rights attached thereto and do whatever is necessary and/or useful for this purpose.
The General Meeting acknowledges that, in the event that the Management Board uses this delegation of authority, the Management Board will report to the General Meeting on the use that will be made of it in accordance with the legal and regulatory provisions in force and in particular those of Articles L. 225-129-5 and L. 225-138 of the French Commercial Code.
This delegation of authority is granted for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of this General Meeting, any issue of category A shares decided under this delegation must be carried out within this period in accordance with Article L. 225-138 of the French Commercial Code.
This resolution was unanimously approved by the category B shareholders present and represented, as the category A shareholders did not take part in the vote pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-138 paragraph 1 of the French Commercial Code.
Second resolution: Delegation of authority granted to the Management Board to proceed, with cancellation of shareholders’ preferential subscription rights, with one or more issues of category B shares reserved for category B Shareholders, subject to the adoption of the first resolution.
The General Meeting, voting under the conditions of quorum and majority required for Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meetings, having reviewed the Management Board’s report and the Statutory Auditors’ report, and having noted that the Company’s share capital has been fully paid up, in accordance with the provisions of Articles L. 225-129 et seq. of the French Commercial Code and Article L. 225-138 of the aforementioned code, and subject to the adoption of the first resolution submitted for the approval of this meeting:
- delegates to the Management Board its authority to decide, with the prior authorization of the Supervisory Board, in the proportion and at the dates and according to the schedules that it will decide, one or more increases in the Company's share capital through the issue of category B shares reserved for category B Shareholders (as such term is defined in the Company’s articles of association);
- resolves that the maximum total amount of share capital increases that may be carried out pursuant to this delegation and the first resolution of this meeting (nominal amount and additional paid-in capital included) may not exceed four billion euros (€4,000,000,000);
- resolves to cancel the preferential subscription rights of the Company’s shareholders to the category B shares that may be issued under this delegation, the subscription of which is reserved for category B Shareholders;
- resolves that the subscription price of the category B shares that may be issued under this delegation will be set by the Management Board on the basis of the valuation of the Company’s share on the date on which the decision to carry out the capital increase;
- resolves that the category B shares shall be fully paid up upon subscription by payment in cash and by delivery of a subscription form; and
- resolves that the new category B shares to be issued under this delegation will be subject to all the provisions of the Company’s articles of association, will be fully assimilated to the previously issued category B shares and will enjoy the rights attached to the category B shares.
The General Meeting grants full powers to the Management Board to implement this delegation, and in particular:
- determine the characteristics, including the amount of the capital increase, the issue price as well as the amount of the additional paid-in capital that may be requested at the time of issue (within the limit of the ceilings set out above), and the terms and conditions of any issue carried out pursuant to this delegation, as well as the terms and conditions for the payment of the category B shares issued, and in particular to set the opening and closing dates of the subscription periods for category B shares;
- determine the number of category B shares issued under this delegation to which each category B Shareholder may subscribe, within the limits set above;
- close the subscription to any issue early in accordance with legal and regulatory conditions;
- receive subscription forms and deposit funds;
- use, in the order it deems appropriate, one of the options conferred by Article L. 225-134 of the French Commercial Code;
- record, at the end of the subscription period for any issue, in light of the custodian’s certificate, the completion of the capital increase;
- make any corresponding amendment to the Company’s articles of association;
- allocate, at its sole decision and if it deems it appropriate, the costs, duties and fees resulting from the completion of any issue to the amount of the related additional paid-in capital and to deduct from this amount the necessary sums to increase the legal reserve to one-tenth of the new share capital after each issue of category B shares;
- in general, enter into all agreements to successfully complete the planned issues, take all measures and decisions and carry out all formalities necessary for the issue and the financial servicing of the category B shares issued under this delegation and the exercise of the rights attached thereto and do whatever is necessary and/or useful for this purpose.
The General Meeting acknowledges that, in the event that the Management Board uses this delegation of authority, the Management Board will report to the General Meeting on the use that will be made of it in accordance with the legal and regulatory provisions in force and in particular those of Articles L. 225-129-5 and L. 225-138 of the French Commercial Code.
This delegation of authority is granted for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of this General Meeting, any issue of category B shares decided under this delegation must be carried out within this period in accordance with Article L. 225-138 of the French Commercial Code.
This resolution was unanimously approved by the category A shareholders present and represented, as the category B shareholders did not take part in the vote pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-138 paragraph 1 of the French Commercial Code.
Third resolution: Delegation of authority granted to the Management Board to proceed, with cancellation of preferential subscription rights, with a capital increase reserved for Company employees.
The General Meeting, ruling under the conditions of quorum and majority required for Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meetings, having reviewed the Management Board’s report and the Statutory Auditors’ special report, and ruling in accordance with the provisions of Articles L. 3332-18 et seq. of the French Labor Code and Articles L. 225-129, L. 225-129-2, L. 225-129-5, L. 225-129-6 and L. 225-138 et seq. of the French Commercial Code:
- delegates to the Management Board its authority to decide, in the proportion and at the dates and according to the schedules that it will decide, to increase the share capital of the Company in cash, in one or more installments, under the conditions provided for in Articles L. 3332-18 et seq. of the French Labor Code, by issuing ordinary Company shares reserved for Company employees who are members of a company savings plan;
- resolves that the maximum nominal amount of the capital increases that may be carried out under this delegation may not exceed two hundred thousand euros (€200,000);
- resolves that the subscription price of the shares issued pursuant to this delegation will be set in accordance with the provisions of Articles L. 3332-18 et seq. of the French Labor Code; and
- resolves to cancel the preferential subscription rights of the Company’s shareholders to the ordinary shares that may be issued under this delegation, the subscription of which is reserved for Company employees who are members of a company savings plan.
The General Meeting grants full powers to the Management Board to implement this delegation, and in particular:
- set the terms and conditions of the capital increases and determine the dates, terms and conditions of the issues that will be carried out pursuant to this resolution;
- set the opening and closing dates of the subscription periods, the subscription price, the dividend date of the shares issued, the terms and conditions for the payment of the shares and granting deadlines for their payment;
- record the completion of the capital increases up to the amount of the shares that will be effectively subscribed and amend the articles of association accordingly;
- allocate, at its sole decision and if it deems it appropriate, the costs, duties and fees resulting from the completion of any issue to the amount of the related additional paid-in capital and to deduct from this amount the necessary sums to increase the legal reserve to one-tenth of the new share capital after each issue of shares;
- in general, enter into all agreements to successfully complete the planned issues, take all measures and decisions and carry out all formalities necessary for the issue and the financial servicing of the shares issued under this delegation and the exercise of the rights attached thereto and do whatever is necessary and/or useful for this purpose.
This delegation of authority is granted for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of this General Meeting.
The General Meeting, voting under the conditions of quorum and majority required for Ordinary Shareholders’ Meetings, on the recommendation of the Audit and Investment Committee, appoints, pursuant to the provisions of Articles L. 821-40 et seq. of the French Commercial Code, Forvis Mazars and PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, as Statutory Auditors in charge of certifying the sustainability disclosures.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article L. 821-44 et seq. of the French Commercial Code and in accordance with Article 38 of Order No. 2023-1142 of December 6, 2023, Forvis Mazars and PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit are appointed to a period of three (3) fiscal years until the end of the General Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2026.
Forvis Mazars and PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit have stated in advance that they accept these functions and meet the legal conditions to perform them.
This resolution cancels and replaces the ninth resolution adopted by the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of May 23, 2024.
8.6 Material changes
The financial statements of BPCE SA, BPCE and Groupe BPCE for the 2024 fiscal year were approved by the Management Board on February 4, 2025. Since that date, there has been no significant change in the financial or commercial situation of BPCE SA, BPCE or Groupe BPCE.
With the exception of the items mentioned in this 2024 universal registration document, in Section 7.2 “Risk factors” in Chapter 7, there has been no significant change since December 31, 2024 in the financial performance of Groupe BPCE, nor in its financial and commercial position, nor since the end of the last period for which audited financial statements have been published, and in particular since the signature of the Statutory Auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements of March 21, 2025.
8.7 Statutory Auditors’ special report on related-party agreements and commitments
In our capacity as Statutory Auditors of your company, we hereby present our report on related-party agreements.
It is our responsibility to inform you, on the basis of the information provided to us, of the characteristics and essential terms and conditions of the agreements of which we have been informed or which we may have discovered in the course of our work, without having to express an opinion on their usefulness or appropriateness, or on the existence of other agreements. It is your responsibility, under the terms of Article R. 225-58 of the French Commercial Code, to assess the interest involved in concluding these agreements with a view to their approval.
In addition, we are required to inform you in accordance with Article R. 225-58 of the French Commercial Code concerning the execution, during the past fiscal year, of the agreements already approved by the General Meeting.
We performed the procedures we considered necessary to comply with the Professional Code of the Compagnie nationale des commissaires aux comptes (France’s National Association of Statutory Auditors) relating to this assignment. Our work consisted in verifying that the information provided to us is consistent with the underlying documents from which it was extracted.
- “BPCE” designates the central institution resulting from the combination of the networks of Caisse d’Epargne and Banque Populaire, a French limited liability company (société anonyme) with a Management Board and a Supervisory Board since July 31, 2009;
- “CE Participations” designates the Caisse Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne (CNCE) a French limited liability company (société anonyme) with a Management Board and a Supervisory Board, renamed CE Participations on July 31, 2009 with a Board of Directors, as the holding company for all of the Caisse d’Epargne network’s equity interests not transferred to BPCE in 2009, and which was merged with BPCE through absorption on August 5, 2010;
- “BP Participations” designates the Banque Fédérale des Banques Populaires (BFBP), a French limited liability company (société anonyme) with a Board of Directors, renamed BP Participations on July 31, 2009 as the holding company for all of the Banque Populaire network’s equity interests not transferred to BPCE in 2009 and which was merged with BPCE through absorption on August 5, 2010.
8.7.1 Agreements submitted for the approval of the General Meeting
9.1 Statement by the person responsible for the Universal Registration Document and for the annual financial report
I hereby certify that the information contained in this universal registration document is, to the best of my knowledge, true and accurate and contains no omission liable to impair its significance.
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual financial statements of BPCE SA and the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE and BPCE have been prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group and of all the companies included in the consolidation, and that the management report (whose contents are listed in the cross-reference table in Chapter 9) presents a true and fair view of the development and performance of the business and of the financial position of the Group and all the companies included in the consolidation, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties they face, and that it has been prepared in accordance with applicable sustainability reporting standards.
9.2 Documents on display
This document is available on the “Investors” section of the Group’s website (www.groupebpce.com), or from the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority website (www.amf-france.org).
All regulated information published in the last 12 months is available online at https://groupebpce.com/en/investors/regulated-information.
9.3 Cross-reference table for the Universal Registration Document
This Universal Registration Document must be read and interpreted in conjunction with the documents listed below. This document is incorporated into this document and is deemed to form an integral part thereof:
- the 2023 Universal Registration Document, filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 25, 2024 under number D.23-0173, which includes the annual financial report, available on the BPCE website:
- The First amendment to the 2023 Universal Registration Document, filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on May 7, 2024 under number D.24-0173-A01, available on the BPCE website:
- The Second amendment to the 2023 Universal Registration Document, filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on September 12, 2024 under number D.24-0173-A02, available on the BPCE website:
- The Third amendment to the 2023 Universal Registration Document, filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on November 8, 2024 under number D.24-0173-A03, available on the BPCE website:
- The 2022 Universal Registration Document, filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 24, 2023 under number D.23-0148, which includes the annual financial report, available on the BPCE website:
- The First amendment to the 2022 Universal Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority on May 10, 2023 under number D.23-0148-A01, which includes the annual financial report, available on the BPCE website:
- The Second amendment to the 2022 Universal Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority on September 12, 2023 under number D.23-0148-A02, which includes the annual financial report available on the BPCE website:
- The Third amendment to the 2022 Universal Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority on November 14, 2023 under number D.23-0148-A03, which includes the annual financial report, available on the BPCE website:
All the documents incorporated by reference in this Universal Registration Document were filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, and are available on the Issuer’s website (https://groupebpce.com/en/ investors/results-and-publications/registration-document) and on the AMF website (https://www.amf-france.org/en).
The information incorporated by reference should be read in accordance with the table below, using the headings provided for in Annex 1 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 2019/980, supplementing European regulation No. 2017/1129 known as the “Prospectus” Regulation. Any information not referred to in this table but which is part of the documents incorporated by reference is provided for information purposes only.
Category referenced in Annexes 1 and 2 of Delegated Regulation No. 2019/2020 |
Universal Registration Document filed on March 21, 2025 page No. |
|||
1 | Persons responsible | |||
1.1; 1.2 | Statement by the person responsible | 1,118 | ||
1.3; 1.4 | Information from third parties, expert statements and declaration of any interest | N/A | ||
1.5 | Approval of the competent authority | N/A | ||
2 | Statutory Auditors | 931 | ||
3 | Risk factors | 940-952 | ||
4 | Information about the issuer | |||
4.1 | Company name and commercial name | 1,096 | ||
4.2 | Place of registration, registration number and ID of legal entity | 1,096 | ||
4.3 | Date of incorporation and term of Company | 1,096 | ||
4.4 | Registered office and legal form | 1,096 | ||
5 | Business overview | |||
5.1 | Principal activities | 28-45 ; 502-516 | ||
5.2 | Principal markets | 28-45 ; 502-516 | ||
5.3 | Highlights | 24-27 ; 501; 717 ; 883 ;871 | ||
5.4 | Strategy and objectives | 6-9 | ||
5.5 | Dependence of the issuer on patents or licenses, industrial, commercial or financial contracts or new manufacturing processes | 1,053 | ||
5.6 | Basis of statements made by the issuer regarding its competitive position | 28-45 | ||
5.7 | Investments | 519 | ||
6 | Organizational structure of the Group | |||
6.1 | Description of the Group | 4-23 ; 48 ; 526 | ||
6.2 | List of significant subsidiaries | 1; 5 ; 676-682 ; 684-698 ; 902-905 | ||
7 | Operating and financial review | |||
7.1 | Financial position | 502-516 | ||
7.2 | Net operating income | 502 ; 527 ; 707 ; 878 | ||
8 | Cash flow and capital resources | |||
8.1 | Information on the issuer’s capital resources | 516 ; 518 ; 530-531 ; 575-576 ; 710-712 ; 755-756 ; 913-914 ; 969-982 | ||
8.2 | Sources and amounts of issuer’s cash flows | 532 ; 715 | ||
8.3 | Information on the issuer’s borrowing requirements and funding structure | 503 ; 575-576 ; 755 ; 913 ; 1,043-1,047 | ||
8.4 | Information regarding any restrictions on the use of capital resources that have affected or could affect the issuer’s operations | N/A | ||
8.5 | Information regarding the expected sources of funds needed to fulfill commitments referred to in point 5.7 | N/A | ||
9 | Regulatory environment |
99-100 ; 538-542 ; 718-722 ;
884 ; 938-939 ; 969-970 |
||
10 | Trend information | 520-521 ; 870 | ||
11 | Profit forecasts and estimates | N/A | ||
12 | Administrative, management and supervisory bodies and executive management | |||
12.1 | Administrative bodies | 14-15 ; 412-460 | ||
12.2 | Conflicts of interest involving the administrative, management and supervisory bodies and executive management | 415-416 ; 462 ; 496-497 | ||
13 | Remuneration and benefits | |||
13.1 | Amount of remuneration and benefits in kind | 474-495 ; 667 ; 846 ; 919 ; 1107-1111 | ||
13.2 | Total amount set aside or accrued by the issuer to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits | 474-495 ; 667 ; 846 ; 919 ; 1107-1111 | ||
14 | Board practices | |||
14.1 | Date of expiration of the current term of office | 413 | ||
14.2 | Service contracts with members of the administrative bodies | 496-497 ; 1107-1111 | ||
14.3 | Information about the issuer’s Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee | 14-15 ; 412 ; 419-420 ; 464-465 ; 468-469 |
||
14.4 | Compliance with the country of incorporation’s corporate governance regime | 410-411 | ||
14.5 | Potential material impacts on corporate governance, including future changes in the composition of administrative and management bodies and committees | N/A | ||
15 | Employees | |||
15.1 | Number of employees | 1 ; 4 ; 167-169 ; 172 | ||
15.2 | Shareholdings and stock options | 490-495 ; 919 | ||
15.3 | Arrangements allowing employees to purchase shares in the issuer | 1102 | ||
16 | Major shareholders | |||
16.1 | Shareholders with over 5% of the issuer’s share capital or voting rights | 1102 | ||
16.2 | Different types of shareholder voting rights | 1,101-1,102 | ||
16.3 | Control of the issuer | 1,101-1,103 | ||
16.4 | Any arrangement, known to the issuer, which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the issuer | 1,101-1,103 | ||
17 | Related party transactions | 667 ; 845-846 | ||
18 | Financial information concerning the issuer’s assets and liabilities, financial position and profits and losses | |||
18.1 | Historical financial information, accounting standards and changes in accounting standards, financial statements and date of most recent financial information | 16-17 ; 502-503 ; 517 ; 527-528 ; 707-708 ; 878 |
||
18.2 | Interim financial information and other information | N/A | ||
18.3 | Auditing of historical annual financial information | 699-706 ; 862-869 ; 920-923 | ||
18.4 | Pro forma financial information | |||
18.5 | Dividend policy | 874 ; 914 ; 1,098 | ||
18.6 | Legal and arbitration proceedings | 1,050-1,053 | ||
18.7 | Significant change in the issuer’s financial position | 1,106 | ||
19 | Additional information | |||
19.1 | Share capital | 1,099-1,102 | ||
19.2 | Charter of incorporation and articles of association | 1,096-1,098 | ||
20 | Material contracts | 1,106 | ||
21 | Documents on display | 1,119 |
In accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No. 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 14, 2017, the following information is incorporated by reference in this Universal Registration Document:
- Groupe BPCE’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and the Statutory Auditors’ report, presented on pages 323 to 510 of the Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 25, 2024 under number D.24-0173;
- BPCE SA group’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and the Statutory Auditors’ report, presented on pages 511 to 681 of the Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 25, 2024 under number D.23-0173;
- BPCE’s annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and the Statutory Auditors’ report, presented on pages 689 to 733 of the Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 25, 2024 under number D.24-0173;
- Groupe BPCE’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 and the Statutory Auditors’ report, presented on pages 259 to 422 of the Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 24, 2023 under number D.23-0148;
- BPCE SA group’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 and the Statutory Auditors’ report, presented on pages 423 to 566 of the Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 24, 2023 under number D.23-0148;
- BPCE’s annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 and the Statutory Auditors’ report, presented on pages 575 to 621 of the Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 24, 2023 under number D.23-0148.
The 2022 Registration Document filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, on March 24, 2023 under number D.23-0148 and the 2021 Registration Document filed with the AMF on March 23, 2022 under number D.22-0135 are available at the following link: https:// groupebpce.com/investisseurs/resultats-et-publications/documents-de-reference.
All the documents incorporated in this Amendment to the Universal Registration Document were filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority, and are available on the Issuer’s website (https://groupebpce.com/investisseurs/resultats-et-publications/documents-de-reference) and on the AMF website (https://www.amf-france.org/fr).
The information incorporated by reference should be read in accordance with the table below. Any information not referred to in this table but which is part of the documents incorporated by reference is provided for information purposes only.
The information incorporated by reference for previous fiscal years should be read in accordance with the table below.
Category referenced in Annexes 1 and 2 of Delegated Regulation No. 2019/2020 |
2022 Universal Registration Document filed on March 24, 2023 page No. |
2023 Universal Registration Document filed on March 25, 2024 page No. |
||||
7.1 | Financial position | 240-242 | 302-304 | |||
7.2 | Net operating income | 240; 261; 423; 570; 575 | 302 ; 325 ; 511 ; 684 ; 689 | |||
8 | Cash flow and capital resources | |||||
8.1 | Information on the issuer’s capital resources | 252-253; 255; 264-265; 314; 426-427; 476; 611- 612; 664-671 | 314-315 ; 317 ; 328-329 ; 372 ; 514-515 ; 558 ; 723- 724 ; 780-788 | |||
8.2 | Sources and amounts of issuer’s cash flows | 266; 428 | 330 ; 516 | |||
12 | Administrative, management and supervisory bodies and executive management | |||||
12.1 | Administrative bodies | 10-11; 150-208 | 10-11 ; 212-275 | |||
12.2 | Conflicts of interest involving the administrative, management and supervisory bodies and executive management | 154; 231 | 218 ; 265 ; 297-298 | |||
13 | Remuneration and benefits | |||||
13.1 | Amount of remuneration and benefits in kind | 209-230; 383; 541; 617; 767-771 | 276-296 ; 470-471; 656-657 ; 729; 901-903 | |||
13.2 | Total amount set aside or accrued by the issuer to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits | 209-230; 383; 541; 617; 767-771 | 276-296 ; 470-471; 656- 657 ; 729; 901-903 | |||
14 | Board practices | |||||
14.1 | Date of expiration of the current term of office | 163 | 217 ; 227 | |||
14.2 | Service contracts with members of the administrative bodies | 231; 767-771 | 297-298 ; 901-903 | |||
14.3 | Information about the issuer’s Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee | 10-11; 153; 158-161; 200; 204 | 10-11 ; 215 ; 222-225 ; 266 ; 270-271 | |||
18 | Financial information concerning the issuer’s assets and liabilities, financial position and profits and losses | |||||
18.1 | Historical financial information, accounting standards and changes in accounting standards, financial statements and date of most recent financial information | 14-15; 240-241; 254; 261- 262; 423-424; 575 | 14-15 ; 302-303 ; 316 ; 325-326 ; 511-512 ; 689 | |||
18.2 | Interim financial information and other information | N/A | N/A | |||
18.3 | Auditing of historical annual financial information | 415-422; 559-566; 618- 621 | 502-510 ; 673-681 ; 730- 733 | |||
18.4 | Pro forma financial information | 254 | ||||
19.2 | Charter of incorporation and articles of association | 760-761 | 894-895 |
9.4 Cross-reference table for the annual financial report and the management report
Cross-reference table for the annual financial report
In order to facilitate the reading of this document, the cross-reference table below makes it possible to identify, in this Universal Registration Document, the information that constitutes the annual financial report to be published by listed companies in accordance with Articles L. 451-1-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and 222-3 of the AMF General Regulation.
Required items | Chapter/Pages | |||
1. | Annual financial statements | Chapter 6/p. 878-919 | ||
2. | Consolidated financial statements | Chapter 6/p. 527-698; 707-861 | ||
3. | Management report (minimum information within the meaning of Article 222-3 of the AMF General Regulation) | See Cross-reference table in the management report on p.1,124 | ||
4. | Declaration by the persons responsible for the annual financial report | Chapter 9/p. 1,118 | ||
5. | Statutory Auditors’ reports on the parent company and consolidated financial statements | Chapter 6/p. 699-706; 862-869; 920-923 |
9.5 Glossary
Acronyms | ||
EBA | The European Banking Authority, established by EU Regulation on November 24, 2010. It came into being on January 1, 2011 in London, superseding the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS). This new body has an expanded mandate. It is in charge of harmonizing prudential standards, ensuring coordination among the various national supervisory authorities and performing the role of mediator. The goal is to establish a Europe-wide supervision mechanism without compromising the ability of the national authorities to conduct the day-to-day supervision of credit institutions | |
ABS | See securitization | |
ACPR | Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR): French prudential supervisory authority for the banking and insurance sector (formerly the CECEI, or Comité des établissements de crédit et des entreprises d’investissement/Credit Institutions and Investment Firms Committee) | |
AFEP-MEDEF | Association française des entreprises privées – Mouvement des entreprises de France/French Association of Private Sector Companies – French Business Confederation | |
AFS | Available For Sale | |
ALM | Asset/Liability management | |
AMF | Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the French financial markets authority | |
AT1 | Additional Tier-1 | |
BCBS | Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, an organization comprised of the central bank governors of the G20 countries, tasked with strengthening the global financial system and improving the efficacy of prudential supervision and cooperation among bank regulators | |
ECB | European Central Bank | |
EIB | European Investment Bank | |
BMTN | Negotiable medium-term notes | |
BRRD | Banking Recovery and Resolution Directive | |
CCF | Credit Conversion Factor | |
CDO | See securitization | |
CDPC | Credit Derivatives Products Company, i.e. a business specializing in providing protection against credit default through credit derivatives | |
CDS | Credit Default Swap, a credit derivative contract under which the party wishing to buy protection against a credit event (e.g. counterparty default) makes regular payments to a third party and receives a pre-determined payment from this third party should the credit event occur | |
LTD | Loan-to-Deposit ratio, i.e. a liquidity indicator that enables a credit institution to measure its autonomy with respect to the financial markets | |
CLO | See securitization | |
CMBS | See securitization | |
CEGC | Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et de Cautions | |
CET1 | Common Equity Tier-1 | |
CFP | Contingency Funding Plan | |
CNCE | Caisse Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne | |
CPM | Credit Portfolio Management | |
CRD | Capital Requirements Directive | |
CRR | Capital Requirements Regulation (European regulation) | |
CVA | Credit Valuation Adjustment: the expected loss related to the risk of default by a counterparty. The CVA aims to take into account the fact that the full market value of the transactions may not be recovered. The method for determining the CVA is primarily based on the use of market inputs in connection with the practices of market professionals | |
CVaR | Credit Value at Risk, i.e. the worst loss expected to be suffered after eliminating the 1% worst-case scenarios, used to determine individual counterparty limits | |
DVA | Debit Valuation Adjustment (DVA), symmetrical to the CVA. Represents the expected loss, from the counterparty’s perspective, on valuations of derivative liabilities. It reflects the impact of the entity’s own credit quality on the valuation of these instruments | |
EAD | Exposure at Default, i.e. the amount owed by the customer at the effective default date. It is the sum of the remaining principal, past due payments, accrued interest not yet due, fees and penalties | |
OFR | Own Funds Requirements: i.e. 8% of risk-weighted assets (RWA) | |
EL | Expected Loss, i.e. the value of the loss likely to be incurred given the quality of the structure of the transaction and any measures taken to mitigate risk, such as collateral. It is calculated by multiplying Exposure at Risk (EAD) by Probability of Default (PD) and by Loss Given Default (LGD) | |
DVA | Debit Valuation Adjustment (DVA), symmetrical to the CVA. Represents the expected loss, from the counterparty’s perspective, on valuations of derivative liabilities. It reflects the impact of the entity’s own credit quality on the valuation of these instruments | |
EURIBOR | Euro Interbank Offered Rate, the benchmark interest rate on the Euro-zone’s money market | |
FBF | Fédération bancaire française (French Banking Federation), a professional body representing all banking institutions in France | |
FCPR | Fonds commun de placement à risque/Venture capital investment fund | |
FGAS | Fonds de garantie à l’accession sociale/French State guarantee fund for subsidized loans | |
FINREP | FINancial REPorting | |
SRF | Single Resolution Fund | |
FSB | The Financial Stability Board: whose mandate is to identify vulnerabilities in the global financial system and to implement principles for regulation and supervision in the interest of financial stability. Its members are central bank governors, finance ministers and supervisors from the G20 countries | |
GAP | Asset/Liability management | |
G-SIBs | Global Systemically Important Banks: financial institutions whose distress or failure, because of their size, complexity and systemic inter-dependence, would cause significant disruption to the financial system and economic activity. These institutions meet the criteria established by the Basel Committee and are identified in a list published in November 2011 and updated every year. The constraints applicable to G-SIBs increase with their level of capital | |
HQLA | High-Quality Liquid Assets | |
Non-life insurance policies (IARD) | Incendie, accidents et risques divers/property and casualty Insurance | |
IASB | International Accounting Standards Board | |
ICAAP | Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process: Process provided for in Pillar II of the Basel Accords to ensure that firms have sufficient capital to cover all their risks | |
ILAAP | Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process: Process provided for in Pillar II of the Basel Accords through which the Group ensures the adequacy of its liquidity level and its management with regard to all its liquidity risks | |
IFRS | International Financial Reporting Standards | |
IRB | Internal-Ratings Based: an approach to capital requirements based on the financial institution’s internal rating systems | |
IRBA | Advanced IRB approach | |
IRBF | Foundation IRB approach | |
IRC | Incremental Risk Charge: the capital requirement for an issuer’s credit migration and default risks, covering a period of one year for fixed income and loan instruments in the trading book (bonds and CDSs). The IRC is a 99.9% Value at Risk measurement; i.e. the greatest risk obtained after eliminating the 0.1% worst-case scenarios | |
L&R | Loans and receivables | |
LCR | Liquidity Coverage Ratio (one month liquidity ratio): a measurement introduced to improve the short-term resilience of banks’ liquidity risk profiles. The LCR requires banks to maintain a reserve of risk-free assets that can be converted easily into cash on the market in order to cover its cash outflows minus cash inflows over a 30-day stress period without the support of central banks | |
LBO | Leveraged Buyout | |
AML-CTF | Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing | |
LGD | Loss Given Default, a Basel II credit risk indicator corresponding to loss in the event of default | |
LOD1 | First Line of Defense | |
LOD2 | Second Line of Defense | |
MDA | Maximum Distributable Amount, a new provision for banks placing restrictions on their dividend, Additional Tier-1 (AT1) coupon and bonus payments (under a rule that tightens restrictions as banks deviate from their requirements), if the capital buffers are not met. As these buffers are on top of Pillars I and II, they apply immediately if the bank fails to comply with the combined requirements | |
SSM | Single Supervisory Mechanism | |
MREL | Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities | |
MRU | Single Resolution Mechanism | |
NPE | Non-Performing Exposure | |
NPL | Non-Performing Loan | |
NSFR | Net Stable Funding Ratio: this ratio is intended to strengthen the longer-term resilience of banks through additional incentives meant to encourage banks to finance their operations using more structurally stable resources. This long-term structural liquidity ratio, applicable to a one-year period, was formulated to provide a viable structure for asset and liability maturities | |
OH | Obligations de financement de l’habitat/Housing financing bond | |
BCP | Business Continuity Plan | |
PD | Probability of Default: the likelihood that a counterparty of the bank will default within a one-year period | |
RMBS | See securitization | |
RSSI | Responsable de la Sécurité des Systèmes d’Information/Head of Information System Security | |
RUBA | Unified Reporting of Banks and Similar Entities | |
RWA | Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA): the calculation of credit risks is further refined using a more detailed risk weighting that incorporates counterparty default risk and debt default risk | |
S&P | Standard & Poor’s | |
SCF | Compagnie de Financement Foncier, the Group’s covered bond issuer | |
SEC | US Securities and Exchange Commission | |
SFH | Housing Finance Company | |
IS | Information System | |
SREP |
Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process: methodology for assessing and measuring the risks faced by each bank. SREP gives the prudential authorities a set of harmonized tools to analyze a bank’s risk profile from four different angles: business model, governance and risk management, risk to capital, and risk to liquidity and funding. The supervisor sends the bank the SREP decisions at the end of the process and sets key objectives. The bank must then “correct” these within a specific time |
|
SRM | Single Resolution Mechanism: an EU-level system to ensure an orderly resolution of non-viable banks with a minimal impact on taxpayers and the real economy. The SRM is one of the pillars of the European Banking Union and consists of an EU-level resolution authority (Single Resolution Board – SRB) and a common resolution fund financed by the banking sector (Single Resolution Fund – SRF). | |
SVaR | Stressed Value at Risk: the SVaR calculation method is identical to the VaR approach (historical or Monte Carlo method, scope – position, risk factors – choices and modeling – model approximations and numerical methods identical to those used for VaR) and involves a historical simulation (with “one-day” shocks) calculated over a one-year stressed period, at a 99% confidence level scaled up to 10 days. The goal is to assess the impacts of stressed scenarios on the portfolio and current market levels | |
T1/T2 | Tier-1/Tier-2 | |
TLAC | Total Loss Absorbing Capacity: a ratio applicable to G-SIBs that aims to ensure that each G-SIB has the capacity to continue its essential operations for the economy even after a loss has consumed all of its capital. In November 2015, the FSB published the final TLAC calibration: all TLAC-eligible instruments will have to be equivalent to at least 16% of risk-weighted assets at January 1, 2019 and at least 6% of the leverage ratio denominator. TLAC will subsequently have to be equivalent to 18% of risk-weighted assets and 6.75% of the leverage ratio denominator from January 1, 2022 | |
TRS | Total Return Swap, i.e. a transaction whereby two parties exchange the income generated and any change in value on two different assets over a given time period | |
TSS | Titres super subordonnés/deeply subordinated notes, i.e. perpetual bonds with no contractual redemption commitment that pay interest in perpetuity. In the event of liquidation, they are repaid after other creditors (subordinated loans). These securities pay annual interest contingent on the payment of a dividend or the achievement of a specific result | |
VaR | Value at Risk: a measurement of market risk on a bank’s trading book expressed as a monetary value. It allows the entity performing the calculation to appraise the maximum losses liable to be incurred on its trading book. A statistical variable, VaR is always associated with a confidence interval (generally 95% or 99%) and a specific time frame (in practice, one day or 10 days, as the trading positions involved are meant to be unwound within a few days) | |
Key technical terms | ||
Netting agreement | A contract whereby two parties to a forward financial instrument (financial contract, securities loan or repurchase agreement) agree to settle their reciprocal claims under these contracts through a single consolidated net payment, particularly in the event of default or contract termination. A master netting agreement extends this mechanism to different transactions through one all-encompassing contract | |
Equities | An equity security issued by a corporation, representing a certificate of ownership and entitling the holder (the “shareholder”) to a proportional share in the distribution of any profits or net assets, as well as a voting right at the General Meeting | |
Rating agency | An organization that specializes in assessing the creditworthiness of issuers of debt securities, i.e. their ability to honor their commitments (repayment of capital and interest within the contractual period) | |
Risk appetite | Level of risk, expressed through quantitative or qualitative criteria, by type of risk and business line, that the Group is prepared to accept given its strategy. The risk appetite exercise is one of the key strategic oversight tools available to the Group’s management team | |
Standardized approach | An approach used to determine capital requirements relative to credit risk, pursuant to Pillar I of Basel II. Under this approach, the risk weightings used when calculating capital requirements are determined by the regulator | |
Basel II (the Basel Accords) | A supervisory framework aimed at better anticipating and limiting the risks borne by credit institutions. It focuses on banks’ credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The terms drafted by the Basel Committee were adopted in Europe through a European directive and have been applicable in France since January 1, 2008 | |
Basel III (the Basel Accords) | Changes in banking prudential standards which incorporated the lessons of the financial crisis of 2007-2008. They complement the Basel II Accords by strengthening the quality and quantity of minimum own funds that institutions must hold. Basel III also establishes minimum requirements for liquidity risk management (quantitative ratios), defines measures aimed at limiting procyclicality in the financial system (capital buffers that vary according to the economic cycle) and reinforces requirements for financial institutions deemed to be systemically important | |
“Bank acting as originator” | See securitization | |
“Bank acting as sponsor” | See securitization | |
“Bank acting as investor” | See securitization | |
CRD IV/CRR | (See Acronyms) Directive No. 2013/36/EU (CRD IV) and regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 (CRR), which transpose Basel II in Europe. In conjunction with the EBA’s (European Banking Authority) technical standards, they define European regulations for the capital, major risk, leverage and liquidity ratios | |
Cost/income ratio | A ratio indicating the portion of net banking income (used to cover operating expenses (the company’s operating costs). It is calculated by dividing operating costs by net banking income | |
Collateral | A transferable asset or guarantee pledged to secure reimbursement on a loan in the event the borrower fails to meet its payment obligations. | |
Haircut | The percentage by which a security’s market value is reduced to reflect its value in a stressed environment (counterparty risk or market stress) | |
Derivative | A financial security or financial contract whose value changes based on the value of an underlying asset, which may be either financial (equities, bonds, currencies, etc.) or non-financial (commodities, agricultural products, etc.) in nature. This change may coincide with a multiplier effect (leverage effect). Derivatives can take the form of either securities (warrants, certificates, structured EMTNs, etc.) or contracts (forwards, options, swaps, etc.). Exchange-traded derivative contracts are called futures | |
Credit derivative | A financial product whose underlying asset is a credit obligation or debt security (bond). The purpose of the credit derivative is to transfer credit risk without transferring the asset itself for hedging purposes. One of the most common forms of credit derivatives is the credit default swap (CDS) | |
Senior non-preferred debt | Senior non-preferred debt is a category of securities, advances, instruments or rights introduced by directive (EU) No. 2017/2399 amending directive No. 2014/59/ EU (BRRD) that, in the event of the insolvency of the credit institution, rank higher than the securities, advances, instruments or rights considered as subordinated, but lower than that of the other securities, advances, instruments or rights considered as senior (including preferred senior debt) | |
Senior preferred debt | Preferred senior debt is a category of securities, advances, instruments or rights that, in the event of the insolvency of the credit institution, rank higher than other securities, advances, instruments or rights considered as senior and subordinated (including senior non-preferred debt) | |
Gross exposure | Exposure before the impact of provisions, adjustments and risk mitigation techniques | |
Tier-1 capital | Core capital including the financial institution’s consolidated shareholders’ equity minus regulatory deductions | |
Tier-2 capital | Supplementary capital mainly consisting of subordinated securities minus regulatory deduction | |
Fair value | The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in a standard arm’s length transaction between market participants at the valuation date. Fair value is therefore based on the exit price | |
Liquidity | In a banking context, liquidity refers to a bank’s ability to cover its short-term commitments. Liquidity also refers to the degree to which an asset can be quickly bought or sold on a market without a substantial reduction in value | |
Rating | An appraisal by a financial rating agency (Fitch Ratings, Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s) of the creditworthiness of an issuer (company, government or other public entity) or a transaction (bond issue, securitization, covered bond). The rating has a direct impact on the cost of raising capital | |
Bond | A portion of a loan issued in the form of an exchangeable security. For a given issue, a bond grants the same debt claims on the issuer for the same nominal value, the issuer being a company, a public sector entity or a government | |
Pillar I | Pillar I sets minimum requirements for capital. It aims to ensure that banking institutions hold sufficient capital to provide a minimum level of coverage for their credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The bank can use standardized or advanced methods to calculate its capital requirement | |
Pillar II |
Pillar II establishes a process of prudential supervision that complements and strengthens Pillar I. It consists of: an analysis by the bank of all of its risks, including those already covered by Pillar I; an estimate by the bank of the capital requirement for these risks; a comparison by the banking supervisor of its own analysis of the bank’s risk profile with the analysis conducted by the bank, in order to adapt its choice of prudential measures where applicable, which may take the form of capital requirements exceeding the minimum requirements or any other appropriate technique |
|
Pillar III | Pillar III is concerned with establishing market discipline through a series of reporting requirements. These requirements – both qualitative and quantitative – are intended to improve financial transparency in the assessment of exposure to risks, risk assessment procedures and capital adequacy | |
Common Equity Tier-1 ratio | Ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital to risk-weighted assets. The CET1 ratio is a solvency indicator used in the Basel III prudential accords | |
Leverage ratio | Tier 1 capital divided by exposures, which consist of assets and off-balance sheet items, after restatements of derivatives, funding transactions and items deducted from capital. Its main goal is to serve as a supplementary risk measurement for capital requirements | |
Total capital ratio | Ratio of total capital (Tier 1 and 2) to risk-weighted assets (RWAs) | |
Resecuritization | The securitization of an exposure that is already securitized where the risk associated with an underlying pool of exposures is tranched and at least one of the underlying exposures is a securitization position | |
Credit and counterparty risk | The risk of loss from the inability of clients, issuers or other counterparties to honor their financial commitments. Credit risk includes counterparty risk related to market transactions and securitization | |
Market risks | The risk of loss of value on financial instruments resulting from changes in market inputs, from the volatility of these inputs or from the correlations between these inputs | |
Operational risk | Risks of losses or penalties due in particular to failures of internal procedures and systems, human error or external events | |
Structural interest rate and foreign exchange risk | The risk of losses or impairment on assets arising from changes in interest rates or exchange rates. Structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks are associated with commercial activities and proprietary transactions | |
Liquidity risk | The risk that a bank will be unable to honor its payment commitments as they fall due and replace funds when they are withdrawn | |
Swap | An agreement between two counterparties to exchange different assets, or revenues from different assets, until a given date | |
Securitization |
A transaction whereby credit risk on loans and advances is transferred to investors by an entity through the issuance of negotiable securities. This may involve the transfer of advances (physical securitization) or the transfer of risks only (credit derivatives). Some securitization transactions are subordinated through the creation of tranches: ABS – Asset-Backed Securities, i.e. instruments representing a pool of financial assets (excluding mortgage loans), whose performance is linked to that of the underlying asset or pool of assets; CDOs – Collateralized Debt Obligations, i.e. debt securities backed by a pool of assets which can be either bank loans (mortgages) or corporate bonds. Interest and principal payments may be subject to subordination (i.e. through the creation of tranches); CLO – Collateralized Loan Obligations, i.e. credit derivatives backed by a homogeneous pool of commercial loans; CMBS – Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities; RMBS – Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities, i.e. debt securities backed by a pool of assets consisting of residential mortgage loans; Bank acting as originator: the securitization exposures are the retained positions, even where not eligible for the securitization framework due to the absence of significant and effective risk transfer; Bank acting as investor: investment positions purchased in third-party deals; Bank acting as sponsor: a bank is considered a “sponsor” if it, in fact or in substance, manages or advises the program, places securities into the market, or provides liquidity and/or credit enhancements. The program may include, for example, asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) conduit programs and structured investment vehicles. The securitization exposures include exposures to ABCP conduits to which the bank provides program-wide enhancements, liquidity and other facilities. |
|
Net value | Total gross value less allowances/impairment | |
Volatility | A measurement of the magnitude of an asset’s price fluctuation and thus a measurement of its risk. Volatility corresponds to the standard deviation of the asset’s immediate returns over a given period | |
Other terms | ||
Back office | Support or back office department, in charge of administrative functions at a financial intermediary | |
Backtesting | Method consisting of verifying that the actual result rarely exceeds the VaR (Value at Risk) loss | |
Bail-in | Tool to limit any assistance from public funds to a troubled institution that is still in operation or in the process of liquidation. The bail-in grants to the prudential supervisory authorities the power to impose on certain creditors of a credit institution that may have solvency problems, the conversion of their receivables into shares of this institution and/or the reduction of the amount of these receivables. The European agreement of June 26, 2015 provides for priority requests, in the event of insufficient equity (following losses), from creditors holding subordinated debt, then senior creditors, then unsecured deposits of large companies, then those of SMEs and finally those of individuals above €100,000. However, guaranteed deposits, covered bonds, employee remuneration, liabilities related to the institution’s vital activities and interbank liabilities with a maturity of less than seven days must not be affected | |
Broker | Broker | |
Brokerage | Brokerage | |
Co-lead | Co-lead | |
Commodities | Commodities | |
Corporate | Corporate | |
Coverage | Hedging (in the sense of customer follow-up) | |
Covered bonds | Covered or collateralized bond: bond for which the repayment and payment of interest are ensured by income flows from a portfolio of high-quality assets that serves as collateral, often a portfolio of mortgages, and the issuing institution is often the manager of the payment of flows to investors (obligations foncières in France, Pfandbriefe in Germany) | |
Datacenter | Datacenter | |
Equity (tranche) | In a securitization arrangement, refers to the tranche that bears the first losses due to defaults in the underlying portfolio | |
Fully-loaded | Expresses full compliance with the Basel III solvency requirements (which became mandatory in 2019) | |
Front office | Customer service (team of market operators) | |
Hedge funds | Alternative management funds: speculative investment funds that aim for an absolute return and have a great deal of freedom in their management | |
Holding | Parent company | |
Investment grade | Long-term rating provided by an external agency ranging from AAA/Aaa to BBB-/Baa3 of a counterparty or underlying issue. A rating equal to or lower than BB+/ Ba1 qualifies the instrument as non-investment grade | |
Joint venture | Joint venture | |
Loss ratio | Ratio between claims/premiums collected | |
Mark-to-market | A method that consists of regularly or even continuously valuing a position on the basis of its market value at the time of the valuation | |
Mark-to-model | Method which consists of valuing a position on the basis of a financial model and therefore assumptions made by the valuer | |
Monoline | Companies that provide credit enhancement to financial market participants | |
New Deal | Strategic plan implemented by Natixis | |
Phase-in | Refers to compliance with current solvency requirements, taking into account the transitional period for the implementation of Basel III | |
Reporting | Reporting | |
Spread | Actuarial margin: difference between the actuarial rate of return of a bond and that of a risk-free loan of identical duration | |
Trading | Trading | |
Watchlist | Watchlist |